In light of the way a few posts are going, this seems like an appropriate thread to bring back up:
The answer is still, from my POV, yes.
Upvote
0
In light of the way a few posts are going, this seems like an appropriate thread to bring back up:
Mine too.The answer is still, from my POV, yes.
It is the year 1611.
Is Israel the Promised Land?
It was promised to a people long before 1611, and what makes you think this date is of any importance whatsoever? Israel entered there promised land long ago, long, long before 1611. That they then lost it is a personal problem, brought about by their own behavior. That governments then gave it back makes no difference one way or the other.
It is the year 1611.
Is Israel the Promised Land?
It is only in a much larger land that the promised "multitudes as numerous as the sands of the sea", or "chariots without number" could be fulfilled.
It is noteworthy however that the Jews, the descendants of the tribe of Judah, have now acquired much more land than was their allotment in ancient Israel.
There is no physical land large enough for that.
Maybe I missed the Headline, but I am unaware of any proof that todays Jews are the descendants of the pre desolation tribe of Judah.
Can you point me to it?
Maybe it's just a matter of taking it on faith? (Nevermind that proof of genealogy is an absolute requirement of The Law of Moses)
-- Oh, oh.The then land of Canaan was the first promised land. However, the fullness of the promised land didn't occur until the ascension of Britain and America.
There is just as much proof that a fellow named Jesus really walked the earth around the year 23 as there is to prove a good majority of Jews today are of the Tribe of Judah.
There is no physical land large enough for that.
It was hyperbole.
Maybe I missed the Headline, but I am unaware of any proof that todays Jews are the descendants of the pre desolation tribe of Judah.
Can you point me to it?
Maybe it's just a matter of taking it on faith? (Nevermind that proof of genealogy is an absolute requirement of The Law of Moses)
Maybe God raised up Jews from stones. That would be confusing genetically.
"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham." Matthew 3:9
-- Oh, oh.
Do I detect British Israelitism here?
It was hyperbole.
Maybe God raised up Jews from stones. That would be confusing genetically.
I wholeheartedly agree!
As I said, perhaps its a matter of taking it on faith...
Fortunately for Christians, Proof of Jesus existence isn't a requirement of Christianity placed upon Christians.
For the Jews however, Proof of Genealogy is a clear requirement of the Law of Moses.
However, since no Jew today follows the Law of Moses, I suppose that point is moot.
Says the follower of the Pope and man-made Cannon law
Then your contention that a much smaller land could not have "fulfilled it" is incorrect, if it's Hyperbole.
Heck, My inner City back yard is large enough to fulfill a dwelling place for innumerable "hyperbolic" multitudes.
"Numerous as the sand of the sea, uncountable for number" is hyperbole, but it means a lot of people, more than can be accurately counted.
Not Really. The Law of Moses still requires proof of Lineage. Any Jews God raised from stones would have surely been also provided by God with documentation of Abrahamic Genetic lineage, as per His own Law.
The prophecy concerning the return of the Jews to the promised land predates the law of Moses, and was fulfilled after the termination of the law of Moses.
The prophecy concerning the return of the Jews to the promised land predates the law of Moses,
and was fulfilled after the termination of the law of Moses.
"Numerous as the sand of the sea, uncountable for number" is hyperbole, but it means a lot of people, more than can be accurately counted.
Chapter & Verse?
Genesis 49:8 Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies; thy father's children shall bow down before thee.
Again, Chapter & Verse?
When was the Law of Moses Terminated exactly?
"Moses Seat", the authority of the Levitical priesthood, ended with the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D.
Does the Catholic church, or any other Christian church, keep the Law of Moses?
Do you believe Ezekiel 40-44 is past?
No, but there is evidence that during the millennial reign of Christ certain ordinances will be reestablished. It will not however be the 'Law of Moses'.
Define Accurately.
Does the current human population of 7+ Billion fit the description of "numerous as the sands of the Sea"?
Did the Human population of 300 million from 1000 years ago fit it too?
Does the current 8.4 million person Population of New York City fit the description?
Can't really "accurately" count the population of My City, Portland Oregon either, and it's only about 800,000 - Would you contend that 800,000 qualifies as "Numerous as the sands of the sea"?
Just trying to get an idea of where you draw the line.
It is the year 1611.
Is Israel the Promised Land?