TerranceL
Sarcasm is kind of an art isn't it?
Is it a new rule that to be considered a scientist you should actually do some science not just have a degree? That's interesting.If I may, allow us to approach this from a different angle...instead of people naming one scientist after another, and getting shot down with new rules about "what constitutes a real scientist" (in efforts to downplay their stance on the topic at hand).
So this is a dance you've done alot with posters here on CF? Attempting to prove to someone that believes in climate change that climate change is real?List off the credentials that one would need to have in order to have a credible stance on this topic, and then I'll go find multiple scientists who meet that criteria that acknowledge that climate change is real and man made. Sound like a plan?
(and when I say credentials, I mean actual credentials, no silly requirements about how "the researcher can't have any form of government funding", strictly academic and professional credentials)
I've done this dance with other posters here on CF. When the onus is put on people who acknowledge it's real to find supporting scientists, they'll spend hours on end finding scientist after scientist just to have it shot down for random reasons given by deniers of "why that scientist isn't a real expert"... I don't know if game for the deniers just to mess with their opponents for fun, or if it's merely a stall tactic/"I got the last word, so that means I win" tactic.
You need a new hobby mate.
Upvote
0