Please go back and re-read the entire post without quote mining, cherry picking, or looking for arguing points because you all missed the point
I apologize that so many people were misunderstanding what I was saying. I was not saying that abortion is morally okay or that murder is okay, I was just presenting the most basic, fundamental pro-choice argument. I do not support abortion, I think it is wrong, and wish that it would nobody would ever have an abortion. The problem is that the goal to make it completely illegal is too entirely idealistic, if we overturn Roe v Wade, it's going to become a state's issue, and even if it did become illegal, it wouldn't end abortion. It will just become this sketchy, underground, and unsafe practice. A perfect metaphor for what will happen is what happened with the war on drugs or Prohibition in the 1920s, it did nothing to combat or get rid of the problem, but ultimately backfired and made it into a bigger problem.
I very much did explain why, it doesn't logically follow. Just because I advocate for the freedom of something, does not mean I advocate for that something.Why? You can say "you are wrong" or that I have a "silly position," but you need to explain why. Or if you want to change my mind then you have to explain why.
So if a Christian has an abortion and then asks forgiveness, what did God do to stop the abortion, and how did He oppose it through the "spirit of natural law". Please explain this further.I am suggesting that God is not pro-murderer because he actively opposes murder through the spirit of the natural law (which is His work) and His justice. Those who are pro-choice do nothing to oppose murder and are, by extent, pro-murder.
I very much did explain why, it doesn't logically follow. Just because I advocate for the freedom of something, does not mean I advocate for that something.
There is no such thing as pro choice.
Please go back and re-read the entire post without quote mining, cherry picking, or looking for arguing points because you all missed the point
I apologize that so many people were misunderstanding what I was saying. I was not saying that abortion is morally okay or that murder is okay, I was just presenting the most basic, fundamental pro-choice argument. I do not support abortion, I think it is wrong, and wish that it would nobody would ever have an abortion. The problem is that the goal to make it completely illegal is too entirely idealistic, if we overturn Roe v Wade, it's going to become a state's issue, and even if it did become illegal, it wouldn't end abortion. It will just become this sketchy, underground, and unsafe practice. A perfect metaphor for what will happen is what happened with the war on drugs or Prohibition in the 1920s, it did nothing to combat or get rid of the problem, but ultimately backfired and made it into a bigger problem.
So would you say that when God granted us the freedom to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, He was "pro" us disobeying Him?I'm glad I'm not the one explaining that on judgement day. "But Jesus, I didn't kill any babies. I just advocated for the rights of others to kill babies."
Perhaps a better word for "pro-life" would be "pro-birth" because a large number of these really do not care what happens after birth and in fact actively promote pro-death policies.
I just did a post on freedom of choice.So would you say that when God granted us the freedom to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, He was "pro" us disobeying Him?
God was clearly pro the freedom of choice.
I never said I was. lol
I'm saying God was pro the freedom of choice... and He was because He granted it to us. That does not mean He was "pro" us disobeying Him.
Just because I am also "pro" the freedom of choice, does not mean I'm "pro" abortion.
Its in the Soteriology section. The idea of 'freedom' is misunderstood, really. We are not autonomous creatures, we are subject to all kinds of laws and limitations. So the choices that we make are not entirely self-derived and self-sufficient.I didn't see your post... but did your post suggest God was "pro" us disobeying Him, simply because He was pro the freedom of choice?
I understand your argument but I suspect your missing my point. God granted us the ability to choose to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, does that mean God was "pro" us disobeying Him?Its in the Soteriology section. The idea of 'freedom' is misunderstood, really. We are not autonomous creatures, we are subject to all kinds of laws and limitations. So the choices that we make are not entirely self-derived and self-sufficient.
Agree'd, have fun explaining that to anyone else on this freaking thread!God did not create robots.
We were given free will to voluntarily submit to His will. This is an act of complete love and submission. The free will we are given also allows us to reject Him and sin. There is no such thing as loving with out a choice not to love.
I don't think allowing something equals promoting it.
I'm a father. I provide love, support, guidance, direction rules, advice and punishment. My kids can still disobey, sin and break my heart.