That is one and the same !!!
Its says it right these in Dan. 9:27, you are just one of the few that don't get it.
The People (Romans) of the prince that is to come (Little horn that ARISES out of the Fourth Beast/Rome)
Look at the Bible like this Dan. 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people (of the prince that shall come) shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
{{{ So look at it like I have written it above via an inset notation so to speak. Take that away and then read it. Where people is at, just place Romans like this.........Dan. 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the Romans shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined..........Do you get it now? The OF THE PRINCE THAT SHALL COME is something I would place in parenthesis like this. (OF THE PRINCE THAT SHALL COME)
Parenthesis literally means “to put beside” from the Greek roots par-, -en and thesis. Grammatically, they behave kind of like commas and serve to set aside a subordinate part of the sentence or discussion.
So today we would place that section in parenthesis and it would be understood that we were pointing towards the next passage/paragraph/verse here, See Below.}}}
27 And he (prince from ABOVE) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
You seem to t be able to recognize this prince being spoken of is the END TIME Little Horn. Jesus is dead by this time. The prince has a SMALL LETTER. In Daniel ch. 8 when its speaking about Jesus the P in Prince is capitalized because its the Lord Jesus being spoken of. SEE BELOW Capital P !
Dan. 8:25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince (JESUS...Capital P) of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
By getting it all wrong you have to change the 69 Week death of Christ to after 69 1/2 weeks. When you have to manipulate Scriptures ti make it fit its wrong brother.
Capitalization of the "p" in prince is inconsistent and therefore unreliable.
Daniel 8:11
Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of the sanctuary was cast down.
The prince is God Himself.
Revelation 1:5
And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood.
The prince is Christ Himself.
There is only one (P)(p)rince in Daniel 9. It is Messiah. He is the only one identified as a
(P)(p)rince in the passage.
There are two perspectives regarding the people of the prince, both applicable:
1. The pagan Roman armies, which were God's instruments of judgment and destruction. In similar fashion elsewhere, e.g. Jeremiah 43:10-13, God described the pagan Nebuchadnezzar, whom He chose as an instrument of judgment and destruction, as being "My servant."
2. The Jews themselves, whom Josephus documents as being responsible for much of the carnage that occurred: "I shall therefore speak my mind here at once briefly; that neither did any other city ever suffer such miseries; nor did any age ever breed a generation more fruitful in wickedness than this was from the beginning of the world." Contemporary Jews concur:
"The scene was now set for the revolt's final catastrophe. Outside Jerusalem, Roman troops prepared to besiege the city; inside the city, the Jews were engaged in a suicidal civil war. In later generations, the rabbis hyperbolically declared that the revolt's failure, and the Temple's destruction, was due not to Roman military superiority but to causeless hatred (sinat khinam) among the Jews (Yoma 9b). While the Romans would have won the war in any case, the Jewish civil war both hastened their victory and immensely increased the casualties. One horrendous example: In expectation of a Roman siege, Jerusalem's Jews had stockpiled a supply of dry food that could have fed the city for many years. But one of the warring Zealot factions burned the entire supply, apparently hoping that destroying this "security blanket" would compel everyone to participate in the revolt. The starvation resulting from this mad act caused suffering as great as any the Romans inflicted."
Upvote
0