Trump will indeed lead us to triumph in the final battle between good and evil, also known as the Battle of Ar Mageddon and the Battle of That Great Day of God Almighty. He will lead a 24 nation coalition that wipes out the latest face of the 7th head of Satan with "exceedingly great hail." Then Satan wont be heard from again for a thousand years.
That seems to be how it works, so you must be right!That's odd, I heard 4 prophetic sources telling me it would be Bernie Sanders.
Since Sanders so far has the most prophets, does he win?
I didn't say I believe them.
I disagree with that.
Can you clarify how you formulated your prediction?
My predictions come from the Word of God.
I'll try to sum it up for you. First, the Euphrates was dry on 9/11 when the 7th head of Satan attacked the US, the 4th horseman to rule the earth for Jesus since 312 AD when the sign of Christ appeared in the clouds. (The US was founded by George Washington who rode a pale horse, and our weapons bring hell and death to the enemies of Jesus). The Battle of Ar Mageddon is fast escalating and becoming a great world war as prophesied. The Good News is, a coalition of 24 nations will ultimately defeat the last head of Satan so soundly that He wont be heard from again for a thousand years, allowing them to rule the earth with (or for) Jesus for a millennial. (See Revelation 16:12-21, 4:4 and 20:1-4)
My prophetic sources are 3 for CruzThat's odd, I heard 4 prophetic sources telling me it would be Bernie Sanders.
Since Sanders so far has the most prophets, does he win?
ok. That's very interesting. I've seen others make predictions via this method but not seen an election presented this way. I appreciate you sharing your views and how you came to them.
Say what you will, i really don't care. However, you may want to reconsider your second sentence. You are easily fooled. You believed a few editorial writers when they asserted without a shred of evidence that Trump was referring to menstrual blood coming from Megyn Kelly/Kendal/Kelly.
We call this begging the question. C.S. Lewis had another term for it that he created in an essay. He called it 'Bulverism', and you may do well to read the essay and educate yourself. You don't bother in refutation, you just assume that your opponent is wrong and go on to create a theory of how he or she got to be so wrong. Of course whether or not your theory has any validity is up for debate as well. However i must give you credit for at least creating an actual theory (theories have the possibility of being falsified).
If they don't come true then Trump won't be president.
Not sure I understand this, I think you meant "no longer believeable"?
As for Trump, that is pretty much a no-brainer because he is leading in all the polls. And he has the balls to do what it takes. He has said he will level all the ISIS houses in Raqqa and kill every last man, woman and child. (And that wont be killing any "innocents" because ISIS has radicalized all their woman and their children from the time they're toddlers, and everyone who doesn't like ISIS has already left).
