The one world goverment and mark of the beast

BABerean2

Newbie
Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
At one time Walter Cronkite was considered by many to be "The most trusted man in America".

In the following you will see how he and other globalists have hidden the truth from the American people.

The lady who speaks during the last few minutes almost became president of the U.S.


 
Upvote 0

Blade

Veteran
Supporter
Dec 29, 2002
8,165
3,989
USA
✟629,996.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you believe we are close? why or why not?

Staff this may not be the right forum for this thread if not feel free to move.


No. The one world order never really is the whole world for some (nations) are fighting the Antichrist. Mark of the beast? Something has to happen that would cause Israel to WANT to sign something. That alone can be years. But before the mark... the beast comes to life..and the world is told to worship it. That alone..do that you have no every lasting life. Not you but people always go to the MARK! To get to the mark you HAVE to worship it. And the word says.. those who worship and take the mark are lost forever. Side note. No one will do this by mistake. Those that worship KNOW they are saying NO to GOD.. they DONT want Him. Same with the mark. No one is lost by accident. God IS FAITHFUL!
 
Upvote 0

RisenInJesus

Well-Known Member
Apr 8, 2016
608
273
USA
✟34,201.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

RisenInJesus

Well-Known Member
Apr 8, 2016
608
273
USA
✟34,201.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Which Israel?


I really find Chuck Baldwin's perspective contrary to the Bible. The re-establishment of present day Israel as a nation again after over 2000 years of dispersion is a miraculous event which could only have been accomplished by God in fulfillment of His prophetic word.

The preservation of the Israelis as an identifiable people, in spite of the proverbial "wandering Jews'" 2,500-year diaspora from the promised land, and the establishment of Israel in 1948, constitute irrefutable proof for the existence of the "God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" and the validity of His Holy Word. Therefore, to insist that Israel no longer has any claim to her ancient homeland, and that her return thereto is a mere coincidence, denies one of the most persuasive arguments for belief in God and the gospel. It dishonors Him and His Word, and is not only illogical but evil!
Jews, Gentiles & the Church
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I really find Chuck Baldwin's perspective contrary to the Bible. The re-establishment of present day Israel as a nation again after over 2000 years of dispersion is a miraculous event which could only have been accomplished by God in fulfillment of His prophetic word.

Did you watch the video in post #14 of this thread?
The one world goverment and mark of the beast


Do you agree with the words of Christ in Matthew 21:42-43 when He said the kingdom would be taken away from those who reject the "chief cornerstone" and it would be given to another nation bearing fruit?

Do you understand that the nation who accepted the "chief cornerstone" is found in 1 Peter 2:4-10?

Do you believe the warning against using "endless genealogies" in 1 Timothy 1:4?

Do you believe 1 John 2:22-23?

Is Chuck Baldwin's perspective contrary to the above?

.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

RisenInJesus

Well-Known Member
Apr 8, 2016
608
273
USA
✟34,201.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Did you watch the video in post #14 of this thread?
The one world goverment and mark of the beast


Do you agree with the words of Christ in Matthew 21:42-43 when He said the kingdom would be taken away from those who reject the "chief cornerstone" and it would be given to another nation bearing fruit?

Do you understand that the nation who accepted the "chief cornerstone" is found in 1 Peter 2:4-10?

Do you believe the warning against using "endless genealogies" in 1 Timothy 1:4?

Do you believe 1 John 2:22-23?

Is Chuck Baldwin's perspective contrary to the above?

.

W.A. Criswell, well-known Baptist pastor and leader, once said, “The
correct identification of Israel is a key to the true interpretation of the whole
Bible. If Israel means God’s ancient people, the Bible becomes as clear as
truth itself. If Israel means the New Testament church, the teaching of the
Bible becomes obscure.”1 Yet supersessionism, the view that the church has
superseded or replaced Israel, seems to be increasingly popular. In spite of serious theological implications and weak exegetical foundations, it is the majority position in contemporary evangelicalism.2 This can be explained only
on spiritual and pastoral bases. Paul warned against a Gentile pride regarding
the people of Israel (Rom 11:13–32), and a failure to heed his warning leads
to supersessionism and, in addition, may lead to anti-Semitism

https://swbts.edu/sites/default/files/images/content/docs/journal/59_1/SWJT 59.1_Sibley.pdf

Yes, Chuck Baldwin's perspective is contrary. Jesus was speaking to Jews in reference to the coming kingdom promised to Israel throughout the OT. It would be given to those of the nation of Israel who believed. Peter was speaking to Jewish believers. He certainly was not speaking about the United States or the church which is not a nation. Again, the point is that the kingdom was prophetically promised to Israel and God will at the end of the age keep His promise to those of Israel who have placed their faith in Christ as Messiah.
All kinds of confusion arises when you try to apply scriptures which are meant for Israel to the church or any other nation.

Supersessionism
Mountains of books and commentaries and file folders full of papers
and articles, all reflecting erudite scholarship and prodigious effort are based
upon the presumption that 1 Peter was addressed to Gentile Christians or to
congregations of both Jewish and Gentile Christians. Several authors have
suggested that the letter should be interpreted in light of a controlling meta
-
Conclusion
The interpretations of, and conclusions based upon, 1 Peter are directly
dependent on the question of the recipients of the epistle. Yet, strangely,
there is seldom a rigorous review of the evidence. This article has attempted
to suggest that such an investigation will indicate that the original readers
were Jewish believers. This profoundly affects the epistle’s interpretation. Just
as when an old masterpiece is cleaned and restored, stripping away a super
sessionist presupposition is sure to yield the surprising beauty intended by
the author.
When 1 Peter is read in light of an original audience of Jewish believers
in Jesus, nothing is lost, but much is gained. Reading this letter “over
the shoulders” of the Jewish believers to whom it was originally addressed is
deeply instructive for all believers today. Peter writes these Jewish believers
as they are experiencing escalating persecution from both Jews and Gentiles,
and he encourages them to endure faithfully and victoriously by living holy
lives and by keeping their focus on Jesus, the Messiah, who died for them.
This is the very message Jewish believers will need in times of future tribula
tion.
https://swbts.edu/sites/default/files/images/content/docs/journal/59_1/SWJT 59.1_Sibley.pdf
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,563
2,480
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟290,794.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Supersessionism
Mountains of books and commentaries and file folders full of papers
and articles, all reflecting erudite scholarship and prodigious effort are based
upon the presumption that 1 Peter was addressed to Gentile Christians or to
congregations of both Jewish and Gentile Christians.
The issue of Two People, Two Promises, [2P2P] has been extensively discussed here.
It is undoubtedly a false theory, well proved by many scriptures saying there is but one people of God. Ephesians 4:4-6, Romans 2:11, John 17:20-23, +
There is just those who believe in God are born again in the Spirit and who accept the atoning sacrifice of Jesus. Be they Jew, Gentile or Eskimo.
Then there are all the rest, non believers, atheists and prime fools.
Let us hear no more nonsense about the ethnic Jews having any special redemption to come. That idea is just promoted in order to suit a 'rapture to heaven' of the Church, while the Jews get tribulated on earth. Jesus said: the Jews were of the synagogue of Satan, Revelation 2:9b and He also said; they would be slaughtered. Luke 19:27
 
Upvote 0