- Jan 2, 2015
- 11,556
- 5,728
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Presbyterian
- Marital Status
- Married
Nothing going on here. It seems that the Semper Reformanda forum has less of a pulse than the average Reformed church. . .
Nothing going on here. It seems that the Semper Reformanda forum has less of a pulse than the average Reformed church. . .
Well…..I guess there is nothing stopping you from kicking the hornets nest?
Go on….you know you want to
Not being one to stir a pile of dung of course but I would be willing to stir up a conversation concerning the law. Is anyone interested?
Do you hold to the WCF view that the law is a rule of life for the believer. I am a Baptist but one of the reasons that I cannot agree with the LBC on the law. Believers are not under the law in any sense.
The traditional Reformed view, according to both confessions, is that believers are still under the Moral Law as a rule of life. That would mean that the law still holds us in bondage. Christ has freed us from the bondage of the law. We are not bound to the law in any way or to any extent. Those who believe that we are able to keep the law in any sense, obedience or through sanctification, has no real understanding of the absolute purity or righteousness of the law. The law is high and holy and we cannot reach its heights in any way. To say that we keep the law in any sense is to destroy the highness of the law and to lower it to a standard that we can reach. The Lord Jesus Christ is all our righteousness and all our holiness and His righteousness and holiness is enough for God and enough for us.Expand on that and see where it goes. If I disagree with you, I will do so respectfully and with a biblical chapter and verse and not a section of a confession, promise.
The traditional Reformed view, according to both confessions, is that believers are still under the Moral Law as a rule of life. That would mean that the law still holds us in bondage. Christ has freed us from the bondage of the law. We are not bound to the law in any way or to any extent. Those who believe that we are able to keep the law in any sense, obedience or through sanctification, has no real understanding of the absolute purity or righteousness of the law. The law is high and holy and we cannot reach its heights in any way. To say that we keep the law in any sense is to destroy the highness of the law and to lower it to a standard that we can reach. The Lord Jesus Christ is all our righteousness and all our holiness and His righteousness and holiness is enough for God and enough for us.
You could always start a different thread so as to start the revival.Nothing going on here. It seems that the Semper Reformanda forum has less of a pulse than the average Reformed church. . .
I saw that when I first joined and added "AdBlock" to my browser. I don't see one ad.I know there is no such thing as a free lunch but the ads are a pain.
Yes I do. The law demands perfect obedience and will accept nothing less. I have no obedience of my own that will meet that requirement except that the perfect obedience of Christ be counted as mine.Do you think that living by faith in Christ, and His finished work, that you walk in fulfillment of the moral law?
Yes I do. The law demands perfect obedience and will accept nothing less. I have no obedience of my own that will meet that requirement except that the perfect obedience of Christ be counted as mine.
So they call you an antinomian too?I agree with you.
There is a real issue with thinking that God accepts our (Christians) imperfect works. I had a pastor who came from Piper's church who constantly said this, and it was always a source of disagreement between us. God accepts perfection only, which is why we need not only forgiveness of sins through the death of Christ, but perfect righteousness given to us in the life of Christ.
So they call you an antinomian too?
You can't do anything to get to heaven except believe. Your works mean nothingSo they call you an antinomian too?
Not being one to stir a pile of dung of course but I would be willing to stir up a conversation concerning the law. Is anyone interested?