Ana the Ist
Aggressively serene!
So, in summation, you believe your position is true based on your interpretation of the evidence despite being unable to prove indisputably that you are correct.
Sure.
This is faith.
I don't recall ever seeing that definition of faith.
In the interest of keeping more to topic, I will ignore the irony of this one and bring us back to what sparked our little conversation. You were mocking belief in creationism by attacking something from nothing.
Not mocking...I was presenting the creationism argument as I understand it. Every creationist I've ever spoken to believes that god simply magics things into existence. One moment there's nothing...the next moment a universe exists.
If you wish to clarify...you've had ample opportunity to do so.
I simply proposed that the dominant scientific approach today is fundamentally the same.
I would simply propose that you don't understand the prevailing scientific approach.
Rather than address my point or present a better theory as I requested, you said you don’t pretend to know what you don’t know.
I don't.
Of course, this statement is False, since you have acknowledged that you embrace atheism by faith, you clearly do pretend to know what you don’t know.
I already explained that atheism is a statement of belief...not knowledge...you do understand the difference between these two don't you?
You really don’t know if God is real, yet you believe he isn’t and live your life as though he isn’t. Why not just admit you take the universe's origin by faith as well? Why the intellectual dishonesty?
What intellectual dishonesty?
Upvote
0