101 Scientific Facts: The Bible-Creationism is accurate and true.

Still waiting on the scientific evidence for Biblical creationism from @Kenny'sID.

Warden_of_the_Storm said:

Still waiting on the scientific evidence for Biblical creationism from @Kenny'sID.

Click to expand...

And that silliness you refer to as evolution, did you have the proof of that I asked for? Not yet? OK, that's fine, I'll wait.

Kenny'sID said:

And that silliness you refer to as evolution, did you have the proof of that I asked for? Not yet? OK, that's fine, I'll wait.

Click to expand...

Why are you lying? I gave you four links in post #293. The fact that you don't know what evidence is not my fault.
But I fulfilled me end of the request, so now you fulfill yours: show me scientific evidence for Biblical creationism.

joshua 1 9 said:

I do not know why it would be embarrassing because Creationism only covers the last 6,004 years. The problem is when they try to explain things from Science before that Date and that is something they should avoid doing. Even the KJV people use the word replenish the earth which would indicate that there was something here before that needed replenished. We read that "on the seventh day God finished his work". So the Bible clearly talks about when God's Work was finished and not when God began His work.

It could have taken God million or billions of years to create Adam, but God was finished with his work 4004 BC when we find Adam in the Garden in Eden.

Click to expand...

Your math is off.

joshua 1 9 said:

I go by Bishop Ussher and everyone agrees that his math is the best and has been for over 400 years.

Click to expand...

Everyone?

LOL

joshua 1 9 said:

I go by Bishop Ussher and everyone agrees that his math is the best and has been for over 400 years.

Click to expand...

No, the math in your post.

Warden_of_the_Storm said:

Why are you lying? I gave you four links in post #293. The fact that you don't know what evidence is not my fault.
But I fulfilled me end of the request, so now you fulfill yours: show me scientific evidence for Biblical creationism.

Click to expand...

Wrong, I looked at one page of your so-called evidence, asked you to be specific on where/what the evidence was from a whole page of stuff where you expected me to see the same evidence you did, and you refused. Even after pushing you several times to do such a simple thing as show me precisely, you couldn't...guess there was no evidence there after all....bummer. Not only embarrassing for you but a waste of my time.

Kenny'sID said:

Wrong, I looked at one page of your so-called evidence, asked you to be specific on where/what the evidence was from a whole page of stuff where you expected me to see the same evidence you did, and you refused. Even after pushing you several times to do such a simple thing as show me precisely, you couldn't...guess there was no evidence there after all....bummer. Not only embarrassing for you but a waste of my time.

Click to expand...

It's not my fault that you are scientifically illiterate and cannot see the evidence that exists.
If anyone should stop embarrassing themselves, it is definitely you sir. I suggest that log off the internet, go back to school and enroll in an actual biology class so that you can actually understand what evolution is and what evidence is.

Now, as I have said repeatedly before, I have fulfilled my part of the request, now you do the same. Show me scientific evidence of Biblical creationism.

Warden_of_the_Storm said:

It's not my fault that you are scientifically illiterate and cannot see the evidence that exists.
If anyone should stop embarrassing themselves, it is definitely you sir. I suggest that log off the internet, go back to school and enroll in an actual biology class so that you can actually understand what evolution is and what evidence is.

Now, as I have said repeatedly before, I have fulfilled my part of the request, now you do the same. Show me scientific evidence of Biblical creationism.

Click to expand...

Yet none of that is evidence either, just more excuses.. Oh well.

Still waiting.

Kenny'sID said:

Yet none of that is evidence either, just more excuses.. Oh well.

Still waiting.

Click to expand...

None of it is excuses. It is all fact. You have been present with evidence on this thread, and USinconito even started a thread about evidence for evolution purely for you.
You're behaviour really shows that you don't care about any sort of intellectual discussion.

joshua 1 9 said:

Ok, here is a interesting one: #4.
"When dealing with disease, clothes and body should be washed under running water (Leviticus 15:13). For centuries people naively washed in standing water. Today we recognize the need to wash away germs with fresh water."

Click to expand...

Where is your evidence for the statement that 'for centuries people naively washed in standing water'?

Warden_of_the_Storm said:

You're behaviour really shows that you don't care about any sort of intellectual discussion.

Click to expand...

You had your chance, and the most intelligent thing I got from you was something you called evidence, but you refused to show me exactly what the evidence was in the write up, a very reasonable request. Once again, very strange after all the prodding you wouldn't do that, just pretend once again, I was at fault in order to dodge the fact you couldn't show me a thing. The tactics, one sided rules or whatever many of you use get old after awhile, then after all that, you actually have the nerve to harass your opponent, and once again, try cover up for your own ineptness... bizarre. I guess it's no wonder not too many will bother to engage in those "intelligent discussions" with you.

If you were to ask me what my evidence of God/creation, whatever it is you don't subscribe to as truth, and I threw a bible at you and told you here is your evidence, you know as well as I do, you'd have a field day with that action, yet you do the same exact thing to me, throw a bunch of reading at me and expect me to see what you see within it, then when I don't, you pretend I'm the problem.
.
Intelligent discussion? Nope, I lost interest, and you can only blame yourself.

Kenny'sID said:

You had your chance, and the most intelligent thing I got from you was something you called evidence, but you refused to show me exactly what the evidence was in the write up, a very reasonable request. Once again, very strange after all the prodding you wouldn't do that, just pretend once again, I was at fault in order to dodge the fact you couldn't show me a thing. The tactics, one sided rules or whatever many of you use get old after awhile, then after all that, you actually have the nerve to harass your opponent, and once again, try cover up for your own ineptness... bizarre. I guess it's no wonder not too many will bother to engage in those "intelligent discussions" with you.

If you were to ask me what my evidence of God/creation, whatever it is you don't subscribe to as truth, and I threw a bible at you and told you here is your evidence, you know as well as I do, you'd have a field day with that action, yet you do the same exact thing to me, throw a bunch of reading at me and expect me to see what you see within it, then when I don't, you pretend I'm the problem.
.
Intelligent discussion? Nope, I lost interest, and you can only blame yourself.

Click to expand...

Again: I have showed your four pieces of evidence. It is not my fault that you are not scientifically literate to understand any of what I presented to you, even though it is written in plain English and in black and white.

But I shouldn't be too surprised. You've been here for six months and I've never seen you even attempt to actually respond meaningfully to any scientific evidence that has been presented to you.
Which leads me to two conclusions: 1) you really are scientifically illiterate and try to carry on with the delusion that you aren't or 2) you are incredibly insincere in any debate you enter in to, and only enter in to debates to waste people's time and then when they grow tired of your antics, you strut around like a peacock over your imaginary victory.
I'll definitely have to go with option 2.
Here's some advice from earlier: log off the internet, go to a community college, take a biological sciences class, actually learn about evolution and learn what evidence is, THEN come back.