Yahushua, Yahusha or Jesus?

SAAN

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
2,034
489
Atlanta, GA
✟80,985.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If you want to keep the feasts and bl


I didn't say that she did. But she certainly didn't call him Yeshua.

He was called Iesous. Hmmmm does that look familiar to you at all?

The name is the tip of the iceberg. Most people I've met that parade this rubbish end up blowing trumpets and reading the Torah and observing the feasts. It's all nonsense, it's a deception - another one that makes the believing group they have found "secret knowledge that no one else has" and appeals to pride and arrogance.

It causes divisions in church (I know because I've seen it) and brings nothing but strife to the body of Christ.

Rubbish of the highest order.
Why in the world would the Messiah Hebrew parents from the line of Judah give their son a Greek or Latino Greek name? It would be like a white American naming their new son WeeToo Lo or Vishnu Ashok Patel and know nothing about that culture.

Yahushah, Yeshua...etc simply means YHWH is Salvation .

How are people who read Torah and the NT keeping the Feasts of the bible deception, but modern day Christianity keeping former Pagan days and slapping Jesus name on top of them arent?

Im not Hebrew Roots, but just question those that bash one group and dont look at what they believe and do as well.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
SeraTaru said:
See? This is exactly the sort of debate I've seen played out in the church building.

Instead of agreeing to extend the kingdom of Christ we get these endless debates over nonsense.
Unfortunately, that goes on a lot here on CF, but it's the nature of the beast and what was prophecied by our Lord and Savior, Jesus the Christ.

Luke 12:51
Ye are supposing that Peace I came to give in the land.
Nay! I AM saying to ye, but rather division

1Corinthians 11:18
For foremost indeed of coming together ye in *the assembly I am hearing schisms/scismata <4978> in ye to be firstly, and part some I am believing it.
Reve 6:4
And came forth another firey horse and to the one sitting on him was given to him to be taking the Peace from the land and that one another they should be slaying.....
As a gentile are you doing that?

Are you making Jews jealous?
According to these verses, that appears to be what Yahweh/Jesus propehcied?......

Deut 32:31
They have made Me jealous with what is not God; They have provoked Me to anger with their idols.
So I will make them jealous with those who are not a people;
I will provoke them to anger with a foolish Nation


Romans:10:19
But I say, Did not Israel know? first Moses saith, 'I will provoke you to jealousy by that which is not a nation; by an unintelligent Nation I will anger you,'

Matthew 21:43 Therefore I am saying to ye, that shall be being taken-away from Ye, the Kingdom of the God, and it shall be being given to a Nation doing the Fruits of it.

l recommend to Christians to study this parable in Luke 16 [as well as Revelation] as "Covenantle" and from a Hebrew perspective...imho

Lazarus and the Rich Man - Here a little, there a little - Commentary

If the Pharisees and scribes understood Yeshua's prophetic parable, it must have astonished and infuriated them. How could the Jews become alienated from God while the elect Gentiles became the "seed of Abraham"?
The implication that the House of Judah and those called from the Gentile nations were to change places would have been almost impossible for the Pharisees and scribes to believe..........

While the significance of this seemingly pointless detail has been neglected by scholars throughout the centuries, you can be certain that it did not escape the notice of the Pharisees and scribes to which Yeshua was speaking. They thoroughly knew their history and were extremely proud of their heritage. Yeshua wanted those self-righteous Pharisees to know exactly who he was referring to with this parable.
This detail cements the identity of the rich man as the House of Judah, the Jews!

ROMANS 11:25 For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that a hardening in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: "The Deliverer will come out of Zion, and He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob; 27 for this is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins."
28 Concerning the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers. 29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. 30 For as you were once disobedient to God, yet have now obtained mercy through their disobedience, 31 even so these also have now been disobedient, that through the mercy shown you they also may obtain mercy. 32 For God has committed them all to disobedience, that He might have mercy on all.
33 Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and His ways past finding out!
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Several years ago there was a pastor who said that if you used Jesus' full name when you pray in His name, then the prayer is more powerful, and demons will understand that you mean Him specifically. He said that the full name was "Jesus of Nazareth," because, you wouldn't want to confuse him with a Jesus from another town.

I tried praying like that a little bit. It felt nice to say, but the prayers weren't answered any better than they had been before or since. I don't think it is wrong to say it. I do think it is wrong to claim you have to or those in the spiritual realm won't know who you mean, or that your prayer life is more powerful if you do.
I have never really noticed how many times the references to "Jesus of Nazarus" is mentioned.
Why did Nathanael say this about Nazareth?

Jhn 1:46
And Nathanael said to him, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” Philip said to him, “Come and see.”

Strong's Concordance with Hebrew and Greek Lexicon
"nazareth"
occurs 29 times in 29 verses in the NKJV.

Mat 2:23
And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, “He shall be called a Nazarene.”

Act 4:
8
Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, “Rulers of the people and elders of Israel:
10
“let it be known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead, by Him this man stands here before you whole.

Act 10:
38

“how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power, who went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him.

Then there is this awesome event with Saul/Paul on the road to Damascus:

Act 22:
6
“Now it happened, as I journeyed and came near Damascus at about noon,
suddenly a great light from heaven shone around me.
8
“So I answered, ‘Who are You, Lord?’
And He said to me, ‘I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom you are persecuting
.’

Nazareth - Wikipedia

Nazareth (/ˈnæzərəθ/; Hebrew: נָצְרַת‎, Natzrat; Arabic: النَّاصِرَة‎, an-Nāṣira; Aramaic: ܢܨܪܬ‎, Naṣrath) is the capital and the largest city in the Northern District of Israel. Nazareth is known as "the Arab capital of Israel".[2] In 2016 its population was 75,922.[1]

The inhabitants are predominantly Arab citizens of Israel, of whom 69% are Muslim and 30.9% Christian.[2][3][4][5] Nazareth Illit (lit. "Upper Nazareth") is built alongside old Nazareth, and had a Jewish population of 40,312 in 2014. The Jewish sector was declared a separate city in June 1974.[6]

In the New Testament, the town is described as the childhood home of Jesus,[7] and as such is a center of Christian pilgrimage, with many shrines commemorating biblical events.................

250px-Habsora_from_selezian.jpg

Panoramic view of Nazareth, with the Basilica of the Annunciation at the center

Hebrew Netzer
One view holds that "Nazareth" is derived from one of the Hebrew words for 'branch', namely ne·ṣer, נֵ֫צֶר,[8] and alludes to the prophetic, messianic words in Book of Isaiah 11:1, 'from (Jesse's) roots a Branch (netzer) will bear fruit'. One view suggests this toponym might be an example of a tribal name used by resettling groups on their return from exile.[9] Alternatively, the name may derive from the verb na·ṣar, נָצַר, "watch, guard, keep,"[10] and understood either in the sense of "watchtower" or "guard place", implying the early town was perched on or near the brow of the hill, or, in the passive sense as 'preserved, protected' in reference to its secluded position.[11]
The negative references to Nazareth in the Gospel of John suggest that ancient Jews did not connect the town's name to prophecy.[12]

Another theory holds that the Greek form Nazara, used in Matthew and Luke, may derive from an earlier Aramaic form of the name, or from another Semitic language form.[13] If there were a tsade (צ) in the original Semitic form, as in the later Hebrew forms, it would normally have been transcribed in Greek with a sigma instead of a zeta.[14] This has led some scholars to question whether "Nazareth" and its cognates in the New Testament actually refer to the settlement known traditionally as Nazareth in Lower Galilee.[15] Such linguistic discrepancies may be explained, however, by "a peculiarity of the 'Palestinian' Aramaic dialect wherein a sade (ṣ) between two voiced (sonant) consonants tended to be partially assimilated by taking on a zayin (z) sound."[14]

Arabic an-Nāṣira
The Arabic name for Nazareth is an-Nāṣira, and Jesus (Arabic: يَسُوع‎, Yasū`) is also called an-Nāṣirī, reflecting the Arab tradition of according people an attribution, a name denoting whence a person comes in either geographical or tribal terms. In the Qur'an, Christians are referred to as naṣārā, meaning "followers of an-Nāṣirī", or "those who follow Jesus of Nazareth".[16]
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: JAM2b
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,604
Hudson
✟283,912.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single

A little Bible study that I did on the name of our Lord Jesus. What are your opinions on it? I believe that salvation is in the name of Jesus or in any of the previous forms of the name. People claiming only salvation under one transliteration of the name are making confusion and divide the body of Christ.

God bless in Jesus name.

In the Bible, a person's name had much more to do with who they were and what their reputation was than a group of sounds that were used to refer to them. So someone who has a correct understanding of who the Messiah is and what he has done, but mispronounces his name nevertheless has a better understanding of his name than someone who correctly pronounces it, but doesn't understand who he is and what he has done. Messiah was called Yeshua by his mother, which was a popular name in the 1st century, but any other mother who called their baby that name would not be giving them the name that is above all names because the others are now who he was and have not done what he has done. There is no authority in the group of sounds, but only in the one that it refers to. Just as there is no need to quote what Messiah said in the original language, there is no need to refuse to transliterate his name. God answers the prayers of the people who pray to Jesus, just as he does the prayers of the people who pray in other languages.
 
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,604
Hudson
✟283,912.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
True and they are missing the gospel entirely. I ask them do you follow Jesus or Torah? Let's take passover for example. I have a friend that observes passover. I said, have you not read that Jesus during passover gave us communion? During that passover Jesus gave us communion and explained a NEW COVENANT. Jesus is the passover, the passover from death to life, the who passover feast was always pointing to the messiah, Jesus. We no longer celebrate the "passover" we celebrate Jesus by communion in remembrance, reflection, repentance, because now we have a savior and we follow the Spirit of the Law through the Holy Spirit, not the letter of the law through Moses.

To point out all who observed passover had to do so in Jerusalem. So unless you are flying to Jerusalem for passover you are already not observing it biblically. That is if you want to be technical.

Do you really believe that the way to follow Messiah is to break the Law that he followed? Does following his instructions to continue to keep Passover in remembrance of him really mean that we should stop keeping Passover? In 1 Corinthians 5:6-8, Paul encouraged us to keep Passover because he is our Passover Lamb, so he brings full meaning to the festival and makes it all the more important to continue to keep. Messiah taught obedience to the Torah both by word and by example, so there is no distinction between following Him and following the Torah. The Torah is the way (Deuteronomy 10:12-13, Jeremiah 6:16-19, Psalms 119:1), the truth (Psalms 119:142), and the life (Deuteronomy 30:15-20, Proverbs 3:18, Matthew 19:17), Messiah is the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6), the Torah is God's Word, and Messiah is God's Word made flesh, so there is no following one apart from following the other. There is certainly nothing that he said to indicate that he was in disagreement with the Father about what commands we should obey, but just the opposite, that if we love him, then we will obey his teachings, which were not his own, but that of the Father (John 14:23-24). As his disciples, our goal should be to learn how to think and act like him, and to become like him, which necessarily involves following the same Law he followed, and indeed we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and to walk in the same way that he walked (1 John 2:3-6). We are indeed under a New Covenant, but we are nevertheless still under the same God with the same ways, and therefore the same instructions for how to walk in His ways. In Romans 8:4-7, it is those who have a carnal mind who refuse to submit to God's Law in contrast with those who are walking in the Spirit, and indeed the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey God's Law (Ezekiel 36:26-27).
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: SAAN
Upvote 0

LivingRightInWrongWorld

Bible believer, follower of Jesus Christ
Sep 18, 2017
93
53
32
Europe
✟16,738.00
Country
Netherlands
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
In the Bible, a person's name had much more to do with who they were and what their reputation was than a group of sounds that were used to refer to them. So someone who has a correct understanding of who the Messiah is and what he has done, but mispronounces his name nevertheless has a better understanding of his name than someone who correctly pronounces it, but doesn't understand who he is and what he has done. Messiah was called Yeshua by his mother, which was a popular name in the 1st century, but any other mother who called their baby that name would not be giving them the name that is above all names because the others are now who he was and have not done what he has done. There is no authority in the group of sounds, but only in the one that it refers to. Just as there is no need to quote what Messiah said in the original language, there is no need to refuse to transliterate his name. God answers the prayers of the people who pray to Jesus, just as he does the prayers of the people who pray in other languages.
If you watch the video till the end, you see that is the point I am trying to make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soyeong
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,604
Hudson
✟283,912.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
I have never really noticed how many times the references to "Jesus of Nazarus" is mentioned.
Why did Nathanael say this about Nazareth?

Jhn 1:46
And Nathanael said to him, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” Philip said to him, “Come and see.”
It was a place known as ungodly at the time. (maybe most of the time also, anyway, before and after, btw; and apparently 'worse' at the time than other cities around it).
It was not a place anyone would expect the Savior of mankind , the Son of YHWH, to come from.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Cat Loaf You

Active Member
Dec 11, 2017
303
142
30
Warsaw
✟22,505.00
Country
Poland
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Only bastards don't know the name of thier father so in my opinion Christians should be able to know the name of YAHWEH (YHWH=LORD in KJV ) . You can call Jesus YAHWEH because they are connected anyways 3 in 1 .

Or you can call him :

Psalm 118:26

Blessed be he that cometh in the name of the LORD: we have blessed you out of the house of the LORD.

Matthew 23:39

For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

I wish Jews would say that so Christ can return ;C
 
Upvote 0

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
11,459
3,771
Eretz
✟317,562.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private

A little Bible study that I did on the name of our Lord Jesus. What are your opinions on it? I believe that salvation is in the name of Jesus or in any of the previous forms of the name. People claiming only salvation under one transliteration of the name are making confusion and divide the body of Christ.

God bless in Jesus name.

It is "Yeshua" from "Yehoshua"
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,821
9,817
✟312,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Why in the world would the Messiah Hebrew parents from the line of Judah give their son a Greek ... name?

The key thing here is that the New Testament transliterates some Aramaic names, like "Tabitha" and "Cephas." It does not transliterate the Aramaic name of Jesus. It's almost like God wanted us to use the Greek name...

As to the video (which I did not have the patience to watch entirely), it seems to me a little pointless. It concedes too much for some people and not enough for others, and doesn't address the underlying theological differences.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,427
26,867
Pacific Northwest
✟731,303.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
See, the point of the whole video is that in the end it is the same person, God manifest in flesh (1Tim.3:16), that we are talking about. That is why I made the video, if you watch it until the end than you see that. I believe the original name is Yahushua or you write it Yehoshua, however you write it it is still pronounced probably the way I pronounced it in the video. Not saying that it is 100% sure, because that certainty we cannot have in 2017. BUT, the point of the whole video is that in the end IT DOESN'T MATTER, the point of the video is to STOP the division in the church about the "real" name of Christ and to unite us all together under our Lord and Saviour.

I agree that pronunciation doesn't matter, because the Lord knows us, and as His people we are of every tribe, tongue, and nation.

I was merely being a stickler for accuracy. Sacred Namers often come up with their own idiosyncratic pronunciations of names, and these simply don't match with reality. The reason why I insist on Yehoshua is because that's very clearly the Hebrew pronunciation we have: written in Hebrew it is יְהוֹשֻׁעַ‎ , the niqqud (vowel-markers) are quite specific. The double vertical dots beneath the yod is known as a shva, which corresponds to the vowel(s) "e", "ĕ", "ə", "'"; and the dot over the vav is a cholam, making the vav a functional vowel with an "o" sound. As such the niqqud indicate it is pronounced "yeho-", not "yah(u)-".

Niqqud - Wikipedia
Shva - Wikipedia
Holam - Wikipedia

-CryptoLutehran
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
It is "Yeshua" from "Yehoshua"
It would appear so. Yah in the name "Yahowshuwa" also means God/Lord

Genesis 1:1 (YLT)
Strong's Number H3050 matches the Hebrew יָהּ (Yahh),
which occurs 49 times in 45 verses in the Hebrew concordance

I find this interesting concerning the similarity of Joshua the 7 Priests with 7 trumpets, and the city of Jericho in relation to Revelation 8 with the 7 Messengers and 7 trumpets against the City of Babylon.......

Joshua/Y@howshuwa` 6:
4 and seven Priests shall bear seven trumpets of the jubilees to faces of the ark and on 7th day, ye shall encompass the city seven times, and the Priests shall blow in trumpets,
16 and becoming in time the seventh, the Priests blew in trumpets, and Y@howshuwa` is saying to the people, "Shout ye!, that Yahweh gave to ye the City
; [Revelation 8]

Heb 11:30
By faith the walls of Jericho fell down after they were encircled for seven days.

Revelation 8:6
And the seven Messengers having the seven trumpets make ready themselves that they-should-be-trumpeting; [Joshua 6]
Reve 14:8
And another Messenger, second-one follows saying "She falls, She falls, Babylon the Great,............

Strong's Hebrew: 3050. יָהּ (Yah) -- the name of the God of Israel
Yah: the name of the God of Israel
Original Word: יָהּ
Part of Speech: Proper Name
Transliteration: Yah

Yahushua is the true name of the Messiah

"Jesus Christ--- ...Although Matthew (1:21) interprets the name originally Joshua, that is, 'Yahweh is Salvation,' and finds it specially appropriate for Jesus of Nazareth, it was a common one at that time." (Vol.16, p. 41)

Again, the context reveals that this scripture is referring to Joshua, the son of Nun and not the Messiah. All other translations put "Joshua" here. Why then is it translated 'Jesus'? The answer lies in the Greek/Latin corruption of the Messiah's original Hebrew name.
Originally, the name of the Messiah was
SonName.gif
, pronounced Yahushua. This is the Messiah's original name. When the Gentiles tried to transliterate His name into Greek, they came up with ihsoun or "Iesous".
But originally, this word was from #3091 in the Hebrew which is
SonName.gif
. When Iesous was transliterated into Latin, it became "Iesus", which was then carried over into English it became our modern day "Jesus" when the letter "J" developed.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Only bastards don't know the name of thier father so in my opinion Christians should be able to know the name of YAHWEH (YHWH=LORD in KJV ) . You can call Jesus YAHWEH because they are connected anyways 3 in 1 .

Or you can call him :

Psalm 118:26
Blessed be he that cometh in the name of the LORD: we have blessed you out of the house of the LORD.
Matthew 23:39
For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

I wish Jews would say that so Christ can return ;C
Interesting post....
It's Yah not Yeh because you say Hallelujah not Hallelujeh .
Somehow i don't like name Jehovah maybe because of Jehovah's witness knocking to my doors from time to time .
Never noticed that. Thanks.

It could be sing praise YAH such as is shown in the Song of Moses in Exodus 15. The words Yahweh, Yah, El and Elohiym are used in these verses:

Exodus 15:
1 Then sang Mosheh and the sons of Yisra'el this song unto YHWH, and they spake saying,--"I will sing to YHWH for He is exalted exalted,--The horse and his rider hath He cast into the Sea.
2 My might and melody is Yah, and He became mine salvation/y@shuw'ah.--This is my 'El and I will glorify Him, 'Elohiym of my father and I will set Him on high".
'[Revelation 15]

Revelation 15:3
and They are singing the Song of-Moses, the bond-servant of the God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, ,
`Great and marvelous the works of Thee, Lord!, the God, the Almighty, just and true the ways of Thee, the king of the [*Ages/Saints] Nations


Reve 19:1 And after these I hear as sound great of a throng, vast, in the heaven saying "halleluYah, the salvation............

Reve 19:3 And a second-time they have declared "halleluYah and the smoke of Her is ascending into the ages of the ages".

Reve 19:4 And fall the elders, the twenty four, and the four living-ones, and worship to the God, to the One sitting upon the throne saying: "amen halleluYah".

Reve 19:6 and I hear as sound of a throng, many, and as a sound of waters, many, and as sound of thunders, strong saying:"halleluYah, that reigns Lord the God *of-us, the Almighty.

Hallelujah - Wikipedia

In the Hebrew Bible hallelujah is actually a two-word phrase, not one word. The first part, hallelu, is the second-person imperative masculine plural form of the Hebrew verb hillel.[1] However, "hallelujah" means more than simply "praise Jah" or "praise Yah", as the word hallel in Hebrew means a joyous praise in song, to boast in God. Hallel could also refer to someone who acts madly or foolishly.[9][10]

The second part, Yah, is a shortened form of YHWH, the name for the Creator.[5] The name ceased to be pronounced in Second Temple Judaism, by the 3rd century BC due to religious beliefs.[11]
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

2Timothy2:15

Well-Known Member
Mar 28, 2016
2,226
1,227
CA
✟78,248.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you really believe that the way to follow Messiah is to break the Law that he followed? Does following his instructions to continue to keep Passover in remembrance of him really mean that we should stop keeping Passover? In 1 Corinthians 5:6-8, Paul encouraged us to keep Passover because he is our Passover Lamb, so he brings full meaning to the festival and makes it all the more important to continue to keep. Messiah taught obedience to the Torah both by word and by example, so there is no distinction between following Him and following the Torah. The Torah is the way (Deuteronomy 10:12-13, Jeremiah 6:16-19, Psalms 119:1), the truth (Psalms 119:142), and the life (Deuteronomy 30:15-20, Proverbs 3:18, Matthew 19:17), Messiah is the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6), the Torah is God's Word, and Messiah is God's Word made flesh, so there is no following one apart from following the other. There is certainly nothing that he said to indicate that he was in disagreement with the Father about what commands we should obey, but just the opposite, that if we love him, then we will obey his teachings, which were not his own, but that of the Father (John 14:23-24). As his disciples, our goal should be to learn how to think and act like him, and to become like him, which necessarily involves following the same Law he followed, and indeed we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and to walk in the same way that he walked (1 John 2:3-6). We are indeed under a New Covenant, but we are nevertheless still under the same God with the same ways, and therefore the same instructions for how to walk in His ways. In Romans 8:4-7, it is those who have a carnal mind who refuse to submit to God's Law in contrast with those who are walking in the Spirit, and indeed the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey God's Law (Ezekiel 36:26-27).


I assume by law you mean the Mosaic Law. No one can keep it, that was the point from the beginning. I am seriously baffled by those who follow the teaching that you have just described in all honesty.

The way you have tied scripture together is not correct exegesis.

1 Corinthians 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:

This is basically what I said and explained that Jesus is the passover. It is glaringly obvious.

So when you read this you get we should keep the passover feast?


1 Corinthians 5
6Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? 7Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: 8Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,604
Hudson
✟283,912.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
I assume by law you mean the Mosaic Law. No one can keep it, that was the point from the beginning. I am seriously baffled by those who follow the teaching that you have just described in all honesty.

Indeed, I am speaking about the Mosaic Law. I don't think you can quote where the Bible says that it is impossible to keep God's Law, but I can quote where it says the opposite. According to Deuteronomy 30:11-14, God said that what He commanded was not too difficult for us to obey and Romans 10:5-8 quotes that passage in regard to what our faith says, so to say that it is impossible to keep God's Law is to call God a liar and to deny what our faith says. God is not an unloving father who gave the Law to his children to put us in bondage and under a curse, but rather He is a loving Father who knows how to give good gifts to His children, who said that the Law was given for our own good, and who desires to teach us how to walk in His ways (Deuteronomy 10:12-13). David say many times throughout the Psalms that he delighted in obeying God Law, that he loved it, that it was perfect, that he meditated on it day and night, that those who obey it will be blessed, that he wanted God to be gracious to him by teaching him to obey it, that he walked about in liberty because of it, etc., and Paul also delighted in obeying it (Romans 7:22), so he and others Jews were on the same page as David. If you consider the Psalms to be Scripture and true, then you should likewise consider the view that David expressed of God's Law to be correct and should therefore share his view of it.

The way you have tied scripture together is not correct exegesis.

1 Corinthians 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:

This is basically what I said and explained that Jesus is the passover. It is glaringly obvious.

So when you read this you get we should keep the passover feast?

1 Corinthians 5
6Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? 7Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: 8Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

I think the bold makes it pretty explicit that we should therefore keep the feast and that he certainly was not acting like it was impossible to keep. The conclusion he drew from his point in verse 7 is that we should therefore keep it, not that we should no longer need to keep it.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Citizen of the Kingdom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2006
44,346
14,507
Vancouver
Visit site
✟311,347.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Exodus 12:17
And you shall keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread, for on this very day I have brought your armies out of the land of Egypt; therefore you shall keep this day throughout your generations as a perpetual statute.

We've been brought out further than the land of Egypt which represents the world. We have also been brought out of the wilderness into the good land. Not physically but now spiritually where representation is in kind.

Seven being completion relates to our whole Christian life perpetually kept, not with the old sin nature but in the new nature in sincerity and truth rather than in evil malice.
 
Upvote 0