John 1:1-5 is NOT a 'trinitarin' text

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dartman said:
You are missing the point.
The CHALLENGE here is; find any verses that state the trinity. (We both know you can't)
The Second CHALLENGE is; find any text that records an apostle PREACHING the trinity. (We both know you can't)

Instead of honestly confronting this issue, the trinitarian/oneness crowd keeps regurgitating the same sad interpretations of texts , and demanding an explanation for those INTERPRETATIONS .... nice parlor trick.
And if you're a Jehovah's Witness....you just need to be honest and come out and say it.
Hmmmm.... perhaps a trade? I will answer your question, if you admit there simply isn't ANY text that; A) states the trinity. or B) records an apostle PREACHING the trinity.
 
Upvote 0

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
no

I think I might have heard an explanation, at some time. But it was not obviously reliable.
The Comma Johanneum, also called the Johannine Comma or the Heavenly Witnesses, is a comma (a short clause) found in Latin manuscripts of the First Epistle of John[1] at 5:7–8. The comma first appeared in the Vulgate manuscripts of the 9th century.[2] The first Greek manuscript that contains the comma dates from the 15th century.[3] The comma is absent from the Ethiopiac, Aramaic, Syriac, Slavic, Armenian, Georgian, and Arabic translations of the Greek New Testament.[3] The scholarly consensus is that that passage is a Latin corruption that entered the Greek manuscript tradition in some subsequent copies.[1] As the comma does not appear in the manuscript tradition of other languages, the debate is mainly limited to the English-speaking world due to the King James Only movement.
 
Upvote 0

Lukaris

Orthodox Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2007
7,883
2,548
Pennsylvania, USA
✟754,677.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Well getting back to John 1:1-5, I presume your sources say that in John 1:1 that instead of its conclusion saying that, "the Word was God" your watchtower Bible would conclude "the word was a god". So from this we must conclude that the "Word" was just a "word"'and "God" is just a "god". I have no idea how you get around John 1:14 with such theory.

Interestingly in the footnotes of the New King James Bible (NKJV) for John 1:18 which says the "only begotten Son who is in the bosom of the Father.." says some ancient manuscripts say the "only begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father.." Note that this further confirms that the Word and Son are "God"and not a "god".

Re 1 John 5:7-8 , I am sure there is scholarship that supports its authenticity surely the whole Gospel of John supports what the apostle summarizes in his 1st epistle.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Other scholars got to me before you did!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,198
9,966
The Void!
✟1,133,468.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Hmmmm.... perhaps a trade? I will answer your question, if you admit there simply isn't ANY text that; A) states the trinity. or B) records an apostle PREACHING the trinity.

Ok. I admit that there is no text in the New Testament that ... specifically uses the term, Trinity, as a collective designation for the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. And no apostle specifically uses the term, Trinity, either.

Are we good now? :rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟960,797.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
The trinity just makes sense to me, I use to be a Jehovah's Witness and did not believe in it then and heard and read much against it, it was discovery of the H.S. and in Acts, and going back to pure scripture rather than their books, that, the trinity, just made/makes sense to me, it solves a problem when trying to work the H.S. into things, into your mental concepts, that the trinity just makes sense to me, and I think it is scripturally sound...

I just don't know know if they are equal or exactly alike or not, or have the same knowledge (at the start) or not...

But Scriptures talking about Jesus as being the one through whom God or the Father, made all things, and the H.S. clearly being present in the very beginning with God also, along with the Son, and The Father God...

John's gospel, and many of the things the disciples and apostles taught in other books, make clear distinctions between the Father and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, yet that all and each are God, like the Father is...

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well getting back to John 1:1-5, I presume your sources say that in John 1:1 that instead of its conclusion saying that, "the Word was God" your watchtower Bible would conclude "the word was a god".
No. "The word was God" ... or, more directly from the Greek, "and God, was the word".

Lukaris said:
So from this we must conclude that the "Word" was just a "word"'and "God" is just a "god".
We need to beware of "straw man" arguments. You've made a couple of fundamental erroneous assessments.
The conclusion that logos/word means EXACTLY what it ALWAYS means, is natural, and supported in the entire Book of John, as well as the rest of the Greek texts.
It is the trinitarian argument that presumes the right to define logos in an UNNATURAL way.

Lukaris said:
I have no idea how you get around John 1:14 with such theory.
There is no "get around", it's simple.
Jesus is the "flesh and blood" fulfillment of his God's words.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dartman said:
I will answer your question, if you admit there simply isn't ANY text that; A) states the trinity. or B) records an apostle PREACHING the trinity.
Ok. I admit that there is no text in the New Testament that ... specifically uses the term, Trinity, as a collective designation for the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. And no apostle specifically uses the term, Trinity, either.

Are we good now? :rolleyes:
Are you telling me you actually think your "admission" meets the criteria I requested? Merely admitting the WORD "trinity" isn't in the Scriptures doesn't work.
" .. there simply isn't ANY text that; A) states the trinity. or B) records an apostle PREACHING the trinity."

Just so there is NO question..... "states the trinity" would include ANY tenet UNIQUE to trinitarian theories.
"PREACHING the trinity" would include ANY tenet UNIQUE to trinitarian theories.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Other scholars got to me before you did!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,198
9,966
The Void!
✟1,133,468.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Are you telling me you actually think your "admission" meets the criteria I requested? Merely admitting the WORD "trinity" isn't in the Scriptures doesn't work.
" .. there simply isn't ANY text that; A) states the trinity. or B) records an apostle PREACHING the trinity."

Just so there is NO question..... "states the trinity" would include ANY tenet UNIQUE to trinitarian theories.
"PREACHING the trinity" would include ANY tenet UNIQUE to trinitarian theories.

Ok. That's the way you see it, and I understand that is your present viewpoint.

But, let's assume that Jesus isn't God. What about the Holy Spirit? What is 'it' in your view?
 
Upvote 0

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The trinity just makes sense to me, I use to be a Jehovah's Witness and did not believe in it then and heard and read much against it, it was discovery of the H.S. and in Acts, and going back to pure scripture rather than their books, that, the trinity, just made/makes sense to me, it solves a problem when trying to work the H.S. into things, into your mental concepts, that the trinity just makes sense to me, and I think it is scripturally sound...

I just don't know know if they are equal or exactly alike or not, or have the same knowledge (at the start) or not...

But Scriptures talking about Jesus as being the one through whom God or the Father, made all things, and the H.S. clearly being present in the very beginning with God also, along with the Son, and The Father God...

John's gospel, and many of the things the disciples and apostles taught in other books, make clear distinctions between the Father and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, yet that all and each are God, like the Father is...

God Bless!
The Scriptures are impeccably clear, that Jehovah/YHVH God, Christ's God, is the Creator in Genesis. The Creator of heaven and earth, and all creatures in them.

The Scriptures are LESS clear, but still clear enough, that Jesus is the creator of the COSMOS in which he was resurrected, and in which the apostles taught, and established the Church, and in which we currently live.
Paul clarifies EXACTLY what this "COSMOS" means, when he stated "thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers".




 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok. That's the way you see it, and I understand that is your present viewpoint.

But, let's assume that Jesus isn't God. What about the Holy Spirit? What is 'it' in your view?
It is God's mind, and the power produced by God's mind.
Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The holy spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

It is in contrast to "the spirit of the world".
1 Cor 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.

The product of God's spirit is KNOWLEDGE ... a Godly mind, with God's values, justice, wisdom, thinking.
God IS spirit, and the believers must worship Him in spirit and in truth.
God is a mentality, and it is crucial that the believer's mind is transformed to match God's thinking/mind/spirit.
Eph 4:17-24 So this I say, and affirm together with the Lord, that you walk no longer just as the Gentiles also walk, in the futility of their mind, 18 being darkened in their understanding, excluded from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, because of the hardness of their heart; 19 and they, having become callous, have given themselves over to sensuality for the practice of every kind of impurity with greediness. 20 But you did not learn Christ in this way, 21 if indeed you have heard Him and have been taught in Him, just as truth is in Jesus, 22 that, in reference to your former manner of life, you lay aside the old self, which is being corrupted in accordance with the lusts of deceit, 23 and that you be renewed in the spirit of your mind, 24 and put on the new self, which in the likeness of God has been created in righteousness and holiness of the truth.
Eph 5:1-2 Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children;
Rom 12:1-2 Therefore I urge you, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies a living and holy sacrifice, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service of worship. 2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect.
 
Upvote 0

GeorgeTwo

Member
May 31, 2008
1,127
126
✟39,702.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
You are missing the point.
The CHALLENGE here is; find any verses that state the trinity. (We both know you can't)
The Second CHALLENGE is; find any text that records an apostle PREACHING the trinity. (We both know you can't)

Instead of honestly confronting this issue, the trinitarian/oneness crowd keeps regurgitating the same sad interpretations of texts , and demanding an explanation for those INTERPRETATIONS .... nice parlor trick.

Read and learn:

The Biblical Basis of the Doctrine of the Trinity by Robert Bowman, Jr.

Trinity | Monergism
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pilgrim
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Other scholars got to me before you did!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,198
9,966
The Void!
✟1,133,468.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It is God's mind, and the power produced by God's mind.
Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The holy spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

It is in contrast to "the spirit of the world".
1 Cor 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.

The product of God's spirit is KNOWLEDGE ... a Godly mind, with God's values, justice, wisdom, thinking.
God IS spirit, and the believers must worship Him in spirit and in truth.
God is a mentality, and it is crucial that the believer's mind is transformed to match God's thinking/mind/spirit.
Eph 4:17-24 So this I say, and affirm together with the Lord, that you walk no longer just as the Gentiles also walk, in the futility of their mind, 18 being darkened in their understanding, excluded from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, because of the hardness of their heart; 19 and they, having become callous, have given themselves over to sensuality for the practice of every kind of impurity with greediness. 20 But you did not learn Christ in this way, 21 if indeed you have heard Him and have been taught in Him, just as truth is in Jesus, 22 that, in reference to your former manner of life, you lay aside the old self, which is being corrupted in accordance with the lusts of deceit, 23 and that you be renewed in the spirit of your mind, 24 and put on the new self, which in the likeness of God has been created in righteousness and holiness of the truth.
Eph 5:1-2 Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children;
Rom 12:1-2 Therefore I urge you, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies a living and holy sacrifice, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service of worship. 2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect.

Ok. So, the Holy Spirit is God, then, right?
 
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,390
✟162,912.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Please read the CONTEXT of Proverbs 8!
This is a classic example of distorting a text, by ignoring it's context.
 
Upvote 0

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,390
✟162,912.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
Please read the CONTEXT of Proverbs 8!
This is a classic example of distorting a text, by ignoring it's context.

It is a characteristic of God anthropomorphized. How different is this than John 1 aside from how the Logos was incarnated?
 
Upvote 0

Dartman

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,311
221
71
Washington
✟27,191.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is a characteristic of God anthropomorphized.
Wisdom is certainly a characteristic of God, and He is the epitome of wisdom, but the text isn't limited to God's wisdom, it is anthropomorphizing ALL wisdom. The attempt to take PART of that text, OUT of context, and force it to be specifically about Jesus, is a classic example of eisegesis.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,390
✟162,912.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
Wisdom is certainly a characteristic of God, and He is the epitome of wisdom, but the text isn't limited to God's wisdom, it is anthropomorphizing ALL wisdom. The attempt to take PART of that text, OUT of context, and force it to be specifically about Jesus, is a classic example of eisegesis.

Thank you for your opinion.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.