was it to protect her from stoning
No. David acted fast enough to make Bath-Sheba a widow and marry her to cover his rape. Remember, that legally he should have been stoned as well.
Upvote
0
was it to protect her from stoning
Acts 8:3
As for Saul, he made havoc of the church, entering every house, and dragging off men and women, committing them to prison.
I wonder, but likely some died in those prisons. And some starved, and some suffered terrible abuses.
Just to nitpick, but Christians weren't going into the arena during Saul's oppressor period.
Actually, David was a pretty sorry king.
David was singularly responsible for the greatest disaster that ever struck the kingdom short of the Babylonian Captivity. David overruled his general and all his captains, obstinately questioning God's protection of Israel and thus causing the death of 70,000 fighting men (plus others uncounted). That was more men than the kingdom had ever lost in all their wars combined. Nobody was responsible for that but David, and all his military leaders knew it.
David was responsible for two rebellions caused by nothing but his own failure to handle his own family (notice that much later, such a man would not even be permitted to be an elder in the Church).
Good, loyal men died, wives were made widows, children were made orphans... to protect David from his own follies.
Even in the end, scripture is careful to note that the murderous drama of his succession was caused directly by David himself knowingly failing to prepare for Solomon to take the throne instead of the expected elder son.
As a warrior, David was great. As a king and father, he was a failure.
The king's authority does not supersede God's authority. David understood that.
The king's authority does not supersede God's authority. David understood that.
Understanding it and following it are 2 different things. Self-deception is yet another.If David had fully understood it, he would not have called Bath-sheba to his palace. If the people fully understood it, they'd have told him, "No, king" on a number of occasions.
Understanding it and following it are 2 different things. Self-deception is yet another.
When confronted by Nathan he certainly understood it and repented on the spot.
The king's authority does not supersede God's authority. David understood that.
Even the fact that his used his authority to put her in a very bad place, he couldn't use the fact that he got her into that die either way situation to save her life.
Yes. People today--particularly Americans--don't understand what power is.
And David called one of the young men and said, “Go, cut him down.” So he struck him and he died. 2 Samuel
And David commanded his young men, and they killed them and cut off their hands and feet and hanged them beside the pool at Hebron. 2 Samuel 4
So David sent someone to inquire about her....
David sent messengers to get her....
David sent orders to Joab....
In other words, the king's power was unquestioned.
And when all the officers of the army joined the general to dissuade David from a nationally disasterous command:
The king's word, however, overruled Joab and the army commanders; so they left the presence of the king to enroll the fighting men of Israel. 2 Samuel 24
The king still prevailed.
she cannot appeal to the law to protect her as an innocent victim for it is the king who has violated her.
How did the fact that David forced her prevented her from claiming innocence? What You Need to Know About Bathsheba - The Junia Project
Interesting post.Then there is Paul. He wasn't a very nice guy at first either. His number one mission in life was rounding up Christians, both men and women, and bring them back to face lions in the arena and such. Not a good way to die. Horrific actually. He was absolutely fanatic about it too.
But surprise, surprise, God forgave him also.
David's story is apparently that there was no intercourse between them at all.
But as I said before, there is little modern understanding of the power of ancient kings--whether a woman's accusation against one would have gotten any hearing whatsoever. Moreover, in David's time there was still little protocol surrounding the crown--they were all rather still playing it by ear.
What was clear is that when the king said, "Kill that man," the man was immediately killed, no question asked.
Maybe she could have tried throwing herself upon the altar at the tabernacle, but as we later see with Joab, it was within the king's power to slay even someone at the altar.
So why did David care if Uriah knew?