Taking Questions on Creationism

Status
Not open for further replies.

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟82,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But your interpretation Of Isaiah 28:10 is entirely out of context and unrelated to the clear import of the text..
To understand Isaiah 28:10, read Isaiah 28:13. But the word of the LORD was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken. It deals with the Scriptures being given and explained to the Jews and their refusal to accept it; much like today's evolution proponents.

Matthew Henry gives this explanation of the entire passage; Isaiah 25:5-15:
The prophet next turns to Judah, whom he calls the residue of his people. Happy are those alone, who glory in the Lord of hosts himself. Hence his people get wisdom and strength for every service and every conflict. But it is only in Christ Jesus that the holy God communicates with sinful man. And whether those that teach are drunk with wine, or intoxicated with false doctrines and notions concerning the kingdom and salvation of the Messiah, they not only err themselves, but lead multitudes astray. All places where such persons have taught are filled with errors. For our instruction in the things of God, it is needful that the same precept and the same line should be often repeated to us, that we may the better understand them. God, by his word, calls us to what is really for our advantage; the service of God is the only true rest for those weary of the service of sin, and there is no refreshment but under the easy yoke of the Lord Jesus. All this had little effect upon the people. Those who will not understand what is plain, but scorn and despise it as mean and trifling, are justly punished. If we are at peace with God, we have, in effect, made a covenant with death; whenever it comes, it cannot do us any real damage, if we are Christ's. But to think of making death our friend, while by sin we are making God our enemy, is absurd. And do not they make lies their refuge who trust in their own righteousness, or to a death-bed repentance? which is a resolution to sin no more, when it is no longer in their power to do so.


Please remove this verse from your "evolution quiver." It does nothing to further your argument.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
To understand Isaiah 28:10, read Isaiah 28:13. But the word of the LORD was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken. It deals with the Scriptures being given and explained to the Jews and their refusal to accept it; much like today's evolution proponents.

Matthew Henry gives this explanation of the entire passage; Isaiah 25:5-15:
The prophet next turns to Judah, whom he calls the residue of his people. Happy are those alone, who glory in the Lord of hosts himself. Hence his people get wisdom and strength for every service and every conflict. But it is only in Christ Jesus that the holy God communicates with sinful man. And whether those that teach are drunk with wine, or intoxicated with false doctrines and notions concerning the kingdom and salvation of the Messiah, they not only err themselves, but lead multitudes astray. All places where such persons have taught are filled with errors. For our instruction in the things of God, it is needful that the same precept and the same line should be often repeated to us, that we may the better understand them. God, by his word, calls us to what is really for our advantage; the service of God is the only true rest for those weary of the service of sin, and there is no refreshment but under the easy yoke of the Lord Jesus. All this had little effect upon the people. Those who will not understand what is plain, but scorn and despise it as mean and trifling, are justly punished. If we are at peace with God, we have, in effect, made a covenant with death; whenever it comes, it cannot do us any real damage, if we are Christ's. But to think of making death our friend, while by sin we are making God our enemy, is absurd. And do not they make lies their refuge who trust in their own righteousness, or to a death-bed repentance? which is a resolution to sin no more, when it is no longer in their power to do so.


Please remove this verse from your "evolution quiver." It does nothing to further your argument.
It's not "my verse." It was offered by a creationist as proof that God laid down the geologic column to give an appearance of great age when He repaired the Earth after the Flood.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,113
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,172.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It's not "my verse." It was offered by a creationist as proof that God laid down the geologic column to give an appearance of great age when He repaired the Earth after the Flood.
Is that why I said He did it?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,113
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,172.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No, but that was the effect of what you claimed the verse describes Him as doing.
Then I didn't make up the intent, did I?

In fact, I gave two intents:
  1. He put them in chronological order according to Genesis 1.
  2. He put them in an order known only to the angels.
Anyone who says I said:

3. He put them there to give an appearance of great age.
... is blowing smoke.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Then I didn't make up the intent, did I?

In fact, I gave two intents:
  1. He put them in chronological order according to Genesis 1.
  2. He put them in an order known only to the angels.
Anyone who says I said:

3. He put them there to give an appearance of great age.
... is blowing smoke.
OK, but that was not my point.
My point was that interpreting Isaiah 28:10 as describing God laying down geological strata after the Flood is doing an injustice to scripture. It is an excellent example of how "literal inerrancy" tortures the meaning of scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Aman777

Christian
Jan 26, 2013
10,351
584
✟30,043.00
Faith
Baptist
So why are so many Bible-believing Chsitians telling us that it was the incarnate Jesus of Nazereth who wrote scripture?

Because they haven't read this verse:

2Pe 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

The only thing "holy" about men is if they have the Holy Spirit inside them.

So was St. Paul then, who believed that Scripture was written by men, divinely inspired men.

The Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, inspired (God breathed) His Truth from inside the men who penned the words.

So you can tell if a person is saved in Christ by whether he believes in the literal inerrancy of Genesis? That if he only believes that Christ is his savior then he is not saved?

The devils believe and tremble. Jas 2:19 Salvation requires the agreement of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Gen 1:26 Gen 5:1-2 John 14:16
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,113
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,172.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
OK, but that was not my point.
My point was that interpreting Isaiah 28:10 as describing God laying down geological strata after the Flood is doing an injustice to scripture. It is an excellent example of how "literal inerrancy" tortures the meaning of scripture.
Again fair enough.

I won't give any verse ... how's that?

Then you can sit and wonder how I justify it Biblically.

I could have just shrugged my shoulders and given you ...

Deuteronomy 29:29 The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,703
2,335
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟467,320.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Fair enough.

Let's get back to the Creation Week in this thread and forget about fossils; or you just might end up doubting all your life.
Ok, let me see if I can forget about fossils...Sorry, can't do it. The fossils tell a story that says it happened different from what creationism says. Why would we just forget that evidence?
 
Upvote 0

Aman777

Christian
Jan 26, 2013
10,351
584
✟30,043.00
Faith
Baptist
I still have no reason to accept this assertion, what evidence do you have of a Holy Spirit? (See below for a synopsis of what I could find...) from what I could discern, the Holy Spirit still needs a Human to act on/through.

Shouldn't Gen 5:1 end in "made They them;"? That aside, this site highlights the problems better than I could “Let us” in Genesis 1:26 is NOT the Trinity :

“Let us” in Genesis 1:26 is NOT the Trinity

As a supposed “proof” text that Jesus Christ, “pre-existed” before his birth, theologians in the Roman Catholic and fundamental Christian churches have used Genesis 1:26; they claim the phrase, “Let Us make man in OUR image after OUR likeness...” refers to the three-headed Deity known as the “Trinity.” The Trinity is a manmade, demonically inspired doctrine that defaces and insults the very nature of God who IS one, not three-in-one, according to Deuteronomy 6:4, Mark 12:29, James 2:19, 1 Timothy 2:5 and a host of other scripture passages.


The Trinity espouses three persons of God and its proponents use the plural pronouns in Genesis 1:26 as illegitimate support for their Triune godhead. The Trinitarian position explains Genesis 1:26 by saying, “This is God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit having an active dialogue about the creation. The three persons of God are discussing the creation of man by saying, ‘Let US make man in OUR image.’” In this so-called Triune dialogue they affirm Jesus was “one of three persons of God” planning to make man in their (his?) image (s?). You see the problem.

Dilemma #1
The first dilemma with the Trinitarian interpretation is CONTEXT; the immediate context (chapter one) of Genesis 1:26 does not reveal who the “Us” is. An honest student of scripture does not assign names or titles to “Us” in the text of Genesis 1:26 to describe “who” the plural pronouns are referring to, except to specify mention of “God” (Hebrew for God = Elohim). Furthermore, one cannot deduce how many individuals “Us” and “Our” is unless there is enough internal evidence within the text to determine such a number.

Dilemma #2
The second problem with assuming the “Us” of Genesis 1:26 is referring to the Trinity is found in the verse following 1:26:

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them. (KJV)

Notice the personal pronouns in Genesis 1:27 (“his” and “he”) are all SINGULAR, whereas the personal pronouns in Genesis 1:26 (“Us” and “Our”) are all plural. In Genesis 1:27 only one individual is actually doing the creating…God!

To explain the variant of plural pronouns in Genesis 1:26 and the singular pronouns in Genesis 1:27 Trinitarians say, “In Genesis 1:27 we only see singular pronouns used because the mystery of the Triune God is being revealed; that is, God is letting us know that even though He is three, He is also three-in-one.”

To bolster this logical fallacy, Trinitarian scholars point out the word for “God” in both Genesis 1:26 and Genesis 1:27 is “Elohim.” “Elohim,” they assert, “is a plural word in the Hebrew, indicating more than one person. Therefore when Elohim says, ‘Let Us make…’ it is the three (plural) persons of the Trinity speaking as one person.”

While it is true elohim is a plural word in the Hebrew, it is not used to indicate plurality in number when constructed together with singular nouns or pronouns, as in Genesis 1:27, which reads, “So God (elohim) created man in His own image, in the image of God (elohim) created He him; male and female created He them.”
and these people ARE Bible Believers and apparently understand the bible as well (or better) than you do.

What is the Holy Spirit? as far as I can tell, it's just a feel-good unsubstantiated uplifting and isn't an animate being of any sort. Even the online references I can find don't do well at explaining it other than that. I can literally get the same buzz by helping someone and being appreciated for it. Most of John 14 seems to be Jesus talking about how he's channelling God (like a Psychic Medium) to 'motivate' those around him with the 'holy spirit' (a motivational speaker like Tony Robbins perhaps?) - I imagine the Holy Spirit thing is just that euphoria you feel when going to Church and paying your tythe. What else is it exactly (besides euphoric belief)?

What it Isn't is a requirement to create new things. This is still a completely unsupported assertion.

God (Elohim-the Judges) is a plural Hebrew name. We use the term Trinity to identify God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. God (Trinity) is an invisible Spirit, the Spirit of Love. Lord God/Jesus is the Son of God and the ONLY God in physical form, Isa 45:5 the ONLY God anyone will ever see. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Truth. Jhn 14:17 He indwells believers but NOT unbelievers. Here is a Scriptural picture of the three of them Who are One Spirit.

Luk 3:22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon Him, (Jesus Christ) and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; (Father) in thee I am well pleased.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Aman777

Christian
Jan 26, 2013
10,351
584
✟30,043.00
Faith
Baptist
heh! :D That's wrong....

Are you aware that these don't agree with Science? Just letting you know...

Sure they do since they are True to Scientific discoveries. Adam was made in the first firmament/heaven which was totally destroyed in the flood. 2Pet3:6 Noah's grandsons, like Cain, married and produced children with the prehistoric people who were on planet Earth when the Ark arrived. Gen 6:4 That is WHY today's Humans have the mind of God Gen 3:22 and the DNA and ERVs of prehistoric people. Amen?
 
Upvote 0

Bugeyedcreepy

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2016
1,660
1,431
Canberra, Australia
✟88,248.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
So you're saying it's not tidy?
No, why would it be tidy? Literally the only reason we could find fossils in the exact order we find them is if Evolution was a thing. it is equally tidy whether they be found randomly (as if the Flood was correct) or in a specific geological column according to time (as if Evolution was correct).

they're equally as tidy (or untidy), though the way in which we find them tells a story about how they got there. According to the evidence, they got there by Evolution.

As @FruminousBandersnatch rightly points out - if God existed and the Flood/Creation Event were real, then why even have fossils at all if he wants to be tidy?
 
Upvote 0

Bugeyedcreepy

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2016
1,660
1,431
Canberra, Australia
✟88,248.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Sure they do since they are True to Scientific discoveries. Adam was made in the first firmament/heaven which was totally destroyed in the flood. 2Pet3:6 Noah's grandsons, like Cain, married and produced children with the prehistoric people who were on planet Earth when the Ark arrived. Gen 6:4 That is WHY today's Humans have the mind of God Gen 3:22 and the DNA and ERVs of prehistoric people. Amen?
Again, No. There is no evidence of any other dimension, or firmament, or whatever, and in order for any organism to be able to reproduce with any other, their DNA has to be very similar, something that would only occur if they were already an interbreeding part of the population, not separate and introduced. Then earlier you said:
Genesis 1:26 shows that God the TRINITY created Adam in Their Image, which is Spiritually in Christ. Gen 2:4-7 shows that Adam was "formed"the 3rd Day, before the plants herbs and trees, from the dust of the ground by LORD GOD/Jesus.
which doesn't agree with Science because Humans didn't exist before plants, herbs and trees. Then, you said:
Adam and Eve were "created" by God the Trinity at the SAME time. Gen 1:26 Gen 5:1-2 and John 14:16 It takes the agreement of the Trinity to create Humans Spiritually in Christ. Be sure to use the KJV or you will probably be confused. Try again?
which doesn't agree with Science because humans come about naturally like every other living organism, descended from the Great Apes and aren't created.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,261
8,057
✟326,642.00
Faith
Atheist
I hope so.
Just wondering - if the idea was just to tidy up, why carefully arrange billions of years of strata in time-order - complete with fossils, oil, evidence of geological events (effects of plate tectonics, erosion, uplifts, faulting, etc), evidence of the variations in climate, to give a comprehensive impression of an ancient history including biological evolution? And broadening the picture - planets, stars, galaxies, clusters and superclusters of galaxies, all consistent with an ancient and evolving universe, from the creation of heavy elements in supernovae and neutron star mergers, to the balance of elemental isotopes indicative of tens of billions of years. It all tells a consistent story, and one very different from what you propose.

Seems to me that every time we look at the real world we discover stuff that we would not expect if the God/scripture explanation was correct, stuff that tells a consistent story but that requires ad-hoc special pleading and/or questionable interpretations to hammer the square peg of real-world observation into the round hole of the God/scripture explanation.

Just sayin'.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,113
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,172.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Just wondering - if the idea was just to tidy up, why carefully arrange billions of years of strata in time-order - complete with fossils, oil, evidence of geological events (effects of plate tectonics, erosion, uplifts, faulting, etc), evidence of the variations in climate, to give a comprehensive impression of an ancient history including biological evolution?
QV my new thread: Let's Set The Fossil Record Straight
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,703
2,335
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟467,320.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Then you have no business discussing Genesis 1 creationism.
Discussing creation without mentioning fossils? That would be like examining a crime scene except for the body.

One would think the fossils are important evidence.
 
Upvote 0

Bugeyedcreepy

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2016
1,660
1,431
Canberra, Australia
✟88,248.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Firstly you have to understand that Jesus Himself predicted that the Jewish people as a whole would reject Him. His parable in Matthew 22 is meant to convey this fact. Paul the apostle even addresses this fact in 2 Corinthians 3:12-16, where he describes their minds as being veiled to the scriptures.
Matthew 22 (as was all of the new testament) was written entirely after the fact. It's telling that he knew that the Jewish people wouldn't take him seriously, especially since Jesus doesn't match what they believe their Messiah would be. Anyone who expects to not be taken seriously ahead of time can often be pointed out for what they are, a charlatan (not saying that was the case here, of course) - that said, why would God, an all omnipotent and omniscient being be so wishy-washy with his chosen people? In the Old Testament, there was no mistaking God and his will, he would pull no punches, even with his own people if they weren't doing exactly as he wanted - now if Jesus comes and pretty much the entire Jewish population spare 12 don't accept his claim, then it's hardly their fault he isn't clearer.
In John 5:46 Jesus told us that Moses wrote of Him.
There are actually three ways in which Moses wrote of Jesus. First he gave several examples of Jesus’ direct pre-incarnate visitations to earth. Second Moses stories in the Torah often were foreshadows of Jesus life and ministry. And Third, there were at least 6 Messianic prophecies written by Moses and fulfilled in Jesus.
Again, this is all easily explained by post-fact reinterpretation. Whoever wrote the new testament had all the information available to them minimum decades after the fact while writing it. I haven't been indoctrinated into this line of thought, so it's harder for me to just accept this to be the way you've reinterpreted it to be.

I haven't included the rest of the monumental wall of text because it doesn't really justify anything outside your reinterpretation, which I've already pointed out. Perhaps if you could point out the 6 specific prophesised foretellings made by Moses regarding Jesus, we could look at those?
I am merely repeating what the scriptures say about all of us...myself included.
And of course, there's no reason why anyone should take any of this text to be authoritive, happy to hear any justifications otherwise though. In the mean time, I'll set it aside awaiting such info.
If you are talking about those who were born on earth and have since gone on to dwell in heaven then yes they do have free will and there is no need for animal sacrifice.
So why not have that same system here on Earth if it can actually be done? There's no need for any sacrifice of any sort at all, and the fact that Heaven demonstrates this is evidence enough.
If you are talking about angelic beings created in heaven then no they do not.
Hadn't even considered Angels.
As for the system of animal sacrifice it was a representation of the real sacrifice that was to come.
Why was any kind of sacrifice neccesary? it just isn't as demonstrated by Heaven.
Yes it was bloody and revolting and God intended it to be this way. He wanted us to have a good grasp on what a cost, the death of His only begotten Son was to be. The penalty for sin is death and He would come and pay our sin debt.
What brutal bloodlust nonsense that is. It just isn't a requirement, and that all of the modern world has more humane justice systems in place than old testament levitical law is proof enough.
Does an all powerful God have the ability to come up with a better plan? I don't see how He could and still be called just. If you saw a judge letting criminals go without punishment you would call Him an unjust judge and be outraged.
Go find any modern nation today for a better judicial system. I agree a Judge letting criminals go without punishment is bad, debatable though if it's worse than a Judge wheeling out his Son and condemning him to punishment in lieu, let alone death - what kind of monster would THAT Judge be? To give you an idea, that Judge would himself be convicted of a number of crimes, that's how bad that Judge is.

What you need is a judicial system that is fair and balanced, weighing up all the facts of the case and the criminal who has been found guilty should make amends, and should make amends to those they've done wrong by, whether it be the state or other people. what shouldn't happen is someone else being convicted and sentenced in their place, no matter who that person is. that's about as bad as a judicial system could get. Sorry, but Scapegoating just isn't justice...
How much more shall the Judge of the universe judge sin? His plan is genius and I can think of no other way to create free will agents who can freely express love for Him and experience His love.
then you either lack the foresight to see the merits of pretty much any other more appropriate system, or you are morally vacuous with an inability to see the problem with it. or a combination of the two.
Love requires free will in order to be at all meaningful. Free will demands three elements in order to be truly free. Ability, opportunity, and unambiguity.
If all of these things are available in Heaven, then it can be available here too.
Of course we have to have the ability to choose or not to choose, but we also have to be given the opportunity to make that choice.
Can you choose in Heaven? Did Satan have a choice?
If God looked down the corridors of time and decided to only create those who would choose to love Him then He would be unjust because this would not be true free will.
I'm not sure I agree with this point. It depends on what you think happens to those people who don't believe in your particular version of your particular God. According to your doctrine, do the souls non-believers spend an eternity being tortured in the afterlife? If so, do you think that's just? No finite crime deserves infinite torture.
Also those who do make the decision to love and serve Him would have no sure way of knowing rather they truly had free will without seeing that there were plenty who chose not to. In this way our free will is made unambiguous.
If there's free will in Heaven, then none of the sacrifice clauses and scapegoat requirements are needed. This is just an arbitrary condition placed on this life by your God, and the fact that Heaven can get by without these arbitrary requirements while still allowing free will is evidence enough that it can indeed be done.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Ah your God arranged the fossils in an order consistent with evolution, since for some reason that is the optimum order, but you have no idea why that is optimum?

I'm not buying it.

He has no idea if that is optimum... he's just assuming because... well, he said so.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I do know, however, that Noah and his family weren't the only persons around.

Angels were there as well.

So perhaps the order of arrangement is a message to them about something.

Don't know.

God doesn't speak to His angels anymore? He expected them to dig?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.