what is it that catholics do wrong?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wolf_Says

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2016
644
323
USA
✟30,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Most catholics around my area only talk about mary. They seem to worship her, pray to her...ect. And then there is confession. They are always doing it. But it never made sense to me since we have a direct connection to Jesus. We pray to Him, not through some priest.

We do indeed pray to Mary, and the saints. Your issue here is with your understanding of the word "pray". For you, pray=worship, for Catholics and Orthodox, pray=earnestly ask.

As stated in the Nicene creed, we all believe in the communion of saints. This communion doesn't stop after death, for we are assured in the Bible that those who died in Christ are alive in heaven. Only their body is dead. Thus, we pray to the saints and Mary and ask for them to pray for us. Seeing how we are all a part of the Church, it makes sense that they are willing to pray for us.

Catholics do not worship Mary, we honor her. She is the highest claim of our race. Worship belongs to God and God alone, and that is what the Catholic Church teaches.

Confession is literally right there in the Bible. Jesus gave his apostles the ability to forgive sins, or retain them. Not just "ask them to pray to me and I shall forgive them." But literally gave them the power to forgive sins, or keep those sins retained, and if they were forgiven by them then they are forgiven in Heaven, but if they are retained by them they are retained in Heaven. Honestly, I am constantly surprised that NOBODY seems to find that scary.

Of course we have a direct connection to Jesus, however that's not what Jesus commanded after his death. He commanded his apostles to hear sins of new disciples, and gave them the power (and choice) to forgive them or retain them. That is confession. Through the unbroken line of laying of hands from bishop to bishop, bishops (and priests who have had bishops lay their hands on them) maintain the same power; the ability to forgive sins or retain them, and those sins are then forgiven in Heaven or retained in Heaven.
 
Upvote 0

Wolf_Says

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2016
644
323
USA
✟30,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
wrong

1. Infant baptism

2. over emphasis of Mary

3. Purgatory

4. Baptism not by immersion

5. Seems to put church history over the bible

1) Where in the Bible is infant baptism said to be against God? Or whatever it is your issue with Infant Baptism actually is...I mean seriously what is it?

2) Sigh...here is an example to hopefully help explain why Catholics (and Orthodox) place so much honor into Mary. It is because she is literally the highest claim of our race, by our Creator.

Ever hear of the Mona Lisa? That famous painting by Leonardo da Vinci? People and critics place the Mona Lisa as possibly the best piece of artwork made by Leonardo da Vinci. That smile is known all over the world. Millions flock to go see that painting every year. Everybody knows that the painting is just a painting, and that da Vinci is the brilliant artist who made it. But, we still see it, talk about it, and marvel at its beauty. In a similar sense, Mary is the best piece of art made by our God. All worship goes to God, because we know that He is responsible, and that all things happen through Him, and we can still marvel and honor Mary as the best claim of our race, God's most beautiful and marvelous masterpiece of the Human Race (of course not including Jesus, who is both True God and True Man).

3) Although Purgatory is not explicitly stated by name in the Bible, it is heavily inferred in both the OT and NT. As the proof texts have been posted literally everywhere on these forums, I shall not repost them, but I will make this quick note. The parable of the man in prison and how he cannot leave until the last penny is paid. The word for prison used here, is the exact same word used for prison in Peter's letters when he discusses how after Jesus died, he descended into prison to save the souls there and bring them to heaven. According to Protestants, there is only Heaven or Hell. So what is this prison that Jesus descended into, seeing how the souls in Hell are eternally damned and shall never see salvation, that he saved the souls there?

4) Baptism is literally being born again by water and spirit, in the way that Jesus instructed us to be Born Again. Nowhere does Jesus say that it must be by full immersion, half immersion, sprinkle, or by firehouse. The exact nature of how much water does not matter. What matters if the person is baptized in "the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit."

5) Considering the Bible came out of that "church history"....I don't understand why it is a bad thing to have a firm understanding of church history and historical context.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vicomte13
Upvote 0

NothingIsImpossible

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
5,615
3,254
✟274,922.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
(1) Gehenna.

(2) The Bible doesn't say that many Christians will not enter heaven. It says they won't enter the Kingdom of Heaven, or (more exactly) the Reign (basileos) of Heaven.
I'm not even sure what those things are. Never heard of that, or whatever basileos is. Is that in the added books that catholics read?

We do indeed pray to Mary, and the saints. Your issue here is with your understanding of the word "pray". For you, pray=worship, for Catholics and Orthodox, pray=earnestly ask.
For us prayer is well prayer. Praying for people, asking God for help, asking for wisdom...etc. I'd so we tend to earnestly ask also. Worship is would be like praising God...etc.

As stated in the Nicene creed, we all believe in the communion of saints. This communion doesn't stop after death, for we are assured in the Bible that those who died in Christ are alive in heaven. Only their body is dead. Thus, we pray to the saints and Mary and ask for them to pray for us. Seeing how we are all a part of the Church, it makes sense that they are willing to pray for us.
I've heard of the creed through this forum but never heard of it before then. Not even in bible studies, granted I never did a ton of bible studies. I think also I just didn't care about what the creed was mainly because it has nothing to do with salvation. I did read it in the past though and don't fully agree with some words in it. Maybe its a catholic thing? Now I do know of the saints and such from having a catholic family. They have them on key chains, or on cards in their rooms...etc.

Catholics do not worship Mary, we honor her. She is the highest claim of our race. Worship belongs to God and God alone, and that is what the Catholic Church teaches.
Then are the people I know maybe just not understanding then what the catholic church teaches? I've only heard them mention God a few times in my life. Jesus maybe once. But Mary hundreds of times.

Confession is literally right there in the Bible. Jesus gave his apostles the ability to forgive sins, or retain them. Not just "ask them to pray to me and I shall forgive them." But literally gave them the power to forgive sins, or keep those sins retained, and if they were forgiven by them then they are forgiven in Heaven, but if they are retained by them they are retained in Heaven. Honestly, I am constantly surprised that NOBODY seems to find that scary.
I believe in confession of course. Like praying to Jesus/God for forgiveness and so on. But not that someone is required to confess to. But I guess I still don't see an answer to as why catholics confess to priests. The bible doesn't say only priests have the power to forgive. Or any power for that matter. They are simply leaders of a church. Actually I guess a better question is do catholics pray for forgivness to God/Jesus on their own? Or are they taught that is impossible?

Also if the apostles could forgive people, then wouldn't that mean none of us can be forgiven since the apostles are all dead?

Of course we have a direct connection to Jesus, however that's not what Jesus commanded after his death. He commanded his apostles to hear sins of new disciples, and gave them the power (and choice) to forgive them or retain them. That is confession. Through the unbroken line of laying of hands from bishop to bishop, bishops (and priests who have had bishops lay their hands on them) maintain the same power; the ability to forgive sins or retain them, and those sins are then forgiven in Heaven or retained in Heaven.
Ah, well sort of answers my above response then. So how is this power passed on from the apostles? Where does it teach in the bible of this? Lastly, and not meant as to sound sarcastic/mean, lets say somewhere back in history one of the popes (or whomever passes on the power) wasn't actualy a true catholic, does this mean all priests/bishops at this time have no power then and you can't be forgiven? Or what if the power faded?

Again I'm asking out of curiousty, not trying to make fun or anything. I'm curious.
 
Upvote 0

Wolf_Says

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2016
644
323
USA
✟30,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
You've piqued my curiosity, so I shall respond for now. I've honestly grown tired of debates that lead nowhere, but seeing how you are legitimately interested, I shall give you some answers. If I sound cold or...off, forgive me. I just have grown tired of fluff and tend to just cut straight to the point.

Now, onto your questions:

For us prayer is well prayer. Praying for people, asking God for help, asking for wisdom...etc. I'd so we tend to earnestly ask also. Worship is would be like praising God...etc.

I never said you didn't. I know for a fact that Protestants also earnestly ask in prayer. Like praying that somebody isn't too badly hurt when you witness a crash, or praying for the ability to help. Not really worship, but you are earnestly asking God. That is prayer.

The issue boils down to, many people hear that Catholics pray to Mary, or the Saints, and immediately assume that we worship them instead of God; thus making us idolators. I was just stopping that train before it really started. Catholics DO NOT worship Mary or the Saints. We worship God, and God alone.

I've heard of the creed through this forum but never heard of it before then. Not even in bible studies, granted I never did a ton of bible studies. I think also I just didn't care about what the creed was mainly because it has nothing to do with salvation. I did read it in the past though and don't fully agree with some words in it. Maybe its a catholic thing? Now I do know of the saints and such from having a catholic family. They have them on key chains, or on cards in their rooms...etc.

That's not really your fault. Many non-denominational or other protestant denominations don't routinely stated the Nicene Creed in their services. I dont know why. The Nicene Creed is the thing that binds all Christians together. It is our statement of faith.

Prior to the development of the Nicene Creed, there was no real statement of faith that united Christians. This became a large issue due to raising heretics and their beliefs. Because Christians had no unified statement of faith, anybody could pass their beliefs along as a Christian. That creed was made, at the first Ecumenical Council, to unite Christians across the world in their faith, and to separate true Christianity from heretical beliefs.

Though the wording changes slightly, the Nicene Creed is stated in Catholic mass, Eastern Orthodox mass, Oriental Orthodox mass, Assyrain Church of the East mass (the 4 ancient Churches), Anglican service, Episcopalian service, Lutheran service, and some others. Case is, it is not just a Catholic thing.

Then are the people I know maybe just not understanding then what the catholic church teaches? I've only heard them mention God a few times in my life. Jesus maybe once. But Mary hundreds of times.

Some Catholics place more emphasis on Mary than others. This comes down to the individual really, and not really the Catholic Church. The Church has been firm in her teachings about worship, that it is for God alone.

Just like any other religion or denomination, you will have those who study and love the faith, and those who only scratch the surface. My thing to you is, ask them, and in a questioning manner, not in an accusing manner, do you worship Mary. Their answer should be a resounding "NO". If it's anything else, they clearly don't have a firm grasp of their faith.

Ah, well sort of answers my above response then. So how is this power passed on from the apostles? Where does it teach in the bible of this? Lastly, and not meant as to sound sarcastic/mean, lets say somewhere back in history one of the popes (or whomever passes on the power) wasn't actualy a true catholic, does this mean all priests/bishops at this time have no power then and you can't be forgiven? Or what if the power faded?

Again I'm asking out of curiousty, not trying to make fun or anything. I'm curious.

No, I can tell your not trying to make fun, and these questions are fine.

If you go back and look in the OT, power of leadership and responsibility were passed on through a laying of hands as seen in Deuteronomy 34:9. Christianity is based in OT Judaism, and many of the same things carry over, such as this.

This is repeated in the NT, as seen in Acts 6:6, where by praying and laying off hands clearly shows a transfer of authority and the power of the Holy Spirit. This is the unbroken chain that I speak of, that allows the bishops and priests of today maintain the same authority as the apostles.

To answer your last question, there have been many bad bishops and popes in the Churches history. However, as it is promised to us by Jesus as shown in Scripture, the gates of Hell shall not triumph against His Church. To Catholics (and Orthodox), this means that, the same gifts and power given to the Church by Jesus shall always be there, through periods of good and periods of bad, and though she may be blemished and stained, Jesus shall never forsake her.

I hope this sufficiently answers your questions.
 
Upvote 0

Philip_B

Bread is Blessed & Broken Wine is Blessed & Poured
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2016
5,412
5,519
72
Swansea, NSW, Australia
Visit site
✟609,647.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Basileus (Greek: βασιλεύς) is a Greek term and title that has signified various types of monarchs in history. In the English-speaking world it is perhaps most widely understood to mean "king" or "emperor"​

Most specifically in the New Testament it refers to the Kingdom of God, and ipso facto the Kingship of God. Indeed this weekend the Western Church, in the main, celebrates the Feast of Christ the King, and I have no idea how you would feel about that, however it is his Kingdom and his Wedding Feast that we have been invited to participate in. I do hope you will be able to join us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gordonhooker
Upvote 0

Emmy

Senior Veteran
Feb 15, 2004
10,199
939
✟50,995.00
Faith
Salvation Army
Dear gustavchristianartist. What do Catholics wrong, and what do they right? I know one thing, and I say it with love. Jesus is our Way, and Jesus told us to Love God and love our neighbour. Who from us all is perfect? Nobody, dear Gustav. In Matthew 22: 35-40: Jesus told us: The first and great Commandment is: Love God with all thy hearts, with all thy souls, and with all thy minds. The second is like it: love thy neighbour as yourselves." We have to ask God for Love, then thank God and share all Love and Compassion with all our neighbours. all we know and all we meet. That is simple and straightforward. God is Love, and God wants loving sons and daughters. We must give up all selfish wishes and desires, we have to love and treat all around us, as we would love be loved and treated. That is what God wants from us. Love is VERY CATCHING, Gustav. Jesus is our Way, let us follow Jesus back to God, and be the men and women which God wants us to be. Is there anything greater, than to show our love and compassion and joy and peace? Let us all try it, and follow Jesus back to God, our Heavenly Father. I say this with love. Greetings from Emmy, your sister in Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟93,837.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm not even sure what those things are. Never heard of that, or whatever basileos is. Is that in the added books that catholics read?

No. That's the word in the actual Gospels, which are all written in Greek, not English. The English "Kingdom of God" that you read in your translation as "Kingdom of God" is, in the actual Scripture, the "basileos tou theou" - the [SOMETHING] of God. "Kingdom" is the word that was chosen by the late medieval Tyndale to translate "basileos", and because every English-speaking Christian on earth lived in a kingdom until 1776, the word was comfortable and familiar, and so has been used ever since.

But the translation choice is not exactly right. A "kingdom" is a piece of territory ruled by a king. It has subject people within it, towns and farms and roads. It's a PLACE. But "basileos" as the Greeks used (and use) it is not the same concept. The concept of basileos is that of the reach of fealty to a ruler - an emperor or a king. This is much better represented by the English word "reign" than the word "kingdom".

To use a modern example, England is a monarchy with a queen. When in the southern part of the UK, one is within the Kingdom of England. An English subject living there is living in the Kingdom of England under the reign of Queen Elizabeth. But when he takes his British passport and flies to New York, he is no longer within the Kingdom of England, or the territory of the United Kingdom. He is living now, at least temporarily, as an alien - a legal alien - an Englishman in New York. New York is in no sense the United Kingdom or the Kingdom of England. The Queen does not rule here.

However, the Englishman himself IS still a subject of the Queen, and he IS still subject to the Queen's laws, the laws of England, while he sojourns in this foreign land. The Queen and her agents do not assert the authority directly, because her agents operate within the Kingdom. But her influence, and his loyalty to her (or at any rate his duty to obey the laws of England) remains upon the Englishman in New York (just as they do on Americans traveling in, say Thailand. Some things are legal there that will get you 20 years of prison on your return to the US, because the US prohibits its citizens from doing that ANYWHERE).

The Englishman in New York is not in the Kingdom of England, but he is nevertheless still under the reign of Queen Elizabeth. She reigns over England, and she reigns over each of her subjects anywhere they be, whether England or New York or Chad. She RULES her Kingdom, but she does not rule New York. She REIGNS over her subjects in England, and in New York, and everywhere else.

The basileos tou theo is not the geographically-determined (and limited) "Kingdom of God", it is the broader reaching "Reign of God", with the "reign" inhering not in a land and the apparatus of a kingdom, but in the subjection of and loyalty to the king, however far away.

The Kingdom of God is not of this world. God does not rule the world directly. But God's willing subjects - men who follow him by following Jesus and listening to him - they are the breaking out of his reign into the world everywhere.

It's not a distinction without a real difference for the Englishman in New York, who is still under the Reign of Elizabeth even when outside of her Kingdom.

It's an easy switch to make, from "kingdom" to "reign", and to switch all of the concepts over to their correct sense. Providing the Greek word "basileos" roots the change in a linguistic fact, one that is completely true.

Why do I write it then? To allow people to demonstrate to themselves, in their own flesh and actions, the exact sort of mulish stubbornness regarding tradition and meaning that Catholics are accused of.

Will you, or other readers, make that adjustment to "Reign of God" from "Kingdom of God"?
Or will you fight, man the barricades, and resist a slight change to a traditional error of your religion, that arises from a slightly erroneous traditional translation of a word.

My money is on you digging in and fighting.

Why? Because five centuries of theology, all interlocked, are based on the use of certain words in certain ways, with other words in other sermons pendent on these first words. A whole stained glass window of theology, sermons, ways of seeing thing and deep comfort are built on the familiar. To pull the green glass out of a stained class window and replace it everywhere with yellow changes the look of the light through the window, and people who were used to the old window will not accept the change, even if it more realistically depicts the thing portrayed in the window.

"Basileos" was in my text to push you back on your own back foot of tradition. "What?" "I never heard that before. Doesn't sound right. Must be wrong."

Protestantism is thick with tradition, as is Catholicism and Eastern and Oriental Orthodoxy. That's fine, until the tradition begins to get the sense of things wrong and starts to depart from the important revealed themes. "The old wine is better."
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: ~Anastasia~
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,592
18,513
Orlando, Florida
✟1,258,288.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Politics
US-Democrat
Often people say catholics are so giving around the world. But that isn't true really. They are only this way because they are taught you earn your way into heaven through good works. So if they found out good works don't get you into heaven, I bet they would not be as helpful as they are.

This is a stereotype that shows little familiarity with the catholic tradition. It also ignores the spiritual narcissism present in many Protestant churches.

Many catholic saints were persecuted for following their conscience, and they faced doubt and struggle along the way. Many were and are genuinely self-giving people. It's wrong to tarnish them all as self-centered. Some of the most noteworthy examples of martyrdom in the 20th century have been from Catholics. Maximilian Kolbe and Oscar Romero come readily to mind.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FenderTL5
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟93,837.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I've heard of the creed through this forum but never heard of it before then.

Well, let me re-emphasize the Creed, because it is central to what Catholicism/Orthodoxy IS. It is repeated by the whole congregation at virtually every mass, and I can only assume that the Orthodox do something similar in their liturgy. This is the definitive statement of Catholic beliefs, and has been the unifying belief of the Church since 325 AD.

It's not a little thing - this creed - it's a big thing. In fact, it's THE faith statement of the Catholic Church, and the Orthodox Churches. One word's difference (in Latin) is the original (putative) reason that Eastern Orthodoxy and Catholicism split apart.

What do Catholics believe? What is stated in the Creed. What about...INSERT YOUR FAVORITE CATHOLIC THING NOT IN THE CREED...? Catholics might also believe that, but it is not central to the Catholic religion. Everything in the creed is.

As a Catholic, you can doubt the extent of the Pope's wisdom or the practical reach of his authority, and you can be as enthusiastic or unenthusiastic as you choose to be regarding things like devotions to saints and to Mary. But you must believe every single point in the Creed. If you don't, you're not a Catholic. You're something else.

It is worth reciting it - and because we say it just about every mass, many churchgoing Catholics can do just that. This is the CHECKLIST of what Catholics believe. If you asked me "What do Catholics believe?"
I would answer you truthfully:

I believe in one God: the Father, the Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible.

I believe in one Lord: Jesus Christ, the only begotten son of God, born of the Father before all ages. God from God, Light from Light, True God from True God, begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father, through him all things were made. For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven, and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary and became man. For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried, and rose again on the third day, in accordance with the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no end.

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who, with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, who has spoken through the prophets.

I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come.

THAT is what Catholics believe - every single word of it.
The Eastern Orthodox and the Catholics split apart in 1054 because the Catholics say "I believe in the Holy Spirit...who proceeds from the Father and the Son." The Eastern Orthodox say "I believe in the Holy Spirit...who proceeds from the Father." The Eastern Orthodox say, as a mandatory article of faith, that the Holy Spirit does NOT proceed from the Son. The Catholics say, as mandatory article of faith, that the Holy Spirit DOES proceed from the Son.

If you believe as the Catholics do, you cannot be Orthodox. Period.
If you believe as the Orthodox do, you cannot be Catholic. Period.
It is a fundamental difference in the belief about God himself.

Is the difference reconcilable? No. The leaders of the two Churches would like to believe it is, and work out scholarly constructions, but Catholics believe that the Holy Spirit proceeds from Jesus and will never say they don't. And the Orthodox do not believe it and will not accept the Catholics as their co-religionists as long as we believe it. Leaders have tried to reduce the matter to a simple linguistic difference and a misunderstanding, but Catholic and Orthodox people don't really think it is a misunderstanding: for all of the bonhomie and good feelings of different years, this is not a trivial difference, and neither side can ever back down without simply becoming what the other is.

And that will never happen. The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son - it's OBVIOUS - and Catholics are not going to stop telling the truth.

The Orthodox feel exactly the same way, and will never change their minds either.

And so the Churches will never reunite until Christ comes again. It's unfortunate, but they CANNOT reunite and it be honest, because they both honestly and deeply believe one different, fundamental thing about God.

I love the Orthodox. I don't think they're stubborn. I don't think Catholics are stubborn either. I think that we really believe two different things, and to state the opposite prospect would be, to a Catholic or to an Orthodox, to mangle the truth about God - essentially to lie about what we really believe in order to effect a political union. It will never happen.

That's all provided by way of example.

I've noticed over the years that Protestants want to talk about the Pope, about birth control, about child molestation by priests, about Saints and confession and sacraments and Mary.

To a Catholic like me, that's a bit like standing around a Mazerati and talking about the paint color, but not looking under the hood. What's under the hood is what makes a Mazerati a Mazerati.

The Creed is what makes a Catholic a Catholic. You don't ever have to pray the rosary, or pray to a saint, or pray to Mary as a Catholic. If you use birth control, you're a sinner and you're supposed to confess it, and if you don't, you're a sinner again. We're all sinners, and we all handle walking around without our burden of sin pretty well.

But you have to believe every clause in the Creed, or you're not a Catholic. That is the part that's not optional. So if you really want to talk about Catholicism, you should focus on THAT.

You say that you have a real problem with some of the things in the creed. THAT is where your differences lie with Catholics. THAT is the marrow of the differences. This business about praying to Mary? That's a bell, a whistle. Hundreds of millions of Catholics never pray to Mary. Most pray to Jesus. All pray to the Father (the "Our Father" is part of the Mass).

Focus on the Creed, because that IS Catholicism. THAT'S the mandatory part. Wherever you disagree with the Creed, THAT is where you and the Catholics part ways. Pope and Mary and saints - way down the line in matters of importance. The contents of the Creed are what every Catholic actually believes about God. Because if a Catholic doesn't believe a part of the Creed, he isn't a Catholic at all.
 
Upvote 0

JESUS=G.O.A.T

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2016
2,681
659
27
Houston
✟68,441.00
Country
United States
Faith
Apostolic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
1) Where in the Bible is infant baptism said to be against God? Or whatever it is your issue with Infant Baptism actually is...I mean seriously what is it?

2) Sigh...here is an example to hopefully help explain why Catholics (and Orthodox) place so much honor into Mary. It is because she is literally the highest claim of our race, by our Creator.

Ever hear of the Mona Lisa? That famous painting by Leonardo da Vinci? People and critics place the Mona Lisa as possibly the best piece of artwork made by Leonardo da Vinci. That smile is known all over the world. Millions flock to go see that painting every year. Everybody knows that the painting is just a painting, and that da Vinci is the brilliant artist who made it. But, we still see it, talk about it, and marvel at its beauty. In a similar sense, Mary is the best piece of art made by our God. All worship goes to God, because we know that He is responsible, and that all things happen through Him, and we can still marvel and honor Mary as the best claim of our race, God's most beautiful and marvelous masterpiece of the Human Race (of course not including Jesus, who is both True God and True Man).

3) Although Purgatory is not explicitly stated by name in the Bible, it is heavily inferred in both the OT and NT. As the proof texts have been posted literally everywhere on these forums, I shall not repost them, but I will make this quick note. The parable of the man in prison and how he cannot leave until the last penny is paid. The word for prison used here, is the exact same word used for prison in Peter's letters when he discusses how after Jesus died, he descended into prison to save the souls there and bring them to heaven. According to Protestants, there is only Heaven or Hell. So what is this prison that Jesus descended into, seeing how the souls in Hell are eternally damned and shall never see salvation, that he saved the souls there?

4) Baptism is literally being born again by water and spirit, in the way that Jesus instructed us to be Born Again. Nowhere does Jesus say that it must be by full immersion, half immersion, sprinkle, or by firehouse. The exact nature of how much water does not matter. What matters if the person is baptized in "the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit."

5) Considering the Bible came out of that "church history"....I don't understand why it is a bad thing to have a firm understanding of church history and historical context.


1. When baptism is done it is always done by someone who has heard and understands the message of Christ. Not once is baptism forced on an individual who doesn't make the decision to believe in JESUS as their savior.


2. I don't read anywhere where she's "the highest claim to our race" or placed on a high platform. I read that she was a ordinary woman in an ordinary location selected to take part in an extraordinary purpose. You're analogy is faulty also. You suggest that Mary is a masterpiece because she was created by an amazing artist. But we all were made by "Leonardo" or God the supreme artist so using that logic all of us would have to be considered the greatest piece of art made by God would we not? Also I read in scripture where John is declared as being the best man to ever live by JESUS..and Job called perfect but I don't read anywhere where Mary gets an emphasis. I want scripture not some faulty analogy.

3. I Will address the scripture you mentioned from 1 peter 3 but first I would like you to post scriptures for the claims you made... the other support you supposedly have for purgatory so I can just address it as a collective.



4. baptism


A. Baptism in scripture is compared to being buried as christ was buried which is why immersion and not sprinkling is essential. It's also a clear indicator that they were baptized by immersion. Romans 6:3-4, Colossians 2:11-12

But Additionally...it's historically reported that baptism has been done by immersion. I believe I have other examples in my notes but this one shall suffice for now.

"I have heard sir," said I, 'from some teacher, that there is no other repentance except that which took place when we went down into the water and obtained the remission of our former sins.' He said to me, 'You have heard rightly, for so it is'" (The Shepherd 4:3:1 to 2 [A.D.80])



B. Baptism was never ever done in the father, son, and holy spirit It was always done in JESUS name.

Acts 2:38, acts 10:43,48, acts 19:1-6 etc.

C. Baptism is only being born of water not Spirit they aren't one in the same

Acts 19:1-6King James Version (KJV)
19 And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,

2 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

3 And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.

4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.

6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.


Comment The HOly Ghost didn't come on them when they were baptized...but after baptism and when Peter layed hands on them...then they were born again of Spirit.

Here's an even better example..

Acts 8:12-17King James Version (KJV)
12 But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.

13 Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done.

14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:

15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:

16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)

17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost.

5. The books of the were not manifested by the church...the bible according to iroincally the bible itself was written by men by the inspiration of the holy Ghost. We even have evidence about who wrote each book and why...for example the book of Jonah was written months to years after the event by a scribe who Jonah told the story too. The Torah Genesis was written by Moses who received revelation from God. And the epistles were written by Paul...letters to the churches...the gospels certian followers of Christ etc.


All the "church" did was put it together.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Phil 1:21
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟93,837.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I don't read anywhere where Mary gets an emphasis. I want scripture not some faulty analogy.

You cannot have what you want. The most important revelations regarding Mary have come from Mary herself, when she was sent as an emissary by God to different people, long after the Bible was written.

So, the importance of Mary, like Transubstantiation, is only hinted at in the Biblical text (specifically, by the greeting that Gabriel gave to her, and the fact that God chose her among all of the women on the earth to be the mother of God).

Her importance has been revealed by God later, like transubstantiation, through miraculous events duly observed and reported.
 
Upvote 0

Oldmantook

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2017
3,633
1,526
64
USA
✟99,173.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You cannot have what you want. The most important revelations regarding Mary have come from Mary herself, when she was sent as an emissary by God to different people, long after the Bible was written.

So, the importance of Mary, like Transubstantiation, is only hinted at in the Biblical text (specifically, by the greeting that Gabriel gave to her, and the fact that God chose her among all of the women on the earth to be the mother of God).

Her importance has been revealed by God later, like transubstantiation, through miraculous events duly observed and reported.
These miraculous appearances of Mary are acts of deception by the father of lies who disguises himself as an angel of light; in this case Mary.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JESUS=G.O.A.T
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟93,837.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
RCC DOES much good. BUT many Of their doctrines and dogma are in error

due to their ignoring the supremacy of scripture

Supremacy of Scripture is a man-made doctrine dating from the 1500s. Catholics don't ignore the doctrine - we understand that Protestants have it - we reject the doctrine as false and heretical.
 
Upvote 0

~Anastasia~

† Handmaid of God †
Dec 1, 2013
31,133
17,455
Florida panhandle, USA
✟922,775.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Regarding baptism in a Trinitarian formula, it was actually always done that way. Many people today who rightly hold the Scriptures in high esteem and as the authority it is, forget the fact (or we're never taught) that the Church operated for decades before it was written.

How things were done, and what we believed, came from the mouth of the Apostles. This is actually made clear in Scripture, where we are told to hold fast to traditions received both by word and by epistle, and that the Church is the pillar and ground of the truth.

The Bible is not a full how-to manual. At best it is corrective to the problems in particular congregations. Though it is quite informative, true, and contains more than enough to give the basis for salvation.

Other documents, such as the Didache (Teaching of the Apostles), are somewhat of a how-to for certain things and provide more detail. It was close to being included in Scripture, but no particular authorship is attached to it (which it was simply what all 12 Apostles taught all in agreement) and writings without authorship could not be canonized.

But denominations come along many centuries later, pick up a book, not meant to include every instruction, and assume no one knew anything not in it. That is not the case. And indeed, as I mention above, the Book itself says so.

I don't fault folks for wanting to be careful. I think their hearts are generally in the right place. I would have made the same arguments at one time. But research into how the Scriptures came to be and how the Church operated, is very instructive.

To refuse to listen to the teaching of the first century Christians because your denomination teaches you otherwise is to listen to "a" tradition, but not the one Christ immediately left to us.

That being said, I am speaking only on baptismal formula, though there is more about what we know about the Virgin Mary as well. She wasn't just randomly selected and immediately received the Annunciation, as if God would simply go to His second, third, or even twentieth choice if she and others in line refused.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟93,837.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
These miraculous appearances of Mary are acts of deception by the father of lies who disguises himself as an angel of light; in this case Mary.

Can Satan heal the paralytic? Can Satan give sight to the blind? God has, many times at Lourdes, where Mary appeared.

"Can Satan cast out Satan?" Jesus asked, when Pharisees accused him of healing with the power of the Devil. Jesus went on to warn the Pharisees not to blaspheme the Holy Spirit by ascribing to Satan that which was of God.

Can the Devil perform major miracles of healing like Jesus did? No.

God performs the healings, at Lourdes - at the place where a shrine was built because God sent Mary there in the mid-1800s.

God is vouching for the reality of the apparation by the fact of performing a superabundance of astonishing miracles there.

If you ascribe God's healings to Satan, you are blaspheming the Holy Spirit just as the Pharisees did to Jesus.

So yes, the Marian apparition at Lourdes, and the fountain of healings that continues unabated, are truly of God, or of Satan.

Can Satan perform such healings? Can Satan cast out Satan? No.

So it's God, and your attribution of God's work, and the embassy of God's mother, to Satan, is blasphemous.

This is another reason why Catholics and Protestants cannot get along. We have to put up with your blaspheming God and insulting his mother every time you attack Mary and ascribe the miracles done at her shrines to Satan. You're not the first to do it.

But yes, this is the most explicitly stark point of confrontation between Catholicism and Protestantism: God performs miracles, and you ascribe those miracles to Satan, because they're not in your book, because they happened 1800 years after the book was written.

Obviously we cannot walk together - you blaspheme God and his mother, and call her Satan. Because your tradition worships a book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philip_B
Upvote 0

JESUS=G.O.A.T

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2016
2,681
659
27
Houston
✟68,441.00
Country
United States
Faith
Apostolic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Regarding baptism in a Trinitarian formula, it was actually always done that way. Many people today who rightly hold the Scriptures in high esteem and as the authority it is, forget the fact (or we're never taught) that the Church operated for decades before it was written.

How things were done, and what we believed, came from the mouth of the Apostles. This is actually made clear in Scripture, where we are told to hold fast to traditions received both by word and by epistle, and that the Church is the pillar and ground of the truth.

The Bible is not a full how-to manual. At best it is corrective to the problems in particular congregations. Though it is quite informative, true, and contains more than enough to give the basis for salvation.

Other documents, such as the Didache (Teaching of the Apostles), are somewhat of a how-to for certain things and provide more detail. It was close to being included in Scripture, but no particular authorship is attached to it (which it was simply what all 12 Apostles taught all in agreement) and writings without authorship could not be canonized.

But denominations come along many centuries later, pick up a book, not meant to include every instruction, and assume no one knew anything not in it. That is not the case. And indeed, as I mention above, the Book itself says so.

I don't fault folks for wanting to be careful. I think their hearts are generally in the right place. I would have made the same arguments at one time. But research into how the Scriptures came to be and how the Church operated, is very instructive.

To refuse to listen to the teaching of the first century Christians because your denomination teaches you otherwise is to listen to "a" tradition, but not the one Christ immediately left to us.

That being said, I am speaking only on baptismal formula, though there is more about what we know about the Virgin Mary as well. She wasn't just randomly selected and immediately received the Annunciation, as if God would simply go to His second, third, or even twentieth choice if she and others in line refused.
We are just going to have to disagree on the baptism formula tbh
 
Upvote 0

~Anastasia~

† Handmaid of God †
Dec 1, 2013
31,133
17,455
Florida panhandle, USA
✟922,775.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
We are just going to have to disagree on the baptism formula tbh

That's fine. :)

I'm only sharing info. I'm perfectly ok with people choosing to disagree with it. That's really not my place to judge or worry about.

Have you read the Didache?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JESUS=G.O.A.T
Upvote 0

Phil 1:21

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2017
5,869
4,399
United States
✟144,842.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We have to put up with your blaspheming God and insulting his mother every time you attack Mary and ascribe the miracles done at her shrines to Satan.
The very concept of shrines to Mary should give any Christian pause. Nothing good in scripture ever came from erecting high places to anyone but God alone.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JESUS=G.O.A.T

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2016
2,681
659
27
Houston
✟68,441.00
Country
United States
Faith
Apostolic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
You cannot have what you want. The most important revelations regarding Mary have come from Mary herself, when she was sent as an emissary by God to different people, long after the Bible was written.

So, the importance of Mary, like Transubstantiation, is only hinted at in the Biblical text (specifically, by the greeting that Gabriel gave to her, and the fact that God chose her among all of the women on the earth to be the mother of God).

Her importance has been revealed by God later, like transubstantiation, through miraculous events duly observed and reported.
Oh I see so there’s anecdotal evidence just not biblical
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.