Why I dislike Calvinism

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
“But you must continue to believe this truth and stand firmly in it. Don’t drift away from the assurance you received when you heard the Good News.

There is a condition. You must continue to believe and stand firmly in your faith.
This command is NOT a condition to stay saved.

John 10:28 also has a condition when you look at verse 27.

“My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish. No one can snatch them away from me,”
‭‭John‬ ‭10:27-28‬ ‭NLT

His sheep who listen to His voice and follow Him will never parish.
No again. v.27 is NOT a condition for receiving eternal life. One must reject the clear teaching of John 3:15, 16, 5:24, 6:47 regarding who receives eternal life to believe what you are claiming.

Jesus taught that those who BELIEVE have eternal life.

If "following Him" is a condition, when is that condition met? Only at the end of one's life. Which directly contradicts what Jesus taught.

He taught that those who believe HAVE eternal life. Period.

What does Jesus mean by they follow me?
He's describing what believers do. Again, v.27 isn't a condition for never perishing. If it were, then what Jesus taught earlier in John cannot be true.

He means they follow His teaching and obey.
Yes, of course all believers must do this. But not to maintain salvation.

Colossians 1:22-23 affirms this by saying we MUST continue to believe and stand firmly in our faith.
Just think about this for a sec. Where in the verse is there a clear condition that maintains salvation?

If there were no conditions then why did Paul say this? Paul is not contradicting Jesus he is reaffirming what Jesus said in John 10:28.
Jesus said nothing about conditions in John 10:28.

What He said was very clear. Recipients of eternal life shall never perish. He couldn't have taught eternal security any more clearly than that.

The ONLY condition for never perishing is receiving the gift of eternal life. That's exactly what Jesus said in John 10:28.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmldn2
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,576
60
Wyoming
✟83,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If you trust Jesus for your salvation He will give you eternal life.
This life He gave us believers is eternal, not temporary. This eternal life is a gift.
If I have eternal life, and then later on I don't, did I ever have eternal life?
The gifts and calling of God are without repentance. Meaning He will not take them back. Rom 11:29
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmldn2
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
If you trust Jesus for your salvation He will give you eternal life.
This life He gave us believers is eternal, not temporary. This eternal life is a gift.
If I have eternal life, and then later on I don't, did I ever have eternal life?
The gifts and calling of God are without repentance. Meaning He will not take them back. Rom 11:29
Bingo!
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Hey FreeGrace2, I'm in a Facebook group dedicated to discussing free grace issues. Are you on facebook? I could send you the link. Sounds like something you'd be interested in.
Please send the link. I'll check it out. Thanks.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,790
✟322,365.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I feel foolish, I'm trying to figure out how to send a private message but I can't figure it out. Is there a next level membership that you need to send a private message of something?
It should be next to the persons post, on top and to the right. Its now called a “Conversation”
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I don't deny Scripture saying unbelievers are totally depraved. But, there conclusion is wrong.
If an unbeliever sees the road they are on is taking them to hell and they do not want to spend eternity their they can make a selfish choice and choose God so they don't go their.
Or, if an unbeliever sees that only God can fill that eternal hole that God placed inside him and he makes a decision for God to fill that aching.
Romans 10:17 Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God.
Titus 2:11 The Grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to ALL men.
2 Peter 3:9 God is not willing that ANY should perish, but that ALL should come to repentance.

But don't this take the work of the Holy Spirit out of the equation?

A man simply cannot stop what he is doing then decide on his own to go another direction. (When speaking of sin that is)

God Bless

TIll all are one.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Step 1 God predestines us through His foreknowledge of knowing who will receive Him of there free will.

SO, from what you have written here, God chose us because in His infinite wisdom and infinite foresight, He saw who would or would not accept the Gospel message and "predestinated" them based on that foreknowledge?

Have you ever actually looked at what Christians are "predestinated" to?

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Ask and you shall receive, knock and the door shall be opened, seek and you will find. Yes no one comes to Jesus unless The Father has sent them but God doesn’t send them until they seek or ask. I used to believe in OSAS until someone pointed out Hebrews 6

“For it is impossible to bring back to repentance those who were once enlightened—those who have experienced the good things of heaven and shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the power of the age to come— and who then turn away from God. It is impossible to bring such people back to repentance; by rejecting the Son of God, they themselves are nailing him to the cross once again and holding him up to public shame.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭6:4-6‬ ‭NLT‬‬

This is a pretty clear contradiction of OSAS.

I love it when people use these verses to try to put to an end once and for all "OSAS".

Arthur W. Pink has an excellent commentary on the Book of Hebrews.

Three this people seem to forget when reading the book of Hebrews:
  1. To whom this Book was written to.
  2. What this book actually addresses.
  3. When it was written.
1) The first chapter tells us to whom this book was written to:

"God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,"

Here I quote A.W. Pink:

"Nevertheless, its first sentence enables us to identify at once those to whom the Epistle was originally sent: see Hebrews 1:1, 2. They to whom God spake through the prophets were the children of Israel, and it was also unto them He had spoken through His Son."

Source

Now ask yourself, to whom did the Prophets speak to?

To whom did Jesus come to?

That right there should answer your question.

2) What does this book address?

Here I quote A.W. Pink again:

"This, in a word, was to instruct Jewish believers that Judaism had been superceded by Christianity. It must be borne in mind that a very considerable proportion of the earliest converts to Christ were Jews by natural birth, who continued to labor under Jewish prejudices."

Ibid

3) When was this book written?

This book was written not very long before the Temple was destroyed. Here, I quote Pink again:

"Fifth, His superiority over Aaron in Hebrews 5:14 to 7:18. Sixth, His superiority over the whole ritual of Judaism, which is developed by showing the surpassing excellency of the new covenant over the old, in Hebrews 7:19 to Hebrews 10:39."

Ibid

But here, is where the rubber hits the road:

""For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened" etc. (verse 4). Here the apostle continues the digression which he began at Hebrews 5:11. The parenthesis has two divisions: the first, Hebrews 5:11-14 is reprehensible; the second, Hebrews 6:1-20 is hortatory. In chapter 6 he exhorts the Hebrews unto two duties: to progress in the Christian course (verses 1-11); to persevere therein (verses 12-20). The first exhortation is proposed in verses 1,2 and qualified in verse 3. The motive to obedience is drawn from the danger of apostasy (verses 4-6). The opening "For" of verse 4 intimates the close connection of our present passage with that which immediately precedes. It draws a conclusion from what the apostle had been saying in Hebrews 5:11-14.

The Greek word for "enlightened" here signifies "to give light or knowledge by teaching". It is so rendered by the Septuagint in Judges 13:8, 2 Kings 12:2, 17:27. The apostle Paul uses it for "to make manifest", or "bring to light" in 1 Corinthians 4:5, 2 Timothy 1:10. Satan blinds the minds of those who believe not, lest "the light of the gospel should shine unto them" (2 Cor. 4:4), that is, give the knowledge of it. Thus, "enlightened" here means to be instructed in the doctrine of the gospel, so as to have a clear apprehension of it. In the parallel passage in Hebrews 10:26 the same people are said to have "received the knowledge of the truth", cf. also 2 Peter 2:20, 21. It is, however, only a natural knowledge of spiritual things, such as is acquired by outward hearing or reading; just as one may be enlightened by taking up the special study of one of the sciences. It falls far short of that spiritual enlightenment which transforms (2 Cor. 3:18). An illustration of a unregenerate person being "enlightened", as here, is found in the case of Balaam; Numbers 24:4.

"If they shall fall away". The Greek word here is very strong and emphatic, even stronger than the one used in Matthew 7:27, where it is said of the house built on the sand, "and great was the fall thereof". It is a complete falling away, a total abandonment of Christianity which is here in view. It is a wilful turning of the back on God’s revealed truth, an utter repudiation of the Gospel. It is making "shipwreck of the faith" (1 Tim. 1:19). This terrible sin is not committed by a mere nominal professor, for he has nothing really to fall away from, save an empty name. The class here described are such as had had their minds enlightened, their consciences stirred, their affections moved to a considerable degree, and yet who were never brought from death unto life. Nor is it backsliding Christians who are in view. It is not simply "fall into sin", this or that sin. The greatest "sin" which a regenerated man can possibly commit is the personal denial of Christ: Peter was guilty of this, yet was he "renewed again unto repentance". It is the total renunciation of all the distinguishing truths and principles of Christianity, and this not secretly, but openly, which constitutes apostasy.

"If they shall fall away". "This is scarcely a fair translation. It has been said that the apostle did not here assert that such persons did or do ‘fall away’; but that if they did—a supposition which, however, could never be realized—then the consequence would be they could not be ‘renewed again unto repentance’. The words literally rendered are, ‘And have fallen away’, or, ‘yet have fallen’. The apostle obviously intimates that such persons might, and that such persons did, ‘fall away’. By ‘falling away’, we are plainly to understand what is commonly called apostasy. This does not consist in an occasional falling into actual sin, however gross and aggravated; nor in the renunciation of some of the principles of Christianity, even though those should be of considerable importance; but in an open, total, determined renunciation of all the constituent principles of Christianity, and a return to a false religion, such as that of unbelieving Jews or heathens, or to open infidelity and open godlessness" (Dr. J. Brown).

"It is impossible . . . if they fall away, to renew them again unto repentance". Four questions here call for answer. What is meant by "renewed unto repentance"? What is signified by "renewed again unto repentance"? Why is such an experience "impossible"? To whom is this "impossible"? Repentance signifies a change of mind: Matthew 21:29, Romans 11:29 establish this. It is more than a mental act, the conscience also being active, leading to contrition and self-condemnation (Job 42:6). In the unregenerate, it is simply the workings of nature; in the children of God it is wrought by the Holy Spirit. The latter is evangelical, being one of the things which "accompany salvation". The former is not so, being the "sorrow of the world", which "worketh death" (2 Cor. 7:10). This kind of "repentance" or remorse receives most solemn exemplification in the case of Judas: Matthew 27:3, 5. Such was the repentance of these apostates. The Greek verb for "renew" here occurs nowhere else in the New Testament. Probably "restore" had been better, for the same word is used in the Sept., for a Hebrews verb meaning to renew in the sense of restore: Psalm 103:5; 104:30; Lamentations 5:21. Josephus applies it to the renovation of the Temple!

But what is meant by "renewing unto repentance"? "To be ‘renewed’ is a figurative expression for denoting a change, a great change, and a change for the better. To be ‘renewed’ so as to change a person’s mind is expressive of an important and advantageous alteration of opinion, and character and service. And such an alteration the persons referred to had undergone at a former period. They were once in a state of ignorance respecting the doctrines and evidences of Christianity, and they had been ‘enlightened’. They had once known not of the excellency and beauty of Christian truth, and they had been made to ‘taste of the heavenly gift’. They once misunderstood the prophecies respecting the Messiah, and were unaware of their fulfillment, and, of course, were strangers to that energetic influence which the New Testament revelation puts forth; and they had been made to see that that ‘good word’ was fulfilled, and had been made partakers of the external privileges and been subjected to the peculiar energies of the new order of things. Their view, and feelings, and circumstances, were materially changed. How great the difference between an ignorant, bigoted Jew, and the person described in the preceding passage! He had become as it were a different man. He had not, indeed, become, in the sense of the apostle, a ‘new creature’, His mind had not been so changed as unfeignedly to believe ‘the truth as it is in Jesus’; but still, a great and so far as it went, a thorough change had taken place" (Dr. J. Brown).

Now it is impossible to "renew again unto repentance" those who have totally abandoned the Christian revelation. Some things are "impossible" with respect unto the nature of God, as that He cannot lie, or pardon sin without satisfaction to His justice. Other things which are possible to God’s nature are rendered "impossible" by His decrees or purpose: see 1 Samuel 15:28, 29. Still other things are "possible" or "impossible" with respect to the rule or order of all things God has appointed. For example, there cannot be faith apart from hearing the Word (Rom. 10:13-17). "When in things of duty God hath neither expressed command thereon, nor appointed means for the performance of them, they are to be looked upon then as impossible [as, for instance, there is no salvation apart from repentance, Luke 13:3. (A.W.P.)]; and then, with respect unto us, they are so absolutely, and so to be esteemed. And this is the ‘impossibility’ here principally intended. It is a thing that God hath neither commanded us to endeavor, nor appointed means to attain it, nor promise to assist us in it. It is therefore that which we have no reason to look after, attempt, or expect, as being not possible by any law, rule, or constitution of God.

Taking the passage as a whole, it needs to be remembered that all who had professed to receive the Gospel were not born of God: the parable of the Sower shows that. Intelligence might be informed, conscience searched, natural affections stirred, and yet there be "no root" in them. All is not gold that glitters. There has always been a "mixt multitude" (Ex. 12:38) who accompany the people of God. Moreover, there is in the real Christian the old heart, which is "deceitful above all things and desperately wicked", and therefore is he in constant need of faithful warning. Such, God has given in every dispensation: Genesis 2:17; Leviticus 26:15, 16; Matthew 3:8; Romans 11:21; 1 Corinthians 10:12."

Source

Now, given the time period this was written, to whom it was written to, and what it addresses, we learn that Christians were indeed under severe persecution from Nero. However, Jewish Christians were not only under the same persecutions, but they were also under persecution from other Jews.

Given the time this was written, it would not have been impossible for a supposedly "Jewish Christian" under persecution from his own people, to abandon his Christian life, and run back to Judaism. Which would have entailed going back under the Law, and running back to a sacrificial system that had been replaced by the Lord Jesus Christ.

Once you have been "enlightened" as to who Jesus was, and what He accomplished, "there remaineth no sacrifice for sin". Once enlightened, there is no sacrificial system.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,576
60
Wyoming
✟83,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
But don't this take the work of the Holy Spirit out of the equation?
The grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men. Titus 2:11
I believe He is drawing everybody. He is no respecter of persons.

SO, from what you have written here, God chose us because in His infinite wisdom and infinite foresight, He saw who would or would not accept the Gospel message and "predestinated" them based on that foreknowledge?
That is exactly what I am saying.
1 Peter 1:2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father,

Have yo u ever actually looked at what Christians are "predestinated" to?
You mean this?
Romans 8:29-30
For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
8:30
Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
 
Upvote 0

Skala

I'm a Saint. Not because of me, but because of Him
Mar 15, 2011
8,964
478
✟27,869.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
The grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men. Titus 2:11

In this verse, the "grace" that appeared to men actually accomplishes stuff. Keep reading beyond verse 11 and you'll see that this grace:

1) Trains us to renounce ungodliness
2) live upright, godly lives
3) wait for our blessed Hope (Jesus)

So the "grace" that this verse is talking about is not some prevenient grace or even common grace, but it's a specific grace that actually causes Christians to do things. So you can't use this verse in a way that talks about God "trying" to save all individuals.

I believe He is drawing everybody.
Why do you believe that? John 12 clearly says God doesn't draw all people. For example, some people God hardens.

He is no respecter of persons.

You're using this verse out of context. The phrase "no respector of persons" does not mean God doesn't show favoritism. It is clear he does. He played favorites with Moses. He played favorites with Samson. David. The prophets. The apostles. The kings of Israel in the OT. He played favorites with Israel. He played favorites with Mary and Joseph. The entire Old Testament is about how God chose and set his love on Israel ALONE out of all the nations of the earth.

Let's look at the passage you're (mis)quoting:
"So Peter opened his mouth and said: “Truly I understand that God shows no partiality, in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him"

This verse is simply saying that God accepts anyone from any nation "who fears him and does what is right". As opposed to say, God accepting Bob from America but not Hector from Mexico, simply because God is biased against Mexico for some reason. The verse is saying that God accepts both Bob and Hector if both "fear Him and do what is right"

The verse has nothing to do with how you are using it.

That is exactly what I am saying.
1 Peter 1:2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father,

Aren't you assuming that "foreknowledge" is synonymous with "foresee?"
Big assumption. Wrong assumption.
 
Upvote 0

Skala

I'm a Saint. Not because of me, but because of Him
Mar 15, 2011
8,964
478
✟27,869.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I worked with three ladies in my factory making samples. These ladies were all Baptist, cheerful, decent, and I would not doubt if they were to tell me they were eternally saved, especially as I don't see it in their character. And this was also true of the old people in the Baptist church I was brought up in.

And then my generation came along.

In the Baptist church I was brought up in we had a large youth group and all the adults thought of them as angels and good saved Christians. That was until someone busted them in one of their dope smoking parties. I also met a lady who is in her fifties as well as I. This lady was Baptist, single, never married, and I thought we were the perfect fit... But the more that woman talked... Come to find out that she sees nothing wrong with the party or sex scene. I finally, after enduring much talk on carnality, said to her, "You know I don't believe you can do those things and get to heaven." Almost immediately she replies, "Are you trying to threaten my salvation?"

None of what you typed here has anything to do with Calvinism.


And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. - Mark 13:13

This verse proves the P in TULIP (Perseverance of the Saints). I thought you didn't like Calvinism? Now you're quoting verses that support Calvinism?

This is my main gripe against Calvinism, and that is it gives people a false sense of eternal security.

"Of all that my Father has given me, I will lose nothing, but raise it up again at the last day" - Jesus
"He who began a good work (God) will complete it" - Paul

Such promises hardly qualify is false senses of security.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,576
60
Wyoming
✟83,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In this verse, the "grace" that appeared to men actually accomplishes stuff. Keep reading beyond verse 11 and you'll see that this grace:

1) Trains us to renounce ungodliness
2) live upright, godly lives
3) wait for our blessed Hope (Jesus)
I totally agree, and this grace appeared to ALL men. Look up the Greek word for all, it is "pas" G3956
It really does mean all, not just the elect or all who will accept.

Why do you believe that? John 12 clearly says God doesn't draw all people. For example, some people God hardens.
The same sun that melts the wax, hardens the clay. We can choose to be wax or clay by whether we accept or reject.

"So Peter opened his mouth and said: “Truly I understand that God shows no partiality, in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him"

This verse is simply saying that God accepts anyone from any nation "who fears him and does what is right"
That is what I have been saying. If you fear God and accept His Son, He accepts you.

Aren't you assuming that "foreknowledge" is synonymous with "foresee?"
Big assumption. Wrong assumption.
Foreknow, the Greek word proginosko, G4267.
From G4253 and G1097; to know beforehand that is foresee: - foreknow (ordain) know (before).
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
In this verse, the "grace" that appeared to men actually accomplishes stuff. Keep reading beyond verse 11 and you'll see that this grace:

1) Trains us to renounce ungodliness
2) live upright, godly lives
3) wait for our blessed Hope (Jesus)

So the "grace" that this verse is talking about is not some prevenient grace or even common grace, but it's a specific grace that actually causes Christians to do things.
I think this misunderstands the passage. Nothing is "caused" by grace. Other than the payment of our sins by Christ on the cross, which is what "salvation" in v.11 means. "The grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to everyone."

If you are looking for causation, it is the grace of God that has brought salvation to everyone. Not that everyone will be saved, however.

Beyond v.11 we read that the grace of God "trains us". There is no causation in that. It's what God does. His grace trains us.

The result of this training does lead those trained by God's grace to live upright, godly lives, and to wait for our blessed hope.

So you can't use this verse in a way that talks about God "trying" to save all individuals.
God never tries to do anything. He is all powerful. He simply does things. He never tries. Everyone should know that.

But where does the Bible teach (say plainly) that God causes anyone to believe? Nowhere.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Doug Melven
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men. Titus 2:11
I believe He is drawing everybody. He is no respecter of persons.

Yes and no.

in Acts 13:48 we read:

"And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed."

What we have here is the notion that every man, woman, and child, is presented the Gospel. But only those who were ordained, believed.

That is exactly what I am saying.
1 Peter 1:2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father,

But your wrong in that you are putting the horse before the cart.

Are people "elect" because of "foreknowledge" or does God have foreknowledge (a deep intimate relationship of) because they are the "elect"?

You mean this?
Romans 8:29-30
For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
8:30
Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

Yes, that's part. But you have passages in Ephesians too.

Now, you also said:

Foreknow, the Greek word proginosko, G4267.
From G4253 and G1097; to know beforehand that is foresee: - foreknow (ordain) know (before).

Technically, your right. But there is a deeper meaning.

Let us look at the definition given in Kittel's dictionary. From Rom. 8:29, we have the word: "prowpisev." From the root word: "proorizw," which means: to limit or mark out beforehand, predestine.

According to the dictionary (Kittel's), K. L. Schmidt comments:

"This comparatively rare and late word is used in the Greek Bible only six times in the NT in the sense "to foreordain" "to predestinate." Since God is eternal and has ordained everything before time, proopizein is a stronger form of opizein (to set bounds to). The synonyms and textual history show that the reference in proginwskien is the same. Rom. 8:29; ouv proginw kai prowpisen summorfouv tnv eikonov tou niou autou, Rom. 8:30; ous...prowpisen (A: proegnw) toutov kai ekalesen. The omniscient God has determined everything in advance, both persons and things in salvation history, with Jesus Christ as the goal. When Herod and Pilate work together with the Gentiles and the mob against Christ, it may be said: "h boulh [sou] prowrisen genesqai, Acts 4:28. Herein lies the hidden wisdom of God in a mystery, "hn prowrisen o qeoV pro twn aiwnwn eiV doxan hmwn," 1 Cor. 2:7, cf. IV, 819. The goal of our predestination is divine sonship through Jesus Christ: "proorisaV hmaV eiV uioqesian dia ihsou cristou ," Eph. 1:5. That we have our inheritance in Christ rests in the fact that we are proopisqentev kata proqesin tou ta panta energountov, Eph. 1:11.

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Edited by: Gerhard Kittel, Translated by: Geoffery W. Bromiley, Vol. V, "proopizw", p. 456, K. L. Schmidt.

You see: "to know beforehand that is foresee: - foreknow (ordain) know (before). And go with that.

But, "predestinate" is never used in the New Testament in this sense. And it is never used in the sense that God had intimate knowledge of said persons in the sense you mean.

Foreknowledge, lets also refer to Rudolf Bultmann's work in this area:

"In the NT, "proginwskein" is referred to God. His foreknowledge, however, is an election or foreordination of His people (Rom. 8:29; 11:2) or Christ (1 Pet. 1:20) (> ginwskw, 698, 706). In Pastor Hermae, mandata, 4, 3, 4 it simply means God's foreknowledge (cf. prognwstv in 2 Cl. 9:9). On the basis of prophecy the word "proginwskein" can be used of believers in 2 Pet. 3:17, also as Pastor Hermae, similitudines, 7,5 > eklegw. Another possible meaning in Greek is that of knowing earlier, i.e., than the time speaking (cf. Demosthenes of Athens, 29, 58; Aristotle, Rhetorica, II, 21, p. 1394b, 11; Josephus, Bella Judiacum, 6,8). This is found in Acts 26:5, where the meaning is strengthened by the addition of "anwqen." In Justin God's "proginwskein" is His foreknowledge (Apol. I, 28, 2 etc.) and the "proegnwsmenoi" are believers (Apol. I, 45, 1 etc.). The polemic against determinism, however, shows that the OT view has been abandoned (Dial., 140, 4). As One who simply knows beforehand, God is called "prognwstv" in Apol., I, 44, 11 etc. as is also Christ in Dial., 35, 7; 82, 1. There is also reference to prophetic foreknowledge in Apol., I, 43, 1; 49, 6 etc. Tatian, of Syria, in Oratio ad Graecos, 19, 3, speaks of Apollo in the same terms, so that what we have here is the Greek understanding."

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Edited by: Gerhard Kittel, Translated by: Geoffery W. Bromiley, Vol. V, "prognwskein", p. 457, Rudolph Bultmann commenting.

Acts 26:5:

"Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee."

Paul is testifying to Agrippa that the crowd knew Paul "previously", "beforehand" because he was known as a Pharisee, in fact, a strict Pharisee.

Also, when referencing Romans 8:29, you need to include verse 28.

Here's why:

"ὅτι οὓς προέγνω, καὶ προώρισεν συμμόρφους τῆς εἰκόνος τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ, εἰς τὸ εἶναι αὐτὸν πρωτότοκον ἐν πολλοῖς ἀδελφοῖς:" -Rom. 8:29 (GNT)

Emphasis absolutely must be place on the very first word of that sentence.

"ὅτι":

"ὅτι,c \{hot'-ee}
1) that, because, since "

Source

Now, why is this so important? "hotee" is a conjunction.


You see, 2 semesters of Greek taught me that grammar is grammar, especially when Greek and English are concerned. The only disagreement is the placement of subject and verb.

The "for" of verse 29, is a conjunction that links the last phrase of verse 28, with verse 29.

Who are the "elect"? Those who are "called".

"...to them who are the called according to his purpose. For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son,"

So, why did God "foreknow", have "foreknowledge of" the elect? Because He "called"/"elected" them first.

I also add:

"1st, The Arminians scheme compared to the Calvinist. With Arminian the decree of redemption precedes the decree of election, which is conditioned on the foreseen faith of the individual. With the Calvinist, on the other hand, the decree of election precedes the decree of redemption, and the decree of election is conditioned upon the simple good pleasure of God alone."

Outlines of Theology, Archibald A. Hodge, Chapter XI, Predestination, p. 232

I also add:

"we believe, teach, and confess that election is the cause of our salvation and of everything that in any way pertains to it, therefore also of our redemption and vocation of our faith and perseverance in faith. Thus understood, election precedes faith as the cause precedes the effect."

The Saint Louis Theological Monthly, Volume 1, December 1881, No. 8, The New Confession of the Ohio Synod.

And, I also add regarding 1 Pet. 1:2:

"Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ" (1 Peter 1:2). Here again election by the Father precedes the work of the Holy Spirit in, and the obedience of faith by, those who are saved; thus taking it entirely off creature ground, and resting it in the Sovereign pleasure of the Almighty. The "foreknowledge of God the Father" does not here refer to His prescience of all things, but signifies that the saints were all eternally present in Christ before the mind of God. God did not "foreknow" that certain ones who heard the Gospel would believe it apart from the fact that He had "ordained" these certain ones to eternal life. What God's prescience saw in all men was, love of sin and hatred of Himself. The "foreknowledge" of God is based upon His own decrees as is clear from Acts 2:23-"Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain"-note the order here: first God's "determinate counsel" (His decree), and second His "foreknowledge." So it is again in Romans 8:28, 29, "For whom He did foreknow, He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son," but the first word here, "for," looks back to the preceding verse and the last clause of its reads, "to them who are the called according to His purpose"-these are the ones whom He did "foreknow and predestinate." Finally, it needs to be pointed out that when we read in Scripture of God "knowing" certain people the word is used in the sense of knowing with approbation and love: "But if any man love God, the same is known of Him" (1 Cor. 8:3). To the hypocrites Christ will yet say "I never knew you"-He never loved them. "Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father" signifies, then, chosen by Him as the special objects of His approbation and love."

Source

And that is what you basically said, "Step 1 God predestines us through His foreknowledge of knowing who will receive Him of there free will."

Election/calling always, always precedes everything, or else your left in a quandary. If calling/election is based upon God's foreknowledge of who would or would not accept and believe, that indeed makes God a respecter of persons.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
in Acts 13:48 we read:

"And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed."

What we have here is the notion that every man, woman, and child, is presented the Gospel. But only those who were ordained, believed.
Nope. The verse does not say that. The word improperly translated "ordained" or in some translations "appointed" isn't translated either way in any of the other 7 times it's found in the NT. The Greek word is 'tasso' and means: to draw up in order, arrange.

Second, this particular form is identical in both the middle and passive voice. So the only way to determine which voice was meant is from context. And we have a huge clue as to which voice was meant from v.44 - On the next Sabbath almost the whole city gathered to hear the word of the Lord

So, basically, we find that "almost the whole city" arranged themselves to hear what Paul preached.

iow, they lined up to hear what he was saying. So the voice here is middle. They arranged themselves, or lined themselves up to hear Paul.

If Luke meant the passive voice, as in God doing the 'tasso-ing', the voice would have to be passive. Yet there's no mention of God in the context regarding who was lining up whom.

So Acts 13:48 offers no support for the reformed claim that God causes or chooses who will believe.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,576
60
Wyoming
✟83,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
echnically, your right. But there is a deeper meaning.

Let us look at the definition given in Kittel's dictionary. From Rom. 8:29, we have the word: "prowpisev." From the root word: "proorizw," which means: to limit or mark out beforehand, predestine.
I was referring to foreknowledge which is what predestination is based on.
You skipped that and went straight to talking about the word "predestinate."
At first I thought you were talking about the English roots of the the word "foreknowledge" because I didn't see this
"prowpisev." word associated with "Foreknowledge".

I agree with all that you are saying about predestination, I just believe it is according to His foreknowledge/foreseeing events before they occur.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I was referring to foreknowledge which is what predestination is based on.
You skipped that and went straight to talking about the word "predestinate."
At first I thought you were talking about the English roots of the the word "foreknowledge" because I didn't see this
"prowpisev." word associated with "Foreknowledge".

I agree with all that you are saying about predestination, I just believe it is according to His foreknowledge/foreseeing events before they occur.

That one statement alone contradicts scripture.

If God elects, predestinates, based upon "foreseen events" namely "accepting or rejecting the Gospel message according to our "free will", that not only makes God a respecter of persons, but it also means that our salvation is partly based upon something we will do in the future!

In other words, that is a works based salvation.

Like I showed you earlier, why did God "foreknow" certain people? Because He called/elected them first.

So it is again in Romans 8:28, 29, "For whom He did foreknow, He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son," but the first word here, "for," looks back to the preceding verse and the last clause of its reads, "to them who are the called according to His purpose"-these are the ones whom He did "foreknow and predestinate."

Not once in the scripture is it recorded where the usage of "proginwskein" is used of people in the sense you use it of God.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Let me quote the rest of A.W. Pink's article (pay attention to my highlighted parts):

"Another thing to which we desire to call particular attention is that the first two passages quoted above show plainly and teach implicitly that God’s "foreknowledge" is not causative, that instead, something else lies behind, precedes it, and that something is His own sovereign decree. Christ was "delivered by the (1) determinate counsel and (2) foreknowledge of God." (Acts 2:23). His "counsel" or decree was the ground of His foreknowledge. So again in Romans 8:29. That verse opens with the word "for," which tells us to look back to what immediately precedes. What, then, does the previous verse say? This, "all things work together for good to them. . . .who are the called according to His purpose." Thus God’s foreknowledge is based upon His purpose or decree (see Ps. 2:7).

God foreknows what will be because He has decreed what shall be. It is therefore a reversing of the order of Scripture, a putting of the cart before the horse, to affirm that God elects because He foreknows people. The truth is, He "foreknows" because He has elected. This removes the ground or cause of election from outside the creature, and places it in God’s own sovereign will. God purposed in Himself to elect a certain people, not because of anything good in them or from them, either actual or foreseen, but solely out of His own mere pleasure. As to why He chose the ones He did, we do not know, and can only say, "Even so, Father, for so it seemed good in Thy sight." The plain truth of Romans 8:29 is that God, before the foundation of the world, singled out certain sinners and appointed them unto salvation (2 Thess. 2:13). This is clear from the concluding words of the verse: "Predestinated to be conformed to the image of His Son," etc. God did not predestinate those whom He foreknew were "conformed," but, on the contrary, those whom He "foreknew" (i.e., loved and elected) He predestinated to be conformed. Their conformity to Christ is not the cause, but the effect of God’s foreknowledge and predestination.

God did not elect any sinner because He foresaw that he would believe, for the simple but sufficient reason that no sinner ever does believe until God gives him faith; just as no man sees until God gives him sight. Sight is God’s gift, seeing is the consequence of my using His gift. So faith is God’s gift (Eph. 1:8,9), believing is the consequence of my using His gift. If it were true that God had elected certain ones to be saved because in due time they would believe, then that would make believing a meritorious act, and in that event the saved sinner would have ground for "boasting," which Scripture emphatically denies: Ephesians 2:9.

Surely God’s Word is plain enough in teaching that believing is not a meritorious act. It affirms that Christians are a people "who have believed through grace" (Acts 18:27). If then, they have believed "through grace," there is absolutely nothing meritorious about "believing," and if nothing meritorious, it could not be the ground or cause which moved God to choose them. No; God’s choice proceeds not from anything in us, or anything from us, but solely from His own sovereign pleasure. Once more, in Romans 11:5, we read of "a remnant according to the election of grace." There it is, plain enough; election itself is of grace, and grace is unmerited favour something for which we had no claim upon God whatsoever.


It thus appears that it is highly important for us to have clear and scriptural views of the "foreknowledge" of God. Erroneous conceptions about it lead inevitably to thoughts most dishonoring to Him. The popular idea of Divine foreknowledge is altogether inadequate. God not only knew the end from the beginning, but He planned, fixed, predestinated everything from the beginning. And, as cause stands to effect, so God’s purpose is the ground of His prescience. If then the reader be a real Christian, he is so because God chose him in Christ before the foundation of the world (Eph. 1:4), and chose not because He foresaw you would believe, but chose simply because it pleased Him to choose: chose you notwithstanding your natural unbelief. This being so, all the glory and praise belongs alone to Him. You have no ground for taking any credit to yourself. You have "believed through grace" (Acts 18:27), and that, because your very election was "of grace" (Rom. 11:5)."

-The Attributes of God, Chapter 4, The Foreknowledge of God, Arthur W. Pink

And one last point, if God used His divine "foreknowledge" of forseen faith or as you put it "foreseeing events before they occur", this gives you room to boast in heaven. God saw in you, or something you would do, that others would not do, or He didn't see in others. You can walk around heaven boasting that God saw something in you that even He didn't see in Abraham.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0