Tools far pre date man, evolution theory kicked in face

Status
Not open for further replies.

davedajobauk

dum spiro spero
Supporter
Dec 26, 2006
55,186
28,520
76
Salford, Greater Manchester. UK
✟300,707.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
from extract said:
"Current fossil evidence from the Woranso-Mille study area clearly shows that there were at least two, if not three, early human species living at the same time and in close geographic proximity."
Haile-Selassie said the discovery of a new species would take "the ongoing debate on early hominin diversity to another level" and was likely to be met by skepticism in some quarters.

And here is a place for such 'skepticism' LOL

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/28/africa/ethiopia-fossil-hominin-ancestor/index.html


http://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/05/africa/ethiopia-ancient-jawbone-discovery/index.html

Nobody, is saying that God didn't create humans
The 'difference', is the baseline chronology .... ie: that which says; Humans, are less than 3,000 years old
and the evidence, that supports the existence of man / his immediate forbears, @ 3 MILLION years ago

Of course we know, that there will always be dissenters (those 'in-denial') right up until, the Lord's Day
Those of us, with thinner skin (hides) are, more impressionable and open-minded
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟12,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Try it and see.

We've all already tried it over and over and over and over and over again ad nauseum. Showing you science is like showing a copy of Nature to a toddler with some crayons. The results are predictable and the same every time.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,904
1,261
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
We've all already tried it over and over and over and over and over again ad nauseum. Showing you science is like showing a copy of nature to a toddler with some crayons. The results are predictable and the same every time.
Then you lose. If your religious posts got busted, and shown to be anything but fact and knowledge, but belief based, then you must deal with it. ..Not pretend that you did something.

That is what is funny...you actually refuse to admit it, and maybe can't even see it.
 
Upvote 0

davedajobauk

dum spiro spero
Supporter
Dec 26, 2006
55,186
28,520
76
Salford, Greater Manchester. UK
✟300,707.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
dad said:
However there is a problem with godless beliefs being offered as science.

So where is your proof (evidence) ????
If anyone has a problem.... it cannot be you ?

Because you, are "undefeated"

LOL
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

dad

Undefeated!
Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,904
1,261
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So where is your proof (evidence) ????
If anyone has a problem.... it cannot be you ?

Because you, are "undefeated"

LOL
Proof that your science so called is godless? Show us Jesus in science? Show us creation? Proof science claims about origins are hot empty air? Just try to defend them! Yes, I am undefeated. You could be too....as hard as that may be to realize now looking at your cheap petty chatter.
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,857
✟256,002.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Nothing wrong with beliefs, especially in the One True Living God. However there is a problem with godless beliefs being offered as science.

I say there is a problem with declaring science to be godless. Nothing can be done without God, not even science; but science doesn't have God for its subject.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,904
1,261
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I say there is a problem with declaring science to be godless.
Great so show where they include Jesus in their creation accounts?
Nothing can be done without God, not even science; but science doesn't have God for its subject.
One could say the same of the lake of fire I suppose. That doesn't mean we can't try to warn folks about some things.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,664
5,233
✟293,810.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Dad, since you & I both believe in a different-state past, here's a weird question:

Do you believe iron rusted back then?

I don't.

Out of curiosity, why is that? What part of the rusting process did not occur back then?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,850,678
51,424
Guam
✟4,896,959.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Out of curiosity, why is that?
Rusting could be costly to a society that used it.

It eats away at the iron, causing it to decay.

Prior to the Fall (or the Split), there was no death or decay.
KTS said:
What part of the rusting process did not occur back then?
Oxidation of iron, I suppose

I'm not sure.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,850,678
51,424
Guam
✟4,896,959.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
And why do you suppose oxidation did not occur back then?
Because it was a different-state past.

Red sun, perpetual motion, no death, etc.*

* Dad may not agree with these, our mileage may vary.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.