No the context statement you avoid is found in verse 3.Sure there is. You just wont accept it. Matthew 19:16-19
I think you've only stated an opinion. If you'd kindly show me how my Scriptures are taken out of context and twisted, I'd appreciate it.
And yes your Matthew 19 is out of context and agreement with the OT, if you think Jesus is requiring the law to be kept.
#222Out of context??? What is out of context???
Teacher, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
...if thou wouldest enter into life, keep the commandments.
Personally I don't think you're being point blank honest. If you were the tone would be much different.
No. You responded with other subject matter. I asked you a direct question you refuse to answer because it puts you between a rock and a very hard place with no where to turn. If you answered the question it proves your argument fails.
Your reference has nothing to do with keeping the law.
Does that mean the law is altered? Wouldn't that be changing the jots and tittles of the law?
quoting and writing just anything isn't an answer.I did answer, you just cant accept it because it ruins YOUR argument...
No the context statement you avoid is found in verse 3.
The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?
How? You're trying to prove a person can possess eternal life with out Jesus.Absolutely it does
quoting and writing just anything isn't an answer.
How? You're trying to prove a person can possess eternal life with out Jesus.
Because the passage doesn't say a Pharisee your claim is isn't the continued testing to trap Jesus. The OT says no one keeps the law. Here your claim is it can be done. Name anyone except Jesus accomplishing this incredible feat.Verse 3 has Pharisees. However they leave in the following verses. So my quote IS in context. The verse I quoted involves a man who comes to Yeshua AFTER the Pharisees leave:
15 And he laid his hands on them, and departed thence.
16 And behold, one came to him and said, Teacher, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
You've been invited to prove these wild claim.You using quotes completely out of context to prove an already incorrect assumption isn't either...
Because the passage doesn't say a Pharisee your claim is isn't the continued testing to trap Jesus. The OT says no one keeps the law. Here your claim is it can be done. Name anyone except Jesus accomplishing this incredible feat.
And he didn't? Why? Jesus showed him he didn't keep the law. And he refused to keep it.No I'm not since Yeshua says too be perfect the man should follow Him.
I think it has to do with the purpose of the law, namely the need for redemption as promised in Genesis 3.If GOD believed that it was possible to keep the Torah perfectly, why did He institute the sin offering?
Because the passage doesn't say a Pharisee your claim is isn't the continued testing to trap Jesus. The OT says no one keeps the law. Here your claim is it can be done. Name anyone except Jesus accomplishing this incredible feat.