I'd like to take a look at Rev.6:1-2,and see what peoples various views are.

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
We are now experiencing the 7 last plagues, such as skin cancer, red tides and global warming, so that proves that all previous prophesies have been fulfilled. We are now fighting the Battle of Ar Mageddon which started on 9/11 when the Euphrates was dry. It will end when Jerusalem is split three ways. Then there will be peace for a thousand years.


Anyone seen any "kings of the East" crossing the river? I would think that would make news.
 
Upvote 0

interpreter

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
6,309
157
77
Texas
✟7,377.00
Faith
Anglican
Anyone seen any "kings of the East" crossing the river? I would think that would make news.
The lower Euphrates was dry for 9 years, dried up by Saddam Hussein to prepare the way for the kings of the east as prophesied. He did it with a couple dams and a diversion canal that he named "The Mother of All Battles River."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,626
1,333
South
✟108,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The lower Euphrates was dry for 9 tears, dried up by Saddam Hussein to prepare the way for the kings of the east as prophesied. He did it with a couple dams and a diversion canal that he named "The Mother of All Battles River."

Who were these kings of the east, and what did they do? If Rev. 16:12 has already happened has verses 13 and 14 happened as well? Please explain???
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,626
1,333
South
✟108,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We are now experiencing the 7 last plagues, such as skin cancer, red tides and global warming, so that proves that all previous prophesies have been fulfilled. We are now fighting the Battle of Ar Mageddon which started on 9/11 when the Euphrates was dry. It will end when Jerusalem is split three ways. Then there will be peace for a thousand years.

Did you maybe leave out Christs return in your post?
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
The lower Euphrates was dry for 9 tears, dried up by Saddam Hussein to prepare the way for the kings of the east as prophesied. He did it with a couple dams and a diversion canal that he named "The Mother of All Battles River."

No kings of the East crossed for him. He could not rush God.

However, he because one head of seven with the deadly wound!
 
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Have you been reading my posts, so you can copy and paste? OF COURSE what Job's three friends said was not inspired by God. That is, they were not inspired by God in what they said, for at the end, Job tells us what they said was WRONG.

OF COURSE Peter was not inspired by God to say "Not so, Lord."

So for once, it would seem on the surface that we are on the same page. No, you were not right. From what I have read, you seldom are. However, you THINK you are.
So which one of them do you think fits Rev 22:18-19?

Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
So which one of them do you think fits Rev 22:18-19?

This phrase was not written for the entire bible; it was written only for the book of Revelation. Yet, even knowing that they should neither add no subtract from it, people think they have the right to rearrange it - as if God did not know what order it should be written in.

It is far better to just understand it and believe it. There is no need to rearrange, for when these events begin to take place, they will take place in the very order they are written in, except for minor parenthesis.
 
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
55
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
This phrase was not written for the entire bible; it was written only for the book of Revelation. Yet, even knowing that they should neither add no subtract from it, people think they have the right to rearrange it - as if God did not know what order it should be written in.

It is far better to just understand it and believe it. There is no need to rearrange, for when these events begin to take place, they will take place in the very order they are written in, except for minor parenthesis.
So, who in Revelation are the verses referring to? :confused:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
N

n2thelight

Guest
This phrase was not written for the entire bible; it was written only for the book of Revelation. Yet, even knowing that they should neither add no subtract from it, people think they have the right to rearrange it - as if God did not know what order it should be written in.

It is far better to just understand it and believe it. There is no need to rearrange, for when these events begin to take place, they will take place in the very order they are written in, except for minor parenthesis.

Actually it was meant for the entire book

Deuteronomy 4:2 "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord God which I command you."
 
Upvote 0

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟18,297.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
This phrase was not written for the entire bible; it was written only for the book of Revelation. Yet, even knowing that they should neither add no subtract from it, people think they have the right to rearrange it - as if God did not know what order it should be written in.

It is far better to just understand it and believe it. There is no need to rearrange, for when these events begin to take place, they will take place in the very order they are written in, except for minor parenthesis.

:thumbsup:

We're going to have to quit agreeing to agree so much my brother. ;)

Old normally disagreeable Jack
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
So, who in Revelation are the verses referring to? :confused:

Read it again:

For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

First notice John wrote "the prophecy of this book." This is of course referring to the book he has just written, the book of Revelation.

Next note who he is talking to: anyone that HEARS the words. I would say this would include anyone who reads also. It would also inWhen we read, we hear on the inside. So it is not talking about those written IN the book; it is talking about those that read the book.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Actually it was meant for the entire book

Deuteronomy 4:2 "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord God which I command you."


Yes, the BOOK of Revelation. It was not for hundreds of years before this book of Revelation was added to what we call the bible today.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,626
1,333
South
✟108,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Originally Posted by n2thelight View Post
Actually it was meant for the entire book

Rev. 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of THE BOOK OF THIS PROPHECY, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in THIS BOOK.

Which book? This Book. Which prophecy? The one in this book! What book is that? The book of Revelation!
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,626
1,333
South
✟108,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So, who in Revelation are the verses referring to? :confused:

Rev. 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

They refer to "every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book"
 
Upvote 0

interpreter

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
6,309
157
77
Texas
✟7,377.00
Faith
Anglican
Who were these kings of the east, and what did they do? If Rev. 16:12 has already happened has verses 13 and 14 happened as well? Please explain???
No kings crossed it. I'm just giving you the reason Hussein dried it up. All of the last plagues have been poured out.
 
Upvote 0

interpreter

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
6,309
157
77
Texas
✟7,377.00
Faith
Anglican
:):) I recently heard of even "4" Comings hence no sarcasm? :confused: Which "Coming"? :blush:
Good point. The first second coming was in 95 or 96 AD when Jesus appeared to John. The second second coming was in 312AD when Jesus appeared to St Constantine. And I do not rule out a third second coming, coming soon.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums