Breaking over 43 Tomahawk Missiles Striking Syria now
- Thread starter eastcoast_bsc
- Start date
Cosmic Charlie
The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated
It's unfortunate that the runway and and the chemical weapons themselves were missed.
Wait.. Unfortunate isn't the word I'm looking for....no Suspicious,that's the word. You give the Russians enough warning and they can move that stuff around. But 1000 bomblets on a runway and you ruin. That didn't happen either.
Unfortunate. No, wait that's not the right word.
Yes, refreshing. No wait that's not the word I'm looking for....
Illegal, that would be correct.
Obama never acted because the Congress refused to give him authorization. Do might remember - The Donald spent much tweet bandwidth on the subject that Obama shouldn't be allowed to get us involved in Syria.
Now, the President Donald is not only for war in Syria, he's not asking permission before taking militarily action.
That would be illegal,but of course the Donald isn't being challendged by his lap dog congress.
Upvote
0
Chemical weapons were missed on purpose. No need to blow chemical toxins into tje air.
Legal experts differ on whether the U.S. airstrike on a Syrian airfield violated laws
Upvote
0
Do you all forget the sanctions Clinton put in place in Iraq in 1996 that was responsible for over 500,000 dead children and Madeline Albright said when asked that "it was worth it"! They pressured the UN to remove the peacekeeping forces in Rwanda! Then you have the Bush debacle, then you have Obama who went into seven countries without congressional authorization. Libya, seriously, we left that country a mess. Now we have Trump. Something is not right. You do know civilians were killed in this strike. We don't even have proof that it was Assad. Something is not right. The timing, everything. What are we doing? Is the world any better off? You can tell me about Assad killing people after you tell me about all the civilians the US has killed over the years, directly or indirectly because of our policies. Fight over your stupid politics and party lines. It's all fun and games for you.
Upvote
0
football5680
Well-Known Member
- Feb 6, 2013
- 4,138
- 1,516
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
Agree with most of this, except Obama did act. He decided it would be a good idea to fund the terrorists so they could carry out their mission of destroying Syria and slaughtering Christians. Mission accomplished.
Upvote
0
concretecamper
Member of His Church
- Nov 23, 2013
- 6,776
- 2,569
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
- May 14, 2015
- 9,736
- 4,784
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
concretecamper
Member of His Church
- Nov 23, 2013
- 6,776
- 2,569
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Cosmic Charlie
The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated
I'm confused, maybe you can help me.
These civilians which you hail as victims and who you praise The President for defending.
How do we know they weren't terrorists ?
Did we extremely vet them before ordering 150 million dollars of bombing. I mean 150 million could be used to support SNAP (America First !) so why would we want to do that if they were actually terrorist, or could be terrorists?
And if we DID extremely vet them and they weren't terrorists why can't we let Syrians into this country just doing the 12 hours extreme vetting process we used to vet these civilians ?
If fact, according to the President we can't vet
Syrians at all to let them in this country so......
....can you help me on how we know these guys weren't terrorists and why we can identify a terrorist in Syria but not at an American entry point ?
Upvote
0
Similar threads
