And that from a Catholic too!"Or worse, the Catholics?" Sheesh.
Your post confuses me. I have no idea what you intended to say.I think part of protesting against a roman religious sect is ignoring thier opinions about them. if the protestants are universal Catholics and a roman religious sect steps in and change things, then Christians are told by God to fight for the church by continuing to be faithful and allow God to deal with those sects with punishments
It's all God's. What I earn, what I do, how I do it. But unless we respond (which is earning our place in heaven) to God's grace, we get nowhere.Absolutely, we live for Christ after we are saved and we obey Him as His disciples, not to be saved, but because we are saved.
As for going about our "sinful ways", are you saying that if we sin after salvation we won't get to heaven/have eternal life?
As for doing something with the "grace" we have been given by God in His Son, yes, such is our "reasonable service", but we do not, and indeed cannot add even one small work of "righteousness" to Christ's finished and all sufficient sacrifice to be saved. Otherwise "grace is no more grace."
If our salvation has anything at all to do with us and our obedience, then we have reason to boast. Scripture is clear, we have none. This is why the cross is an "offense", because what seems right to man is that we do good and as a result we will earn salvation. (And indeed, this is the way pretty much all religions teach that one will receive eternal life/enter paradise.) But this is not what Scripture teaches. We know from Scripture that our "righteous deeds are as filthy rags" and that we cannot do enough good or stop doing enough evil to be saved. This is why only Christ can save us.
To add even one work to His finished sacrifice for salvation is to say that what He did for us was not enough.
I don't think I said any such thing.Working with grace is the same as earning a wage? Paul didn't think that people earned their way to heaven but he did think that people had to work out their own salvation. It's a little confusing. First he writes
Rom 4:1-12 What then shall we say was gained by Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh? [2] For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. [3] For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” [4] Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. [5] And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, [6] just as David also speaks of the blessing of the one to whom God counts righteousness apart from works: [7] “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven, and whose sins are covered; [8] blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not count his sin.” [9] Is this blessing then only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? For we say that faith was counted to Abraham as righteousness. [10] How then was it counted to him? Was it before or after he had been circumcised? It was not after, but before he was circumcised. [11] He received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. The purpose was to make him the father of all who believe without being circumcised, so that righteousness would be counted to them as well, [12] and to make him the father of the circumcised who are not merely circumcised but who also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Abraham had before he was circumcised.then he writes
Php 2:12-18 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, [13] for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure. [14] Do all things without grumbling or disputing, [15] that you may be blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and twisted generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world, [16] holding fast to the word of life, so that in the day of Christ I may be proud that I did not run in vain or labor in vain. [17] Even if I am to be poured out as a drink offering upon the sacrificial offering of your faith, I am glad and rejoice with you all. [18] Likewise you also should be glad and rejoice with me.
What did you say then? I admit to not knowing what you mean by "earn" in your earlier post. So tell me what it means.I don't think I said any such thing.
Again, it's a metaphor. We can't earn anything. It's sort of like letting your child help you with the dishes, even though you know she would just get in the way.What did you say then? I admit to not knowing what you mean by "earn" in your earlier post. So tell me what it means.
That's better. But by using the word "earned" your post plays into the hands of people who say that Catholics teach works-salvation. The idea of earning salvation is abhorrent to evangelicals.Again, it's a metaphor. We can't earn anything. It's sort of like letting your child help you with the dishes, even though you know she would just get in the way.
It's all God's. What I earn, what I do, how I do it. But unless we respond (which is earning our place in heaven) to God's grace, we get nowhere.
I believe the overarching truth is: what we do is a reflection of what we truly believe.It's all God's. What I earn, what I do, how I do it. But unless we respond (which is earning our place in heaven) to God's grace, we get nowhere.
Yes even Evangelicals like the apostles.The idea of earning salvation is abhorrent to evangelicals.
Do you know what you meant by "turn to Christ" when you wrote it in your sentence below?I'm not sure what you mean by "turn to Christ". It's not about self-effort or work, or simply repeating a prayer.
I will address that last question, however. First of all, I do believe we have free will and so we can choose to reject God or, of course, to turn to Christ for Salvation.
Well let's just hope that a year from now folks are not talking about you as one of those folks who "were never really saved in the first place."I'm in the beloved Apostle's camp. I think that much should be clear. It's a "catholic" epistle you should join the camp too.
1 Peter 1:3-5
My trust is in Christ to fulfill His promises. Everyone the Father gives Him, He will lose none (John 6:39).
Well the above is a bit over the top. I trust God to keep His promises. Romans 8:38-39
Let's see what Scripture has to say about that:Yes, this is the part that often get's overlooked. Works are a byproduct of salvation, not a road map to it.
I will consider your hypothetical approach to discussions.Well let's just hope that a year from now folks are not talking about you as one of those folks who "were never really saved in the first place."
Indeed. Have you exegeted recently?Have you not read the Bible lately?
Last time you brought up James 2 as an argument, I searched for the better part of two hours to find an ECF who opined on those verses. None exist. I wonder now why? If you can find an early church father who opined on works justify using James 2 please post here.Only when I agree with you. When I disagree with you, it is eisegesis.