No, He wasn't.
Not after you said mark 9 was exact and clear yet leave out what was clear and exact
they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes. 2And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit, 3Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains: 4Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him
Notice their reaction?
Wrong treasure
Not answering the question shows that you have not answer. Better yet, simply claiming that I am the one with the low moral standard is a pretty poor deflection tactic. And then there is the beautiful "You don't understand the Bible" claim.
Can't you find any better straws to clutch at? Gentiles may eat pork if they so desire. They're not subject to Mosaic Law. And if you want to punish a human, do you really think killing animals is the way forward? Where do you get that moral direction from?
Where did I say he locked himself up? You're adding to what I said. But then you're allowed to do that if it helps make a point, aren't you?
So you think the townspeople left the tools rather than them being his? Where did you get that from?
Does that make you feel better sir?
Only they weren't Gentiles, they were Jews from the tribe of Gad.
