The Dangerous Confusion & Delusion In Dispensationalism & Christian Zionism Doctrines

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Those two videos by him - the one you posted, and the one I posted, reveal, for anyone unbiased as they hear the man out; reveal the exact type of closet, Acts 2 Dispensationalist sensationalist at his worst.

His every output on those two videos is that of someone out for a buck via however he has to adjust his act to suit the sensationalist needs of whatever circus has him speak.

But for some of his differences in belief his tactics are exactly those of Jeffrey, Stone, Hagee, et al including the Israel in 1948 sensationalist notions.

What is it about him that appeals to you - he is everything you have asserted for a very long time now that you can't stand about the Acts 2 sensationalists?

Is it that you know you screwed up in endorsing him and now have to back up your actions to save face rather than simply admit you were wrong?

It happens. No one is perfect. Drop him and find someone more consistent with what you assert against. I'd still not agree with you, but at least you'd have our respect.

Try following those two assertions at the end of your posts.


He is like Pastor Bryan Ross. He is a man.
Pastor Ross spent a great deal of time and energy in his "Darby on Trial" videos attempting to be Darby's defense attorney.
His efforts came unglued very quickly when examined without the pretrib bias.
Your effort to promote the videos was dropped like a hot potato.

Has Pastor Gallups and almost all other Baptist pastors been influenced to some degree by Dispensational Theology? Absolutely.

So far I have not found one pastor of any denomination that I agree with 100% of the time, because we are all men made of flesh.

Pastor John Reisinger comes very close, however he is a Calvinist and I am not.
If Calvin was 100% correct (I do not think he was.), I still would not call myself a Calvinist, because he was a man.

Pastor Mike Hoggard was raised in a Dispensational Baptist Church, but abandoned the doctrine also. He has been attacked by Dispensationalists for doing so.



These men are not looking for your respect, because they only preach one Gospel to both Jew and Gentile alike, and neither am I.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaw-6n_L0pg

.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Danoh

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
3,064
310
✟40,528.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
He is like Pastor Bryan Ross. He is a man.
Pastor Ross spent a great deal of time and energy in his "Darby on Trial" videos attempting to be Darby's defense attorney.
His efforts came unglued very quickly when examined without the pretrib bias.
Your effort to promote the videos was dropped like a hot potato.

Has Pastor Gallups and almost all other Baptist pastors been influenced to some degree by Dispensational Theology? Absolutely.

So far I have not found one pastor of any denomination that I agree with 100% of the time, because we are all men made of flesh.

Pastor John Reisinger comes very close, however he is a Calvinist and I am not.
If Calvin was 100% correct (I do not think he was.), I still would not call myself a Calvinist, because he was a man.

Pastor Mike Hoggard was raised in a Dispensational Baptist Church, but abandoned the doctrine also. He has been attacked by Dispensationalists for doing so.



These men are not looking for your respect, because they only preach one Gospel to both Jew and Gentile alike, and neither am I.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaw-6n_L0pg

.


How you slander another. The ONLY item I have CONSISTENTLY promoted is Stam's book, just as I asserted it would be the ONLY item I would CONSISTENTLY point to for considerarion.

You are out to prove a conspiracy; thus find one you will and due to how such a mind works towards its intended agenda; it reads one INTO everything it looks at.

You know in your heart before God that that is what you do going in; thus its CONSISTENT result.

I am not the you tube this, you tube that. We both know who is.

Please, get some honesty in your walk as to these things already.
 
Upvote 0

Danoh

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
3,064
310
✟40,528.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
And get it through your head already - what Stam meant was two ASPECTS of THE Gospel of God.

Last time I checked, that would be ONE.

You disagree due to your bias going in.

But that does not right off equal conspiracy.

Unlike Gallups who even asserts a conspiracy is afoot when those who do NOT view present Israel as a fulfilment of Prophecy.

What? Don't tell me you now see present Israel as a fulfillment of Prophecy?

If you do not, as you have continually asserted, and as I do not, then he is condeming us both of being in line with the KKK and all those other anti-Semitic groups he is sensationalizing on about in the way he is.

He should be ashamed of himself. That can only cloud the very real threat Jews the world over still face at the hands of those out their out to destroy every one of them.

Last I checked, that is not me, and that is not you.

Last I checked, we both care for their souls as people in need of Christ.

How exactly that lines me up with the KKK, etc., you will have to explain to me as you are the one posting your praises to high heaven about this John Hagee wannabe.

What's wrong with you - why would you want to promote such an individual - he has maligned us both and you know it.

Man up, you were wrong about him. Drop him and move on. Quit calling malotove cocktails oranges just so you can cover up that you made a mistake, B, it happens; no one's perfect.

Regretabbly,
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And get it through your head already - what Stam meant was two ASPECTS of THE Gospel of God.

Last time I checked, that would be ONE.

You disagree due to your bias going in.

But that does not right off equal conspiracy.

Unlike Gallups who even asserts a conspiracy is afoot when those who do NOT view present Israel as a fulfilment of Prophecy.

What? Don't tell me you now see present Israel as a fulfillment of Prophecy?

If you do not, as you have continually asserted, and as I do not, then he is condeming us both of being in line with the KKK and all those other anti-Semitic groups he is sensationalizing on about in the way he is.

He should be ashamed of himself. That can only cloud the very real threat Jews the world over still face at the hands of those out their out to destroy every one of them.

Last I checked, that is not me, and that is not you.

Last I checked, we both care for their souls as people in need of Christ.

How exactly that lines me up with the KKK, etc., you will have to explain to me as you are the one posting your praises to high heaven about this John Hagee wannabe.

What's wrong with you - why would you want to promote such an individual - he has maligned us both and you know it.

Man up, you were wrong about him. Drop him and move on. Quit calling malotove cocktails oranges just so you can cover up that you made a mistake, B, it happens; no one's perfect.

Regretabbly,

If Danoh went into a phone both (We will have to find one in a museum.) and removed his glasses and his shirt, would Pastor Bryan Ross come out?

Is Danoh the alias of Pastor Bryan Ross, who uses this forum incognito?

Will the real Danoh, please stand up?

We are awaiting a handwriting analysis and a DNA match at the present time...

 
Upvote 0

random person

1 COR. 10:11; HEB. 1:2; HEB. 9:26,28; 1 PET. 1:20
Dec 10, 2013
3,646
262
Riverside California
✟14,087.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
You dispensationalist fail to realize the Church is Israel transformed into universal.

You still believe these chosen people still exist, you still believe the Old Covenant still exists. Neither exist anymore.

Israel was transformed by Christ into universal.

All Christians possessing the Holy Spirit, circumcised in heart, and follow Christ in faith are members of Israel. It don't matter if they are Jew or Gentile.

Those distinctions were removed by Christ see Galatians 3:28; Ephesians 2:14-16; & Colossians 3:11.

Dispensationalism is a heretical dinosaur. Neaderthals.

It believes in the resurrection of the Ministration of Death.

It believes in the resurrection of circumcision in the flesh.

It believes in the resurrection of distinction between Jews and Gentiles.

Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

ISRAEL IS UNIVERSAL NOW!

"Unga-Bunga"!
 
Upvote 0

random person

1 COR. 10:11; HEB. 1:2; HEB. 9:26,28; 1 PET. 1:20
Dec 10, 2013
3,646
262
Riverside California
✟14,087.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
"Unga-Bunga"!


Now I know who the random person is

What made the Jews unique and chosen?

Circumcision and the Mosaic Covenant!

Both were done away by Christ though, weren't they?

Why build up again what Christ tore down?

Dispensationalism has wool pulled down over its eyes, it can't comprehend the liberty in Christ.

Israel is now universal. Circumcision, Jew, and Gentile are no longer valid terms under the New Covenant. The Everlasting Covenant I might add.
 
Upvote 0

random person

1 COR. 10:11; HEB. 1:2; HEB. 9:26,28; 1 PET. 1:20
Dec 10, 2013
3,646
262
Riverside California
✟14,087.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Only two things made a Jew... a Jew!

It was not his ethnics.

It was Circumcision and the Mosaic Covenant.

It was never ethnics.

Anybody can become a Jew, ANYBODY!

Do you know can become a Jew Straightshot? first you have to be circumcised and then you have to study from their Talmud.

Heck, if you do that, you can even claim land in the State of Israel if you convert.

ANYBODY CAN BE A JEW, JUST CONVERT TO JUDAISM!
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What does the book "Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty" by Manuel Lacunza have in common with a book written by Mid-Acts Dispensationalist C.R. Stam and John Hagee's recent sermon?

They all changed one little word in Romans 11:26.

They all changed the word "so" which is an adverb of manner, to the word "then", which is an adverb of time.
The word used in the Greek was "houto" which is clearly defined as...
"in this manner".



Rom 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

The following text comes from page 349 of Lacunza's book.

"The blindness of Israel, saith the apostle, must endure until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. When this fulness hath entered in, or the time of the nations are concluded, then all Israel shall be saved, according as it is written, that is, (continue the interpreters) Israel shall be saved, a little while before the end of the world, after the death of their false Messiah."

This is a tremendous coincidence since we have been told on numerous occasions that Dispensational Theology has nothing to do with Lacunza or Edward Irving.

Maybe we can get BW on this to see if he can find out if Lowth or some earlier source among the ECF made this same replacement of words.

Changing one little word of scripture can make a big difference.



Lacunza’s book “Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty“ is available at…
http://www.regal-network.com/dispensationalism/pdfs.htm

.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Straightshot

Member
Feb 13, 2015
4,742
295
56
✟16,234.00
Faith
Christian
"Straightshot, do you want to live in the State of Israel, you so adore?"


No .... I would rather live in the outback of South Dakota

Israel .... to close to the fire


Maybe you should go there .... you might learn something

But watch out because the Muslim terrorists are in the region .... one might come after your head
 
Upvote 0

Danoh

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
3,064
310
✟40,528.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You dispensationalist fail to realize the Church is Israel transformed into universal.

You still believe these chosen people still exist, you still believe the Old Covenant still exists. Neither exist anymore.

Israel was transformed by Christ into universal.

All Christians possessing the Holy Spirit, circumcised in heart, and follow Christ in faith are members of Israel. It don't matter if they are Jew or Gentile.

Those distinctions were removed by Christ see Galatians 3:28; Ephesians 2:14-16; & Colossians 3:11.

Dispensationalism is a heretical dinosaur. Neaderthals.

It believes in the resurrection of the Ministration of Death.

It believes in the resurrection of circumcision in the flesh.

It believes in the resurrection of distinction between Jews and Gentiles.

Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

ISRAEL IS UNIVERSAL NOW!

"Unga-Bunga"!


Welcome aboard, brother, the stares are cold, the sensationalism comes with its own marching band, but the fellowship in this with you is mutual.

Take a look at what Carl Gallups says about what you just posted - what he says in that video I posted on the "Would You Endorse This Man?" thread - according to him, you and I are "in line with the KKK," and so on.

No, that's my hood; yours is the one with the extra holes in it, lol
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
What does the book "Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty" by Manuel Lacunza have in common with a book written by Mid-Acts Dispensationalist C.R. Stam and John Hagee's recent sermon?

They all changed one little word in Romans 11:26.

They all changed the word "so" which is an adverb of manner, to the word "then", which is an adverb of time.
The word used in the Greek was "houto" which is clearly defined as...
"in this manner".



Rom 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

The following text comes from page 349 of Lacunza's book.

"The blindness of Israel, saith the apostle, must endure until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. When this fulness hath entered in, or the time of the nations are concluded, then all Israel shall be saved, according as it is written, that is, (continue the interpreters) Israel shall be saved, a little while before the end of the world, after the death of their false Messiah."

This is a tremendous coincidence since we have been told on numerous occasions that Dispensational Theology has nothing to do with Lacunza or Edward Irving.

Maybe we can get BW on this to see if he can find out if Lowth or some earlier source among the ECF made this same replacement of words.

Changing one little word of scripture can make a big difference.



Lacunza’s book “Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty“ is available at…
PDF Files

.

Please quote when and where I ever, even once, said that Dispensational Theology "has nothing to do with Lacunza or Edward Irving." I have never said any such thing, even once. What I did say, and not only say, but conclusively prove, was that they were not the source of Darby's ideas.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Please quote when and where I ever, even once, said that Dispensational Theology "has nothing to do with Lacunza or Edward Irving." I have never said any such thing, even once. What I did say, and not only say, but conclusively prove, was that they were not the source of Darby's ideas.

So-->then, if Darby did not get any of his Dispensational doctrine from Lacunza, can you explain how Lacunza's replacement of the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then" has become a part of modern Dispensational theology.

Did modern Dispensationalists get it directly from Lacunza?


.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Straightshot

Member
Feb 13, 2015
4,742
295
56
✟16,234.00
Faith
Christian
"Did modern Dispensationalists get it directly from Lacunza?"


Unlike you, there are actually those who can render and understand scripture for what it is instead of relying upon a boat load of other questionable interpreters

Like where did you get your preterism? .... from others, you did not get this off course theology from the Lord's Word

Your search is without end ..... always resourcing the writings of those like David McPherson, or your Hebraic Roots rabbi, but never gaining biblical truth from the scriptures by studying yourself approved with the Lord's guidance
 
Upvote 0

Danoh

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
3,064
310
✟40,528.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So-->then, if Darby did not get any of his Dispensational doctrine from Lacunza, can you explain how Lacunza's replacement of the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then" has become a part of modern Dispensational theology.

Did modern Dispensationalists get it directly from Lacunza?


.


Your logic is so infected with the false positive of your agenda going in that you continually fail to test where said logic falls apart that you might solve for that before presenting it.

You, a former science teacher who has to well know that throughout history men completely unaware of the other nevertheless have arrived at more or less a similar conclusion, while, in the case of others, upon reading of the conclusions of others, have recognized in their work a line of thought similar to their own.

In fact, whenever you post one of your off base videos you have done so out of this same kind of a meeting of the minds before you even knew of some of these off-base people you are so devoted to tracking down.

You continue to prove you are not suited to this conspiracy notion task of yours that you have assigned yourself the gran pooh ba of.

In short, that's an "F" on your poorly thought out "findings" once more - in your favorite bright red bold.

I'd love a challenge from you - from any of you, but as they might say in some cultures "sit down, Danoh, you have a long wait."
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Your logic is so infected with the false positive of your agenda going in that you continually fail to test where said logic falls apart that you might solve for that before presenting it.

You, a former science teacher who has to well know that throughout history men completely unaware of the other nevertheless have arrived at more or less a similar conclusion, while, in the case of others, upon reading of the conclusions of others, have recognized in their work a line of thought similar to their own.

In fact, whenever you post one of your off base videos you have done so out of this same kind of a meeting of the minds before you even knew of some of these off-base people you are so devoted to tracking down.

You continue to prove you are not suited to this conspiracy notion task of yours that you have assigned yourself the gran pooh ba of.

In short, that's an "F" on your poorly thought out "findings" once more - in your favorite bright red bold.

I'd love a challenge from you - from any of you, but as they might say in some cultures "sit down, Danoh, you have a long wait."

So->then, based on your exceptional application of logic, it can all be attributed to mere coincidence that Lacunza, Stam, and Hagee all changed the word "so" to the same word "then" in Romans 11:26.

And you believe any other possibility is "poorly thought out".

Are you sure your soul is not presently sleeping, Pastor Ross... I mean Danoh?


 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
random person said in post 25:

You still believe these chosen people still exist . . .

If by "these chosen people", you mean Jews, note that Romans 11:28 is referring to the fact that some unbelievers are the genetic descendants of Abraham (John 8:37, Acts 13:26, Romans 11:1, Acts 7:2, Acts 3:25). And some of these unbelievers are elect, and are beloved in part because of their genetic descent (Romans 11:28-29).

All the still-living, elect, non-believing genetic Israelites who don't become believers before Jesus' 2nd coming will become believers (and so will become members of the church: cf. Ephesians 4:4-6) at the 2nd coming (Romans 11:26), when they will see the returned Jesus in person (Zechariah 12:10-14). But even though all those still-living, elect, genetic Israelites will eventually become believers and be saved, they will be only a remnant of all genetic Israelites (Romans 9:27), most of whom will never be saved, just as most of humanity in general, both Jews and Gentiles, will never be saved (Matthew 7:14, Matthew 22:14).

The gospel of salvation goes to genetic Jews first (Romans 1:16, Matthew 10:5-6, Matthews 15:24, Acts 3:26), and salvation is of the Jews (John 4:22b), because salvation is of the New Covenant (Matthew 26:28; 1 Corinthians 11:25; 2 Corinthians 3:6, Hebrews 9:15), which is made only with Israel (Jeremiah 31:31-34). Gentile believers are grafted into Israel so they can partake of the salvation offered to Israel (Romans 11:17,24, Ephesians 2:12,19, Galatians 3:29, John 10:16). And all believers, no matter whether they are genetic Jews (Acts 22:3) or genetic Gentiles (Romans 16:4b), have become spiritually-circumcised Jews, if they have undergone the spiritual circumcision of water-immersion (burial) baptism into Jesus (Romans 2:29, Philippians 3:3, Colossians 2:11-13).

Just as all believers are individual branches in the vine which is Jesus (John 15:5), the only way to salvation (John 14:6, Acts 4:12), so all believers are individual branches in the good olive tree of Israel, the Jews' own tree (Romans 11:17,24, Jeremiah 11:16-17). For all Jewish believers remain part of Israel (Romans 11:1) as the natural branches in the tree of Israel (Romans 11:24). And all Gentile believers have been grafted as branches from a wild olive tree into the tree of Israel (Romans 11:17,24, Ephesians 2:12,19, Galatians 3:29), so they can partake of the salvation of the New Covenant (Matthew 26:28; 1 Corinthians 11:25; 2 Corinthians 3:6, Hebrews 9:15), which is made only with Israel (Jeremiah 31:31-34, John 4:22b). This doesn't mean a wild branch becomes a natural branch, that a Gentile believer becomes a genetic Jew, but that Gentile believers, even while remaining branches from a wild olive tree, even while remaining genetic Gentiles, are still grafted in to become part of the good olive tree of Israel (Romans 11:17,24).

random person said in post 25:

You still believe these chosen people still exist . . .

If by "these chosen people", you mean the elect, note that the elect are those individuals, whether Jews or Gentiles, who were chosen (elected) and predestinated by God before the foundation of the world (Ephesians 1:4-11; 2 Thessalonians 2:13), before they were born (Romans 9:11-24), to become initially saved by faith at some point during their lifetime (Acts 13:48b). This initial salvation is possible only because of Jesus' sacrifice (Romans 3:25-26), which was also foreordained by God before the foundation of the world (Revelation 13:8; 1 Peter 1:19-20).

Everyone on his own is wholly corrupt (Romans 3:9-12), and so it is impossible for people on their own to ever believe in Jesus and the gospel and be initially saved (1 Corinthians 15:1-4, John 20:31; 1 John 5:13) through their own will (Romans 9:16, John 1:13, John 6:65) or their own intellect (1 Corinthians 1:18 to 2:16). Unsaved people can't understand the gospel (1 Corinthians 2:14; 1 Corinthians 1:18) because only initially saved people, who have received the miraculous gift of some measure of God's own Spirit, can understand it (1 Corinthians 2:11-16).

The nonelect can't ever believe in Jesus and the gospel and be initially saved, even when they are shown the truth (John 8:42-47, John 10:26, Matthew 13:38-42), because the ability to believe in Jesus and the gospel comes only to the elect (Acts 13:48b) wholly by God's grace as a miraculous gift from God (Ephesians 2:8, John 6:65; 1 Corinthians 3:5b, Romans 12:3b, Hebrews 12:2) as the elect read (or hear) God's Word the Bible (Romans 10:17, Acts 13:48, Acts 26:22-23), just as the ability to repent comes only as a miraculous gift from God (2 Timothy 2:25, Acts 11:18). Satan blinds the minds of unbelievers so that on their own they can't repent and acknowledge the truth of God's Word (2 Corinthians 4:4; 2 Timothy 2:25-26).

--

God doesn't love everyone; he hates the nonelect (Romans 9:11-22). During their lifetime, God hardens the nonelect in their sinfulness instead of showing them his mercy (Romans 9:18), because he created them to be vessels of his wrath (Romans 9:20-22, Proverbs 16:4). They were of old ordained to condemnation (Jude 1:4). They were appointed to disobedience (1 Peter 2:8, Acts 2:23). But God never forces them or anyone else to commit sin. He never even tempts anyone to commit sin (James 1:13-15). All people will be justly held accountable for their deeds (Romans 2:6-8), for neither election nor nonelection takes away the free will of people.

God created nonelect people to be vessels of his wrath instead of vessels of his mercy so he might eternally make known his wrath and power (Romans 9:21-22, Proverbs 16:4, Revelation 14:10-11). And God created elect people to be vessels of his mercy so he might eternally make known his mercy, glory, and wisdom (Romans 9:23, Ephesians 3:10, Ephesians 1:8,11).

God wants these aspects of his nature to be made known to both humans and angels (Ephesians 3:10), neither of which group yet knows experientially the full extent of God's qualities and abilities (1 Corinthians 2:9; 1 Peter 1:12b). For example, the full extent of God's wrath won't be known to humans and angels until Satan and his fallen angels and all of unsaved humanity are cast into the eternal suffering of the lake of fire and brimstone (Matthew 25:41,46, Revelation 20:10,15, Revelation 14:10-11), and saved humans and holy angels go forth from the city of New Jerusalem on the new earth to witness the suffering of the unsaved in the lake of fire (Isaiah 66:24), the eternal hell (Mark 9:45-46), and realize by seeing it, not only the extent of God's wrath, but by it, by way of contrast, the extent of God's mercy toward them (Lamentations 3:22-23). Just as "up" can't be eternally known for what it is without the eternal coexistence of "down", so God's mercy can't be eternally known for what it is without the eternal coexistence of his wrath.

random person said in post 25:

. . . you still believe the Old Covenant still exists.

No, in that, on Jesus' Cross, for both Jews and Gentiles (John 11:51-52), of all times, the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law was abolished (Ephesians 2:15-16, Colossians 2:14-17; 2 Corinthians 3:6-18), disannulled (Hebrews 7:18), rendered obsolete (Hebrews 8:13, Galatians 3:2-25, Galatians 4:21 to 5:8), taken away and replaced (Hebrews 10:9) by the better hope (Hebrews 7:19), the better covenant (Hebrews 7:22, Hebrews 8:6-12), the 2nd covenant (Hebrews 8:7, Hebrews 10:9), of Jesus' New Covenant law (Galatians 6:2, John 1:17, Matthew 26:28, Hebrews 12:24, Hebrews 9:15), so that the law was changed (Hebrews 7:12).

All believers, both Jews and Gentles, of all times, are delivered from the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law, and shouldn't keep it (Romans 7:6; 2 Corinthians 3:6-18, Galatians 2:11-21), or have any desire to keep it (Galatians 4:21 to 5:8, Galatians 3:2-25). Believers keep the spirit of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (Romans 7:6) by loving others (Galatians 5:14, Romans 13:8-10), by doing to others as they would have others do to them (Matthew 7:12).

The New Covenant is a new law (Hebrews 7:12,18,19, Hebrews 10:1-23), consisting of Jesus' New Covenant/New Testament commandments (John 14:15), such as those he gave in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:19 to 7:29) and in the epistles of Paul the apostle (1 Corinthians 14:37). These commandments exceed in righteousness the abolished letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (Matthew 5:20-48). So there is no reason why any believer should ever want to go back under the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (Galatians 3:2 to 5:26). It was just a temporary schoolmaster (Galatians 3:24-25), a temporary shadow (Colossians 2:16-17), which God set up because of sins long after he had set up the original promise of the Abrahamic Covenant, and long before he brought that promise to fulfillment in Jesus' New Covenant (Galatians 3:16-29, Matthew 26:28).

The letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law has been made obsolete by the New Covenant (Hebrews 8:13). For example, the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law required an Aaronic priesthood (Exodus 30:30), while the New Covenant replaced the Aaronic priesthood with the Melchisedechian priesthood (Hebrews 7:11-28). And the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law required animal sacrifices for sin (e.g. Leviticus 23:19), while the New Covenant replaced these with the one-time sacrifice of Jesus (Hebrews 10).

The letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law is the Hagar to the New Covenant's Sarah (Galatians 4:22-25), so that those people, whether Jews or Gentiles, who try to keep the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law are like Ishmael, while those people, whether Jews or Gentiles, who keep the New Covenant are like Isaac (Galatians 4:22-31).

The letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (including the letter of the 10 commandments) written and engraven in stones (2 Corinthians 3:7, Deuteronomy 4:13, Deuteronomy 27:8) was the ministration of death and condemnation (2 Corinthians 3:7,9). For example, see Leviticus 20:10, Exodus 31:14, and Numbers 15:32-36; and contrast these with the New Covenant's John 8:4-11 and Matthew 12:1-8.

The letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law has been done away (2 Corinthians 3:11), abolished (2 Corinthians 3:13b). But it is still able to spiritually blind some people as with a veil from beholding Jesus (2 Corinthians 3:14-16), while the New Covenant is the ministration of the spirit and righteousness (2 Corinthians 3:6,8,9b) which remains (2 Corinthians 3:11b), and which permits believers to remove the veil and to behold Jesus (2 Corinthians 3:16-18, Mark 15:38, Hebrews 7:18-19, Ephesians 2:15-18, Colossians 2:14-17).

But a mistaken spirit of Pharisaism can still sometimes deceive even Christians into thinking they must keep the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law in order to be saved (Acts 15:1,5), or in order to become perfect (Galatians 3:2 to 5:26). This is a false, cursed gospel (Galatians 1:6-9). For if any believers are keeping any part of the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law thinking they must do so in order to be saved, or in order to become perfect, then Jesus will profit them nothing; they have fallen from grace (Galatians 5:2-8).

--

random person said in post 27:

Circumcision, Jew, and Gentile are no longer valid terms under the New Covenant.

Regarding circumcision, whether or not someone is physically circumcised doesn't matter to Christians (Colossians 3:11, Galatians 6:15, Galatians 5:6). Instead, the only circumcision that matters is the spiritual circumcision (Philippians 3:3) of water-immersion (burial) baptism into Christ (Colossians 2:11-13).

If Christians get physically circumcised thinking they have to (Acts 15:1,5) because it was commanded to Abraham (Genesis 17:10) and was part of the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (Leviticus 12:3), then Christ will profit them nothing (Galatians 5:2). They have fallen from grace (Galatians 5:4) and placed themselves under the curse of the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (Galatians 3:10).

Under the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law, physical circumcision was required for a male, whether Jew or Gentile, whether infant or adult, to become part of Israel (Exodus 12:48). But under the New Covenant, physical circumcision isn't required for a Jew or Gentile to become part of Israel. All that is required is faith in Jesus (Romans 11:17,24, Ephesians 2:12,19, Galatians 3:29). This is one of the ways that the New Covenant is not according to the Old Covenant (Jeremiah 31:32). The letter of the entire Old Covenant Mosaic law was abolished on the Cross (Ephesians 2:15-16, Colossians 2:14-17, Romans 7:6).

Also, unlike the abolished physical circumcision of the Old Covenant Mosaic law, the spiritual circumcision of the New Covenant of Jesus (Colossians 2:11-13, Philippians 3:3, Romans 2:29) makes no distinction between males and females (Galatians 3:28-29).

Also, a non-Christian, genetic Jew, even though he may be physically circumcised, is spiritually uncircumcised (Acts 7:51), and so spiritually isn't a Jew (Romans 2:28-29, Revelation 2:9b, Revelation 3:9). He has been broken off in spirit from the good olive tree of Israel, the genetic Jews' own tree (Romans 11:20,24).

random person said in post 27:

Circumcision, Jew, and Gentile are no longer valid terms under the New Covenant.

Regarding "Jew, and Gentile", are you thinking of Galatians 3:28?:

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28).

If so, note that in Galatians 3:28, Paul can't possibly mean there are no believers who are Jews or Gentiles in any sense, because elsewhere he shows, for example, that believers remain either genetic Jews (Acts 22:3) or genetic Gentiles (Romans 16:4b). Similarly, Galatians 3:28 doesn't mean there are no believers who are males or females, for clearly we are still males or females with regard to our genitals, and with regard to other matters (1 Timothy 2:11-12; 1 Corinthians 14:34-37; 1 Corinthians 11:4-16; 1 Peter 3:7a).

So Galatians 3:28 can only mean there is no distinction between believing Jews and Gentiles, or between believing males and females, with regard to them being "one in Christ" (Galatians 3:28b), in the sense of them being one body in Christ (Ephesians 4:4-6), without distinction with regard to their salvation (Romans 10:12; 1 Corinthians 12:13; 1 Peter 3:7b).
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
B

Bible2

Guest
BABerean2 said in post 35:

So-->then, if Darby did not get any of his Dispensational doctrine from Lacunza, can you explain how Lacunza's replacement of the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then" has become a part of modern Dispensational theology.

Did modern Dispensationalists get it directly from Lacunza?

Note that someone doesn't have to be a dispensationalist to understand that "there shall come out of Sion the Deliverer" (Romans 11:26) refers to Jesus' (never fulfilled) 2nd coming, when the still-living, unsaved, elect genetic Jews (Romans 11:28-29) will get saved when they see the physically returned Jesus in person and believe in him (Zechariah 12:10-14).

Also, in Romans 11:26, the original Greek word (houto: G3779) translated as "so" can refer to "what precedes or follows" (Strong's Greek Dictionary), i.e. the salvation of all surviving, elect, genetic Jews in Romans 11:26 will follow the fulness of the Gentiles being come in, in Romans 11:25c.

That is, when Paul says "until the fulness (pleroma) of the Gentiles be come in" (Romans 11:25c), he means until a full number of genetic Gentile individuals have become saved, which won't happen until near the end of the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24, right before Jesus' 2nd coming (Romans 11:26), immediately after the tribulation (Matthew 24:29-30), just as Luke 21:24 shows that "the times of the Gentiles" won't be "fulfilled (pleroo)" until the completion of the treading down of Jerusalem during the future, literal 3.5-year worldwide reign of the Antichrist (the individual-man aspect of Revelation's "beast") (Revelation 11:2b, Revelation 13:5-18), during the 2nd half of the tribulation.

Immediately after the tribulation, at Jesus' 2nd coming (Matthew 24:29-30), all the still-living, unsaved, elect genetic Jews will become saved (Romans 11:26-28) by God's grace when they see the returned Jesus in person and believe in him (Zechariah 12:10-14). And so they will all become part of the church at that time, just as when genetic Jews believe in Jesus now they become part of the church. For now there are no believers outside of the church (Ephesians 4:4-6).

And the genetic Jews who will become believers at the 2nd coming will all become part of the church by receiving some measure of the Holy Spirit, who is "the spirit of grace and of supplications" in Zechariah 12:10 (Hebrews 10:29c, Romans 8:26), just as genetic Jewish believers today become part of the church by receiving some measure of the Holy Spirit. For it is by receiving some measure of the Holy Spirit that both genetic Jewish believers and genetic Gentile believers become part of the church (1 Corinthians 12:13).
 
Upvote 0