- Sep 6, 2016
- 15,961
- 10,817
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
The basis for which God shows mercy on whom He wills is left to God and Him alone. And is definitely not based on human will or effort, as Romans 9:16 states. Unless you know the mind of the Lord, the arbitrary response as to why is foolish and arrogant"I will have mercy upon whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion"
Is there a basis by which God shows mercy to one and not another or is it purely arbitrary?
But what is that basis? The bible tells us what that basis is....Jeremiah 18:8-10The basis for which God shows mercy on whom He wills is left to God and Him alone. And is definitely not based on human will or effort, as Romans 9:16 states. Unless you know the mind of the Lord, the arbitrary response as to why is foolish and arrogant
Who has said man has no responsibility to obey God? You assume that simply because you believe salvation is dependent upon sinful man. Your question was what is the basis by which God shows mercy upon a sinner. The Bible means what it says. The Bible is very clear that it has nothing to do with mans efforts or the act of his will. "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us.." Titus 3:5. It is according to the election of GRACE! And that in Christ and through His merits alone. Your whole statement is contradicting itself. Either God shows mercy, on the vessels of mercy, by their works and efforts or He doesn't. The simple fact that you refuse to believe God shows mercy apart from anything He sees in the sinner, is why you accuse God of being arbitrary in His decision to choose some over others. And is why you refuse to believe Romans 9:16. And is why you are foolish in saying such thingsBut what is that basis? The bible tells us what that basis is....Jeremiah 18:8-10
=======
Romans 9:16 "So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy."
1) we can know that this verse does NOT mean man has no responsibility to obey the will of God for such an idea contradicts all the verses that requires man to obey as Hebrews 5:9, 2 Thessalonians 1:8; Acts 10:35; 1 John 3:10; etc
2) we can know from this verse that man did not deserve salvation nor can man earn salvation. Paul was proving to the Jew (who God cast off see Romans 11) that God did not owe them salvation. Just being descendants of Abraham did not obligate God to owe them salvation.
3) we know that God "sheweth mercy" to mankind by sending His Son to die upon the cross for the sins of man. There was no "willing or running" on the part of man that caused God to show His mercy, it was purely due to God's graciousness that He sent Christ to earth thereby showing mercy to man. Even though it was solely God's choice to extend mercy to man, there is still a required "willing" (John 7:17; Revelation 22:17) and "running" (Hebrews 12:1; 1 Corinthians 9:24-26) on the part of man in order to receive God's mercy. Because God's mercy does not unconditionally save everyone, but those that conditionally obey the will of God ( those that "willeth and runneth") are the ones that conditionally receive God's grace.
Who has said man has no responsibility to obey God?
MDC said:You assume that simply because you believe salvation is dependent upon sinful man.
MDC said:Your question was what is the basis by which God shows mercy upon a sinner. The Bible means what it says. The Bible is very clear that it has nothing to do with mans efforts or the act of his will. "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us.." Titus 3:5. It is according to the election of GRACE! And that in Christ and through His merits alone.
MDC said:Your whole statement is contradicting itself. Either God shows mercy, on the vessels of mercy, by their works and efforts or He doesn't. The simple fact that you refuse to believe God shows mercy apart from anything He sees in the sinner, is why you accuse God of being arbitrary in His decision to choose some over others. And is why you refuse to believe Romans 9:16. And is why you are foolish in saying such things
Nothing God does is purely arbitrary."I will have mercy upon whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion"
Is there a basis by which God shows mercy to one and not another or is it purely arbitrary?
Man has absolutely no role in his own salvation.
MDC said:All he can do is seek Gods mercy and submit (by faith) to the righteousness of Christ and His merits alone.
MDC said:Romans 9:11 exposes your erroneous opinion that sinful mans obedience is the basis for God showing mercy on some. Which in turn teaches works based salvation. You accuse the Jews of being self righteousness, but yet cannot see your own teaching promotes self righteousness. The basis for one receiving mercy is left to God and Him alone by the pleasure of His will.. To the praise of the glory of His grace as Ephesians 1:6 states
Nothing God does is purely arbitrary.
When we say that God's election is unconditional that does not mean that there is no reason at all for it.
Marvin Knox said:I simply means that it is unconditional on anything of value in fallen mankind.
Whatever reason brings Him the most glory in any given circumstance.What is the reason then?
"Abraham will surely become a great and mighty nation, and in him all the nations of the earth will be blessed? For I have chosen him, so that he may command his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing righteousness and justice, so that the Lord may bring upon Abraham what He has spoken about him.” Genesis 18:18-19 NASB......Genesis 18:19 "For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him."......
I understand why it may be more comfortable for you to line up with this "Coffman" commentary as opposed to lining up with Greathouse and the vast majority of solid systematic theologians over the years (or me for that matter).......
There was certainly something in Abraham and his children that God saw thereby making them to be the elect of God. There is a reason given as to why Abraham was chosen...for there was something "in" Abraham, Isaac and Jacob that God saw with that being the very reason they were chosen:..........
"That God chose Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob did not depend upon anything in them .... The choice depended solely on God's gracious will" William M. Greathouse...........
In this epic passage of God's word, God stated his reasons for the choice of Abraham. God categorically stated, that he knew that Abraham would command his posterity after him, that they would keep the way of the Lord to do justice and judgment, "that the Lord may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him," the latter clause being a dogmatic affirmation that without the qualities God foreknew in Abraham, the fulfillment of the promise would have been impossible. Thus they greatly err who fancy that it "was nothing in" Abraham that entered into God's election. That there was indeed something "in" Abraham that formed the basis of God's just and righteous act should have been assumed, even without the statement of what it was; but such is the perversity of human thought that it is even denied AFTER the statement of it!..........Coffman Commentaries
Whatever reason brings Him the most glory in any given circumstance.
Marvin Knox said:"Abraham will surely become a great and mighty nation, and in him all the nations of the earth will be blessed? For I have chosen him, so that he may command his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing righteousness and justice, so that the Lord may bring upon Abraham what He has spoken about him.” Genesis 18:18-19 NASB
"Abraham will surely become a great and powerful nation, and all nations on earth will be blessed through him. For I have chosen him, so that he will direct his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing what is right and just, so that the Lord will bring about for Abraham what he has promised him.” "...." NIV
"Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? For I have chosen him, that he may command his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing righteousness and justice, so that the Lord may bring to Abraham what he has promised him.” "...." ESV
"Abraham is destined to become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth will be blessed through him? For I have known (chosen, acknowledged) him [as My own], so that he may teach and command his children and [the sons of] his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing what is righteous and just, so that the Lord may bring upon Abraham what He has promised him.” "...." AMP
"his family will become a great and powerful nation that will be a blessing to all other nations on earth. I have chosen him to teach his family to obey me forever and to do what is right and fair. Then I will give Abraham many descendants, just as I promised.” "...." CEV
"His descendants will become a great and mighty nation, and through him I will bless all the nations. I have chosen him in order that he may command his sons and his descendants to obey me and to do what is right and just. If they do, I will do everything for him that I have promised.” "...." GNT
"Abraham will surely become a great and powerful nation, and all the nations on the earth will pronounce blessings on one another using his name. I have chosen him so that he may command his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing what is right and just. Then the Lord will give to Abraham what he promised him.” "...." NET
I could go on I suppose. But the point is that you and your chosen commentator have clearly chosen a translation which allows you to present things according to your preconceived doctrine rather than researching the true meaning of the passage and bringing you doctrine to line up with the teaching of scripture.
I understand why it may be more comfortable for you to line up with this "Coffman" commentary as opposed to lining up with Greathouse and the vast majority of solid systematic theologians over the years (or me for that matter).
But you are wrong concerning this doctrine - even if opposing views seem unfair to you.
It seems that God's ways are not our ways. That is especially true when we don't have all the facts.
Even when we do have the curtain drawn back a little for us (such as the JOB case) - God's way of doing things seems to not be the way we think He should act.
I personally am willing to accept what He says about the way He acts rather than bend what He says to meet my expectations of how He should act.
Of course it does.This does not give a basis as to why God has mercy upon one and not another.
Who said otherwise?The bible time and time again gives obedience to the will of God as to why one receives mercy or not.
Of course it fits with Calvinistic doctrine. This is what all Calvinists I am aware of teach.Since this does not fit Calvinistic theology Calvinist are force to either shuffle around as to what the basis is or claim that man does not know the basis as to why one is saved thereby leaving man in the dark not being able to know if he will be saved or not.
Of course it does.
It does not innumerate every single situation in history and how it brings God glory. But it most certainly does state the reason why God chooses to do certain things and not others.
Marvin Knox said:Who said otherwise?
A person does not receive mercy until he obeys God in coming to Christ and is justified by his faith.
This is Calvinistic doctrine all the way.
Marvin Knox said:Of course it fits with Calvinistic doctrine. This is what all Calvinists I am aware of teach.
Calvinists do not claim that man does not know the basis as to why one is saved.
They do claim that they do not know why the Father chooses to open the eyes of some and not others so that they can receive salvation by faith. But then the Bible simply addresses that question with the statement that God will have mercy on whom He will have mercy.
There is no question that God shows mercy to those who have faith. There is, however a question as to why He begins a good work in some which brings them to faith so that they will be shown mercy in the day of judgment - and does not do the same for others.
None of us deserve to be given to the Son by the Father and thus drawn to the Son by the Father. We are saved by grace through faith.
Those 'other verses' about obedience are just exposing the transformed heart will be obedient to the gospel.You posted earlier "Whatever reason brings Him the most glory in any given circumstance."
So what is the reason that God chooses one person over another that brings Him glory?
Why choosing Joe over John brings glory to God and not the other way around? What was different about Joe over John? You simply cannot suggest that God's choosing brings Him glory with no basis for the choosing.
So Calvinistic doctrine puts the work of obeying BEFORE justification/salvation?
I NEVER seen a Calvinists say that before.
I have yet to see a Calvinist say one obeys to be saved. All I have seen Calvinists say one is saved not by works but saved by faith only then after one is saved one can obey.
It cannot be assumed since Romans 9:18 gives no basis that there is no basis or man cannot know the basis. When other verses show that obeying or not obeying the will of God is the basis.
You posted "A person does not receive mercy until he obeys God in coming to Christ and is justified by his faith." I am curious as to how many other Calvinists agree with your statement here in putting obedient works before receiving mercy/grace/salvation.
I cannot innumerate for you every conceivable circumstance in the spiritual realm and in the physical realm that may exist at any given time.You posted earlier "Whatever reason brings Him the most glory in any given circumstance."
So what is the reason that God chooses one person over another that brings Him glory?
Why choosing Joe over John brings glory to God and not the other way around? What was different about Joe over John? You simply cannot suggest that God's choosing brings Him glory with no basis for the choosing.
I'm not sure how many Calvinists you have given such a chance to. But, of course, the work of obeying by believing comes before justification. Every Calvinist believes that just as I hope you do.So Calvinistic doctrine puts the work of obeying BEFORE justification/salvation?
I NEVER seen a Calvinists say that before..
We are commanded by God to obey the demands of the gospel. Trusting in Christ for our only hope of salvation is obedience. Only after thus obeying is a person justified.I have yet to see a Calvinist say one obeys to be saved. All I have seen Calvinists say one is saved not by works
No - Calvinist teach that only after drawing by the Father can one obey..... only then after one is saved one can obey.
No one said that there was no basis for God's giving a person to the Son by drawing him so as to believe the gospel.It cannot be assumed since Romans 9:18 gives no basis that there is no basis or man cannot know the basis. When other verses show that obeying or not obeying the will of God is the basis.
All Calvinist believe that salvation comes by the obedience of faith in Christ.You posted "A person does not receive mercy until he obeys God in coming to Christ and is justified by his faith." I am curious as to how many other Calvinists agree with your statement here in putting obedient works before receiving mercy/grace/salvation.
Those 'other verses' about obedience are just exposing the transformed heart will be obedient to the gospel.
sdowney717 said:As Peter tells us straight up very first verse, first epistle.
1 Peter 1New International Version (NIV)
1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ,
To God’s elect, exiles scattered throughout the provinces of Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia, 2 who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to be obedient to Jesus Christ and sprinkled with his blood:
Grace and peace be yours in abundance.
Praise to God for a Living Hope
3 Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! In his great mercy he has given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4 and into an inheritance that can never perish, spoil or fade. This inheritance is kept in heaven for you, 5 who through faith are shielded by God’s power until the coming of the salvation that is ready to be revealed in the last time. 6 In all this you greatly rejoice,
Well the ELECT should greatly rejoice having been chosen by God to obtain salvation.
But some people seem to HATE being chosen....
As Paul also tells this church here
2 Thessalonians 2:13-14New King James Version (NKJV)
13 But we are bound to give thanks to God always for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God from the beginning chose you for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth,
14 to which He called you by our gospel, for the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
I cannot innumerate for you every conceivable circumstance in the spiritual realm and in the physical realm that may exist at any given time.
I could dream up a few examples for you. But then so could you.
But since you insist on an example - take the one of Paul - election of a much less deserving person can hardly be conceived of.
But at that time and place in history Paul served the purpose of God in so far as bringing Him maximum glory over against choosing someone else.
Sure - Paul had more potential than some seal hunter on the North slope of North America with no education for example. But the only reason for choosing Paul for salvation and leaving the Eskimo in his sin, passing him by, was because it would bring more glory to God.
The point is that neither Paul or our imaginary Eskimo deserved the mercy which it would take to open his eyes so that he could see the truth of the gospel. It was, in the word of Calvinists, unconditional grace.
I suppose I could imaging a situation in the spirit realm having to do with certain angelic battles which could come into play I suppose. But why don't you go ahead and let your imagination go wild on that one.
Marvin Knox said:I'm not sure how many Calvinists you have given such a chance to. But, of course, the work of obeying by believing comes before justification. Every Calvinist believes that just as I hope you do.
Marvin Knox said:We are commanded by God to obey the demands of the gospel. Trusting in Christ for our only hope of salvation is obedience. Only after thus obeying is a person justified.
Reformed theologians above anyone else teach justification by faith alone.
Marvin Knox said:No - Calvinist teach that only after drawing by the Father can one obey.
Marvin Knox said:One cannot be saved until he obeys. No one obeys in their natural state (according to Calvinist teaching). Therefore they teach that what is necessary to understand and obey is a new creation - one that comes from God by grace and not because the old man deserved regeneration.
No one said that there was no basis for God's giving a person to the Son by drawing him so as to believe the gospel.
They have simply said that that basis was not the deserving nature of the sinner.
All Calvinist believe that salvation comes by the obedience of faith in Christ.
What they apparently believe that is different from you is that you believe there is something in some sinners which makes them more deserving than other men of having their natures changed so that they can believe while others are passed by.
Calvinist simply teach that the reason for that election is only known by God and that it is not because any particular person deserves it more than another.
No - they say that one is elect first (with the expected drawing and giving by the Father as per Jesus words coming as a result of God's unconditional election).Other than you, I have NEVER seen a Calvinist say either of these things but instead they tell me one is FIRST saved THEN obeys where you put obedience first.
I doubt that you are being "attacked" because you say "one must do the work of obeying BEFORE he can be justified/saved". Likely what you are being taken to task about is your saying in effect that fallen men have the ability to and inclination to understand and obey the command to believe in and of themselves. The scriptures teach otherwise.When I say one must do the work of obeying BEFORE he can be justified/saved, I get attacked and accused of having a "works based salvation" where I am trying to earn my salvation. I was told earlier in this thread that being saved/receiving mercy has nothing to do with the willing and running of man.
If I am making it a point to use wording which most Calvinist do not use with you - it is only because I care enough about you to try (perhaps in vain) to reason with you and show where you are depicting Calvinistic beliefs wrongly and arguing against straw men much of the time - perhaps even doing it with not realizing it since you misunderstand what others believe and teach.I have NEVER seen a Calvinists 1) call belief a work or 2) put a work BEFORE justification as you do.