- May 15, 2005
- 11,935
- 1,498
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
What is profit? Your assumption just flummoxed you again. Who says it is not going in a profitable direction now that the worthless futurist stuff has been demoted?
Where, anywhere, is your kind of futurist stuff in the NT, constantly banging on about the last 10 chapters of Ezekiel?
Your main "problem" that is not imaginary at all (I'll look up the threads if I have to) is that you deny the technical covenant terms exist in Eph 2-3, which are the reasons for saying the opposite of what you do about the promises to Israel. Eph 2-3 say they are fulfilled in the Gospel of Christ. You say no such thing is said and go to great lenths to deny and say it has to be battles with evil countries on the steppes of Israels' mountiains. You've done this over and over.
You think Rom 11:26 is a state of Israel coming soon. The meaning of the text is nothing like that. It is far more a matter of conclusiveness in light of the Gospel as vs 30, 31 say. So 30, 31 are a "problem" for you because you have to have 2P2P intact. The NT is a problem for you because you have to have 2P2P intact.
The only thing I deny, and I deny that absolutely, is your interpretation of what these New Testament passages mean. For not even one of them actually says what you claim it means.
And the flummoxing you speak of exists 100% in your imagination. In your 2+ years of relentless attacks, you have not yet even slightly flummoxed me, even once.
Upvote
0