Science PROVES the BIBLE is True

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Joshua- that would mean that the city of Ur was covered by mud and debris from Noah's flood. Is the city of Ur mentioned in the Bible- would you look at that, it is not only mentioned once, but five times in different verses of the Bible: Genesis 11:28; Genesis 11:31; Genesis 15:7; 1 Chronicles 11:35; and Nehemiah 9:7, so would that not prove to the skeptics(the evolutionist) that there is Biblical evidence of Noah's flood? That the names of cities and the names of real people were true in the Bible? Hey, there is also fossil evidence of human and dinosaur bones found in the same strata(Geology. a single bed of sedimentary rock, generally consisting of one kind of matter representing continuous deposition.) in Australia here is the website: http://www.news.com.au/technology/s...ngside-dinosaurs/story-fn5fsgyc-1226930162755 Have a blessed day knowing the truth.
The Harry Potter books mention London, and we know that London is real. Does that mean the Harry Potter books are real stories?
Dinosaurs are in the Bible does that mean they were/are not real?



What is the evidence?
It's in the fossil record, how do jellyfish fossilize, how do dinosaur eggs fossilize, how is there blood found in fossilized dinosaur bone?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Dinosaurs are in the Bible does that mean they were/are not real?

Dinosaurs are not in the Bible. That is something you have invented.


It's in the fossil record,

Where is the fossil evidence for dinosaurs and humans living at the same time?
 
Upvote 0

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Ever see a monkey turn into a man, did not think so, so lets not call it science, because it can not be observed.

If this happened, evolution would be falsified. Evolution does not make this claim. You share a common ancestor with chimpanzees, you don't come from them. This is demonstrated as fact in the fossil record and in DNA. You simply do not understand the most basics of biology. Instead you build a strawman.
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,793
✟229,457.00
Faith
Seeker
It's in the fossil record, how do jellyfish fossilize, how do dinosaur eggs fossilize

The same way anything fossilizes. Do you understand what a fossil actually is?

how is there blood found in fossilized dinosaur bone?

There hasn't been. If you're talking about what I think you're talking about - the 'Schweitzer find' - she didn't find actually blood. It's a common misconception made by creationists. She found the remains of blood cells, but not actual blood. It's not like she cut the thing open and blood just spilled out onto the floor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Macroevolution-major evolutionary change. The term applies mainly to the evolution of whole taxonomic groups over long periods of time. That would be millions of years to an evolutionist.

Microevolution-evolutionary change within a species or small group of organisms, especially over a short period. Now we can observe microevolution, not macroevolution.
 
Upvote 0

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If this happened, evolution would be falsified. Evolution does not make this claim. You share a common ancestor with chimpanzees, you don't come from them. This is demonstrated as fact in the fossil record and in DNA. You simply do not understand the most basics of biology. Instead you build a strawman.
Yes it would be false! Because it is false, the truth will set you free brother.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Macroevolution-major evolutionary change.

Macro-running is a marathon. Micro-running is a 0.5 km jog. Both are accomplished the same way, by putting one foot in front of the other over and over and over.

In the same way, macro and micro evolution work the exact same way. Microevolution is the effect of a single mutation. Macroevolution is the effect of single mutations piling up over time in the same way that single steps add up to a marathon.

Microevolution-evolutionary change within a species or small group of organisms, especially over a short period. Now we can observe microevolution, not macroevolution.

Again, you don't observe theories. Please learn how science works.
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,793
✟229,457.00
Faith
Seeker
Microevolution-evolutionary change within a species or small group of organisms, especially over a short period. Now we can observe microevolution, not macroevolution.

We've observed evolution above the species level.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciation

Also, you seem to have a poor understanding of what 'observation' means in science. Science doesn't require you to sit down and visual watch something in order to observe it. For instance, no one has ever sat back and watched Pluto make an entire orbit, but that doesn't mean we can't know how long it takes and make predictions based off that. No one has ever been to the center of the Earth, but we still understand and know its composition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The same way anything fossilizes. Do you understand what a fossil actually is?



There hasn't been. If you're talking about what I think you're talking about - the 'Schweitzer find' - she didn't find actually blood. It's a common misconception made by creationists. She found the remains of blood cells, but not actual blood. It's not like she cut the thing open and blood just spilled out onto the floor.
But blood cells and the remains of blood cells are not the same? Would they still be there over millions of years?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Yes it would be false! Because it is false, the truth will set you free brother.

No, I am explaining your "Monkey turning into a man" is not what evolution states and if it were to happen, evolution would be falsified. It just demonstrates you do not know what evolution is.

99.9% of endogenous retroviral insertions in your genome insert in the same spot in the chimpanzee genome. This is only possible if you share a common ancestor. This is irrefutable evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Macro-running is a marathon. Micro-running is a 0.5 km jog. Both are accomplished the same way, by putting one foot in front of the other over and over and over.

In the same way, macro and micro evolution work the exact same way. Microevolution is the effect of a single mutation. Macroevolution is the effect of single mutations piling up over time in the same way that single steps add up to a marathon.



Again, you don't observe theories. Please learn how science works.
You should come up with your own meanings for words, wait you already have. How did we know how to put one foot in front of the other, where did this come from, would in be God the Creator?
 
Upvote 0

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, I am explaining your "Monkey turning into a man" is not what evolution states and if it were to happen, evolution would be falsified. It just demonstrates you do not know what evolution is.

99.9% of endogenous retroviral insertions in your genome insert in the same spot in the chimpanzee genome. This is only possible if you share a common ancestor. This is irrefutable evidence.
Or a common Creator!
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,793
✟229,457.00
Faith
Seeker
Would they still be there over millions of years?

Under certain circumstances, yes, soft tissue can be preserved.

And ask yourself this: we've found many dinosaur bones. Thousands upon thousands. Only a few of them have any soft tissue in them. If dinosaurs lived recently, why don't we find soft tissue more often?

Also, if dinosaurs lived with humans, why are they fossilized? We can find unfossilized human bones, but we've never found any dinosaur bones that haven't gone through the process. We've even been able to get DNA off human remains, but we've never done that with dinosaurs. If dinosaurs and humans lived together, why is human DNA still present but dinosaur DNA degraded?
 
Upvote 0

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Or a common Creator!

Nope. No evidence of a creator at all. It's overwhelming evidence that you share a common ancestor with a chimpanzee. Just like we can do DNA tests to demonstrate someone is your 5th cousin, DNA can demonstrate how closely related you are to other species.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, they aren't.



Based on observation, yes they would be there millions of year
Would they not be fossilized over millions of years? Or could it be that they are not millions of years old? You do know that it does not take millions of years for something to turn into fossil? See a fossilized dog in a tree at:
https://www.google.com/search?q=fos...T9ZRV4SWJ4iGyALw2baoCg#imgrc=NDmCgYJXQnV3mM:s later.
Or a fossilized cowboy boot and leg at: http://www.bible.ca/tracks/rapid-fossils-rapid-petrifaction.htm
 
Upvote 0

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you understand what an ERV is? Do you actually comprehend the argument he's making?
Where does the ERV, other viruses and bacteria come from? I also know that God the Creator also has given us(the human race) herbs, which contain different constituents to combat these organisms.
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,793
✟229,457.00
Faith
Seeker
Where does the ERV, other viruses and bacteria come from?

That's not relevant to the argument.

I also know that God the Creator also has given us(the human race) herbs, which contain different constituents to combat these organisms.

That's even less relevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Commander

A son of God.
Apr 10, 2015
830
99
Oklahoma
✟9,062.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Nope. No evidence of a creator at all. It's overwhelming evidence that you share a common ancestor with a chimpanzee. Just like we can do DNA tests to demonstrate someone is your 5th cousin, DNA can demonstrate how closely related you are to other species.
There is evidence all around, take a look in the mirror.
 
Upvote 0