I think its important to correctly parse "put away" and "divorce" as our modern Bible translations tend to get that incorrect. However, there are a few authors that go too far down this path for me. They note that Jesus always uses "put away" in Matthew, Mark and Luke, and conclude that adultery is only the result because the proper divorce papers have not be drawn up. While technically their word study is correct, I think that they miss the point:
1. The point of the Jesus words is unarguably that Jesus affirms Gods plan for lifelong marriage and sternly rebukes the practice of Hillite divorce. Parsing Jesus words as described makes it seem like His point was that the crowds needed to line up with the local scribes and get their divorce papers finalized. Had that been so, the disciples would not have found his teaching to be difficult.
2. A man who was initiating an improper divorce would already be guilty of putting away his wife in his heart. Filing the proper divorce paperwork does not take away that sin, or erase the "putting away". Even if it does take away the technical adultery under Jewish law, the entire point of Matthew 5 is that God looks at the heart, not technical obedience to the law.
Yes, that's true.
There are two principles illustrated here. One is the principle of increased performance from covenant to covenant. God makes a greater promise, and as well, an increased level of performance is expected of man.
Man had totally fallen from God's ideal of marriage as expressed by Adam and Eve. Moses required an increased permanence in that respect, but not perfectly "because of the hardness of their hearts."
Jesus, by the New Covenant requires an even higher level of performance. Thus, by the Mosaic Law, it was "thou shalt not commit adultery." By the New Covenant, the expected performance is "thou shalt not even consider adultery."
The second principle is the concept that God recognizes man is in a fallen world, and in consideration of that, God authorizes actions without declaring them righteous. Divorce is one of those. Capital punishment by the king is another. Even the fact that lions eat lambs is an example. None of things "were this way in the beginning" and do not represent God's dispositional will. God has authorized them in this fallen world, but they are not righteous.
Upvote
0