- Oct 10, 2013
- 1,039
- 232
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
It is plain to see we live in a world with much suffering. This suffering seems rather random - the atheists, Christian, or Buddhist all have chances of developing cancer, losing a loved one, or experiencing any other tragedy. As evidenced in the early church, the Christian is certainly not exempt from earthly suffering. Sure, some suffering may be directly attributed to free will, but this is not the case with natural disaster or disease. It is the old question: if God is all-powerful, and all-loving, why does suffering exist? To me, the only logical answers to this question imply that (just maybe) modern, popular Christianity has largely misunderstood God in one way or another.
(1). First, it is possible that God is not the extremely personally, all-loving being we imagine Him to be. Instead, He is personal and loving in that He provided the sacrifice (Jesus) that made a blissful eternity possible, but, is not really involved in the "physical" areas of this present life. Obviously, one problem with this is that God did (and likely still does) perform miracles. But why are they seemingly random? After all, Jesus did not heal every blind man on earth, nor cleanse all lepers. Is it possible that such healings are more of a sign of God's power than for the purpose of relieving earthly suffering?
(2). The second possibility is that we, perhaps, are misunderstanding the omnipotence of God. For example, can God lie? Could God forgive the sins of man without the sacrifice of Jesus? Can God create a rock that is too heavy for Him to lift (a tired question, I know)? Is it possible that, in a way that is beyond our comprehension and perhaps as a factor of another one of His attributes (such as holiness or justice), that God is limited by how He interacts with this physical world (and that is why He resorted to sending Jesus to die)?
I know this is a very old debate, and I certainly do not have the answers, but I am curious what others think. Surely, isn't possible that perhaps many Christians (or at least the average, modern Protestant Christian) are misunderstanding God? If not, how would you explain natural suffering?
I am not trying to argue a point, just trying to get some insight into a difficult subject.
Thanks!
(1). First, it is possible that God is not the extremely personally, all-loving being we imagine Him to be. Instead, He is personal and loving in that He provided the sacrifice (Jesus) that made a blissful eternity possible, but, is not really involved in the "physical" areas of this present life. Obviously, one problem with this is that God did (and likely still does) perform miracles. But why are they seemingly random? After all, Jesus did not heal every blind man on earth, nor cleanse all lepers. Is it possible that such healings are more of a sign of God's power than for the purpose of relieving earthly suffering?
(2). The second possibility is that we, perhaps, are misunderstanding the omnipotence of God. For example, can God lie? Could God forgive the sins of man without the sacrifice of Jesus? Can God create a rock that is too heavy for Him to lift (a tired question, I know)? Is it possible that, in a way that is beyond our comprehension and perhaps as a factor of another one of His attributes (such as holiness or justice), that God is limited by how He interacts with this physical world (and that is why He resorted to sending Jesus to die)?
I know this is a very old debate, and I certainly do not have the answers, but I am curious what others think. Surely, isn't possible that perhaps many Christians (or at least the average, modern Protestant Christian) are misunderstanding God? If not, how would you explain natural suffering?
I am not trying to argue a point, just trying to get some insight into a difficult subject.
Thanks!