Yes, interesting that another person's opinion on the subject is being boosted who cannot properly read the Swedish study (see point 8). She completely ignores that the study itself says that those who transitioned after 1989 don't have the high suicide rate. It's literally in the
language of the study itself. Look under Discussion, paragraph 2. It's in plain black and white. But that's not the only problem with her opinion piece. Here's three more:
Point 5 she refers to a study from 2003 of 30 trans individuals to say that it's unsafe. She wrote this study a few days ago. Why she would pick this study when there is a more recent (2012), much more extensive study of a much larger (over 1,000) population is unclear, unless you look at the results of the study. The study she presented says there is a high risk. The larger, more recent study
says it's safe.
In point 4, her conclusion that the medical protocol leads children to identify as transgender is unsupported and ignores the reality of the requirements for medical treatment (mainly that the child
already persistently, consistently and insistently identify as transgender). It's rather a bizarre way to look at the cases.
Point 7 demonstrates a lack of awareness of the studies done. Keep in mind she wrote this article in July 2017 and notes here that "there is no evidence" that affirmation helps children.
Yet there is. The study is over a year before this article. "no evidence" indeed.
If you actually want to understand the subject matter, I wouldn't turn to folks who are cherry picking their presentation and ignoring the current science on the subject.