Blood transfusions and organ transplant

Corduroys

I like chips
Feb 15, 2014
94
3
✟15,240.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I was wondering what people feel about these, because I am not sure I can fault the JW's too much on this point.

Surely if fornication is forbidden then the levels of intimacy from a blood transfusion or an organ donation would similarly be forbidden outside of a marriage?

Does anyone have any biblical knowledge or can point me to scripture that could be applied to the subject of blood transfusions or organ transplant?
 
Last edited:

cubanito

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2005
2,680
222
Southeast Florida, US (Coral Gables near Miami)
✟4,071.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
before going to Scripture, let's go to Burger King

Any JW who eats at any non-Kosher restaurant is breaking the Noahic and Mosaic covenant and needs to shut up.

As to Scripture, this is handles amond us fundys in 2 very different ways. Covenant theology which is typical of Presbytereans like myself, which sets up a non-Biblical system where the Law is categorized in 3 ways: civil, ceremonial and moral. The other method shared by dispensationalists of verious flavors and New Covenant Theology (my own favorite) which says the entire law was fulfiled in Christ and we now are free of it altogether. The new requirements on us now come ONLY from the New Testament. Thus only 9 of the tencommandments now apply, Shabbat being expressly repealed.

This was the first big problem in the Church, and Galatians is an excellent read on this.

I am a Presbyterean, I do not agree that Covenant Theology is Biblical.

JR
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Another problem with JW's view, is in the Torah, there is the provision that if you touch blood, you would be considered "ritually unclean" and this required a time of purification.

How many babies have been born, how many wives have given birth that did not get "blood" on them from the birth process?

This also may be a valid explaination of Luke 2:22:

"And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord;"

Let me also say that if my wife is in a car accident, and needs blood and an organ transplant to live, if God condemns me for that, (and He would still be righteous for doing so) so be it.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
One thing that needs to be understood: being ritually unclean (called "tamay" in the Torah) is NOT sinful.

So becoming tamay from contact with blood may render you unable to go to the temple and offer a goat or lamb for a few days; (but who does that now anyway?) it does NOT mean you are sinning. Big difference.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
One thing that needs to be understood: being ritually unclean (called "tamay" in the Torah) is NOT sinful.

So becoming tamay from contact with blood may render you unable to go to the temple and offer a goat or lamb for a few days; (but who does that now anyway?) it does NOT mean you are sinning. Big difference.

First off, where did I imply or say being "ritually unclean" was "sinning"?

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But here again, the first Apostolic Council held in Acts 15, clearly states that blood was not for consumption. But nowhere is blood transfusions or organ transplants forbidden anywhere in the scriptures. (That I know of)

Kinda settles it for me.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
But here again, the first Apostolic Council held in Acts 15, clearly states that blood was not for consumption. But nowhere is blood transfusions or organ transplants forbidden anywhere in the scriptures. (That I know of)

I agree.

I am also impressed. Acts 15 gets overlooked in many christian circles but is the basis for most of Paul's letters.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I agree.

I am also impressed. Acts 15 gets overlooked in many christian circles but is the basis for most of Paul's letters.

A lot of Christians fail to know that in less than 7 years, around AD 40 presumably, that the first Apostolic Council met.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟155,600.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
One thing that needs to be understood: being ritually unclean (called "tamay" in the Torah) is NOT sinful.

So becoming tamay from contact with blood may render you unable to go to the temple and offer a goat or lamb for a few days; (but who does that now anyway?) it does NOT mean you are sinning. Big difference.

I know this is a digression, but I'd be curious to hear what purpose is served by denoting someone as ritually unclean?
 
Upvote 0

classicalhero

Junior Member
Jun 9, 2013
1,631
399
Perth,Western Australia
✟11,338.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Liberals
You are confusing the fact that blood transfusions is a modern thing and much preparation goes into it to make sure the blood is clean to use. This is a totally different situation than what would happen in the Bible where you would get blood on you from killing or giving birth, but blood that is clean is an affront to the Lord and you couldn't be in his presence as a result. But also it is a way of stopping the spread of disease, which is what happened in many hospitals where doctors would examine a dead guy and then go to a pregnant woman and deliver a baby without making sure they were clean. It wasn't until Germ Theory that we discovered the reason behind the command from God.
 
Upvote 0

Souldier

Regular Member
Mar 30, 2015
2,270
99
✟2,955.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I use to think that many things were evil that were not. If we get wrapped up in OT law then we will think that way. What we need is to study the NEw Testament and follow only that, then we gain spiritual insight that allows us to see good things from the OT. We are not given the OT law and are not required to follow it, however once we learn to follow the law of Christ in the NT then our eyes will begin to see OT in a new way.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Souldier

Regular Member
Mar 30, 2015
2,270
99
✟2,955.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
A lot of the cleanliness laws in the OT are rather useful in stopping the spread of disease.

I suppose there might be truth in that, but the OT law isn't what we are given as a standard of holiness. Thats all i was referring to. We already know how to stop the spread of disease so OT law isnt really needed for that. I think that there are mysteries in the OT law though, and that is where the real beauty of it is seen. These mysteries are shadows that foretell things concerning Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Blades

Active Member
Mar 21, 2006
108
41
✟684.00
Faith
Christian
I was wondering what people feel about these, because I am not sure I can fault the JW's too much on this point.

Surely if fornication is forbidden then the levels of intimacy from a blood transfusion or an organ donation would similarly be forbidden outside of a marriage?

Does anyone have any biblical knowledge or can point me to scripture that could be applied to the subject of blood transfusions or organ transplant?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums