- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,021
- 51,492
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Seriously, I'm the last type of person you want to discuss this with.The word "Raqiya" means ...
I'm a
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Seriously, I'm the last type of person you want to discuss this with.The word "Raqiya" means ...
Seriously, I'm the last type of person you want to discuss this with.
I'm aGACTKJVO.
I know what he is going for, since I have debated AV a lot. He believes that the original language of the world was English, and thus the KJV is the most accurate version. That is, it doesn't matter that in Hebrew, this word means that or that, because he thinks the Hebrew version isn't in the original language to begin with, and thus is not the most accurate translation.OK, I could guess.
But it's probably quicker for you to explain why you think that you are the last type of person I want to discuss this with.
In Christ-
Papias
Because I won't accept any of that speaking-in-tongues apologetics educated people like to adhere to when telling us how God did what He did in Genesis 1.But it's probably quicker for you to explain why you think that you are the last type of person I want to discuss this with.
Yes, and I didn´t object to this. So feel freel to run with it.
Did we ever define "fact"?
For example, the answer to the question is "No" when using this definition:
something that actually exists; reality; truth:
But the answer is "Yes" with this definition:
something said to be true or supposed to have happened:
I said that your summary didn´t summarize what I said in the paragraph you had quoted.Yet in post 712, you replied specifically to just that statement I made and claimed: "That´s not an accurate paraphrasing of what I said. You may want to reread my previous post."
So yes, you did object to it.
And? Are you excluding solipsism as an option? You didn't stipulate limits in your opening post, but you seem to have added several since then, mostly associated with your own incredulity.How do you figure that it's NOT a fact that a person lives on earth if fact is taken to mean, "something that actually exists; reality; truth:"
That seems to be veering towards solipsism...
Because ...
because he thinks the Hebrew version isn't in the original language to begin with, and thus is not the most accurate translation.
Yes.AV, is that correct?
Yes.Papias said:Do you think Genesis was originally written in English, long before Christ was born?
Genesis 11:1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.Papias said:I don't think that's a KJVO position - even by Ruckmanists.
Yes.
Yes.
Jacobean English, to be exact.
Genesis 11:1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
What language do you think it was?
We are getting to the point that language barriers are about to be dissolved without everyone necessarily having to speak a common language. However, I don't think this in and of itself makes us a species more dangerous to ourselves.I call it Human speak and it is why Noah's descendants were scattered over the face of the whole Earth. It is very dangerous for everyone to speak the same language:
It's not common language that brought us to that point, though. That's the nukes. Also, it's highly debatable that we have enough firepower to actually make this planet void of life, even if every nuclear weapon on the planet was launched and every nuclear power plant had a meltdown strategically. I'm pretty sure the tardigrades could make it through that.It's the same today since the internet has brought us again to another dangerous place where even total destruction of our Earth, is possible for us to do.
I said that your summary didn´t summarize what I said in the paragraph you had quoted.
But you know what, Kylie: Why don´t we simply agree that I am generally and principally wrong no matter what I say, and be done with it?
And? Are you excluding solipsism as an option? You didn't stipulate limits in your opening post, but you seem to have added several since then, mostly associated with your own incredulity.
I'll give it another try.By all means, go with solipsism if you want.
If someone can tell me how they know solipsism to be a fact, I'd love to hear how they justify me being a figment of their imaginations...
Genesis 11:1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
What language do you think it was?
Yes.
(Genesis was originally written in Jacobean English, long before Christ was born.)
Also, it's highly debatable that we have enough firepower to actually make this planet void of life, even if every nuclear weapon on the planet was launched and every nuclear power plant had a meltdown strategically. I'm pretty sure the tardigrades could make it through that.
Sure.Help me out here -
We are getting to the point that language barriers are about to be dissolved without everyone necessarily having to speak a common language. However, I don't think this in and of itself makes us a species more dangerous to ourselves.
It's not common language that brought us to that point, though. That's the nukes. Also, it's highly debatable that we have enough firepower to actually make this planet void of life, even if every nuclear weapon on the planet was launched and every nuclear power plant had a meltdown strategically. I'm pretty sure the tardigrades could make it through that.
then those books in Heaven are written in Jacobean English.
and until someone comes up with a better one, I'll stick to that.