Why do you refuse to engage my argument?
Try and get it together and get some cohesive argument that you can post clearly. Maybe someone will respond to it if it is reasoned.
If dino's are that old and there was a same state past, then there shouldn't be any dino DNA worth sequencing. That's the whole point.
You guys get your story straight now will ya? The previous poster just expressed great hope that they would find some.
One thing for absolute certain is, that we would not attribute your fantasy state past to being the reason that no real ancient DNA exists!
You claim that we don't have any of Adam's DNA, as if that was a point against us. It isn't. It is a point against you. You are the one who claims that Adam was a real person. So where is his DNA? Where is there any evidence that Adam ever existed?
If Adam went back to being dust like God said he would, then why would we expect what you claim??? That is crazy talk.
You ignore the evidence because you know it disproves your claims.
Try posting said evidence. Be honest.
What is stopping someone from claiming that any DNA sample is from a different state past, and is therefore not valid?
?? Try to face the fact you have no real ancient DNA rather than invent conspiracies about what might happen if you did!
It is pre-5,000 AD. Of course, there is no way you would ever accept any DNA evidence.
False. I assume the flood was somewhere near the KT layer. In so called science fantasy time that is many millions of years ago!
Why would science need to deal with fictitious stories and myths?
No choice, it IS fictitious stories and myths!!
If you want to claim that something is real history, then you need to produce real evidence that those things actually occurred, but you don't. Instead, you just assume the myths are true and refuse to consider any evidence to the contrary.
The record of earliest man cannot be shown true or false by science. So what would you like us to do, hire a psychic to divine the records!!??
Show us how they have been molested. Until then, stop with the false accusations.
Easy. Look at continental drift at say the rate of a fingernail growing. They use that rate from the present to say great time was involved. Look at decay rates. They use present state decay rates to claim great time for ratios. Look at evolving. They use present nature and laws and processes of life to claim great ages for ancient life. Etc etc.
Why would a reset in a different state past produce the exact ratios produced by same state radioactive decay?
The point you either ignore or do not comprehend, is that we have no way of knowing so much as if something was reset in the former state. Do we? Explain how?
You seem to be claiming that because a reset IN THIS PRESENT STATE would be required to make the isotopes a certain way, that this would mean a reset in the former state also would! How about creation? Would that count as a reset in some cases?? You ain't deep, you just ain't clear.
Nothing is being extrapolated. The ratios are calculated from the directly measured and observed decay rates.
Out of your own mouth we see that it is by what we now measure that you view all the ratios! Hoo ha
