7 year peace treaty, what 7 year peace treaty?

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Did you know that the Jews had several traditions added to their celebration of the Feast of Tabernacles that went beyond the basic requirements in the Bible? There was a water pouring ceremony (water from the lowest pool in Jerusalem, the Pool of Siloam, was carried up to the temple area and poured out) and there was a large menorah lighting ceremony. It is believed to be in the context of these Feast of Tabernacles (John 7:2) traditions that Jesus proclaimed, "I am the Living Water" (John 7:37-39) and, "I am the Light of the World" (John 8:12). To top that off, he healed the man born blind by sending him to wash mud off his eyes in the pool of Siloam (John 9). I learned all about it in this book, which is very good: http://store.jewsforjesus.org/books/christ-in-the-feast-of-tabernacles.html

Remember we Gentiles aren't better than Jews. Faith and wisdom are gifts from the Lord so there's nothing to boast about.
Brother, please! Christ saying he's the Living Water or the Light of the World has NOTHING to do with the practice of the Maccabees and everything to do with what is written in the OT way before the Maccabees.

<Staff Edit>

The Maccabees is the result of the forsaking of the Levitical priesthood, which is the AOD.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Fusion77

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2015
756
267
50
Texas
✟62,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's interesting that you would jump from vs 5 to 24 when the context of vs 7 to 24 is Artaxerxes.

<Staff Edit>v


So when did the building stop, and when did it resume?


So who caused the building to cease?


A greater chance than thinking this is Nehem--h's Artaxerxes who you also claime gave the decree to build the city and not Cyrus. See the insanity?


Ezra didn't interpret the book into English.


The word there is frustrated, not stopped. And if it was stopped in vs 4 and 5, there wouldn't be a letter to Artaxerxes in vs 7 resulting in his decreeing the work to stop in vs 24, the reason you have to jump from vs 5 to 24 in your interpretation - the confusion.


I can see where you're coming from now, but even if it did cease from Cyrus to Darius, it is still 71 yrs of unhindered building to Artaxerxes!

This is the umpteenth time I'm saying it. How couldn't Israel have finished rebuilding the city in that 71yrs what you claim Nehem--h completed in 52 days?

Plus it's recorded in the new testament that the temple took a number of years to rebuild, and Solomon took at least 7 yrs. Four years from Darius' 2nd year to his 6th year doesn't cut it.



You're forcing that square peg in the wrong hole again. Frustrate means frustrate, harassment, not ceasing, or else Ezra 6:14 wouldn't have been reporting building thru the reigns of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes.
Well the word frustrate in Ezra 4:5 is derived from H6565 cause to cease, break asunder, disannul, defeat, make void, to come to naught, make of none effect...they're all there

6565. parar
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
break asunder, cast off, cause to cease, clean, defeat, disannul, disappoint,
A primitive root; to break up (usually figuratively, i.e. To violate, frustrate -- X any ways, break (asunder), cast off, cause to cease, X clean, defeat, disannul, disappoint, dissolve, divide, make of none effect, fail, frustrate, bring (come) to nought, X utterly, make void.

Forms and Transliterations
אָפֵ֧ר אפר הֲפֵרָ֔ם הִֽתְפּוֹרְרָה֙ הֵ֝פֵ֗רוּ הֵפֵ֖ר הֵפֵ֖רוּ הֵפֵ֣רוּ הֵפֵ֤ר הֵפֵ֤רוּ הֵפַ֑ר הֵפַֽר׃ הָפֵ֗רָה הָפֵ֣ר הָפֵ֥ר הָפֵר֩ הפר הפר׃ הפרה הפרו הפרם התפוררה וְהֵפֵ֖ר וְהֵפֵ֗ר וְהֵפֵ֥ר וְהֵפֵר֙ וְהֵפַרְתָּ֣ה וְהָפֵ֖ר וְתָפֵ֖ר וְתֻפָ֑ר וַֽיְפַרְפְּרֵ֗נִי וַיָּ֥פֶר וַיָּפֵ֙רוּ֙ וַתֻּפַ֖ר והפר והפרתה ויפר ויפרו ויפרפרני ותפר יְפֵרֶֽנּוּ׃ יָפֵ֑ר יָפֵ֛ר יָפֵ֨ר יפר יפרנו׃ לְהַפְרְכֶ֖ם לְהָפֵ֞ר לְהָפֵ֣ר לְהָפֵ֥ר לְהָפֵיר֙ לְהָפֵר֙ להפיר להפר להפרכם מֵ֭פֵר מֵפֵר֙ מפר פּ֤וֹר פוֹרַ֣רְתָּ פור פוררת תָּפֵ֙רוּ֙ תָּפֵ֣ר תָּפֵ֥ר תֻפַר֙ תפר תפרו ’ā·p̄êr ’āp̄êr aFer foRarta hā·p̄ê·rāh hă·p̄ê·rām hā·p̄êr haFer haFerah hafeRam hāp̄êr hāp̄êrāh hăp̄êrām hê·p̄ar hê·p̄ê·rū hê·p̄êr heFar heFer heFeru hêp̄ar hêp̄êr hêp̄êrū hiṯ·pō·wr·rāh hitporRah hiṯpōwrrāh lə·hā·p̄êr lə·hap̄·rə·ḵem lehaFeir lehaFer lehafreChem ləhāp̄êr ləhap̄rəḵem mê·p̄êr Mefer mêp̄êr p̄ō·w·rar·tā pō·wr Por pōwr p̄ōwrartā tā·p̄ê·rū tā·p̄êr taFer taFeru tāp̄êr tāp̄êrū ṯu·p̄ar tuFar ṯup̄ar vaiYafer vaiyaFeru vattuFar vayfarpeReni vehaFer vehefarTah veheFer vetaFer vetuFar wat·tu·p̄ar wattup̄ar way·p̄ar·pə·rê·nî way·yā·p̄ê·rū way·yā·p̄er wayp̄arpərênî wayyāp̄er wayyāp̄êrū wə·hā·p̄êr wə·hê·p̄ar·tāh wə·hê·p̄êr wə·ṯā·p̄êr wə·ṯu·p̄ār wəhāp̄êr wəhêp̄artāh wəhêp̄êr wəṯāp̄êr wəṯup̄ār yā·p̄êr yaFer yāp̄êr yə·p̄ê·ren·nū yefeRennu yəp̄êrennū
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,667
550
United States
✟12,166.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Brother, please! Christ saying he's the Living Water or the Light of the World has NOTHING to do with the practice of the Maccabees and everything to do with what is written in the OT way before the Maccabees.

You people will believe anything. It's as if you don't know anything for yourself.

The Maccabees is the result of the forsaking of the Levitical priesthood, which is the AOD.

Jesus called out the hypocrisy of the religious rulers, but my point is He didn't despise the Jews or their traditions in general (just the ones that nullified God's law).
 
Upvote 0

Goodbook

Reading the Bible
Jan 22, 2011
22,090
5,106
New Zealand
Visit site
✟78,875.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
There are many verses of Christ criticizing the rulers of Israel and their practices. That is why He is quoted as saying, "Could anything good come out of Israel?"


Which part of the history of the Maccabees being the forsaking of the Levitical priesthood don't you comprehend? Why are you posting what i already told you is not of God? If anything, you should be addressing the fact the AOD is the replacement of the sons of Aaron as high priests, the forsaking of the Levitical covenant, the reason the temple meet it's final desolation.
I dont remember Jesus ever saying that!! It was the pharisees saying could anything good come out of nazareth!

What bible are you reading????
 
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,667
550
United States
✟12,166.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I dont remember Jesus ever saying that!! It was the pharisees saying could anything good come out of nazareth!

What bible are you reading????

I don't remember Jesus saying that, either (and I can't find it in a search).

It was Nathanael who asked, "Can anything good come out of Nazareth?"

John 1:45-46
45 Philip found Nathanael and said to him, “We have found Him of whom Moses in the law, and also the prophets, wrote—Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”
46 And Nathanael said to him, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?”
Philip said to him, “Come and see.”
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If anything, you should be addressing the fact the AOD is the replacement of the sons of Aaron as high priests, the forsaking of the Levitical covenant, the reason the temple meet it's final desolation.

Why?

For the same reason that I and others should question any theory.

When someone comes up with a theory they claim is the solution and then they heap condemnation on others who dare to question the scheme, then we should all view the idea with great suspicion, especially when they have not shown any support from any other source.

How about showing us the words of a Greek or Hebrew scholar who can lend support to your theory.


Your condescending tone and derogatory remarks are not adding anything to the strength of your argument.
As a matter of fact, they are doing the exact opposite.

Claiming that the temple was destroyed in 70 AD for any reason other than the rejection of God's Son, clearly does not agree with the words of the Messiah Himself.



Mat 21:33 Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country:


Mat 21:34 And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.



Mat 21:35 And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.



Mat 21:36 Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise.



Mat 21:37 But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son.



Mat 21:38 But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.



Mat 21:39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.



Mat 21:40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?



Mat 21:41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.




.
 
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Well the word frustrate in Ezra 4:5 is derived from H6565 cause to cease, break asunder, disannul, defeat, make void, to come to naught, make of none effect...they're all there

6565. parar
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
break asunder, cast off, cause to cease, clean, defeat, disannul, disappoint,
A primitive root; to break up (usually figuratively, i.e. To violate, frustrate -- X any ways, break (asunder), cast off, cause to cease, X clean, defeat, disannul, disappoint, dissolve, divide, make of none effect, fail, frustrate, bring (come) to nought, X utterly, make void.

Forms and Transliterations
אָפֵ֧ר אפר הֲפֵרָ֔ם הִֽתְפּוֹרְרָה֙ הֵ֝פֵ֗רוּ הֵפֵ֖ר הֵפֵ֖רוּ הֵפֵ֣רוּ הֵפֵ֤ר הֵפֵ֤רוּ הֵפַ֑ר הֵפַֽר׃ הָפֵ֗רָה הָפֵ֣ר הָפֵ֥ר הָפֵר֩ הפר הפר׃ הפרה הפרו הפרם התפוררה וְהֵפֵ֖ר וְהֵפֵ֗ר וְהֵפֵ֥ר וְהֵפֵר֙ וְהֵפַרְתָּ֣ה וְהָפֵ֖ר וְתָפֵ֖ר וְתֻפָ֑ר וַֽיְפַרְפְּרֵ֗נִי וַיָּ֥פֶר וַיָּפֵ֙רוּ֙ וַתֻּפַ֖ר והפר והפרתה ויפר ויפרו ויפרפרני ותפר יְפֵרֶֽנּוּ׃ יָפֵ֑ר יָפֵ֛ר יָפֵ֨ר יפר יפרנו׃ לְהַפְרְכֶ֖ם לְהָפֵ֞ר לְהָפֵ֣ר לְהָפֵ֥ר לְהָפֵיר֙ לְהָפֵר֙ להפיר להפר להפרכם מֵ֭פֵר מֵפֵר֙ מפר פּ֤וֹר פוֹרַ֣רְתָּ פור פוררת תָּפֵ֙רוּ֙ תָּפֵ֣ר תָּפֵ֥ר תֻפַר֙ תפר תפרו ’ā·p̄êr ’āp̄êr aFer foRarta hā·p̄ê·rāh hă·p̄ê·rām hā·p̄êr haFer haFerah hafeRam hāp̄êr hāp̄êrāh hăp̄êrām hê·p̄ar hê·p̄ê·rū hê·p̄êr heFar heFer heFeru hêp̄ar hêp̄êr hêp̄êrū hiṯ·pō·wr·rāh hitporRah hiṯpōwrrāh lə·hā·p̄êr lə·hap̄·rə·ḵem lehaFeir lehaFer lehafreChem ləhāp̄êr ləhap̄rəḵem mê·p̄êr Mefer mêp̄êr p̄ō·w·rar·tā pō·wr Por pōwr p̄ōwrartā tā·p̄ê·rū tā·p̄êr taFer taFeru tāp̄êr tāp̄êrū ṯu·p̄ar tuFar ṯup̄ar vaiYafer vaiyaFeru vattuFar vayfarpeReni vehaFer vehefarTah veheFer vetaFer vetuFar wat·tu·p̄ar wattup̄ar way·p̄ar·pə·rê·nî way·yā·p̄ê·rū way·yā·p̄er wayp̄arpərênî wayyāp̄er wayyāp̄êrū wə·hā·p̄êr wə·hê·p̄ar·tāh wə·hê·p̄êr wə·ṯā·p̄êr wə·ṯu·p̄ār wəhāp̄êr wəhêp̄artāh wəhêp̄êr wəṯāp̄êr wəṯup̄ār yā·p̄êr yaFer yāp̄êr yə·p̄ê·ren·nū yefeRennu yəp̄êrennū
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
You can say what ever you want. The text from vs 7 to 24 tells you specifically when the building cease. There's nothing saying the building cease and had to had begun again in order for Artaxerxes' ceasing in vs 7 to 24. Plus Ezra 6:14 tells you they built thru the reigns of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes.

<Staff Edit>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Jesus called out the hypocrisy of the religious rulers, but my point is He didn't despise the Jews or their traditions in general (just the ones that nullified God's law).
The forsaking of the Levitical covenant is the AOD. The High Priest during Christ time wasn't of the direct line of firstborn sons of Aaron, if he even was a son of Aaron.

Christ couldn't have condemn what was happening all together because that was all the righteous people had in the form of obeying the laws of Moses. But the "forsakers of the covenant" did hijack the government and temple sacrifices.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I dont remember Jesus ever saying that!! It was the pharisees saying could anything good come out of nazareth!

What bible are you reading????
To err is human. Whether Christ or Nathan said it doesn't make a difference. It still sets the stage.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I don't remember Jesus saying that, either (and I can't find it in a search).

It was Nathanael who asked, "Can anything good come out of Nazareth?"

John 1:45-46
45 Philip found Nathanael and said to him, “We have found Him of whom Moses in the law, and also the prophets, wrote—Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”
46 And Nathanael said to him, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?”
Philip said to him, “Come and see.”
To err is human, so I recalled it to be the other way around. Nathaniel saying it still paints the picture of "nothing good" going on in Israel.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Fusion77

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2015
756
267
50
Texas
✟62,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You can say what ever you want. The text from vs 7 to 24 tells you specifically when the building cease. There's nothing saying the building cease and had to had begun again in order for Artaxerxes' ceasing in vs 7 to 24. Plus Ezra 6:14 tells you they built thru the reigns of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes.

It's as if you have a one track mind. You see only what you want to see. How many times have I asked you how could Israel not complete the city in 71yrs to Nehem, but Nehem could finish it in 52 days?

<Staff Edit>
<Staff Edit>. It is the most plausible answer to read Ezra 4:6-23 as a parentheses that jumps into a future description of what occurred during the reign of Xerxes and Artexerxes.

It's better than thinking an imposter who usurped authority for a matter of months is who Ezra is referring to in Ezra 4 and Ezra 6:14. If he were, I'm sure that he being a scribe would make record of it.

The alternative is to think that instead of this happenings in the 40+ years in the reign of the Artexerxes of Nehemiah's time. That in a window of a matter of months Shimshai the scribe wrote a letter, brought it all the way to the king. The king searched the records, then wrote a decree stopping the building. After that, they brought it all the way back to Judah and then stopped the building. Yet, at the same time, according to you Ezra 6:14 the Jews finished in building by the decree of this imposter. What? If the imposter issued a decree to stop building, how did they finish building by his decree to stop building? Ezra 6:14

14And the elders of the Jews were successful in building through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they finished building according to the command of the God of Israel and the decree of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.

It states they finished building according to the decree of Artexerxes of Persia. So tell me...if this is the imposter did he make a decree to stop the building? Or to finish the building? Because doing both in a matter of months, without a time machine is impossible.

Furthermore, the sources I've checked seem to state this imposter had little to no impact on the affairs of the kingdom.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,667
550
United States
✟12,166.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
To err is human. I recalled it to be the other way around. But that Nathaniel saying still paints the picture of "nothing good in Israel."

Nathanael was an Israelite looking for the Messiah. All Nathanael's statement said is that he didn't think Nazareth's people were very noble. They must have had a poor reputation. You just sound bitter towards Israel.

Also, look at this commentary for Matthew 2:23 (you have to scroll down to the commentary for verse 23).

Matthew 2:23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, “He shall be called a Nazarene.”

(Matthew understood this prophetic tie--maybe Jesus explained it to him--but apparently Nathanael hadn't.)
http://biblehub.com/commentaries/pulpit/matthew/2.htm
 
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
<Staff Edit>It is the most plausible answer to read Ezra 4:6-23 as a parentheses that jumps into a future description of what occurred during the reign of Xerxes and Artexerxes.
As it is as plausible to believe Nehem could complete from ruins in 52 days what the entire nation tried to complete in 91yr, yet it still laid in ruins 91yrs after. That is so plausible.


It's better than thinking an imposter who usurped authority for a matter of months is who Ezra is referring to in Ezra 4 and Ezra 6:14. If he were, I'm sure that he being a scribe would make record of it.
Logic dictates it since the rebuilding began in Darius' 2nd yr of reign. Nehem never mentions Artaxerxes halting any building even though he gets the news of the ruins in the first chapter and verse.


The alternative is to think that out of the 100+ years from the time of Cyrus to Artexerxes of Nehemiah's time. That in a window of a matter of months Shimshai the scribe wrote a letter, brought it all the way to the king. The king searched the records, then wrote a decree stopping the building. After that, they brought it all the way back to Judah and then stopped the building. Yet, at the same time, according to Ezra 6:14 the Jews prospered in building by the decree of this imposter. What? If the imposter issued a decree to stop building, how did they finish building by his decree to stop building? Ezra 6:14
You forgot to mention that when they wrote the imposter and he caused the building to cease, that after two yrs the building began again in Darius' 2nd yr, possibly fulfilling Ezra 6:14's building thru their reign. I don't remember Nehem speaking of any decree by his Artaxerxes to cease building and then decreeing rebuilding for Nehem's 52 days rebuilding. Hmmm!


14And the elders of the Jews were successful in building through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they finished building according to the command of the God of Israel and the decree of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.
Where is the decree to stop building between Darius' decree to start rebuilding in his 2nd yr of reign to Nehem's 52 days of building 71 yrs later? Where is that decree located, and who gave it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Nathanael was an Israelite looking for the Messiah. All Nathanael's statement said is that he didn't think Nazareth's people were very noble. They must have had a poor reputation. You just sound bitter towards Israel.

Also, look at this commentary for Matthew 2:23 (you have to scroll down to the commentary for verse 23).

Matthew 2:23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, “He shall be called a Nazarene.”

(Matthew understood this prophetic tie--maybe Jesus explained it to him--but apparently Nathanael hadn't.)
http://biblehub.com/commentaries/pulpit/matthew/2.htm
Are you trying to tell me the Pharisees and Sadducees wasn't a change of government from the OT set up?
 
Upvote 0

Fusion77

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2015
756
267
50
Texas
✟62,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As it is as plausible to believe Nehem could complete from ruins in 52 days what the entire nation tried to complete in 91yr, yet it still laid in ruins 91yrs after. That is so plausible.


Logic dictates it since the rebuilding began in Darius' 2nd yr of reign. Nehem never mentions Artaxerxes halting any building even though he gets the news of the ruins in the first chapter and verse.


You forgot to mention that when they wrote the imposter and he caused the building to cease, that after two yrs the building began again in Darius' 2nd yr, possibly fulfilling Ezra 6:14's building thru their reign. I don't remember Nehem speaking of any decree by his Artaxerxes to cease building and then decreeing rebuilding for Nehem's 52 days rebuilding. Hmmm!


Where is the decree to stop building between Darius' decree to start rebuilding in his 2nd yr of reign to Nehem's 52 days of building 71 yrs later? Where is that decree located, and who gave it?
Ezra 6:14 says they finished building by the decree of Cyrus, Darius and Artexerxes. It doesn't say they finished building by the decree of only Cyrus and Darius, in the reign of Artexerxes. Otherwise where's Cambyses name? Besides that not what it says it says by the decree of Cyrus, Darius and Artexerxes.
It's almost impossible for that Artexerxes or any Artexerxes in the book of Ezra to represent the imposter.


The Decree to stop building after the reign of Darius is found in Ezra 4:7-23. The effects of that decree can be seen in Artexerxes 20th year. Nehemiah 1:1-3
The words of Nehemiah the son of Hacaliah.
Now it happened in the month Chislev, in the twentieth year, while I was in Susa the capitol, 2that Hanani, one of my brothers, and some men from Judah came; and I asked them concerning the Jews who had escaped and had survived the captivity, and about Jerusalem. 3They said to me, “The remnant there in the province who survived the captivity are in great distress and reproach, and the wall of Jerusalem is broken down and its gates are burned with fire.”

That imposter was irrelevant. He usurped for a matter of months.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Ezra 6:14 says they finished building by the decree of Cyrus, Darius and Artexerxes. It doesn't say they finished building by the decree of only Cyrus and Darius, in the reign of Artexerxes. Otherwise where's Cambyses name? Besides that not what it says it says by the decree of Cyrus, Darius and Artexerxes.
Okay, you do have a point on this one. The text might be speaking specifically to their decrees allow for building, but the Artaxerxes in Ezra 4:7-24 is not Nehem's Artaxerxes because vs 24 "specifically" states the building ceased until Darius' 2nd yr.


It's almost impossible for that Artexerxes or any Artexerxes in the book of Ezra to represent the imposter.
<Staff Edit> that if the ceasing is done by an Artaxerxes in Ezra 4:7-23 and vs 24 goes on to tell that it ceased until Darius' 2nd yr, that it cannot by Nehem's Artaxerxes based on the chronology of events and kings?


The Decree to stop building after the reign of Darius is found in Ezra 4:7-23. The effects of that decree can be seen in Artexerxes 20th year. Nehemiah 1:1-3
The words of Nehemiah the son of Hacaliah.
Now it happened in the month Chislev, in the twentieth year, while I was in Susa the capitol, 2that Hanani, one of my brothers, and some men from Judah came; and I asked them concerning the Jews who had escaped and had survived the captivity, and about Jerusalem. 3They said to me, “The remnant there in the province who survived the captivity are in great distress and reproach, and the wall of Jerusalem is broken down and its gates are burned with fire.”
How <Staff Edit> can Ezra 4:7-23 be the halting after Darius' decree when the very next verse tells you that that halting was ended by Darius? Are you going to put parenthesis around vs 7-23 and ignore vs 24?


That imposter was irrelevant. He usurped for a matter of months.
He did not usurped for a matter of months, the rebuilding began in Darius/ 2nd yr. Though Darius slew and dethrone the imposter in less than a yr, the building didn't resume until Darius' 2nd yr.

<Staff Edit>

Plus, even though you're <Staff Edit> trying to make up a decree for a ceasing post Darius, you still haven't explained how Nehem rebuilt in 52 days what Israel supposedly couldn't in 71 or 91 years.

<Staff Edit>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
<Staff Edit>

The high priests from just before the revolt of the Maccabees aren't of the line of firstborn sons of Aaron, the "prince of the covenant." Address the fact.

<Staff Edit>

Let us address the fact...

Can you at least provide some scripture from one of the New Testament writers which confirms your statement that the temple was destroyed in 70 AD, because of the abandonment of the Levitical Priesthood?


We have scripture from the Book of Hebrews which clearly states that the Levitical priesthood was to be replaced.

Heb_5:6 As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

Heb_5:10 Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.

Heb_6:20 Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

Heb_7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

Heb_7:17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

Heb_7:21 (For those priests were made without an oath; but this with an oath by him that said unto him, The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:)

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Fusion77

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2015
756
267
50
Texas
✟62,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Okay, you do have a point on this one. The text might be speaking specifically to their decrees allow for building, but the Artaxerxes in Ezra 4:7-24 is not Nehem's Artaxerxes because vs 24 "specifically" states the building ceased until Darius' 2nd yr.


<Staff Edit> if the ceasing is done by an Artaxerxes in Ezra 4:7-23 and vs 24 goes on to tell that it ceased until Darius' 2nd yr, that it cannot by Nehem's Artaxerxes based on the chronology of events and kings?


How <Staff Edit> can Ezra 4:7-23 be the halting after Darius' decree when the very next verse tells you that that halting was ended by Darius? Are you going to put parenthesis around vs 7-23 and ignore vs 24?


He did not usurped for a matter of months, the rebuilding began in Darius/ 2nd yr. Though Darius slew and dethrone the imposter in less than a yr, the building didn't resume until Darius' 2nd yr.

<Staff Edit>

Plus, even though you're <Staff Edit> trying to make up a decree for a ceasing post Darius, you still haven't explained how Nehem rebuilt in 52 days what Israel supposedly couldn't in 71 or 91 years.

<Staff Edit>
Nehemiah completed the wall in 52 days. There's no disputing that. In 52 days the wall was completed, from whatever state it was in.
Nehemiah 6:15

15So the wall was completed on the twenty-fifth of the month Elul, in fifty-two days.

Who says the houses in the city were rebuilt in 52 days? Nehemiah 7:1-4 tells us the city still basically was in ruins. Even, after the wall was built. Which it (the wall), was built in 52 days, from whatever state it was in, at the time Nehemiah arrived.

Nehemiah 7:1-4

1Now when the wall was rebuilt and I had set up the doors, and the gatekeepers and the singers and the Levites were appointed, 2then I put Hanani my brother, and Hananiah the commander of the fortress, in charge of Jerusalem, for he was a faithful man and feared God more than many. 3Then I said to them, “Do not let the gates of Jerusalem be opened until the sun is hot, and while they are standing guard, let them shut and bolt the doors. Also appoint guards from the inhabitants of Jerusalem, each at his post, and each in front of his own house.” 4Now the city was large and spacious, but the people in it were few and the houses were not built.

The houses (the city was not built). It's very clear. if the houses were not built at that time, all Nehemiah did (which was a lot), in those 52 days was completed the wall...from whatever condition it was in prior to that .

Now back to the word frustrate. Nehemiah 4:15

15When our enemies heard that it was known to us, and that God had frustrated their plan, then all of us returned to the wall, each one to his work.

The word frustrated here sure seems to mean to stop, or to cause to cease. In that same manner, so does the word frustrate mean to stop in Ezra 4:5. It's the same word H6565!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0