Libertarian freewill vs limited freewill

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,576
60
Wyoming
✟83,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Man thinks he is in control, but God works all things for His plans.
I think of that verse more like God being a Director.
Think about a pilot and the Airport Controller.
Is it in the pilot to determine his course? No, he must do what the controller says.
If he disobeys and decides to do what he thinks is right, the results could be catastrophic.
So it is when we disobey God, we are not the only ones who get hurt, others may suffer the consequences.
Adam disobeyed God and look at the results of his disobedience.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I think of that verse more like God being a Director.
Think about a pilot and the Airport Controller.
Is it in the pilot to determine his course? No, he must do what the controller says.
If he disobeys and decides to do what he thinks is right, the results could be catastrophic.
So it is when we disobey God, we are not the only ones who get hurt, others may suffer the consequences.
Adam disobeyed God and look at the results of his disobedience.

I personally believe God locates each electron in it's cloud at each moment
and only decides it's location based on the intent of the researcher.
goXj82VkE3VrbPM2ee52yB6x.jpeg
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I do believe God is in control. I do not believe He is in total control.

This is an odd things to assert about God. It seems quite evident to me that God must be in complete ultimate control of everything in order to be God. If there is anything operating outside His ultimate control, then God cannot be God.

Once God gave Adam dominion over the Earth, He gave control to Adam and he messed everything up for all of us.

What do you mean by "control"? I don't see that Adam - or any human - has ever controlled the planet.

God could not just say that He didn't like what Adam did and take back control from Adam.
He gave control to a man, and it would take a Man to take it back.

??? Where do you get this from? Within the bounds of His own nature, God can do whatever He likes however He likes. And He does so frequently in the record of the Bible. God exerts His power in the earth just as He likes many times: parting the Red Sea, making the earth open up and swallow the wicked, the Great Flood, the plagues of Egypt, etc. Clearly, God is not held powerless to act in the earth by some deal He made with Adam.

People sin against God's will.
People die and go to Hell against God's will.

People sin against God's will only because permits them to do so. God certainly has the power to prevent anyone from acting against His holy command. But He chooses not to exert that power just yet.

No one ends up in Hell against God's will. No one twisted God's arm and forced Him to make Hell and no one is twisting His arm and forcing Him to send the unrepentant wicked there. It is God's design, His intended purpose, to make Hell as a place of eternal punishment of the wicked. And He willfully acts to send the wicked there. Of course, God desires a better end for us, but when a man spurns His offer of salvation and dies unrepentant in his sins, God judges and punishes him actively, on purpose, and in righteous wrath willfully consigns that wicked man to Hell.

I have heard Calvinists say man has limited freewill.
Could someone show me what limited freewill looks like.

I hold to "soft libertarianism." I think there are points at which we all have genuinely free choices we make. But as we make those choices, they constrain us more and more to an increasingly limited line of thinking and living. We begin free in our decision-making but are bound by the inertia of what we choose. I don't think, though, that this is what Calvinists generally hold to. More often, they offer a semantics game called "compatibilism" or go the route of most atheists and espouse some form of determinism.
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,821
9,817
✟312,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I see I got no responses to this:

There are different kinds of non-libertarian free will.

Consider this: you are in a locked room (so you can't leave), but you don't know that it's locked.

There is a really interesting book on the table; you pick it up and start reading. It's so good that you don't stop, so you don't try to leave the room.

Do you have free will about staying in the room?

Libertarian free will says "no," because you could have done nothing else (it was determined that you would stay in the room, because of the locked door).

Compatibilist free will says "yes," because you wanted to be in the room, and you are doing what you want.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,821
9,817
✟312,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
More often, they offer a semantics game called "compatibilism"

If you think it's a "semantics game," you don't understand it.

or go the route of most atheists and espouse some form of determinism.

Now you're accusing Calvinists of being atheists? :doh:

It seems quite evident to me that God must be in complete ultimate control of everything in order to be God. If there is anything operating outside His ultimate control, then God cannot be God.

This is exactly what Calvinists say. It can be combined with compatibilist versions of free will, but not with libertarian free will.
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
If you think it's a "semantics game," you don't understand it.

Actually, it is because I understand it that I see it for the semantic game that it is.

Now you're accusing Calvinists of being atheists?

Is that what I wrote? Read carefully.

This is exactly what Calvinists say. It can be combined with compatibilist versions of free will, but not with libertarian free will.

Oh, I don't know... Molinism does a good job, I think, of this very thing.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,576
60
Wyoming
✟83,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
??? Where do you get this from? Within the bounds of His own nature, God can do whatever He likes however He likes. And He does so frequently in the record of the Bible. God exerts His power in the earth just as He likes many times: parting the Red Sea, making the earth open up and swallow the wicked, the Great Flood, the plagues of Egypt, etc. Clearly, God is not held powerless to act in the earth by some deal He made with Adam.
If you look at each one of those items you mentioned, with the exception of the Great Flood, Moses did something for God to act upon.
When Moses asked God to save them from the Egyptians, God told Moses to stretch out his rod over the sea and part the waters.
Moses said God would open up the Earth as a new thing.
Every one of the plagues came about because Moses spoke them into existence.
And with the flood, God saw this was the only way to keep the line pure and He Himself said
Genesis 6:6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
6:7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

I never said God was helpless. But God did choose to use man to get things done on earth.
People sin against God's will only because permits them to do so.
Please provide Scripture that teaches this.

No one ends up in Hell against God's will. No one twisted God's arm and forced Him to make Hell and no one is twisting His arm and forcing Him to send the unrepentant wicked there. It is God's design, His intended purpose, to make Hell as a place of eternal punishment of the wicked. And He willfully acts to send the wicked there. Of course, God desires a better end for us, but when a man spurns His offer of salvation and dies unrepentant in his sins, God judges and punishes him actively, on purpose, and in righteous wrath willfully consigns that wicked man to Hell.
So you do agree God does not get what He desires?

I hold to "soft libertarianism." I think there are points at which we all have genuinely free choices we make. But as we make those choices, they constrain us more and more to an increasingly limited line of thinking and living. We begin free in our decision-making but are bound by the inertia of what we choose. I don't think, though, that this is what Calvinists generally hold to. More often, they offer a semantics game called "compatibilism" or go the route of most atheists and espouse some form of determinism.
This is straight up free will. Romans 6:16 says we are servants of the one we obey.
When a person makes a choice to commit a crime he will find his free will is very restricted in jail/prison.

I see I got no responses to this:

There are different kinds of non-libertarian free will.

Consider this: you are in a locked room (so you can't leave), but you don't know that it's locked.

There is a really interesting book on the table; you pick it up and start reading. It's so good that you don't stop, so you don't try to leave the room.

Do you have free will about staying in the room?

Libertarian free will says "no," because you could have done nothing else (it was determined that you would stay in the room, because of the locked door).

Compatibilist free will says "yes," because you wanted to be in the room, and you are doing what you want.
Libertarian free will says he can choose to stay and read or try the door.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,576
60
Wyoming
✟83,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This is an odd things to assert about God. It seems quite evident to me that God must be in complete ultimate control of everything in order to be God. If there is anything operating outside His ultimate control, then God cannot be God.
Why?
What do you mean by "control"? I don't see that Adam - or any human - has ever controlled the planet.
Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Could you elaborate on what you think and subdue it: means?
 
Upvote 0
Oct 21, 2003
6,793
3,289
Central Time Zone
✟107,193.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I have heard Calvinists say man has limited freewill. Could someone show me what limited freewill looks like.

Sure, and to that end I will First post a few Scriptures demonstrating limits...

Freedom Restrained

Job 14:4 Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? No one!

Psalm 22:29 All the prosperous of the earth Shall eat and worship; All those who go down to the dust Shall bow before Him, Even he who cannot keep himself alive.

Proverbs 20:9 Who can say, “I have made my heart clean, I am pure from my sin”?

Jer 13:23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard its spots? Then may you also do good who are accustomed to do evil.

Matt 7:18 “A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.

Matt 19:25 When His disciples heard it, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?” 26 But Jesus looked at them and said to them, “With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

John 1:12 But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: 13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

John 6:44No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him;

John 6:65 And He said, “Therefore I have said to you that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted to him by My Father.”

John 8:34 Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin.

John 8:44You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do.

Romans 6:20 For when you were slaves of sin

Romans 8:7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be.

1 Cor 2:14 But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned

2 Tim 2:25 in humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth, 26 and that they may come to their senses and escape the snare of the devil, having been taken captive by him to do his will.

Romans 9:19 You will say to me then, “Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?” 20 But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, “Why have you made me like this?”

Ephesians 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, 4 even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love 5 he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will,..............11 In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will,"

Second I will quote a technical and basic definition of my position from a philosophical encyclopedia, because there is no way to avoid philosophy in any depth of discussion concerning the controversial subject of free will.

"Compatibilism offers a solution to the free will problem, which concerns a disputed incompatibility between free will and determinism. Compatibilism is the thesis that free will is compatible with determinism. Because free will is typically taken to be a necessary condition of moral responsibility, compatibilism is sometimes expressed as a thesis about the compatibility between moral responsibility and determinism." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Third it will be helpful to make an important distinction, I recognize no less (angels and man, fallen and non) than two distinct chains of causality. God is the uncaused direct first cause of everything in existence. Select portions of His creation were created, especially humans made in His image, with a will and ability to be secondary chains of causality, such that humans could be given commands and actually choose to obey or not obey (subjects of Theocracy). However, the first humans in disobeying, brought curse (original sin) to the choices of everyone after them. As secondary chains of cause, originating from the first Causer, there is of course a link (as image bearers), however the freedom given to fallen secondary agents of causality, shifts the responsibility of causality to secondary causers.

Because He works all things according to the council of His will, there is a sense in which everything is pre-determined, if in no other sense than permanently settled in the immutable omniscience of God. Does this make God the direct cause of everything? NO, of course not. It does not follow that secondary chains of causality necessarily (by necessity) be caused by the first Causer. God is not pulling strings like a puppet master, He does not force, but has EVERY right to impose Himself when and where He so desires. I subscribe to what is technically called "the two wills of God theory", but it would be better termed "two aspects or attributes of one will". I recognize, within His one will a permissive/prescriptive aspect, and a sovereign/decree aspect, what should be (and allows) and what shall be. So God can accomplish His will either directly, or indirectly through secondary causal agents.

Causality alone is not the sole contributor of our choices, by and large I would say most of our choices spring from desires which are bound by our nature. The complicated aspect about desires though is, for the Christian, there is the Spirit and the flesh, with contrary desires at constant war with one another.

Further, there is a difference between making a choice in the libertarian sense and a free but limited sense. Choices cannot be free from many variables including desires (other general variables: time, gravity, location, economies, biology). Most importantly choices are limited by nature. While fallen man can and does make choices, his freedom is bound (slave) to a completely sinful nature (Rom 6:20). Christians and non-Christians do not have the same freedoms. The Christian set free from the bondage of sin has a choice not to do what he knows is sin, he can fight the good fight of faith, he can put on the whole armor of God, whereas the non-Christian, cannot please God (Rom 8:8), as we read in the Word, whatever is not of faith [in Christ] is sin (.Rom 14:23). Apart from Christ, all good deeds are as filthy rags (Isa 64:6) before a righteous and Holy God.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,503
7,861
...
✟1,193,888.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This is an odd things to assert about God. It seems quite evident to me that God must be in complete ultimate control of everything in order to be God. If there is anything operating outside His ultimate control, then God cannot be God.

Not true. If God was in ultimate control of everything than that would mean God was in control of us when we sinned and that it was His will for us to sin. However, God cannot agree with sin because He is holy and good. God allowing something bad to take place (as a part of man's decisions and control) is not the same as God's control or will. Yes, God determines to what degree a man can sin or not, because He can take life or cause certain things to happen for His greater plan for good, but God is not directing every single decision of sinful men.

Man has sovereignty just as God has sovereignty because we were made in His image. For why call us kings and priests if GOD never desired us to have any control over anything. For are we not to take control over our life with GOD over sin within our lives? Are we not to take control over our life with GOD to love GOD and to love others? Or are we mindless rag dolls being moved about?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Ronald

Exhortations
Site Supporter
Jul 30, 2004
4,620
982
southern
✟111,578.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I myself am a believer that we have complete freewill.
God does not make choices for us.
He knows all of the choices we will make.
He urges us to make the correct choice, choose Him and live.
If we choose anything besides Him, down that road is death. Proverbs 14:12

I do believe God is in control. I do not believe He is in total control.
Once God gave Adam dominion over the Earth, He gave control to Adam and he messed everything up for all of us.
God could not just say that He didn't like what Adam did and take back control from Adam.
He gave control to a man, and it would take a Man to take it back. So when the time was right, Jesus Christ came and took that authority back. Matthew 28:19
People sin against God's will.
People die and go to Hell against God's will.
Someone will probably say but God creates the wicked for destruction.
Revelation says that the Lake of fire was created for the Devil and his angels.
Man was never meant to go to the LOF.
But, he will go if he doesn't repent and believe the Gospel.

I have heard Calvinists say man has limited freewill.
Could someone show me what limited freewill looks like.
Really? How did the prophets write every word exactly how God inspired them to do so, if we are just thinking our own thoughts and then choosing wether to act on them or not?
How could God's perfect plan be fulfilled through us, with everyone who is written in the book of life getting saved right on schedule, without His direct guidance and drawing power? He draws us, orchestrates events and people to come into our lives to witness to us with percision and at that divine moment you say OK, as if He had nothing to do with it? He enables you to say yes, to be willing. Otherwise your "free will left to itself would continue on a rebellious path.
If we had a completely independent free will, we could choose not to be slaves to sin or slaves to God. The wages of sin would not have any consequences when we died. We could just will ourselves off to wherever we wanted and float away to o ur own paradise. "Hell, nah, not me, Satan has no power over me, I'm free and not willing to go - I will create mine own realm." You are either a slave to Satan or to God. That doesn't sound free to me.
You can resist God and I think many do. But significant choices in life, I would have to give credit to God. At certain moments, we think God's thoughts, He enlightens us so that the direction we choose makes sense, yet we think that those thoughts are self generated, that we figured things out independent of God, while in reality God was in fact coddling us along and whispering ... "You ought to go this way" ... "Help this person" ... "Do this, or say that ..."Move, NOW!" God guides us, you just don't understand how.
But feel free to choose whatever thing you like, and sometimes its the wrong choice and God all along factors your blunders and sin into His plan for you - for a purpose, a lesson. In the end, faith comes by the WORD, which has power, its not your word or your power that enables you.
If that were true, if we came to Him all on our own, by our own independent will and thoughts, then we could take the credit for our salvation. Remember without God we can do nothing good. Faith is a gift, not some reward for finding Him, You were lost and He found you, called you, sanctified you, justified you. I know, it seems like you made all the right choices that led you to salvation by yourself, but He chose you first.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,503
7,861
...
✟1,193,888.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Really? How did the prophets write every word exactly how God inspired them to do so, if we are just thinking our own thoughts and then choosing wether to act on them or not?

The OT saints that had written God's Word did not do so against their own free will. God did not make them to be a certain way and nor did God spiritually regenerate random certain individuals of His choosing to do that.

You said:
How could God's perfect plan be fulfilled through us, with everyone who is written in the book of life getting saved right on schedule, without His direct guidance and drawing power? He draws us, orchestrates events and people to come into our lives to witness to us with percision and at that divine moment you say OK, as if He had nothing to do with it?

I agree that GOD is the One who guides and draws us to Himself (who is salvation), but GOD does not force some to be saved and others to be not saved.

You said:
He enables you to say yes, to be willing.

No, He doesn't. If such were the case, then why was GOD grieved at the wickedness of man during the global flood? Could not have GOD just forced regenerated everyone to say "yes" and to be "willing" instead of being grieved by man's wickedness? In addition Noah was a preacher of righteousness. This means that Noah preached to those who perished in the global flood. Why do that if they were all condemned? Also, God told Jonah to preach that the city of Nineveh was going to be overthrown soon, and yet it did not happen because the people of Nineveh had repented. So we see that it based off what the people decide and not what GOD does to people in regards to their sin. God does not make some people to be saved and GOD does not make others to remain damned. That makes no sense in light of reading the Bible. Jesus said, "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones God's messengers! How often I have wanted to gather your children together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn't let me" (Matthew 23:37). So here we see Jerusalem thwarting the will of our Lord here. They would not let Him to gather them like a hen gathers it's chicks.

You said:
Otherwise your "free will left to itself would continue on a rebellious path.
If we had a completely independent free will, we could choose not to be slaves to sin or slaves to God.

Being a slave to sin does not mean one cannot break sin's control.
Even unbelievers can stop sinning.
Did you ever hear of alcohol or drug free programs?

However, with Jesus we can be set free from all sin.

"But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof" (Romans 13:14).

But if men's hearts are waxed gross, it is a free will choice for them to choose to see and to hear and understand whereby God then can convert them and heal them. How so? It is written...

"For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them" (Matthew 13:15).

You said:
The wages of sin would not have any consequences when we died. We could just will ourselves off to wherever we wanted and float away to o ur own paradise. "Hell, nah, not me, Satan has no power over me, I'm free and not willing to go - I will create mine own realm." You are either a slave to Satan or to God. That doesn't sound free to me.

This makes no sense. How can you say you do not make a choice towards GOD and then declare that you have freedom? Especially when you believe that it is GOD who makes some to be slaves to do His good will and others to remained damned as a part of His will? If that is not what you are saying, then please explain in more detail.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
If you look at each one of those items you mentioned, with the exception of the Great Flood, Moses did something for God to act upon.

God initiated the freeing of the Israelites from Egypt. He decided when and how He would bring His Chosen People out of the bondage of Egypt. Moses was hiding out on the back side of the desert when God conscripted him for service. And it was God directing Moses all through the process of the emancipation of the Israelites.

Every one of the plagues came about because Moses spoke them into existence.

??? God told Moses what to say. God had already determined what He would do, what plagues He would send to afflict Egypt. Moses was nothing more than a mouthpiece for God, a delivery boy of divine messages. His speaking brought nothing into being. All that happened was God's doing, it was His power on display.

And with the flood, God saw this was the only way to keep the line pure and He Himself said
Genesis 6:6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
6:7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

You seem to be agreeing with me here that God does as He wills in the earth.

I never said God was helpless. But God did choose to use man to get things done on earth.

With this I agree. But Man getting things done does not mean God is restrained or prevented from acting just as He likes when He likes in the world.

Please provide Scripture that teaches this.

Are you implying God cannot prevent a person from doing evil? He does so again and again in Scripture. And if God can and does prevent some evil, it stands to reason that what evil does occur He has permitted.

So you do agree God does not get what He desires?

God desires to judge and punish the wicked, He desires to see justice done, else He would not condemn the wicked to Hell. But His greater desire is to see people come to a saving faith in Christ.

This is straight up free will. Romans 6:16 says we are servants of the one we obey.
When a person makes a choice to commit a crime he will find his free will is very restricted in jail/prison.

Hard libertarianism holds that a person may exert genuinely free agency at all times. This is not true of soft libertarianism. There is free will at certain points, not at all times.


Two reasons: It is what Scripture indicates and it tracks with the conception of God as the Greatest Possible Being. Please also note that I wrote "ultimate control."

Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Could you elaborate on what you think and subdue it: means?

You've answered my question with a question. Does Man control the weather? Does Man control the currents of the oceans? Does Man control the movement of tectonic plates? Does Man control the flow of magma beneath the Earth's crust? No, he doesn't. It seems to me to go too far to say Man controls the Earth. He may control some things on the Earth, but he does not control the Earth itself.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Not true. If God was in ultimate control of everything than that would mean God was in control of us when we sinned and that it was His will for us to sin.

It was His will for us to freely choose to walk with Him or not. How we exercise that freedom is our responsibility but the capacity to choose is God's doing. Whatever we may choose to do, God's ultimate will is accomplished. When playing a chess grandmaster, we may move as we like on the chess board, but he will always win.

However, God cannot agree with sin because He is holy and good.

Permitting sin and agreeing with it are not the same thing.

Yes, God determines to what degree a man can sin or not, because He can take life or cause certain things to happen for His greater plan for good, but God is not directing every single decision of sinful men.

I did not say that He was.

Man has sovereignty just as God has sovereignty because we were made in His image.

Do you control the universe? No. Do you control the existence of every person on the planet? No, you don't. Do you control whether or not you'll contract some fatal disease, or die in some horrible accident? No. God, though, has sovereign control over all of these things.

For why call us kings and priests if GOD never desired us to have any control over anything.

I never said we had no control over ourselves and circumstances at all. I am not a determinist.

For are we not to take control over our life with GOD over sin within our lives?

No, we aren't to take control, we are to yield it - to God (Ro. 12:1).
 
Upvote 0

wonderkins

Active Member
Jul 16, 2017
309
215
Winlock
✟147,268.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"The OT saints that had written God's Word did not do so against their own free will. God did not make them to be a certain way and nor did God spiritually regenerate random certain individuals of His choosing to do that."

Jonah? Paul?


From Genesis 20 about Abraham and Abimelech

1 From there Abraham journeyed toward the territory of the Negeb and lived between Kadesh and Shur; and he sojourned in Gerar.
2 And Abraham said of Sarah his wife, "She is my sister." And Abimelech king of Gerar sent and took Sarah.
3 But God came to Abimelech in a dream by night and said to him, "Behold, you are a dead man because of the woman whom you have taken, for she is a man's wife."
4 Now Abimelech had not approached her. So he said, "Lord, will you kill an innocent people?
5 Did he not himself say to me, 'She is my sister'? And she herself said, 'He is my brother.' In the integrity of my heart and the innocence of my hands I have done this."
6 Then God said to him in the dream, "Yes, I know that you have done this in the integrity of your heart, and it was I who kept you from sinning against me. Therefore I did not let you touch her.
7 Now then, return the man's wife, for he is a prophet, so that he will pray for you, and you shall live. But if you do not return her, know that you shall surely die, you and all who are yours."
(Genesis 20:1, ESV)


It appears that God was very much in control of whether Abimelech sinned or not.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,503
7,861
...
✟1,193,888.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It was His will for us to freely choose to walk with Him or not. How we exercise that freedom is our responsibility but the capacity to choose is God's doing. Whatever we may choose to do, God's ultimate will is accomplished. When playing a chess grandmaster, we may move as we like on the chess board, but he will always win.

Yes, God's will is for us to freely choose, but it is not God's ultimate will that anyone actually sins. God does not think that He wins if any of us sins. Where did you come up with that crazy idea? That is making a wrong conclusion about things. God allowing us to choose Him or not does not mean He wanted us to not choose Him as an alternative.

You said:
Permitting sin and agreeing with it are not the same thing.

I would actually say this to you to prove my case against what you said.

You said:
I did not say that He was.

Do you believe in Unconditional Election?
That God spiritually regenerates a person in order for them to say... "Yes" to God?
Do you believe God spiritually regenerates a person based upon nothing within the individual at any point in time?

You said:
Do you control the universe? No. Do you control the existence of every person on the planet? No, you don't. Do you control whether or not you'll contract some fatal disease, or die in some horrible accident? No. God, though, has sovereign control over all of these things.

I am not denying God has sovereignty. I already admitted that He has this. But man also has sovereignty over things, too. Man has rule or sovereignty to make decisions outside of the things of God. The world system or world order (i.e. people of this world) you see around you are not that way because God wanted them to be that way. The world is sinful and God desires them to repent. But God knows they won't repent. God does not feel like He is winning if they do not repent. God loves them and desires for them to repent, but He knows many will not do that. God is grieved at the destruction of the wicked.

You said:
I never said we had no control over ourselves and circumstances at all. I am not a determinist.

Then how would you classify your belief?

You said:
No, we aren't to take control, we are to yield it - to God (Ro. 12:1).

What do you think you are doing when you yield to God? You are exercising control or your will to do that. There is no such thing as .... God made me do it or.... the devil made me do it. Every man will be responsible for his own actions before GOD (Even believers).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Yes, God's will is for us to freely choose, but it is not God's ultimate will that anyone actually sins. God does not think that He wins if any of us sins.

I don't recall ever writing that when we sin, God thinks He wins...

Where did you come up with that crazy idea?

I didn't. You did. Are you sure you're responding to what I wrote and not what someone else has written?

God allowing us to choose Him or not does not mean He wanted us to not choose Him as an alternative.

Of course.

Do you believe in Unconditional Election?

No. I don't.

I am not denying God has sovereignty. I already admitted that He has this.

My questions were in response to your claim to have sovereignty in the same way God does. I did not think you were denying God was sovereign.

Man has rule or sovereignty to make decisions outside of the things of God. The world system or world order (i.e. people of this world) you see around you are not that way because God wanted them to be that way.

Not entirely, no. But Scripture is very clear about God's integral role in setting up and taking down rulers and their regimes (Ro. 13:1).

The world is sinful and God desires them to repent. But God knows they won't repent. God does not feel like He is winning if they do not repent.

I don't think God sees our doings in terms of winning or losing. What we do ultimately has no material effect on Him. God is perfect and this entails that He is neither diminished (He loses) or improved (He wins) by what we do or don't do.

Then how would you classify your belief?

See Molinism: www.reasonablefaith.org

What do you think you are doing when you yield to God? You are exercising control or your will to do that.

I don't believe that. Whatever steps toward God I am able to take, whatever obedience I am capable of, ultimately God has enabled it (Phil. 1:6; 2:13; Jude 1:24). True yielding (not a fleshly piety) to God is something He makes possible in me; it is not a work of my flesh, of my will, but the consequence of God's transforming work in me.

There is no such thing as .... God made me do it or.... the devil made me do it. Every man will be responsible for his own actions before GOD (Even believers).

The apostle Paul disagrees with you:

Ephesians 2:1-6
1 And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins,
2 in which you once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience,
3 among whom also we all once conducted ourselves in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind
, and were by nature children of wrath, just as the others.
4 But God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us,
5 even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved),
6 and raised us up together, and made us sit together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,


Can a dead man do anything? No. Can those who are dead spiritually act positively toward God without His aid? No. They're spiritually dead. Without life. Incapable of spiritual activity. And what's more, these spiritually dead people are caught in the grip of the World, the Flesh, and the devil. And this is why God - not us - must act to redeem us. If He does not, no one can be saved.

Titus 3:3-5
3 For we ourselves were also once foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving various lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful and hating one another.
4 But when the kindness and the love of God our Savior toward man appeared,
5 not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit,


2 Timothy 2:25-26 (NKJV)
25 in humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth,
26 and that they may come to their senses and escape the snare of the devil, having been taken captive by him to do his will.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,576
60
Wyoming
✟83,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That was not an answer to my question.
Your question had a wrong premise.
If someone has freewill, then what they do is not predetermined.
You may have been showing an example of nonlibertarian freewill, but it was not libertarian.
A person with freewill would check the door. I know I would.
 
Upvote 0