The Mingling of Different Christians

Spirit of Pentecost

Acts 2:38 Salvation
May 6, 2016
263
100
Georgia
✟39,057.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
The only people that should be upset about mingling with other denominations are those who are insecure in their own beliefs and doctrines. I don't mean that in a harsh way but we can all learn something from people in other denominations and to think otherwise is absurd.

Yes, there will always be that one or two who feel their denomination has it all down pat and any who disagree is a heathen for it, but you'll find nearly all people, even crossing Pentecostal/non-Pentecostal bounds can agree on many topics and such times can be very uplifting
I agree. I personally have no problem fellowshipping with Christians from different faiths. No two people will agree, no matter if they consider themselves a part of the same denomination or faith anyhow. When we come together in the name of Jesus Christ, powerful things will happen, and it won't matter what denomination/movement/faith we consider ourselves a part of.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
How could it conflict if they are all coming to worship and celebrate the living God?
Big "IF" , that's how...
I wish there was something like this in my town.
There is, possibly, though finding them might take time.
In every land, from every people, every place YHWH has called people to Himself, set them apart to Himself, for His Own Testimony.
My point is some will not Agree to Disagree, therefore leading to debate and unneeded conflict.
"unneeded" ? Perhaps. False gospels ? Perhaps. Thus, as Jesus said "I did not come to bring peace, but a sword..." (to separate people , the called ones seeking Him, to Himself for the Gospel's Sake)
Therein lies the problem, eh?
Perhaps one of many potential problems.
Yes, problems could most definitely could come from that. However, I do know of Christians from different faiths that can fellowship and only discuss/preach on what they agree. And this most definitely is a great thing!
Not if it is ecumenical (i.e. not if they are accepting of all people even if they do not abide in Jesus, and/or even if they do not consider true repentance as necessary - that Jesus Himself is the ONLY Way, Truth, and Life).
we never joined in offically.
Good. (see sentence just above)
Yes it is great when churches can be seen to be working together, but it also indicates to those who are not christian that there is littl;e or no difference between these churches.
Correct. And sometimes/ often maybe? / it is life and death difference.
I agree with this. Revivals or fellowships such as this, while potentially good for the Kingdom of Christ, could be misleading to non-believers.
Amein. Potentially misleading to both non-believers, seekers, passers-by, and believers, anyone with no faith or weak faith.
 
Upvote 0

5thKingdom

Newbie
Mar 23, 2015
3,698
219
✟35,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I agree. I personally have no problem fellowshipping with Christians from different faiths. No two people will agree, no matter if they consider themselves a part of the same denomination or faith anyhow. When we come together in the name of Jesus Christ, powerful things will happen, and it won't matter what denomination/movement/faith we consider ourselves a part of.


How does that work when one person believes in Universal Atonement and a "works gospel"
and another person believes in Particular Atonement and Election?

The Bible
(a) teaches the church consists of both (few) saved "wheat" and (many) unsaved "tares"
(b) teaches we can tell the difference by their "fruit"... which includes their doctrines (heresy)
(c) teaches we must identify those "tares" who are bringing false gospels/heresies and
(d) teaches we must separate from heretics bringing false gospels

Where does the Bible teach we should fellowship with those bringing false gospels (heresies)
and we should celebrate their heresies - or accept those heretics as "brothers"?
I do not remember any Scripture suggesting such a thing.

.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,254
20,262
US
✟1,450,958.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How does that work when one person believes in Universal Atonement and a "works gospel"
and another person believes in Particular Atonement and Election?

The Bible
(a) teaches the church consists of both (few) saved "wheat" and (many) unsaved "tares"
(b) teaches we can tell the difference by their "fruit"... which includes their doctrines (heresy)
(c) teaches we must identify those "tares" who are bringing false gospels/heresies and
(d) teaches we must separate from heretics bringing false gospels

Where does the Bible teach we should fellowship with those bringing false gospels (heresies)
and we should celebrate their heresies - or accept those heretics as "brothers"?
I do not remember any Scripture suggesting such a thing.

.

Because the beliefs of both of them come down to the same mission, and it's the mission that we should all be about.

Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

It's all about the mission, and if one is not about the mission, what he professes is irrelevant.

“What do you think? A man had two sons. And he went to the first and said, ‘Son, go and work in the vineyard today.’ And he answered, ‘I will not,’ but afterward he changed his mind and went.

And he went to the other son and said the same. And he answered, ‘I go, sir,’ but did not go. Which of the two did the will of his father?” They said, “The first.”

When I was active duty military, I got up every day, cleaned and dressed myself, then woke, cleaned, fed, and dressed my baby son. That's the mundane stuff, the stuff that everyone does.

Then I went to work and addressed my fragment of the commander's mission. And at the end of the day, when I returned to pick up my son at the babysitter, go back home, feed him, play with him, bathe him and put him to bed--the stuff everyone does--I knew I had faithfully attended to my fragment of the commander's mission, that part which he had called me to do.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Foxfyre

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 1, 2017
1,484
831
New Mexico
✟233,566.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I chose to use the term "Different Christians", because I know some CF members don't like to discuss denominations or different organized movements.

Anyways, my question here is: To what degree should different Christians (from different faiths) fellowship and/or mingle?

In a town close to me, I know there is an annual Community Revival that lasts about a week. The pastors involved come from different denominations; there are two Baptist preachers, a Methodist minister, and a Church of God (Cleveland) pastor. (There may be more involved, but I couldn't say for sure.)

Are things such as this a good thing? I agree that it very well could be, but couldn't different beliefs conflict an evening of fellowship? Personally, I'm of the viewpoint to agree to disagree, but I know all aren't that way.

Any thoughts?

I very much enjoy ecumenical events for a common cause or purpose.

Yes we have many different Christian denominations, sects, and groups, each organized and developed in the intention of creating a more perfect, more pure Christian community. And that's okay because frankly we don't all enjoy 'doing church' in the same way. High church/low church or full band/piano and/or organ only/no instrumental music or more recited creeds and liturgy/no creeds or recitations, etc. And we all seek a church that fits our particular needs and comfort level--a church that just feels right.

But in my opinion, we are all on the same team just the same.
 
Upvote 0

Aseyesee

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2017
1,745
1,473
64
Norfolk, Virginia
✟59,815.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I chose to use the term "Different Christians", because I know some CF members don't like to discuss denominations or different organized movements.

Anyways, my question here is: To what degree should different Christians (from different faiths) fellowship and/or mingle?

In a town close to me, I know there is an annual Community Revival that lasts about a week. The pastors involved come from different denominations; there are two Baptist preachers, a Methodist minister, and a Church of God (Cleveland) pastor. (There may be more involved, but I couldn't say for sure.)

Are things such as this a good thing? I agree that it very well could be, but couldn't different beliefs conflict an evening of fellowship? Personally, I'm of the viewpoint to agree to disagree, but I know all aren't that way.

Any thoughts?

For this to be a question we would ask shows that there is a problem.
 
Upvote 0

Foxfyre

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 1, 2017
1,484
831
New Mexico
✟233,566.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
'We are one in the Spirit we are one in the LORD'

Or at least we all should be.

I had a great choral arrangement for that song when I was still directing choir, and it was a favorite of both the choir and the congregation.

This one is nice too:
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: quietbloke
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

quietbloke

Brother in Christ
Site Supporter
Jun 30, 2006
58,465
54,735
72
England
✟807,383.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Or at least we all should be.

I had a great choral arrangement for that song when I was still directing choir, and it was a favorite of both the choir and the congregation.

This one is nice too:
'And we pray that all unity will one day be restored and they'll know we are Christians by our love,by our love and they'll know we are Christians by our love' (Jimmy and Carol Owen)
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Foxfyre
Upvote 0

5thKingdom

Newbie
Mar 23, 2015
3,698
219
✟35,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Because the beliefs of both of them come down to the same mission, and it's the mission that we should all be about.

Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

It's all about the mission, and if one is not about the mission, what he professes is irrelevant.


But the PROBLEM is that you are CONFLATING issues.

The "mission" of the "wheat" is NOT the same as the "mission" of the "tares"
Because the Gospel ("seed") of the "wheat" is the Gospel of Jesus while the
"seed" (Gospel) of the "tares" is the gospel of Satan.

It has always been PART of the Christian Gospel that the "Kingdom of Heaven"
(the Christian Kingdom) would be infiltrated by unsaved "tares" and the "leaven"
(false doctrines) of the "tares" would corrupt the churches and eventually the Kingdom.
In fact, read Revelation chapters 2 and 3 to see the extent of this corruption
before the end of the first century.

So.... it is simply NOT TRUE (not Biblical) for you to say the "mission"
of the "wheat" (children of God) is the same as the "mission" of the "tares"
(children of Satan).

The "tares" often LOOK like the "wheat".... but they are not.
And the gospel of the "tares" often LOOKS like the True Gospel... but it is not.

The "mission" of the "wheat" is to "seek and save" all the lost "sheep"
The "mission" of the "tares" is to bring "leaven" of false doctrines into the Kingdom.

Granted, the "tares" do so unwittingly.
But that is irrelevant.


.


.
 
Upvote 0

5thKingdom

Newbie
Mar 23, 2015
3,698
219
✟35,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
'And we pray that all unity will one day be restored and they'll know we are Christians by our love,by our love and they'll know we are Christians by our love' (Jimmy and Carol Owen)


Of course the QUESTION becomes; what is the BIBLICAL definition of "love"?

And the Biblical definition of "love" is to "keep my commandments".
And the result of this "love" is being "indwelt" by the Holy Spirit.

------------

Joh 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
Joh 14:16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter,
that he may abide with you for ever;

Joh 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words:
and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.



.
 
Upvote 0

5thKingdom

Newbie
Mar 23, 2015
3,698
219
✟35,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Or at least we all should be.


Of course the PROBLEM with that position is it contradicts the Bible.
The Bible is very clear that the "Kingdom of Heaven" (the Christian Kingdom)
consists of many unsaved "tares" (sown by Satan) and relatively few saved "wheat"
(sown by Christ).

In fact it was always PART of the Gospel that the "tares" would infiltrate the churches
and the "leaven" of their false doctrines would corrupt the churches and eventually the
entire Kingdom.

We can say "it should be" that the "wheat and tares" are the same.... but they are not.
The "wheat" are children of God... and the "tares" are children of Satan.
This has always been PART of the Christian Gospel.
The church consists of "wheat and tares".


.
 
Upvote 0

5thKingdom

Newbie
Mar 23, 2015
3,698
219
✟35,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But in my opinion, we are all on the same team just the same.


Unfortunately, your "opinion" does not harmonize with all related Scripture.
The Bible is very clear that the "Kingdom of Heaven" (Christian Kingdom) consists
of (many) unsaved "tares" and relatively few saved "wheat".

The "tares" often LOOK like real Christians.... but they are not.
The gospel of the "tares" often LOOKS like the True Gospel... but it is not.

The "wheat" are the children of Christ
The "tares" are the children of Satan
The grow together (in the church) until the end.


It is completely un-Biblical to teach "we are all on the same team"
when the Bible teaches the exact opposite.

It was always PART of the Christian Gospel that unsaved "tares" would
infiltrate the church and the "leaven" of their false doctrines would corrupt
the Gospel. In fact, read Revelation chapters 2 and 3 to see the extent of
this corruption before the end of the first century.


.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,254
20,262
US
✟1,450,958.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But the PROBLEM is that you are CONFLATING issues.

The "mission" of the "wheat" is NOT the same as the "mission" of the "tares"
Because the Gospel ("seed") of the "wheat" is the Gospel of Jesus while the
"seed" (Gospel) of the "tares" is the gospel of Satan.

It has always been PART of the Christian Gospel that the "Kingdom of Heaven"
(the Christian Kingdom) would be infiltrated by unsaved "tares" and the "leaven"
(false doctrines) of the "tares" would corrupt the churches and eventually the Kingdom.
In fact, read Revelation chapters 2 and 3 to see the extent of this corruption
before the end of the first century.

So.... it is simply NOT TRUE (not Biblical) for you to say the "mission"
of the "wheat" (children of God) is the same as the "mission" of the "tares"
(children of Satan).

The "tares" often LOOK like the "wheat".... but they are not.
And the gospel of the "tares" often LOOKS like the True Gospel... but it is not.

The "mission" of the "wheat" is to "seek and save" all the lost "sheep"
The "mission" of the "tares" is to bring "leaven" of false doctrines into the Kingdom.

Granted, the "tares" do so unwittingly.
But that is irrelevant.


.


.

"They find a button and weave an entire vest behind it"--An anonymous but wise pastor

You've woven a vest behind a button--there isn't that much theology intended behind the wheat and tares parable. The single lesson of that parable is that you and I cannot determine who in the final judgment is saved or unsaved.

The lesson of the Wheat and the Tares is: It's not your job to make that distinction.

But, indeed, there is a way that we wind up with false brothers in the pews, because as noted by Roger Williams in 1644, if we the Body of Christ make it socially beneficial for people to profess Jesus whether they actually have faith or not, then we wind up with pews packed by unbelievers. It is far better for the profession of Christ to result in social disadvantage so such people who have not been enabled by the Father will avoid our company.
 
Upvote 0

5thKingdom

Newbie
Mar 23, 2015
3,698
219
✟35,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
"They find a button and weave an entire vest behind it"--An anonymous but wise pastor

You've woven a vest behind a button--there isn't that much theology intended behind the wheat and tares parable. The single lesson of that parable is that you and I cannot determine who in the final judgment is saved or unsaved.

The lesson of the Wheat and the Tares is: It's not your job to make that distinction.


LOL....
What EXACTLY are you disputing?

(a) are you disputing that the church consists of saved "wheat" (sown by Christ)
and unsaved "tares" (sown by Satan)

(b) or that the MISSION of the "wheat and tares" is the same?

Those were the issues being discussed.

------

BTW.... you are mistaken about the fact that we cannot identify the difference
between "wheat and tares" (on an individual basis) because the Bible is full of verses
COMMANDING US to identify these "tares" by their "fruit".... and we are COMMANDED
to rebuke their false doctrines.... and we are COMMANDED to separate from them if/when
they refuse to repent. Obviously there is a huge HOLE in your theory... because you
have not harmonized all related Scriptures.

There are two (2) problems here:

(1) One problem is that people who think vests are woven behind a button
often do not understand the complexity of the process so they cannot see
the forest for the trees. When someone has a simple view... everything looks simple.
Harmonizing EVERYTHING the Bible has to say about the "wheat and tares" is far
from simple.

(2) The measure of truth has NEVER been harmonizing two-or-three passages.
Most heresy is BUILT on some partial-truth and, therefore, most heresy can harmonize
with some select passages. The only measure of truth is to harmonize ALL RELATED passages.

In fact we cannot even understand the meaning of verses unless/until we
determine whether the focus of the passage is on the (a) "wheat" only...
or whether the focus is on the (b) "tares" only... or whether the focus is on
(c) both the "wheat and tares".... or whether the focus is on
(d) those OUTSIDE the "Kingdom".

I can provide verses (if you want) that focus only on (a)...
and verses that focus only on (b).... and verses that focus on (c)...
and verses that focus only on the lost souls OUTSIDE the church (d)....
So your theology must be able to identify WHO is the focus of Scripture.

------------

BTW.... Roger Williams was only about 1650 years late when he realized that
the Christian Gospel has ALWAYS taught the "Kingdom of Heaven" (the church)
would be infiltrated by unsaved "tares" and the "leaven" of their false doctrines
would corrupt the church... and eventually the entire Kingdom. The PROCESS
started while the Apostles were still preaching. Read Revelation chapters 2 and 3
to see the extent of this corruption before the end of the first century.

Many will respond.... but God PROMISED to protect the true church....
and that is 100% true..... But it also illustrates my points above.


Harmony of ALL RELATED SCRIPTURE does show that God promises to protect
the true church... but it also teaches there are NO TARES in the true church. In fact,
the Bible promises God will protect the "wheat" in the "church"... while, at the same time,
the Bible also promises God will torment the "tares" in the "church".

Obviously... the lesson here is that no man can offer an "informed opinion on the "church"
unless he first discerns whether the Scripture is talking about the "wheat" or the "tares"
or both the "wheat and tares". If this distinction is not made... there can be no chance
of an "informed opinion" on the passage.

I will provide two examples for you:
In both examples below.... see if you can identify who are the "wheat"
in the "church" and who are the "tares" in the "church". BTW.... we can know
the passages is not talking about people OUTSIDE the "church" because they never
call Jesus Lord... they never preach in His Name....

----------------

Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven;
but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that
day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and
in thy name done many wonderful works? Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never
knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.


Luk 13:23 Then said one unto him, Lord, are there few that be saved? And he said unto them,
Luk 13:24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in,
and shall not be able. Luk 13:25 When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath
shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord,
open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are:
Luk 13:26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast
taught in our streets. Luk 13:27 But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are;
depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. Luk 13:28 There shall be weeping and gnashing
of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the
kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out. Luk 13:29 And they shall come from the
east, and from the west, and from the north, and from the south, and shall sit down in the
kingdom of God. Luk 13:30 And, behold, there are last which shall be first, and there are
first which shall be last.

--------------------

So.... the passages above are talking about the "wheat and tares" in the "church"....
but you think this is all a button with a vest being woven around it?


.
 
Upvote 0

Foxfyre

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 1, 2017
1,484
831
New Mexico
✟233,566.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Of course the PROBLEM with that position is it contradicts the Bible.
The Bible is very clear that the "Kingdom of Heaven" (the Christian Kingdom)
consists of many unsaved "tares" (sown by Satan) and relatively few saved "wheat"
(sown by Christ).

In fact it was always PART of the Gospel that the "tares" would infiltrate the churches
and the "leaven" of their false doctrines would corrupt the churches and eventually the
entire Kingdom.

We can say "it should be" that the "wheat and tares" are the same.... but they are not.
The "wheat" are children of God... and the "tares" are children of Satan.
This has always been PART of the Christian Gospel.
The church consists of "wheat and tares".
.

But we are talking about Christians, the adopted children of God. And though we sing different songs, recite different liturgy, and enjoy worshiping in many different ways, we are all the Church. I believe we grieve the Spirit when we presume to be superior to THOSE Christians or THAT group simply because they do not embrace our preferred denomination or group.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

Foxfyre

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 1, 2017
1,484
831
New Mexico
✟233,566.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Unfortunately, your "opinion" does not harmonize with all related Scripture.
The Bible is very clear that the "Kingdom of Heaven" (Christian Kingdom) consists
of (many) unsaved "tares" and relatively few saved "wheat".

The "tares" often LOOK like real Christians.... but they are not.
The gospel of the "tares" often LOOKS like the True Gospel... but it is not.

The "wheat" are the children of Christ
The "tares" are the children of Satan
The grow together (in the church) until the end.


It is completely un-Biblical to teach "we are all on the same team"
when the Bible teaches the exact opposite.

It was always PART of the Christian Gospel that unsaved "tares" would
infiltrate the church and the "leaven" of their false doctrines would corrupt
the Gospel. In fact, read Revelation chapters 2 and 3 to see the extent of
this corruption before the end of the first century.

.

Sorry but I choose to believe in all believers who know Jesus as their Savior, who love and worship God. I do believe we are all on the same team, and it is good to recognize that the Body of Christ or the Church is made up of many parts--head, hands, feet, etc. Or possibly another way to look at it is one group will be high church and one group will be low church and whether there are guitars and drums or a majestic pipe organ, all are part of the same Body. This topic is the mingling of different Christians.

The tares I believe belong on another thread.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums