Chiliasm was the forerunner to premillennialism

Quasar92

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 7, 2016
3,762
1,943
100
Lexington, KY 40517
Visit site
✟332,574.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Historically Christian premillennialism has also been referred as "chiliasm" or "millenarianism". The theological term "premillennialism" did not come into general use until the mid-nineteenth century, the modern period in which premillennialism was revived. Coining the word was "almost entirely the work of British and American Protestants and was prompted by their belief that the French and America Revolution (the French, especially) realized prophecies made in the books of Daniel and Revelation."

Jewish antecedents to Christian premillennialism

The concept of a temporary earthly messianic kingdom at the Messiah's coming was not an invention of Christianity. Instead it was a theological interpretation developed within the apocalyptic literature of early Judaism. In intertestamental Judaism there was a basic distinction between the current age and the “age to come.” The “age to come” was commonly viewed as a nationalistic golden age in which the hopes of the prophets would become a reality for the nation of Israel. On the surface, the Old Testament prophets revealed an “age to come” which was monolithic. Seemingly the prophets did not write of a two-phase eschaton consisting of a temporary messianic age followed by an eternal state. However, that was the concept that some Jewish interpreters did derive from their Old Testament exegesis. Their conclusions are found in some of the literature and theology of early Judaism within the centuries both before and during the development of the New Testament. R. H. Charles in his commentary on Book of Revelation concluded that Jewish eschatology must have developed the concept of an earthly temporary messianic reign prior to the eternal state at the latest by the year 100 B.C..

A temporary messianic kingdom in 1 Enoch

The earliest instance in Jewish literature that teaches an earthly temporary messianic age prior to an eternal state began with “The Apocalypse of Weeks” contained in 1 Enoch 91-107. This work likely dates to the early second century and shows a schematization of the divine history divided into ten ambiguous periods of time called “weeks.” In the apocalypse, weeks 1-7 (93:1-10) retell the biblical history from the creation of humanity to the author’s time of writing (possibly during the Maccabean crisis). However, after the seventh "week", the temporary earthly messianic age begins and occurs for a period of three more “weeks” (93:12-15). After the temporary messianic kingdom, the creation of the new heavens and the new earth occurs (93:16).

A temporary messianic kingdom in 4 Ezra

An additional piece of early Jewish literature which explicitly teaches a temporary messianic reign prior to the eternal state is the apocalyptic work 4 Ezra. 4 Ezra likely dates from soon after the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. The apocryphal book was apparently an attempt to explain the difficulties associated with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple to the Jewish people. During one of the visions in the book, Ezra received a revelation from the angel Uriel. The angel explained that prior to the last judgment, the Messiah will come and establish a temporary kingdom lasting 400 years after which all of creation will be obliterated including the Messiah. (7:28) Seven days after this cataclysmic event, the resurrection and the judgment will occur followed by the eternal state (7:36).

Other early Jewish contributions

Supplementary early Jewish literature that refers to a temporary messianic kingdom prior to the eternal state may be found in 4 Ezra 12:34; 2 Baruch 24:1-4; 30:1-5; 39:3-8; 40:1-4; Jubilees 1:4-29; 23:14-31; b. Sanh. 99a. The Jewish belief in an earthly temporary messianic age continued during and beyond the time of the writing of Book of Revelation. A sample of the rabbinical contributions to the concept are listed as follows:

Circa A.D. 90 Eleazar ben Hurcanus claimed that the messianic reign would last 100 years based on Psalm 90:15;
Circa A.D. 100 Eleazar ben Azariah claimed that the messianic reign would last 70 years based upon Isaiah 23:15;
Circa A.D. 110 Joseph ben Galilee claimed that the messianic reign would last 60 years based upon Psalm 72:5;
Circa A.D. 150 Eliezer ben Joseph of Galilee claimed that the messianic reign would last 400 years based upon Genesis 15:13 and Psalm 90:15;

Various rabbis around the close of the first century C.E. have claimed that the messianic reign would last 2000 years based upon 4 Ezra 7:28; Some contemplated that there may be no messianic reign at all.

Blessings,

Quasar92
 

faroukfarouk

Fading curmudgeon
Apr 29, 2009
35,901
17,177
Canada
✟279,058.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
1 Thessalonians 4.15-18:

"For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.

16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words."


John 14.2-3:

"In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quasar92
Upvote 0

Quasar92

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 7, 2016
3,762
1,943
100
Lexington, KY 40517
Visit site
✟332,574.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
1 Thessalonians 4.15-18:

"For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.

16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words."


John 14.2-3:

"In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also."


Well said.


Quasar92
 
Upvote 0

Tayla

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 30, 2017
1,694
801
USA
✟147,315.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Chiliasm was the forerunner to premillennialism
I'm amillennial.

I hope you're not claiming the church fathers taught chiliasm.
This is a great thread! [I believe the RCC is Amill?].
I also am Amill, [tho I am starting to lean more toward "full preterism"], just have a little more studying to do on it.

Full Preterist Safe House

I believe that Chiliasm, but especially Dispensationalism, [including the "Rapture doctrine"], has done more damage to Christianity and Christ's church than any others in denying Christ's fulfillment of all things written.
I look forward to this discussion.......

Condemnation of Premillennialism by the early church?
quotes from thread:

quote: Post #1 OP:
I have read on multiple threads here that the early church proclaimed premillennialism a heresy.
This link is of an article of a researcher who couldn't find proof for this claim:

http://www.bible.org/docs/soapbox/st-essay/phantomheresy.htm

Is there proof that premillennialism was in fact condemned?
The article concludes that the author's who claimed that premillennialism was a heresy both provided each other as a source of their information, while neither of them had a source from the actual documents of these early church councils.


quote Post #2:
"This should be fun... :)
Of course it (Chiliasm) was, because it takes the "kingdom" away from the "church".
I have some notes at home, will post tomorrow"
unquote

Quote Post #3:
"Chiliasm is heresy, that is why it was condemned". unquote
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TrevorL

Regular Member
Aug 20, 2004
590
54
Lake Macquarie NSW
✟56,943.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Greetings Quasar92,
Historically Christian premillennialism has also been referred as "chiliasm" or "millenarianism". The theological term "premillennialism" did not come into general use until the mid-nineteenth century, the modern period in which premillennialism was revived.
You suggest that premillennialism was revived in the mid-nineteenth century, and this indicates that the early believers believed in chiliasm or millennialism.

My understanding of the following which is the first major vision and probably one of the most important visions of the writing prophets seems to me to teach pre-millennialism:
Isaiah 2:1–5 (KJV): 1 The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. 2 And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD’S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. 3 And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. 4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. 5 O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the LORD.

The following also teaches pre-millennialism, coupled with all of Daniel 2 and is the basis or structure of Daniel and Revelation, and both of these prophecies are used extensively to teach pre-millennialism.
Daniel 2:44 (KJV): And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

Kind regards
Trevor
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quasar92
Upvote 0

Quasar92

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 7, 2016
3,762
1,943
100
Lexington, KY 40517
Visit site
✟332,574.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Greetings Quasar92, You suggest that premillennialism was revived in the mid-nineteenth century, and this indicates that the early believers believed in chiliasm or millennialism.

My understanding of the following which is the first major vision and probably one of the most important visions of the writing prophets seems to me to teach pre-millennialism:
Isaiah 2:1–5 (KJV): 1 The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. 2 And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD’S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. 3 And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. 4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. 5 O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the LORD.

The following also teaches pre-millennialism, coupled with all of Daniel 2 and is the basis or structure of Daniel and Revelation, and both of these prophecies are used extensively to teach pre-millennialism.
Daniel 2:44 (KJV): And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

Kind regards
Trevor


Chiiasm was Jewish oriented and disposed of as heresy by the teachings of some of the church father's, and adopted by the RCC, and Amillennialism. Pre-millennialism was not revived until the 19th century.


Quasar92
 
Upvote 0

TrevorL

Regular Member
Aug 20, 2004
590
54
Lake Macquarie NSW
✟56,943.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Greetings again Quasar92,
Chiiasm was Jewish oriented and disposed of as heresy by the teachings of some of the church father's, and adopted by the RCC, and Amillennialism. Pre-millennialism was not revived until the 19th century.
I am not sure that I can agree with you here. Firstly Isaiah 2:1-5 and Daniel 2:35,44 and many other OT Scriptures teach pre-millennialism. When Peter preached he mentioned, and most probably extensively quoted some of these OT prophecies, as the record in Acts 3 appears to be a summary of Peter’s speech:
Acts 3:19-21 (KJV): 19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; 20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: 21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
These times of refreshing and times of restoration represent per-millennium concepts, in that Jesus will return to establish the kingdom. This is clearly taught by all the OT prophets.

As far as the church fathers being correct in rejecting the millennium as heresy, the ball is in the other court. The Apostolic teaching was corrupted by the Church fathers, and they replaced the millennium with heaven going, or claiming that the Church was already the Kingdom of God, and thus replaced or rejected the future Kingdom of God, that is the millennium.

Gibbon describes this change from a belief in the Millennium:
The ancient and popular doctrine of the Millennium was intimately connected with the second coming of Christ. As the works of creation had been finished in six days, their duration, in their present state, according to a tradition which was attributed to the prophet Elijah, was fixed to six thousand years. By the same analogy it was inferred that this long period of labor and contention, which was now almost elapsed (as they supposed), would be succeeded by a joyful Sabbath of a thousand years; and that Christ, with the triumphant band of the Saints and the elect who had escaped death, or who had been miraculously revived, would reign upon earth till the time appointed for the last and general resurrection. So pleasing was this hope to the minds of believers, that the New Jerusalem, the seat of this blissful kingdom, was quickly adorned with all the gayest colors of the imagination. A felicity consisting only of pure and spiritual pleasure would have appeared too refined for its inhabitants, who were still supposed to possess their human nature and senses. A garden of Eden with the amusements of pastoral life, was no longer suited to the advanced state of society which prevailed under the Roman Empire. A city was therefore erected, of gold and precious stones, and a supernatural plenty of corn and wine was bestowed on the adjacent territory; in the free enjoyment of whose spontaneous productions, the happy and benevolent people was never to be restrained by any jealous laws of exclusive property. The assurance of such a millennium was carefully inculcated by a succession of fathers, from Justin Martyr and Irenaeus, who conversed with the immediate disciples of the apostles, down to Lactantius, who was preceptor to the son of Constantine. Though it might not be universally received, it appears to have been the reigning sentiment of the orthodox believers; and it seems so well adapted to the desires and apprehensions of mankind, that it must have contributed in a very considerable degree to the progress of the Christian faith. But when the edifice of the church was almost completed, the temporary support was laid aside. The doctrine of Christ’s reign upon earth was at first treated as a profound allegory, was considered by degrees as a doubtful and useless opinion, and was at length rejected as the absurd invention of heresy and fanaticism. A mysterious prophecy (the Apocalypse) which still forms a part of the sacred canon, but which was thought to favor the exploded sentiment, has very narrowly escaped the proscription of the church.

Kind regards
Trevor
 
Upvote 0

SummaScriptura

Forever Newbie
May 30, 2007
6,984
1,050
Scam Francisco
Visit site
✟49,219.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
This came up in another thread so I felt it might best be served up in its own...

In an article titled: Millennialism and the Early Church Councils: Was Chiliasm Condemned at Constantinople? the author demonstrates convincingly the following:

1. From early times there have been amillenialists and premillenialists which are historically the two main views on the Millenium.
2. Contrary to prevalent thought, the 2nd Ecumenical Council in Constantinople in 381 did not condemn Chiliasm.
3. The insertion of "his kingdom will have no end" into the creed in 381, was to counter the faulty Christology of Marcellus, not to counter Chiliasm.
4. Though Chiliasm fell into broader disfavor after the fourth century, there are no early creeds condemnatory of Chiliasm.

Your thoughts are appreciated.

{Thank you to Christos Anesti for bringing the above-referenced article to light}
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums