Recent Bill Nye Hatred...

ximmix

Newbie
Feb 14, 2014
925
485
Sweden
✟200,441.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
No, I mean just the details for the comment you keep making, leaving me nothing to reply to. And I already told you where we can start, but whatever, go to the posts and refute what I said or not.

I thought we said we would start anew..?
 
Upvote 0

Greyy

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
514
214
XX
✟9,927.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Honestly, I've explained it so many times before, I just get tired of it.

No, what you are actually doing is excusing your inability to put up a coherent argument. You chose to post in this thread and challenge others about "evolution" and the minute they address you, you go on about how you are "tired" of it. You aren't tired of it, you have literally nothing to say about it, yet you keep engaging people about the issue in the hope they don't address the obvious.

You see a hint of my reasoning on "opinions" even in the post you just replied to, so there you go. Just keep reading, I have and will comment on it often, so you if what I touched on already didn't make my point, should get an idea of my way of thinking...agree or not.

You are babbling at this point. You are literally posting words for the sake of posting words.

Seriously, look at what you just wrote there.

No offense, but I can define how the moon is made from Cheese, but that doesn't make it so. You have not proven evolution. Had you done so or even gave something in the way of reasonable argument I haven't already heard, I would have commented on your post.

You can define words however you want. If you are going to use a single word, then demand proof and when it is given to you, change the definition... and then argue in response that you can define the word however you want... it becomes difficult to see as anything other than intellectual dishonesty.

Or in short, you didn't prove it, so I didn't comment, or "deleted" your post as you put it.
I couldn't be any clearer.

I didn't prove what?

I didn't prove evolution? I defined what evolution is and pointed out the various ways of proving it. I even realized that you weren't even asking for proof of evolution, that you have no idea what evolution means or involves and discussed that.

I countered any argument you could have have. Your response was that you can define evolution any way you want to.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Greyy

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
514
214
XX
✟9,927.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Which means I have to go back and find them all. There are enough things being discussed here, my mind can only retain so much, so in making room for the present, I shove the past to a place it's hard, if not impossible for me to remember all of it, but only that it was there. No offense, but this happens a lot, I may have even done/do it myself, but am learning it isn't a fair expectation to skip what was propesed the first itime around, then ask that the proposer repeat it. And I know you had no harmful intentions when asking.

You can actually read everything posted in this topic.

You aren't a politician being questioned about a conversation you had 20 years ago. You are being asked about the things you said in a recent completely recorded conversation you still have access to and you said something about "I shove the past to a place it's hard, if not impssible for me to remember all of it, but only that it was there."

I am a normal person, going by normal person intuition, so can you tell me how that does not sound remarkably odd?
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No, what you are actually doing is excusing your inability to put up a coherent argument. You chose to post in this thread and challenge others about "evolution" and the minute they address you, you go on about how you are "tired" of it. You aren't tired of it, you have literally nothing to say about it, yet you keep engaging people about the issue in the hope they don't address the obvious.

No what I'm actually doing is what I said I was doing. I was going to go into detail, but the post is right there for you to see.

On the other hand, what you are doing is attempting to goad me into waiting more time on something I've done to death already. You missed the show, deal with it. If you need to pretend I have nothing because you weren't around for it, or refuse to look for it, so you can walk away with a win...suit yourself.



You are babbling at this point. You are literally posting words for the sake of posting words.

Seriously, look at what you just wrote there.

Again, suit yourself. Do you really think I'm going to cave to rude/uncalled for comments like that designed to force me into argument? Please, I'm doing my best to give you some credit here but...



You can define words however you want. If you are going to use a single word, then demand proof and when it is given to you, change the definition... and then argue in response that you can define the word however you want... it becomes difficult to see as anything other than intellectual dishonesty.

LOL, I think you missed the point completely.



I didn't prove what?

I didn't prove evolution?
I defined what evolution is and pointed out the various ways of proving it. I even realized that you weren't even asking for proof of evolution, that you have no idea what evolution means or involves and discussed that.

I countered any argument you could have have. Your response was that you can define evolution any way you want to.

I see, and this is becoming way too over used BTW...what if I were to just say, nope you don't understand God? end of story? You know what would happen, yet you all keep throwing that around as defense?

Is it any wonder I'm losing interest. :)

And yes you figured out the question, you did not prove evolution, nothing there for me to reply to. Doing so would peak my interest, otherwise, same ol' same ol', and to sum up the basis of a lot of what I'm saying, it just gets old.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You can actually read everything posted in this topic.

You aren't a politician being questioned about a conversation you had 20 years ago. You are being asked about the things you said in a recent completely recorded conversation you still have access to and you said something about "I shove the past to a place it's hard, if not impssible for me to remember all of it, but only that it was there."

I am a normal person, going by normal person intuition, so can you tell me how that does not sound remarkably odd?

You can actually read everything posted in this topic.

You aren't a politician being questioned about a conversation you had 20 years ago. You are being asked about the things you said in a recent completely recorded conversation you still have access to and you said something about "I shove the past to a place it's hard, if not impssible for me to remember all of it, but only that it was there."

I am a normal person, going by normal person intuition, so can you tell me how that does not sound remarkably odd?

If you don't believe what I said, or disagree with my ideas on that, then deal with it...it's hardly something I'm going to waste time arguing.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You just said you read it. What would posting it again accomplish?

Why is it such a problem to be specific. If you think I'm lying and do know what you are referring to, why bother even posing it, I'm a liar so why bother even talking to me.

On the other hand, and as I said I have no idea where what you are claiming is. I REALLY DON'T SEE IT. :)

Something is amiss here.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,844
25,769
LA
✟555,025.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I just don't have the patience some of you have to keep trying to explain evolution to the people that will not accept it. Big thanks to those of you who don't give up, despite the obvious frustration it can cause. There's things I've learned from reading posts on here and then going off to look further into them myself.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I just don't have the patience some of you have to keep trying to explain evolution to the people that will not accept it. Big thanks to those of you who don't give up, despite the obvious frustration it can cause. There's things I've learned from reading posts on here and then going off to look further into them myself.

And vice versa for those explaining there is nothing to explain since it never pans out when we get into the details...never.

So, for those who choose not to want a God to exist, in spite of being told this has nothing to do with God existing or not, you'd best not dig too deep. Believe what you are told, in that all this massive amount of proof *must* contain enough truth to make it a fact...that makes it easy to fool yourselves, and I assure you, works perfectly for many.

For the others, never stop digging, even if it's just slightly below the surface. Make em prove out what they are saying, and watch it fall apart as proof every time.

Evolution is a complete joke.. precisely why some don't buy it.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,707
14,589
Here
✟1,205,159.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Evolution is a complete joke.. precisely why some don't buy it.

I'm going to say this next bit (hoping that people don't get too sore about it)...being that you referred to what others believe as "a complete joke", I'm assuming that means you, like I, have a thick skin and aren't the kind of person who clicks the "report" button.

While you believe that evolution is a complete joke, you have to understand that many of us feel the same way about the biblical accounts of things.

Being perfectly candid about it, the concepts of
-Noah's magic 450ft boat that holds 4 million animals is laughable,
-the idea of virgin births is contradictory to everything we know about human reproduction,
-raising people from the dead is something that's never been witnessed in any tangible way (outside of anecdotal accounts from books written hundreds of years ago)
-nobody has ever witnessed the process of walking on water, turning water into wine, etc...
-nobody has seen a person live to be 900+ years old...

So, the notion that you'd be completely willing to get your information from that book, but then completely write off peer reviewed research as "a complete joke" seems odd to many of us.

That's where I am puzzled when I debate Christian creationists on this topic. When it comes to rationalizing their own beliefs, the bar is set very low in terms of requiring tangible evidence in order to believe something, yet, when discussing evolution, they all of the sudden develop these lofty standards of proof where "if you can't completely recreate the process in front of me so I can see the entire thing from start to finish in front of my own eyes, then I don't believe it happened".

Or, another way to put it, explain to me why evolution is unfathomable, but the story of Noah's Ark is completely believable?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I'm going to say this next bit (hoping that people don't get too sore about it)...being that you referred to what others believe as "a complete joke", I'm assuming that means you, like I, have a thick skin and aren't the kind of person who clicks the "report" button.

While you believe that evolution is a complete joke, you have to understand that many of us feel the same way about the biblical accounts of things.

Being perfectly candid about it, the concepts of
-Noah's magic 450ft boat that holds 4 million animals is laughable,
-the idea of virgin births is contradictory to everything we know about human reproduction,
-raising people from the dead is something that's never been witnessed in any tangible way (outside of anecdotal accounts from books written hundreds of years ago)
-nobody has ever witnessed the process of walking on water, turning water into wine, etc...
-nobody has seen a person live to be 900+ years old...

So, the notion that you'd be completely willing to get your information from that book, but then completely write off peer reviewed research as "a complete joke" seems odd to many of us.

That's where I am puzzled when I debate Christian creationists on this topic. When it comes to rationalizing their own beliefs, the bar is set very low in terms of requiring tangible evidence in order to believe something, yet, when discussing evolution, they all of the sudden develop these lofty standards of proof where "if you can't completely recreate the process in front of me so I can see the entire thing from start to finish in front of my own eyes, then I don't believe it happened".

Or, another way to put it, explain to me why evolution is unfathomable, but the story of Noah's Ark is completely believable?
Playing pigeon chess, gets boring.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ThatRobGuy
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
joke", I'm assuming that means you, like I, have a thick skin and aren't the kind of person who clicks the "report" button.

Never reported anyone...a strict rule of mine to not make reality go away. Removal of curse words is probably a good idea. As for the thick skin...in this area I find the opposition not doing so well to be the reason.. or vindictivity, nothing more.

While you believe that evolution is a complete joke, you have to understand that many of us feel the same way about the biblical accounts of things.

Of course.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Being perfectly candid about it, the concepts of
-Noah's magic 450ft boat that holds 4 million animals is laughable,

Bad start. so first let me ask you how you think life got it's start, then we can talk about the "magic" you mention.

I'll get to the rest of your post as I can.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,707
14,589
Here
✟1,205,159.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Bad start. so first let me ask you how you think life got it's start, then we can talk about the "magic" you mention.

On that matter, I'm not sure, I'm not an expert in the field of big bang cosmology or physics.

However, evolution doesn't try to answer the question of "how life started", it merely tries to answer the question of how life evolved after it was already in place.

Thus the reason you have a large number of people who are theistic evolutionists, (they believe in evolution, but they still feel that there was a god who created life to begin with, and evolution just explains how life progressed after that)
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
On that matter, I'm not sure, I'm not an expert in the field of big bang cosmology or physics.

As far as I know, most Atheists have dumped what one might call the magic big bang theory, and moved on to "don't know", a very popular consensus these days. Whatever on that but I'm only asking what you "think".. humor me. You say "nor sure" so that indicates you have at least something for me, almost, if not everyone, does.

However, evolution doesn't try to answer the question of "how life started", it merely tries to answer the question of how life evolved after it was already in place.

That is the popular belief passed on by evolutionists, and a rule I think they just hide behind since we are being honest here. Also, I think the beginning has everything to do with fully explaining how anything happens, but I'm not going to hash that out. We're already getting so far off just trying to get started here, and I only asked a simple common question.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,707
14,589
Here
✟1,205,159.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
As far as I know, most Atheists have dumped what one might call the magic big bang theory, and moved on to "don't know", a very popular consensus these days. Whatever on that but I'm only asking what you "think".. humor me. You say "nor sure" so that indicates you have at least something for me, almost, if not everyone, does.

That is the popular belief passed on by evolutionists, and a rule I think they just hide behind since we are being honest here. Also, I think the beginning has everything to do with fully explaining how anything happens, but I'm not going to hash that out. We're already getting so far off just trying to get started here, and I only asked a simple common question.

Why is "I don't know" such an unacceptable answer in your opinion? Is it because in order for you to suggest that "the other side is no better" they have to claim to be as sure of the origin of life as you claim to be?

I mean, I could just make something up at random just so you could shoot it down as being no more provable than what you believe...is that what you're after?

Nobody is hiding behind anything...evolution strictly focuses on how life evolved, not the origins of life. That's not a dodge by any means, that's simply the definition of the field of study.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pakicetus
Upvote 0