Everybodyknows
The good guys lost
Jesus was fully human.
- Jesus is God.
- Jesus wasn't always human
- Jesus became human (the word became flesh)
- Jesus was fully human.
- Jesus changed.
- God became human
Upvote
0
Jesus was fully human.
How do you explain existence changing without God changing?
I explained it to you. The creation is not God. God created it out of nothing.
- Jesus is God.
- Jesus wasn't always human
- Jesus became human (the word became flesh)
- Jesus was fully human.
- Jesus changed.
- God became human
What was he before his conception?Jesus was always human from the moment of His conception.
Jesus was always human from the moment of His conception.
I'm not sure you two agree on your theology either.Humans comes from Dust.
Your Lord is Dust?
Could we have a discussion minus the insults please. There're are many differing views on the divinity/humanity of Christ throughout Christian history. So no need to take offence if you come across one that differs from your own.I explained it to you. The creation is not God. God created it out of nothing.
Jesus wasn't always human? Jesus was always human from the moment of His conception.
I (quite seriously) thought about asking how old you guys are. Then I saw that you were both married and realized that you must be at least adults.
Go back and read my last posts to you again very carefully.
It seems to me that you guys either have to be kidding or you aren't playing with a full deck.
I don't believe we do. Nor has either of us said that we do. Our posts are completely independent from each other and your conversations with both of us are independent from each other.I'm not sure you two agree on your theology either.
Jesus was non existent before His conception just as you and I were.What was he before his conception?
The heretical idea that God became man and that man became God in the incarnation was put to rest at Chalcedon.Could we have a discussion minus the insults please. There're are many differing views on the divinity/humanity of Christ throughout Christian history. So no need to take offence if you come across one that differs from your own.
But you both claim that your view comes from the Bible.I don't believe we do. Nor has either of us said that we do. Our posts are completely independent from each other and your conversations with both of us are independent from each other.
So the Trinity didn't exist before Jesus's conception then. That seems like a major change. Jesus (God) began to exist. Another major change.Jesus was non existent before His conception just as you and I were.
So what? We don't even know each other.But you both claim that your view comes from the Bible.
I said no such thing.So the Trinity didn't exist before Jesus's conception then..................
That's the point I'm trying to make. Same Bible yet @SBC, @YouAreAwesome, yourself and me all have different understandings of what it means. So let's try to understand why we think what we think and allow others to challenge or thinking.Lots of people who believe the Bible to be the Word of God have quite different beliefs about what it says (Witness John Calvin and Jacobus Arminius).
I agree with that creed, but I don't see how you've come to the conclusion that Jesus was non-existent before his conception. If he didn't exist then what comprised the Trinity?I said no such thing.
The Chalcedonian creed tells us that, Jesus is “recognized in two natures [God and man], without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by union, but rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming together to form one person and subsistence, not as parted or separated into two persons but one and the same Son and Only-begotten God the Word, Lord Jesus Christ.”
That is the way I and most of the Church believe.
Obviously you believe otherwise.
I agree with you, so if God is never presented with new knowledge then why did He create this world?
If He saw everything ahead of time, exactly as it is today, why didn't He make it slightly better?
Why did He not make the best possible world?
You might answer "He did and we wrecked it!"
But our wrecking it was also seen by God. It was all a part of His decision to create it in the first place. It is the main objection to the Free Will Defence and the objection is supported by strong immutability.
Do you not think it's a little naive to believe you can interpret the bible correctly on first reading by simply trusting what God says?
Surely if it were that simple we would all believe the same thing right?
Do you not think it's a little naive to believe you can interpret the bible correctly on first reading by simply trusting what God says?
Surely if it were that simple we would all believe the same thing right?
No need for bible studies. No need for seminary. No need for strong concordance. No need for learning the cultural context. It is something to be applauded, the optimism of a simple faith, but we must be aware of the limitations. What are the limitations?
Yes, exactly. Exegesis.
I don't doubt that God can teach us about Himself completely separate to the bible, or that we can gain insights by reading of a verse out of its context, but we must recognise when we are doing this -- it's called Eisegesis -- and we can't use it to justify doctrine, even if we find it personally edifying.
God does not change with regard to: character and promises.
God changes with regard to: the universe, our free-choices,
His will/mind
God created it out of nothing.
For His pleasure.
If He saw everything ahead of time, exactly as it is today, why didn't He make it slightly better?
He made it Very Good.
You mean better than "Very Good", like "perfect"?
If all of Gods creations had been made "perfect", all of mankind would have been created "loving Him", and "believing in Him".
I'm not sure you two agree on your theology either.
So the unchangeable God created. How does He create without changing something? To change something He must do something. To do something is to change, or else, He would do nothing and everything would have remained as it were -- with God alone, frozen and static.
God created evil, pain and suffering for His pleasure?
I asked, why didn't He make it better?
Is that a problem?
I'll bow out of this discussion here before I condemn myself any further. I'm sorry I misunderstood the scripture. May the Lord have mercy on my soul.If you speak psychobabble, half truths, and understanding of men, IN JESUS NAME, you do NOT do the will of the Father, and the consequences thereof, are plainly told you IN Scripture.
Of course God knew what mankind would do, each one individually, collectively.
Of course God knew SOME WOULD choose to love Him, believe in Him.....DESPITE
...having the people constantly facing of people who would be anti-God, anti-Christ.
1) How did you decide, I interpret the Bible?
2) How did you decide, Trusting what one reads, gives one ability to interpret?
Surely if it were that simple we would all believe the same thing right?
You will have to answer for what you think. I already know differently.
The circumstances the context is irrelevant.
Catholics do the same, hanging on every word of their Pope, to tell them what to believe as their Truth, He has decided is their Truth.
The average clergyman, spends little time reading Scripture
So HOW do YOU decide the interpretation, meaning of scripture? From other men? From critical thinking in your mind?
Can you answer?
You seem to believe, God WAITS for a reaction of His creation, to decide what He will do. Which is false. God already knows what men will do. God already knows WHICH men will change their choices, and God already knows what He will do WHEN a man changes his choices.
When you argue with me, what I say for myself, you argue against Scripture and Gods understanding, because what I say for myself, is according to Scripture and Gods understanding.
I
Jesus was non existent before His conception just as you and I were.