Do you really not see what the ramifications of your idea are? If Husky has to pair with Mastiff to get Chinook, how did Husky, Mastiff, or Chinook ever come into being if all you ever started with was NOAH'S POODLES?
No, you simply do not want to accept the ramifications. Half of the genome was in the female and half in the male.
"
24For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh."
When a man and woman mate - their genomes are reunited and another creature is born.
You are simply refusing to accept what a perfect genome separated into two would be capable of. If the first genome had the combinations A, B, C and D within it and was separated into A, C in one and B, D in the other, then the possible combinations are endless. A+B=E, A+D=F, C+B=G, C+D=H. And on and on and on....
On the other hand you want us all to start with A and then magically pretend we get B, let alone C, D, E, etc.
So your argument is that starting with a perfect genome with all combinations possible can not produce what we see, while starting with a simple genome with no combinations possible we got to the complexity that we see?
I'm still waiting for you to show me that a bacteria has become anything other than what it was since it never exchanges genomes with anything? Your E coli experiments falsified your beliefs. After billions of mutations and billions of generations they remained E coli. You couldn't even make it to different infraspecific taxa within the bacteria species. Your entire belief system is based upon pure fantasy.
Only by starting with a perfect genome can all the diversity we see today be explained.
)
