- Dec 10, 2013
- 3,646
- 262
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
What do you all think of the apocalyptic language pronounced against Babylon foretelling their judgment at the hands of the Medes?
Isaiah 13 talks about Babylon, the ancient city destroyed and never rebuilt. But Babylon is used prophetically as a type for any nation that is godless. Therefore we await verses 1-16, that have not yet been fulfilled.
What do you all think of the apocalyptic language pronounced against Babylon foretelling their judgment at the hands of the Medes?
random person said in post 1:
Any of you ever read Isaiah 13:1-20
What do you all think of the apocalyptic language pronounced against Babylon foretelling their judgment at the hands of the Medes?
Isaiah 13:17-22 [Fulfilled prophecy - Ancient Babylon was destroyed by the Medes, it has never been rebuilt as an inhabited city. Isaiah chapter 47]
They have absolutely been fulfilled.
The Destruction of ancient Babylon by the Medes was a "Day of the Lord" event.
There have been several "Day of the Lord" events in History.
The language of universal cataclysm is used to describe the fall of a nation.
That is how the prophets discuss judgement upon individual nations.
You didn't miss it.
Yes, this same language can be found in the Gospels and Revelation.
The Medo-Persian Empire overthrew the Babylonian Empire.
The problem with this Keras, is that you have imposed a view on this passage that departs from the passage itself. This is NOT intended to be "a type" of Babylon!Isaiah 13 talks about Babylon, the ancient city destroyed and never rebuilt. But Babylon is used prophetically as a type for any nation that is godless. Therefore we await verses 1-16, that have not yet been fulfilled. They refer to the day of the Lord, the Sixth Seal event and what happens then, is not a rapture to heaven, but the redemption and restoration of the Lord's righteous people. Their gathering and settling into all of the holy Land, in preparation for the glorious Return of Jesus, to come years later.
ebedmelech said in post 14:
The "Babylon" of Revelation 17 is Israel . . .
ebedmelech said in post 14:
How about Ezekiel 16? There's NO DOUBT who the harlot is...
Here again Bible2, you jump in with practically a thesis of statements and passages with NO REAL correlation searched out to their logical conclusions.Note that while the corrupt aspects of Israel are included in what Revelation's symbolic "Babylon" (Revelation chapters 17-18) represents, it represents much more than just the corrupt aspects of Israel. For Israel just by itself doesn't reign over the kings of the earth (Revelation 17:18). Nor is Israel the only place where people buy merchandise (Revelation 18:11). Nor has Israel just by itself corrupted the entire world (Revelation 18:3). Nor has Israel been continuously supported by the empires of fallen man throughout history (Revelation 17:9-10). Instead, Revelation's symbolic "Babylon" represents all of mankind's corrupt political (Revelation 17:18), economic (Revelation 18:11), and religious (Revelation 18:24) systems throughout the earth (Revelation 18:3), and throughout history (Revelation 17:9-10).
The 10 kings of the Antichrist's empire will destroy with fire what Revelation's "Babylon" represents (Revelation 17:16-17) when they destroy the cities of the nations (Revelation 16:19), probably with nukes (and probably with Fission-Fusion-Fission, "FFF", or "666", nukes, "F" representing the number six in English gematria), at the time of the 7th vial (Revelation 16:17,19), which will be the final event (Revelation 16:17) of the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24, right before Jesus' 2nd coming (Revelation 19:2 to 20:6, Matthew 24:29-31). They could do this under the direction of Lucifer/Satan (Isaiah 14:17,12), who could want to leave only a literal "scorched earth" for Jesus to return to.
Near the very end of the future tribulation, Lucifer (employing the ancient lies of Gnosticism) could say to the Antichrist and his 10 kings something like: "Our great battle against the evil, tyrant god YHWH is about to begin [Revelation 16:14, Revelation 19:19], a battle which we will win, and so we will be able to escape YHWH's prison house, this material universe, and return to the wholly-spiritual Pleroma [i.e. Heaven]. So let us now destroy this prison cell, this foul planet, and let us, as it were, burn up all the gewgaws which we have hung upon our cell walls. Let us burn up all our great cities, all our magnificent systems. Let us break all our chains of attachment to this vile physical realm, that we might more freely ascend back to our rightful place in the Pleroma [cf. Isaiah 14:13-14]".
Of course this will be a lie. For at his 2nd coming, Jesus (who is YHWH: John 10:30, Zechariah 14:3-4) will completely defeat the world's armies, arrayed against YHWH (Revelation 16:14, Revelation 19:19-21). And Jesus will have Lucifer bound in the bottomless pit during the subsequent 1,000 years (Revelation 20:1-6, Isaiah 14:15). And Jesus will restore ruined parts of the earth and make them like the Garden of Eden (Ezekiel 36:35, Isaiah 51:3). And after the 1,000 years and subsequent events (Revelation 20:7-15), God will create a new heaven (a new 1st heaven, a new sky/atmosphere for the earth) and a new earth (a new surface for the earth) (Revelation 21:1). And then God will descend from the 3rd heaven in the literal city of New Jerusalem to live with saved humanity on the new earth (Revelation 21:2-4).
Note that passages like Ezekiel 16 calling Jerusalem a "harlot" doesn't require that Jerusalem alone must be the entirety of what the symbolic harlot "Babylon" in Revelation chapters 17-18 represents, just as, for example, Nahum 3:4 doesn't require that Nineveh alone (Nahum 1:1) is the entirety of Revelation's "Babylon". Similarly, Isaiah 23:15-16 doesn't require that Tyre alone is the entirety of Revelation's "Babylon". And Ezekiel 23:4-8,44 doesn't require that Samaria alone is the entirety of Revelation's "Babylon". And Jeremiah 3:6-7 and Hosea 4:15 don't require that the northern kingdom of Israel alone is the entirety of Revelation's "Babylon". And Ezekiel 20:30 and Ezekiel 43:7 don't require that the house of Israel alone is the entirety of Revelation's "Babylon". And Hosea 5:3 and Hosea 6:10 don't require that Ephraim alone is the entirety of Revelation's "Babylon". Instead, the corrupt aspects of all of these, and of all other cities and nations throughout the earth and throughout history, can be included as only parts of what Revelation's "Babylon" represents.
Ezekiel 16:46 means that the corrupt aspects of the harlot "sisters" Samaria, Jerusalem, and Sodom all arose from one, other mother, who would be the symbolic "Babylon" in Revelation chapters 17-18, the "mother" of harlots (Revelation 17:5).