Jesus healing lepers

simonpeter

Newbie
Jan 30, 2010
1,097
71
✟16,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Shalom,

Consider Jesus healing lepers ... we find this often in the Bible. Isn't there a deeper meaning to this? Leprosy was considered incurable at that time, and lepers a lost cause. Yet Jesus healed them as if suggesting that even the most hopeless had hope in God.

So basically what this means is that even the most wretched sinner will be healed, right? Everyone deserves forgiveness. God is for restorative justice, not retributive justice. He heals, doesn't punish.

Is this the lesson you've also learnt from Jesus healing the lepers?

Thanks,
Simon
 

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,066
4,740
✟839,413.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Shalom,

Consider Jesus healing lepers ... we find this often in the Bible. Isn't there a deeper meaning to this? Leprosy was considered incurable at that time, and lepers a lost cause. Yet Jesus healed them as if suggesting that even the most hopeless had hope in God.

So basically what this means is that even the most wretched sinner will be healed, right? Everyone deserves forgiveness. God is for restorative justice, not retributive justice. He heals, doesn't punish.

Is this the lesson you've also learnt from Jesus healing the lepers?

Thanks,
Simon
Yes, I agree.

I would also note that this call from Jesus was an impetus for Catholic hospitals and nuns to treat HIV-Aids when there was no cure. This was at a time when other heath professionals ran for the hills.
 
Upvote 0

Look Up

"What is unseen is eternal"
Jul 16, 2010
928
175
✟16,230.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
While one may dispute the absence of "retributive justice" in the canonical Gospels (e.g., Mt. 23 & 25), surely Jesus' public ministry emphasizes His compassion. The Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost (like tax collector Zacchaeus).

Also worth noting regarding leprosy was (1) how it was not necessarily contracted on account of some particular "worse" sin in the diseased person (cf. Jn. 9, Lk. 13, Lev. 13, Job) and (2) how through ceremonial uncleanness it excluded--in effect ostracized--the diseased person from participating in the religious life of the Jewish community. Healing from leprosy (and attendant sacrifice) restored the diseased person to the religious community--or in the case of at least one "foreigner" Samaritan, to the community of Jesus' disciples, Lk. 17:11-19.
 
Upvote 0

benedictaoo

Legend
Dec 1, 2007
34,418
7,261
✟72,332.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Shalom,

Consider Jesus healing lepers ... we find this often in the Bible. Isn't there a deeper meaning to this? Leprosy was considered incurable at that time, and lepers a lost cause. Yet Jesus healed them as if suggesting that even the most hopeless had hope in God.

So basically what this means is that even the most wretched sinner will be healed, right? Everyone deserves forgiveness. God is for restorative justice, not retributive justice. He heals, doesn't punish.

Is this the lesson you've also learnt from Jesus healing the lepers?

Thanks,
Simon
Jesus came for the sick, those who are well aren't in need. But the whole Gospel native can be seen as sin as a diseases that Jesus heals, cures. More and more we are learning that sin is not seen as a crime and Jesus seen as God's prosecutor who finds you guilty and condemns you to hell.
 
Upvote 0