The track record you have thus far displayed on the forum is one of fanatical blind faith in the unproven godless same state past. End of story.Our track records speak very differently. You have consistantly denied science and always you have been unable to provide any rational grounds for that denial.
Not in any way actually. You invent distances and sizes and all sorts of things, and then sit there with a glazed look saying 'how similar to here it looks!'And you don't seem, to understand that what we see elsewhere in the universe is absolutely the same as what we see here.
Post this fact so we can see it plainly. You are funny.It's not denial. It is fact. .
Pathetic, isn't it?!!! They imput same state only programs into computers, and run tons of models within that religious little data set, until they finally cook up something that seems like the same state could have dunnot. Then they get a little deranged look in the eye, and say something like 'gee, it MUST HAVE happened this way, it is the only way that seems to fit, ain't I a genius'?http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...lted-impact-double-blows-moons-space-science/
This guy ran computer simulations to see what could have happened.
I dare him to discuss it here.While I don't have the details of the program he used, I'm certain he does.
Meanwhile you admit cluelessness. OK.
No need, science uses only certain criteria. You can be certain it uses physics from earth and etc.Please feel free to contact him and request the details for yourself. If you do, I certainly hope you'll make your communications public so we can all see what he says.
Great if he impresses you, contact him and tell him to get posting.Here's his contact details. http://www.iau.org/administration/membership/individual/11712/
Hey, I eat those sort of blather claims for breakfast.(Now, I'm half suspecting that you are going to find some way to get out of actually putting your money where your mouth is, as we say here in Australia. Perhaps you will claim that because I can't explain it myself that it doesn't count, even though that isn't enough to make it useless.)
Don't they speak English down under?So you're answer is to claim that you get to arbitrarily choose whether it counts or not, based on whether you want it to?
Upvote
0