I have no intention to watch a video of more propaganda, seeing as what RCs have come up with has already been refuted, and it remains that the church began upon Scriptural substantiation in word and in power, (
Mt. 4:4;
19:4-5;
22:23-45;
Lk. 24:27,
44;
Jn. 5:36,
39;
Acts 2:14-35;
4:33;
5:12;
15:6-21;
17:2,
11;
18:28;
28:23;
Rm. 15:19;
2Cor. 12:12, etc.) in dissent from the historical magisterial stewards of Divine revelation of the body “unto whom were committed the oracles of God," (
Rm. 3:2) to whom pertained "the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises" (
Rm. 9:4) of Divine guidance, presence and perpetuation as they believed, (
Gn. 12:2,
3;
17:4,
7,
8;
Ex. 19:5;
Lv. 10:11;
Dt. 4:31;
17:8-13; Ps, 11:4,9;
Is. 41:10,
Ps. 89:33,
34;
Jer. 7:23) but who wrongly supposed lineage made them correct, (
Mt. 3:9;
Jn. 8:33) and thus the authenticity of Truth claims and oral preaching of the word must be subject to the only wholly God-inspired substantive body of Truth, the Scriptures. (
Matthew 4:4;
Luke 24:44,
45;
Acts 17:2,
11;
18:28)
In the light of which, what the NT church in Scripture (as seen in Acts onward, which shows how the NT church understood the gospels) did NOT profess/teach practice were such things as:
•
Praying to created beings in Heaven, which is utterly unseen in Scripture despite prayer being so basic a practice that the Holy Spirit inspired the recording of approx.
200 prayers by believers, with none being addressed to anyone else but God, who alone is shown able to hear all such from Heaven. Only pagans prayed to invisible heavenly beings than God, as the Spirit is faithful to record.
• Kneeling before a statue and praising the entity it represented in the unseen world, beseeching such for Heavenly help, and making offerings to them, and giving glory and titles and
ascribing attributes to such which are never given in Scripture to created beings (except to false gods. Only pagans burned incense unto the queen of heaven:
Jeremiah 44:16-17), including having the uniquely Divine power glory to hear and respond to virtually infinite numbers of prayers individually addressed to them
Which
manner of adulation would constitute worship in Scripture, yet Catholics imagine that by playing word games then they can avoid crossing the invisible line between mere "veneration" and worship.
• That the act of baptism itself renders souls formally justified by their own holiness so that they would directly enter Heaven if they died at the time of the baptism, but which thus means that the same (due to the outworking of their remaining sinful nature) usually have to later endure postmortem purifying torments in order to become good enough (and atone for venial sins) to enter Heaven.
• Nor were novenas made to obtain indulgences to escape RC purgatory, as instead by effectual faith true believers are already accepted in the Beloved, and positionally seated together with Him in Heaven, and have boldness to enter into the holy of holies, (
Eph. 1:6;
2:6;
Heb. 10:19; cf.
Phil. 3:21) and will go to be with the Lord at death or at His return. . (
Lk. 23:43 [cf.
2Cor. 12:4;
Rv. 2:7];
Phil 1:23;
2Cor. 5:8 [“we”];
1Cor. 15:51ff';
1Thess. 4:17) Note in the latter case all believers were assured that if the Lord returned, which they expected in their lifetime, so would they “ever be with the Lord.” (
1Thes. 4:17) though they were still undergoing growth in grace, as was Paul, who expressed he would go to be with the Lord at death, yet was not already perfect. (
Phil. 3:10f)
And with the only suffering for believers that is manifestly taught as after this life being that of the judgment seat of Christ, which does not begin at death, but awaits the Lord's return, (
1 Corinthians 4:5;
2 Timothy. 4:1,
8;
Revelation 11:18;
Matthew 25:31-46;
1 Peter 1:7;
5:4) and is the suffering of the loss of rewards (and the Lord's displeasure) due to the manner of material one built the church with, which one is saved despite the loss of such, not because of. (
1 Corinthians 3:8ff)
• That believers were separated into two classes, one formally called "saints," the latter being the only believers who directly go to Heaven at death, contrary to Scripture.
• That the Catholic Eucharist was
the paramount, supreme central practice in the life of the church, the "source and summit of the Christian life," in which "our redemption is accomplished," around which all else basically revolved. For instead it is only manifestly described in one epistle (besides "feast of charity" in
Jude 1:12) and
in which the Catholic Eucharist is not evident, but
the church is the focus as the "one bread" and the body of Christ, purchased with the sinless shed blood of Christ, whose death, and the love behind it, the church is supposed to declare by sharing food in that communal meal. (
1 Corinthians 11:17-34)
More , by God's grace.
• Ordaining a separate class of believers distinctively titled "priests" whose primary active function was conducting the Lord's supper and offering up "real"
flesh and blood as a sacrifice for sin. Neither presbuteros or episkopos are even called “hiereus," the distinctive word translated "priest," which conflation is the result of ecclesiastical evolution, and NT pastors are nowhere even described as officiating at the Lord's supper and dispensing the elements, much less offering them as a sacrifice for sins.
• Nor is this Catholic function taught as being a primary or unique function of the clergy, who instead are exhorted to preach the word, (
2 Timothy 4:2) feeding the flock (
Acts 20:28;
1 Peter 5:2) with the word of God, which is what is called spiritual "milk" and "meat" (
1 Corinthians 3:2;
Hebrews 5:13;
1 Peter 2:2) by which souls obtain spiritual life within themselves, (
Acts 10:43-47;
15:7-9;
Ephesians 1:13) and then by which they are "nourished" (
1Timothy 4:6) and built up. (
Acts 20:32)
• That presbuteros (senior/elder) and episkopos (superintendent/overseer)
denoted two separate classes.
• That
celibacy was a requirement for clergy. Instead both apostles (
1 Corinthians 9:5) and NT clergy were normatively married with children, which evidenced his qualifications for the pastorate, (1 Timothy 3;1-7) and with celibacy being a gift that not all have, ((
1 Corinthians 7:7) and it is only wrongly presumed that all or almost all clergy do.
• Directing the church to look to
Peter as
the first of a line of supreme infallible popes reigning over the churches from Rome (which even Catholic scholarship provides
testimony against), whom they were especially enjoined to honor and obey.
• Choosing more apostolic successors (or preparations for it) as was done for Judas (in order to maintain the original number of 12:
Rv. 21:14) by casting lots, thus no politics. (
Acts 1:15ff; cf.
Prov. 16:33;
Leviticus 16:5,
8,
9-10,
15-16,
29-30) despite the vacancy left by the martyrdom of the apostle James. (
Acts 12:1,
2)
• That the magisterial office possessed ensured magisterial infallibility (thereby infallibly declaring that she is infallible), enabling them to even claim to essentially "remember" an extraScriptural event which lacks even early
historical testimony. , and was
opposed by RC scholars themselves the world over as being apostolic tradition.
More to see by God's grace.
