- Apr 5, 2007
- 140,174
- 25,219
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
I implied nothing. Zero. Zilch. Nada. There's nothing in the OP that would lead you to the conclusion you came up with. If there was, anyone reading it who knew nothing of me would be able to draw the same conclusion. I've given you multiple opportunities to recant. And it's not because I really care. I'm certainly not going to lose sleep over it. But I gave you the opportunity because I was quite certain you would not apologize and instead find ways to excuse your behavior. And the same thing later when you claimed that I said I'd do something that I never said I would do. The words were there in black and white, yet you still insisted I made a claim that I never did.I believe the OP is suggestive of your belief. You may disagree with me on that. But it is what I believe. For you have to admit that your OP questions are reflective of your belief and they are not reflective of the type of questions a Conditional Salvationist would normally ask (like myself). But does your post say exactly what you believe? No. That is not what I was trying to say. I apologize if I gave you that impression. People can have their arms folded and have a mad look on their face, which is suggestive that they may be close minded. My use of the word "implied" is simply that in post #228. "Implied." I was speaking of the intent of your posting of the OP is suggestive of your belief. I hope you understand where I am coming from; And I am not meaning to insult you in any way.
If you don't agree, I think it is best that we agree to disagree.
But please know there was no ill will in my words towards you.
I am merely in strong disagreement with what you believe.
Anyways, may God's love and peace be upon you this fine day;
And may you please be well.
So the exercise was to show the hypocrisy of those who claim to be sinless. It's easy to accomplish when you control the bar. And you did just that.
Upvote
0