National Go Topless Day

Darkhorse

just horsing around
Aug 10, 2005
10,078
3,977
mid-Atlantic
Visit site
✟288,141.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
http://www.plainbibleteaching.com/2006/04/01/modest-apparel/

You don't see truth to that? With bikinis the combination of those areas exposed can cause overwhelming temptation to lust.

And when it does...the problem (sin) is in the luster, not the person wearing little or no clothing.

Sometimes the bare skin causes no lust; do you consider it a sin then?

If someone cuts me off in traffic, I could get angry (sin?), or curse (sin?), or do some violent road-rage thing (sin). Or I can remind myself that people can be inconsiderate and careless, and avoid sinning over their behavior.

Same thing.

Do you consider cutting people off to be a sin?
 
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟104,579.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Not necessarily.

You seem to be oblivious to the assumptions, logic leaps and non-sequiturs the guy makes.

In a person who has a foot fetish, an exposed toe or heel can cause an "overwhelming temptation to lust" as well. Is having bare feet not modest?

One assumption the guy makes in Paul's writing (and you have been told this by several people) is that the "modest clothing" refers to sexuality. It is clear from the context that it is about wealth.

Most women don't expect a guy to think that way. Bikinis are different.
 
Upvote 0

dayhiker

Mature veteran
Sep 13, 2006
15,557
5,288
MA
✟220,077.00
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
1st off I'd say we are all responsible for ourselves. No woman can make a man sin. The seed of sin is inside of each of us that sins. The outside part just provides an opportunity. Women are only responsible if a man asks them to not do dress a certain way when we are at the same event. See what the Bible says about a weak believer.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sometimes the bare skin causes no lust; do you consider it a sin then?

If someone cuts me off in traffic, I could get angry (sin?), or curse (sin?), or do some violent road-rage thing (sin). Or I can remind myself that people can be inconsiderate and careless, and avoid sinning over their behavior.

Same thing.

Do you consider cutting people off to be a sin?
The Wesleyan Holiness people of the late 19th and early 20th century considered sporting events to be immodest since it caused people to get angry and yell and curse at each other, the teams and the refs.
 
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟104,579.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
1st off I'd say we are all responsible for ourselves. No woman can make a man sin. The seed of sin is inside of each of us that sins. The outside part just provides an opportunity. Women are only responsible if a man asks them to not do dress a certain way when we are at the same event. See what the Bible says about a weak believer.

Bikinis emphasize the private areas-that is very different from saying "women wearing dresses is more modest" or "that clothing exposes midriff".

Should a Christian girl wear a bikini? | 412teens.org

If a girl has no intention to cause temptations or draw attention to herself, then it might be perfectly fine for her to wear a bikini. A lot depends on the situation and location and the people around her. Just a bunch of the girls in a friend's hot tub? Probably fine! A private swimming pool in the backyard, where no neighbors can gawk and stalk? Totally okay, so long as there are no guys present who are going to have a problem with your swimwear.

Remember, girls, we have a responsibility to be modest by not drawing attention to ourselves but instead putting the focus back on God. We are also responsible for helping and encouraging our fellow Christian friends by not intentionally tempting them to have impure thoughts (from the guys) or even thoughts of jealousy (from the girls). "Therefore encourage one another and build one another up, just as you are doing" (1 Thessalonians 5:11).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟104,579.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Yup, I said earlier that clothes often are more erotic and sensuous than being naked.

Isn't that why a bikini is something Christian women shouldn't wear-showing all of her skin but the private areas and having those parts emphasized can be overwhelming temptation for some men.
 
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟104,579.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The biological info is reasonably correct.

While the verses I posted earlier tend to lend credence to his assertions, drawing a hard conclusion about "God's INTENDED design" is speculation. It is just as likely that the verses are instructions on dealing with the current situation, regardless of divine intent.

Don't other living things not feed their young through breasts?
 
Upvote 0

dayhiker

Mature veteran
Sep 13, 2006
15,557
5,288
MA
✟220,077.00
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Isn't that why a bikini is something Christian women shouldn't wear-showing all of her skin but the private areas and having those parts emphasized can be overwhelming temptation for some men.

She should only have to do something about it the man can't do anything about it. In this can the man can leave the beach. So I don't see what she is doing as a problem. Now if the man invited some people over for a pool party and was bothered buy her bikini then he should ask her to leave saying her bikini is causing him a temptation and she should thank him for letting her know and she should leave.
 
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟104,579.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
She should only have to do something about it the man can't do anything about it. In this can the man can leave the beach. So I don't see what she is doing as a problem. Now if the man invited some people over for a pool party and was bothered buy her bikini then he should ask her to leave saying her bikini is causing him a temptation and she should thank him for letting her know and she should leave.

Wouldn't wearing a different type of swimsuit cause less temptation and be more wise?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Here are just a few places where the author of the OP has suggested that the standard is Scripture. Claiming that it is not addressed in Scripture is still a claim that Scripture is the standard, and many verses have been provided that demonstrate that it is mentioned in Scripture



If you had bothered reading the posts to which I was responding in these posts you would have noticed that those posters had raised the question of scripture. That is answering a simple question. That was not me raising the issue "that the standard is Scripture." Should I have instead replied by citing the Quran or the Bhagavad Gita?
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Isn't that why a bikini is something Christian women shouldn't wear-showing all of her skin but the private areas and having those parts emphasized can be overwhelming temptation for some men.

Have you ever gone topless in public? If so, why is it acceptable for you to do so but it isn't acceptable for a woman?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

benelchi

INACTIVE
Aug 3, 2011
693
140
✟17,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Should I have instead replied by citing the Quran or the Bhagavad Gita?

It is just as appropriate to pretend that those are the standards for your belief as it is to pretend that Scripture is the standard for your beliefs. Why not be honest and acknowledge that you do not look to Scripture, the Quran, or the Bhagavad Gita as a standard when deciding your views on public nudity?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mccleary
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
It is just as appropriate to pretend that those are the standards for your belief as it is to pretend that Scripture is the standard for your beliefs. Why not be honest and acknowledge that you do not look to Scripture, the Quran, or the Bhagavad Gita as a standard when deciding your views on public nudity?

Why don't you instead admit that there is nothing in scripture stating that woman should not go topless in public?

And just out of curiosity, have you ever gone topless in public?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟104,579.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
And when it does...the problem (sin) is in the luster, not the person wearing little or no clothing.

Sometimes the bare skin causes no lust; do you consider it a sin then?

If someone cuts me off in traffic, I could get angry (sin?), or curse (sin?), or do some violent road-rage thing (sin). Or I can remind myself that people can be inconsiderate and careless, and avoid sinning over their behavior.

Same thing.

Do you consider cutting people off to be a sin?

That is totally different from dressing a certain way. The issue is, this.

What Christian Modesty Looks Like
When Adam and Eve fell, they made aprons to cover their nakedness. When God confronted them about their sin, He also made clothing for them – tunics to replace their aprons, which indicates that stomachs and backs are not to be on public display, even for guys.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Don't other living things not feed their young through breasts?
Of course they do. But does not say whether God considered that to be THE PRIMARY function in humans. Perhaps it is secondary.

The biblical book that mentions human breasts the most (Song of Solomon - 8x) says not one word about nourishing the young - or even about conception and pregnancy.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Of course they do. But does not say whether God considered that to be THE PRIMARY function in humans. Perhaps it is secondary.

The biblical book that mentions human breasts the most (Song of Solomon - 8x) says not one word about nourishing the young - or even about conception and pregnancy.
Actually the primary function of breasts is to be exposed and to enjoy the sun! :wave:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0