The Fundamentalist
New-manbie
Ok, thank you for your time....I will attempt to keep my responses brief and as direct as possible. However, I will not simply state yes or no for the aforementioned reason....
Upvote
0
Ok, thank you for your time....I will attempt to keep my responses brief and as direct as possible. However, I will not simply state yes or no for the aforementioned reason....
As you will.Since you wish me to be direct, btw, I would appreciate it if you refrained from calling me "sister" anymore. ...
ECR I am against the Catholic message but not against all the people, many will be saved during the Time of Trouble.
That being said, I don't think such a headship philosophy makes coherent sense with Adventist theology or practices from the beginning of the Advent movement through the present time.
You ought realize who William Edwy Vine was, and what he believed, and also what Scripture [KJB] actually teaches in regards the instrument of death - http://www.christianforums.com/t7868203/...
a stake or post (as set upright)
The words "cross" and "crucify" are mistranslations, a "later rendering," of the Greek words stauros and stauroo. According to Vine's Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, STAUROS denotes, primarily, an upright pole or stake. The shape of the two-beamed cross had its origin in ancient Chaldea and was used as the symbol of the god Tammuz. In the third century A.D., pagans were received into the apostate ecclesiastical system and were permitted largely to retain their pagan signs and symbols.
In the beginning of the New Evangelical Translation is a page describing the chi-rho symbol. "The symbol above is called a chi-rho; it reminds Christians of their Savior, Jesus Christ. This emblem is composed of two Greek letters (chi = "ch" and rho = "r"), which are superimposed on each other, and form an abbreviation of the Name "CHRIST." The chi-rho emblem also stands in the columns of the New Evangelical Translation (NET) New Testament text, indicating passages which directly quote those Old Testament promises which were fulfilled in relation to or through the work of the CHRIST!" Again , there is a well-intentioned purpose with the source of the symbol apparently being not known. Cross and Chi-Rho...
@philadelphiagape:
Sometimes people write poems, songs (or even books) that we like. We're not necessarily agreeing with all they stand for by sharing a song or a poem. For instance I enjoy reading the poetry of Pablo Neruda, yet I obviously don't approve of all the choices he made in his life (he made some poor decisions) or his political views.
You complained that what jojothebeloved shared was merely a poem, (which was on topic) yet you bring up a number of subjects that have absolutely nothing to do with this thread.
You can cut all the flowers but you cannot keep Spring from coming.
― Pablo Neruda
I am not here to question Kate Wallace beliefs or practices. I here about the poem she wrote only. There was nothing sacrilegious about the poem!
Infidel Authors
Many think that in order to obtain an education it is necessary to study the productions of writers who teach infidelity, because their works contain some bright gems of thought. But who was the originator of these gems of thought? It was God, and God alone. He is the source of all light. Why should we wade through the mass of error contained in the works of pagans and infidels, for the sake of a few intellectual truths, when all truth is at our command? {8T 306.1}
There is a reason why these men sometimes display remarkable wisdom. Satan himself was educated in the heavenly courts, and he has a knowledge of good as well as of evil. He mingles the precious with the vile, and this is what gives him power to deceive. But because Satan has robed himself in garments of heavenly brightness, shall we receive him as an angel of light? The tempter has his agents, educated according to his methods, inspired by his spirit, and adapted to his work. Shall we co-operate with them? Shall we receive the works of his agents as essential to the acquirement of an education? {8T 306.2}