Since John the Baptist came from the family of priests, wouldn't it be normal for his ordination to occur at 30. Something I am sure he was raised to be since birth.
Upvote
0
John had probably been 'ordained' by one of those in the Essence community who were also of the priesthood.
Many think Yeshua's baptism was for repentance like all the others coming to John but I like to think it was a ritual immersion before being ordained into the Priesthood.
It is thought by a minority that Zak and Elizabeth both being elderly when John was born would have died shortly afterwards and that John was raised with the Essences. They had their own idea which can be seen in the DDS of what a proper priesthood should be which is why they weren't in Jerusalem. Many Essences were of the true priesthood. As far as the repentance things, yeah, many do think that because they think 1. Baptism is Christian and 2. There is only two kinds, one of water and one of the Spirit. They don't realize that the mikvah was used for all kinds of things. One being the change of life from one to another. That is what Yeshua was doing, going from a carpenters son to the most famous Rabbi in the world.What connection is there between Yochanan and the Essenes?
And what connection is there between the Essenes and priesthood?
I don't think anyone thinks he was baptized for repentance. Nor do I see what baptism has to do with priesthood. The rite for making someone a priest is a complex procedure that involves sacrificing animals, the priest(s)-to-be shaving off all the hair on the body, marking one's earlobes, thumbs and big toes with blood, etc.
See Leviticus 8 for the full account.
It is thought by a minority that Zak and Elizabeth both being elderly when John was born would have died shortly afterwards and that John was raised with the Essences. They had their own idea which can be seen in the DDS of what a proper priesthood should be which is why they weren't in Jerusalem. Many Essences were of the true priesthood. As far as the repentance things, yeah, many do think that because they think 1. Baptism is Christian and 2. There is only two kinds, one of water and one of the Spirit. They don't realize that the mikvah was used for all kinds of things. One being the change of life from one to another. That is what Yeshua was doing, going from a carpenters son to the most famous Rabbi in the world.
Interestingly enough as they are, maybe they were hidden.The idealization of Essenes in modern MJ makes less and less sense to me, the more I read their writings.
They were deeply unorthodox and at odds with the Pharisees, whose theology Yeshua praised. "Whatever they tell you, do." He never said that about Essenes.
One thing we must remember is that Herod gave an oath, it wasn't him that wanted to do this, but his wife, Herodias. It states he didn't want to do it but since he told her daughter that she could have anything she wanted he couldn't go back on his promise to her.
It does teach a lesson to watch what you say.
Interestingly enough as they are, maybe they were hidden.
I agree with much of what you have stated about Hrod.
His is an evil inclination. One that hastened his own demise by the very oath he spoke to a young woman.
The same evil inclination lead him to attempt blamelessness by keeping Yochanan alive and imprisoned.
Imagine the gruesome reality when Yochanans head was presented.
I doubt even Hrod was ignorant of the Law concerning outright murder.
The unbridled tongue.
I thought, like Pharoah of egypt and the 'king' over Esther/Ruth that the king could not ever go against a law, period.If he were familiar with the law he would have considered it better to break an oath than to kill a man.
I thought, like Pharoah of egypt and the 'king' over Esther/Ruth that the king could not ever go against a law, period.
"he couldn't go back on his promise to her."
Of course he could. He chose to go through with it anyway.
What this reveals also is that Herodias knew that this new conviction John gave Herod could result in a divorce, a loss of status for her, and she had to get rid of the "problem". Reminds me of Hillary.17 For Herod himself had sent forth and laid hold upon John, and bound him in prison for Herodias' sake, his brother Philip's wife: for he had married her.
18 For John had said unto Herod, It is not lawful for thee to have thy brother's wife.
19 Therefore Herodias had a quarrel against him, and would have killed him; but she could not:
20 For Herod feared John, knowing that he was a just man and an holy, and observed him; and when he heard him, he did many things, and heard him gladly.
21 And when a convenient day was come, that Herod on his birthday made a supper to his lords, high captains, and chief estates of Galilee;
22 And when the daughter of the said Herodias came in, and danced, and pleased Herod and them that sat with him, the king said unto the damsel, Ask of me whatsoever thou wilt, and I will give it thee.
23 And he sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, I will give it thee, unto the half of my kingdom.
24And she went forth, and said unto her mother, What shall I ask? And she said, The head of John the Baptist.
25And she came in straightway with haste unto the king, and asked, saying, I will that thou give me by and by in a charger the head of John the Baptist.
26 And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath's sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her. 27And immediately the king sent an executioner, and commanded his head to be brought: and he went and beheaded him in the prison,
28 And brought his head in a charger, and gave it to the damsel: and the damsel gave it to her mother.
I have to say that it does echo a certain Pharaoh (in Josephs time) who beheaded a man on his Birthday.
Also it brings to mind the vow of Jephthah in Judges 30.
He made an oath in-front of his guests and he didn't tell her that was totally inappropriateOne thing we must remember is that Herod gave an oath, it wasn't him that wanted to do this, but his wife, Herodias. It states he didn't want to do it but since he told her daughter that she could have anything she wanted he couldn't go back on his promise to her.
It does teach a lesson to watch what you say.
Thus compounding the sin.What this reveals also is that Herodias knew that this new conviction John gave Herod could result in a divorce, a loss of status for her, and she had to get rid of the "problem". Reminds me of Hillary.
No, he was bound by the very thought that so many dismiss."he couldn't go back on his promise to her."
Of course he could. He chose to go through with it anyway.