Honestly, I've explained it so many times before, I just get tired of it.
You see a hint of my reasoning on "opinions" even in the post you just replied to, so there you go. Just keep reading, I have and will comment on it often, so you if what I touched on already didn't make my point, should get an idea of my way of thinking...agree or not.
No offense, but I can define how the moon is made from Cheese, but that doesn't make it so. You have not proven evolution. Had you done so or even gave something in the way of reasonable argument I haven't already heard, I would have commented on your post.
Or in short, you didn't prove it, so I didn't comment, or "deleted" your post as you put it.
I couldn't be any clearer.
Which means I have to go back and find them all. There are enough things being discussed here, my mind can only retain so much, so in making room for the present, I shove the past to a place it's hard, if not impossible for me to remember all of it, but only that it was there. No offense, but this happens a lot, I may have even done/do it myself, but am learning it isn't a fair expectation to skip what was propesed the first itime around, then ask that the proposer repeat it. And I know you had no harmful intentions when asking.
No, what you are actually doing is excusing your inability to put up a coherent argument. You chose to post in this thread and challenge others about "evolution" and the minute they address you, you go on about how you are "tired" of it. You aren't tired of it, you have literally nothing to say about it, yet you keep engaging people about the issue in the hope they don't address the obvious.
You are babbling at this point. You are literally posting words for the sake of posting words.
Seriously, look at what you just wrote there.
You can define words however you want. If you are going to use a single word, then demand proof and when it is given to you, change the definition... and then argue in response that you can define the word however you want... it becomes difficult to see as anything other than intellectual dishonesty.
I didn't prove what?
I didn't prove evolution? I defined what evolution is and pointed out the various ways of proving it. I even realized that you weren't even asking for proof of evolution, that you have no idea what evolution means or involves and discussed that.
I countered any argument you could have have. Your response was that you can define evolution any way you want to.
You can actually read everything posted in this topic.
You aren't a politician being questioned about a conversation you had 20 years ago. You are being asked about the things you said in a recent completely recorded conversation you still have access to and you said something about "I shove the past to a place it's hard, if not impssible for me to remember all of it, but only that it was there."
I am a normal person, going by normal person intuition, so can you tell me how that does not sound remarkably odd?
You can actually read everything posted in this topic.
You aren't a politician being questioned about a conversation you had 20 years ago. You are being asked about the things you said in a recent completely recorded conversation you still have access to and you said something about "I shove the past to a place it's hard, if not impssible for me to remember all of it, but only that it was there."
I am a normal person, going by normal person intuition, so can you tell me how that does not sound remarkably odd?
Post 287 has an example of one of the creationist groups making up the claim that we should expect more transitionals than we do.Be more specific, I see nothing there...or did you point to the wrong post?
Post 287 has an example of one of the creationist groups making up the claim that we should expect more transitionals than we do.
You just said you read it. What would posting it again accomplish?
I just don't have the patience some of you have to keep trying to explain evolution to the people that will not accept it. Big thanks to those of you who don't give up, despite the obvious frustration it can cause. There's things I've learned from reading posts on here and then going off to look further into them myself.
Evolution is a complete joke.. precisely why some don't buy it.
Playing pigeon chess, gets boring.I'm going to say this next bit (hoping that people don't get too sore about it)...being that you referred to what others believe as "a complete joke", I'm assuming that means you, like I, have a thick skin and aren't the kind of person who clicks the "report" button.
While you believe that evolution is a complete joke, you have to understand that many of us feel the same way about the biblical accounts of things.
Being perfectly candid about it, the concepts of
-Noah's magic 450ft boat that holds 4 million animals is laughable,
-the idea of virgin births is contradictory to everything we know about human reproduction,
-raising people from the dead is something that's never been witnessed in any tangible way (outside of anecdotal accounts from books written hundreds of years ago)
-nobody has ever witnessed the process of walking on water, turning water into wine, etc...
-nobody has seen a person live to be 900+ years old...
So, the notion that you'd be completely willing to get your information from that book, but then completely write off peer reviewed research as "a complete joke" seems odd to many of us.
That's where I am puzzled when I debate Christian creationists on this topic. When it comes to rationalizing their own beliefs, the bar is set very low in terms of requiring tangible evidence in order to believe something, yet, when discussing evolution, they all of the sudden develop these lofty standards of proof where "if you can't completely recreate the process in front of me so I can see the entire thing from start to finish in front of my own eyes, then I don't believe it happened".
Or, another way to put it, explain to me why evolution is unfathomable, but the story of Noah's Ark is completely believable?
joke", I'm assuming that means you, like I, have a thick skin and aren't the kind of person who clicks the "report" button.
While you believe that evolution is a complete joke, you have to understand that many of us feel the same way about the biblical accounts of things.
Being perfectly candid about it, the concepts of
-Noah's magic 450ft boat that holds 4 million animals is laughable,
Bad start. so first let me ask you how you think life got it's start, then we can talk about the "magic" you mention.
On that matter, I'm not sure, I'm not an expert in the field of big bang cosmology or physics.
However, evolution doesn't try to answer the question of "how life started", it merely tries to answer the question of how life evolved after it was already in place.
As far as I know, most Atheists have dumped what one might call the magic big bang theory, and moved on to "don't know", a very popular consensus these days. Whatever on that but I'm only asking what you "think".. humor me. You say "nor sure" so that indicates you have at least something for me, almost, if not everyone, does.
That is the popular belief passed on by evolutionists, and a rule I think they just hide behind since we are being honest here. Also, I think the beginning has everything to do with fully explaining how anything happens, but I'm not going to hash that out. We're already getting so far off just trying to get started here, and I only asked a simple common question.