.
Ive been doing a bit of research lately and have found out
the early church believed Jesus second coming would be
Easter Eve by midnight and a type of holy passion play
was observed until midnight every Easter Eve.
CELEBRATIONS OF EASTER EVE
" In the primitive church, it appears from Lactantius and Jerome there was a universal expectation
of the second coming of our Lord on this night, and the early Christians therefore prepared themselves
for the advent, watching until midnight, which was about the hour of His resurrection "
https://books.google.com/books?id=iRkFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1&focus=viewport
" Jerome assigns as a reason for the congregation not being dismissed on Easter Eve till after midnight,
that even as the Paschal deliverance of Israel took place at midnight (Exod. xii. 29) it was the expectation
of the church, according to apostolic tradition, that Christ would return to accomplish the redemption
of His church and triumph over her enemies at the same hour. That hour being passed, the awe with which
the Lord's coming was anticipated being relieved, the Easter Feast was celebrated with universal joy
(Hieron. In Matt. xxv. 6). The same belief is mentioned by Lactautius (ie. Inst. vii. 19), when he speaks
of the night being passed in watchfulness on account of the coming of our King and God. "
https://books.google.com/books?id=NjoPAAAAYAAJ&dq=jerome+second+coming+easter+eve&source=gbs_navlinks_s
" The ceremony may be described as being in its nature a rubrical ceremony as distinguished from a 'mystery,' or ' miracle play;' but there was also a performance permitted (though not enjoined), and regulated by certain quasi-rubrics, which can scarcely be distinguished from a ' mystery.' Different places had their several customs, and the office-books of some of them contain fuller rubrics than are found in others; while a notice of what was enjoined in other countries throws a light on what was done in England. It will further be seen that there existed no rigid rule of uniformity. The ceremony may in general terms be described as the deposit on Maundy Thursday of the consecrated Host and the Crucifix from the High Altar in a place apart, where it remained concealed for a time (the spot being carefully watched and guarded), in signification of the deposit of our Lord's body in the grave; partly also from an ancient belief that His second coming would be on Easter Eve, on account of which St. Jerome conceived that the people should wait in Church until midnight for Christ's appearance. The ceremony was called in England the 'making of the sepulchre,' and allusions to it are numerous. The earliest English authority is as old as the Saxon times, and there are proofs that it lingered in some places down into the reign of Elizabeth. "
https://books.google.com/books?id=jKIaAAAAYAAJ&dq=jerome+second+coming+easter+eve&output=text&source=gbs_navlinks_s
.
Ive been doing a bit of research lately and have found out
the early church believed Jesus second coming would be
Easter Eve by midnight and a type of holy passion play
was observed until midnight every Easter Eve.
CELEBRATIONS OF EASTER EVE
" In the primitive church, it appears from Lactantius and Jerome there was a universal expectation
of the second coming of our Lord on this night, and the early Christians therefore prepared themselves
for the advent, watching until midnight, which was about the hour of His resurrection "
https://books.google.com/books?id=iRkFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1&focus=viewport
" Jerome assigns as a reason for the congregation not being dismissed on Easter Eve till after midnight,
that even as the Paschal deliverance of Israel took place at midnight (Exod. xii. 29) it was the expectation
of the church, according to apostolic tradition, that Christ would return to accomplish the redemption
of His church and triumph over her enemies at the same hour. That hour being passed, the awe with which
the Lord's coming was anticipated being relieved, the Easter Feast was celebrated with universal joy
(Hieron. In Matt. xxv. 6). The same belief is mentioned by Lactautius (ie. Inst. vii. 19), when he speaks
of the night being passed in watchfulness on account of the coming of our King and God. "
https://books.google.com/books?id=NjoPAAAAYAAJ&dq=jerome+second+coming+easter+eve&source=gbs_navlinks_s
" The ceremony may be described as being in its nature a rubrical ceremony as distinguished from a 'mystery,' or ' miracle play;' but there was also a performance permitted (though not enjoined), and regulated by certain quasi-rubrics, which can scarcely be distinguished from a ' mystery.' Different places had their several customs, and the office-books of some of them contain fuller rubrics than are found in others; while a notice of what was enjoined in other countries throws a light on what was done in England. It will further be seen that there existed no rigid rule of uniformity. The ceremony may in general terms be described as the deposit on Maundy Thursday of the consecrated Host and the Crucifix from the High Altar in a place apart, where it remained concealed for a time (the spot being carefully watched and guarded), in signification of the deposit of our Lord's body in the grave; partly also from an ancient belief that His second coming would be on Easter Eve, on account of which St. Jerome conceived that the people should wait in Church until midnight for Christ's appearance. The ceremony was called in England the 'making of the sepulchre,' and allusions to it are numerous. The earliest English authority is as old as the Saxon times, and there are proofs that it lingered in some places down into the reign of Elizabeth. "
https://books.google.com/books?id=jKIaAAAAYAAJ&dq=jerome+second+coming+easter+eve&output=text&source=gbs_navlinks_s
.