What if we have ALL been 'duped'?

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I've recently bought the Anchor Yale Bible Commentary volume on Job by Pope. A scholar recommended it despite its age that's why I bought it, the hardcover Edition:
You wasted your money, it is free on the internet. That is a Book on Job by Pope Gregory and James, and ignores the fact that the Book of Job is a PARABLE. 'Job 27:1 Moreover Job continued his parable, and said,' Then Pope G. addresses the adversary as a devil and falsely ignores Job 2:10 by dwelling on the words "In all this did not Job sin with his lips."

Job 42:11 Then came there unto him all his brethren, and all his sisters, and all they that had been of his acquaintance before, and did eat bread with him in his house: and they bemoaned him, and comforted him over all the evil that the LORD had brought upon him

Job 2:10 But he said unto her, Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh. What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? In all this did not Job sin with his lips.

Job 19:21 Have pity upon me, have pity upon me, O ye my friends; for the hand of God hath touched me.

Job 6:4 For the arrows of the Almighty are within me, the poison whereof drinketh up my spirit: the terrors of God do set themselves in array against me.

Job 31:23 For destruction from God was a terror to me, and by reason of his highness I could not endure.
 
Upvote 0
G

GivingMyAll4Him

Guest
Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant when you posted:

Imagician - I hope you don't feel like I was being critical of your first post. It seems to me, from what you've said, that you and I approach scripture in vastly different ways. Neither of us needs to explain it or apologize it. It is enough (for me, at least) to acknowledge it and move on.

I thought I was responding to those comments. I thought they were pretty clear. Acknowledge it and MOVE ON would indicate to me that you are saying that it is not NEAR as important to YOU to STUDY it as it is to ME. To merely acknowledge it and move on would indicate there is NO NEED to actually STUDY it, but to merely acknowledge it.

Perhaps it was not MY misunderstanding as much as your mis-wording what you REALLY meant to say.

Blessings,

MEC


Goodness! Allow me to be as clear as possible:

You and I appear to have been shaped by different theological camps/traditions, both of which probably take scripture very seriously, and both of which probably study scripture very carefully, but which come to different interpretive conclusions. That's all I was saying.

If you disagree with that, then we're even more different than I imagined. And that's okay, too.

You may believe that you're right and I'm wrong. I'm fine with that. I don't believe that I'm right and you're wrong - I believe that we probably both interpret in the ways we've been taught to interpret, and we make every effort to honor God in the ways we interpret. That's all we can do, and that's good enough for me. A bit of humility thrown in to say "I might be wrong" makes it even better.

When I said we could "move on," I was saying "we're not going to convince each other, bub." Frankly, when I encounter people with the approach you have taken in these posts, I generally pity them. You've jumped to all kinds of conclusions about me, you have made all kinds of incorrect assumptions about me, and you've been bordering on rude the entire time. But that's okay. This is an internet forum, that kind of mistake happens and I don't allow myself to become worked up over it.

We've communicated poorly, which is an indication that it might be best to stop communicating at all. If I knew you personally, I might be concerned that we are still at odds. Encountering you only online, all I can say is that I hope you don't find this too upsetting. I'm sure we'd find it easier to resolve this discussion offline.

If you feel like you need to respond, do so. I'll grant you the final response as I bow out.
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

BukiRob

Newbie
Dec 14, 2012
2,766
991
Columbus, Ohio
✟50,619.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Let me offer my perspective in this manner:

47 scholars spent seven years of their lives to translate the King James Version of the Bible. Many of those scholars were so versed in Greek that the debated the Bible in Greek. As each part of the Bible was translated, the GROUP got together and discussed each and every part BEFORE it was agreed upon to be as close as they could get it from the documents they were using.

47 of the brightest and most devoted individuals King James could find in his Kingdom. These were professors of universities who took the challenge as seriously as could be imagined. Just read the preface and see if the words don't have quite a somber 'ring' to them. These men were DEVOTED to their task. And from what I have learned from MY studies, men devoted to God as well. It was a DIFFERENT time and men were DIFFERENT then as well. More 'Spiritual' you might say, than men of TODAY.

And let me offer this, he man: If the Catholic Church had REALLY wanted to alter the Bible in the manner you have indicated, they would CERTAINLY have altered the parts that directly speak out AGAINST their own faith. So that conclusion doesn't 'add up'. While there may well be words or even lines of scripture that were not PERFECTLY translated, it is NOT about letters or words on pieces of paper to begin with. It is about God's Word that can ONLY be understood through guidance of the Holy Spirit. At least that is what we are offered. That to 'this world' and those that live FOR IT, the words contained within the Bible are but 'foolishness'. Unable to be understood by mere intellect or effort. ONLY able to be revealed in TRUTH through the Holy Spirit.

So you see, it is not merely a matter of reading the Bible or what others have written that has led me to my beliefs. I offer testimony and witness that my understanding has been revealed THROUGH the Holy Spirit. My understanding is NOT MY OWN. For what I have come to understand through the Bible is about as CONTRARY to what I WOULD CHOOSE to understand as anything possible. Before the understanding that has been revealed was offered, MY understanding was about 180 degrees DIFFERENT. It is my witness and testimony that my understanding is NOT MY OWN, but given me through the Holy Spirit.

Is my understanding COMPLETE? By NO MEANS. There is more I have to learn, by FAR, than what has already been revealed. But as concerns Satan and his demons? I have personally witnessed enough to plainly illustrate not only their EXISTENCE, but the influence they have have had in my own LIFE.

In other words, I have witnessed ENOUGH evidence in my OWN life to KNOW what I speak of when I speak of Satan or his minions. Couple that with what we are offered in the Bible and the picture become perfectly CLEAR.

Satan WAS an angel. When God decided to create MEN and chose His Son as the instrument of their creation, Satan felt betrayed. He felt that this event should have been HIS to perform. That God SHOULD have chosen HIM instead of another. And for this cause, he decided to rebel. And he wasn't alone. There were many OTHER angels that also felt that the task should have been given to Satan. They rebelled with him. A battle took place in which Satan and his angels were defeated and CAST OUT of heaven and down to this Earth.

And it has been Satan's desire ever since to THWART the 'creation' he felt should have been his own. To subvert men into following HIM as God. To turn men's hearts AGAINST God and convince them, (influence them), to follow HIM instead.

The Bible even tells us that he would ACCOMPLISH his mission if God doesn't intervene. That even God's VERY ELECT would be led astray, (end up followers of Satan), if God does not 'cut the days short'.

And it also explains that at that time, Satan will once again be defeated and separated from mankind for a thousand years.

While the Bible does not put this concept in such plain words, if one takes it as a WHOLE, it is pretty clear to see that this condensed version is pretty accurate.

But if one were to choose to follow the path that he man suggests, NONE of it makes ANY sense. Not when we compare what he offers to the Bible itself.

For what you are offering is that we disregard the ENTIRE BIBLE and learn Greek so we can RE translate it ourselves.

But it is MY contention that if "I" were to DO SO, I would end up with the same Bible that already exists. If I were to learn Greek and attempt to 're translate' the Bible, it would come out the same way that my Bible already exists. For in truth, the Bible is merely the BEGINNING of wisdom and understanding. It offers CONVICTION of what I have already come to know through personal experience.

And once again allow me to OFFER this: It is LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE to defend oneself against an UNKNOWN or UNRECOGNIZED enemy. For if you do NOT KNOW that an enemy exists, you cannot take the proper steps to defend yourself against them. It is the way with LIFE and it is this way with Satan. Resist the devil and he will FLEE. Ignore the devil and he will OWN you.

Blessings,

MEC

While I do not disagree with you concerning the N.T. The same can NOT be said of the O.T. which is the very foundation upon which the N.T. rests.

The problem is that unless you are well versed in Hebrew, understand at a very deep level Jewish idiom's you often walk away with a complete misunderstanding of what is actually being said.

If I said to you that something is "the cats meow" would you know what that means? Its an American idiom from the 1930's

Today if someone says its raining cats and dogs... we know what that means... ask someone from a different culture new to American and they will have NO CLUE as to what you are saying.

another example... without cheating (by googling it) tell me what a Fifteen Puzzle means?

This is an English idiom scarcely 200 years old....


Such is the case of Jewish idioms in the Bible... "no one knows the day or hour in Matthew is an idiom and SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN LITERAL.


and there are MANY like them in scripture.

So you being well versed in English does not assure you understand what is being said.... likewise, we have this issue with scripture and translations be they 'perfect' or otherwise....

Oh by the way, Fifteen Puzzle means to be complete and absolute confusion
 
  • Like
Reactions: ron4shua
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Let me offer my perspective in this manner:
47 scholars spent seven years of their lives to translate the King James Version of the Bible. Many of those scholars were so versed in Greek that the debated the Bible in Greek. As each part of the Bible was translated, the GROUP got together and discussed each and every part BEFORE it was agreed upon to be as close as they could get it from the documents they were using.
Thus the tablet of Adrumetum is a memorial of the Alexandrian Old Testament. Not only does it reveal what a potent formal influence the Greek Bible, and especially the praise-book thereof, exercised upon the classes who
lived outside of the official protection of the Synagogue and the Church, and who thus elude the gaze of history, but it lets us also surmise that the eternal thoughts of the Old Testament had not wholly lost their germinative power
even where, long after and in an obscure place, they had seemingly fallen among thorns. Demons, in Tombs, 281.DEISSMANN

Satan WAS an angel. When God decided to create MEN and chose His Son as the instrument of their creation, Satan felt betrayed. He felt that this event should have been HIS to perform. That God SHOULD have chosen HIM instead of another. And for this cause, he decided to rebel. And he wasn't alone. There were many OTHER angels that also felt that the task should have been given to Satan. They rebelled with him. A battle took place in which Satan and his angels were defeated and CAST OUT of heaven and down to this Earth.MEC
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
While I do not disagree with you concerning the N.T. The same can NOT be said of the O.T. which is the very foundation upon which the N.T. rests.

The problem is that unless you are well versed in Hebrew, understand at a very deep level Jewish idiom's you often walk away with a complete misunderstanding of what is actually being said.

If I said to you that something is "the cats meow" would you know what that means? Its an American idiom from the 1930's

Today if someone says its raining cats and dogs... we know what that means... ask someone from a different culture new to American and they will have NO CLUE as to what you are saying.

another example... without cheating (by googling it) tell me what a Fifteen Puzzle means?

This is an English idiom scarcely 200 years old....


Such is the case of Jewish idioms in the Bible... "no one knows the day or hour in Matthew is an idiom and SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN LITERAL.


and there are MANY like them in scripture.

So you being well versed in English does not assure you understand what is being said.... likewise, we have this issue with scripture and translations be they 'perfect' or otherwise....

Oh by the way, Fifteen Puzzle means to be complete and absolute confusion

ALL that you have offered here indicates you are relying on the UNDERSTANDING of MEN. in other words, you are indicating that WE are trying to discern the TRUTH of the words offered in the Bible STRICTLY on our OWN perception.

I offer this AGAIN: It is IMPOSSIBLE to understand God's Word ON OUR OWN. It is ONLY through the Holy Spirit that the TRUTH contained within God's Word can be understood. It TAKES the guidance of the Holy Spirit to SEE.

But from what you have offered in the perspective you have offered it: I AGREE. If one were to rely upon their OWN understanding in order to discern the TRUTH offered in the Bible, they would certainly be destined to FAIL. But not for the REASON you have offered. NOT because of a misunderstanding of Greek or Hebrew or even the manner in which words were used HISTORICALLY. But because of relying upon ANY understanding devised by MEN.

If I approach the Bible as a text book, I will most certainly walk away CONFUSED or MISLED. it is a GATEWAY to the truth as is able to be REVEALED through the Holy Spirit. The Bible itself states that to those that are merely READING WORDS it is BUT FOOLISHNESS. It's principles and truths totally inconceivable to those living IN and FOR this world.

And I would offer this: UNTIL one is BORN AGAIN, about 90 percent of what the Bible offers is IMPOSSIBLE to understand in TRUTH as it has been offered.

So instead of believing one needs to learn Hebrew or Greek or ENGLISH for that matter, it would be more PRUDENT to come to the understanding that FIRST comes 'REBIRTH' and THEN it is possible for the Holy Spirit to lead one to TRUE understanding so far as God's Word is concerned.

And THIS is exactly what my point has been from the opening of this thread. Almost every response has been offered from the perspective of 'this world' instead of SPIRIT. As if somehow those that have responded believe that the words of the Bible can be understood in ANY language in and of THEMSELVES. People, this is IMPOSSIBLE. For it is NOT a matter of LANGUAGE that we speak, but of Spirit. It doesn't MATTER what language the Bible is written in, it is IMPOSSIBLE to come to a correct interpretation of what is offered OTHER THAN THROUGH The Spirit.

So it would appear that it is a LACK of Spirit that would allow each of us to be DUPED into FALSE understanding. Not LANGUAGE. But SPIRIT. Instead of following IN Spirit after being 'born again', many seem to think they can come to a DEEPER understanding by RE-TRANSLATING the Bible BACK into it's original languages. And in this, they err. Err to the point they are BOUND to find themselves DUPED into false understanding.

The IDEA itself is 'false understanding'. God is able to reveal His truth in ANY language or in NO LANGUAGE at all through the Holy Spirit. The Bible cannot be interpreted through the languages of MEN. it is not BOUND by ANY language. What truths that are contained within the Bible are ONLY able to be REVEALED through the Holy Spirit.

I don't think that there are many that even understand what this means. For in TRUTH, if God so desired, He could reveal His truth WITHOUT the Bible even being necessary. So that means that NO LANGUAGE whatsoever is necessary for the truth to be revealed by the Holy Spirit.

If we read the Bible from a 'worldly' perspective, (believing that the truth is contained within some specific LANGUAGE), ALL one could possibly expect to receive would be understanding ACCORDING to this world. And that could be as varied as their are people upon this planet.

Yet that revealed by the Holy Spirit in TRUTH is the same REGARDLESS of the language in which it is understood. And this is WHY the Catholic Church insisted for SO LONG in keeping the scriptures out of the hands of LAYMEN. For they KNEW that it is a matter of GUIDANCE that truth is revealed. Not simply READING. They KNEW that the average person reading the Bible as a BOOK would end up with utter CONFUSION rather than UNDERSTANDING.

And it is NO different TODAY than it was two thousand years ago: the average person that heard the Words of God offered through Christ didn't have the FIRST CLUE as to their TRUE meaning. Like parables that are revealed by the Holy Spirit in MEANING, the average person doesn't have the FIRST CLUE as to the TRUTH behind them. Impossible to understand them from the perspective of 'this world'.

And I have found that there are those that would rebel against what I offer just as there were many that rebelled against the SAME words when offered by Christ Himself. No surprise there. What is surprising is that the words actually seem to ANGER some.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I offer this AGAIN: It is IMPOSSIBLE to understand God's Word ON OUR OWN. It is ONLY through the Holy Spirit that the TRUTH contained within God's Word can be understood. It TAKES the guidance of the Holy Spirit to SEE.MEC
So why don't you want to LOOK?

Angels cannot fall, they are immortal and therefore never die.
Luke:20:34 So Jesus said to them, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 20:35 But those who are regarded as worthy to share in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. 20:36 In fact, they can no longer die, because they are equal to angels and are sons of God, since they are sons of the resurrection.

"Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same nature; that through death he might destroy him who has the power of death, that is, the devil . . ." (Hebrews 2:14)

In Hebrews 2:14 Jesus destroyed the devil. It starts with saying that he was a flesh and blood human and then it tells us that he also had our sinful nature. Through his death he destroyed the devil in his life and therefore has showed us how we are to do the same. Notice it says the devil has the power of death. According to Paul sin has the power of death. We can then see that these words are used synonymously.

The verse below would have been a good place for the Apostle to tell us the truth about the devil being a real fallen angel. We see the opposite.

Romans 6: 19 Put in human terms we are weak in our natural selves. Just as you used to offer the parts of your body in slavery to impurity and to ever-increasing wickedness, so now offer them in slavery to righteousness leading to holiness. 20When you were slaves to sin, you were free from the control of righteousness. 21What benefit did you reap at that time from the things you are now ashamed of? Those things result in death! 22But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves to God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life. 23For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Sin holds the power of death and this comes from within the person. Not some fallen angel.
1 Corinthians 15
55"Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?"[h] 56The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. 57But thanks be to God! He gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.

No fallen angel here. We can only see that sin is the power of death and the power of sin is Consciousness from the law.
5Those who live according to the sinful nature have their minds set on what that nature desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. 6The mind of sinful man is death, but the mind controlled by the Spirit is life and peace; 7the sinful mind[f] is hostile to God.

You see the devil Jesus speaks of is the same one Paul and the other Apostles speak of which is our sinful nature. Jesus has shown us how to crucify our sinful nature with him and God has given him as an offering for our sin.

Is the word satan a proper name?
Gabriel is a proper Name.

Michael is a proper name

Satan is not a proper name.

It is a Hebrew metaphor meaning an adversary.
If you can never die, then you can never sin (Cyclic reasoning therefore no literal satan)
see: wrestedscriptures.com

LISTEN:
#1: The carnal mind is the adversary to the spiritual mind.
#2: Disease is the adversary of good health.
#3: Peter was an adversary for trying to prevent the Lord from doing his God's Will.
#4: The Holy angel was an adversary to Balaam.

When you realize that anything can be a satan then the bible will make complete sense to you and you will see the real enemy they are talking about = people, governments, idols and most importantly yourself.

LISTEN:
When was the Book of Revelation recorded by John?
Approx. AD 96 and
What does Rev. 1: 1 state? . . . . to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John: (Rev. 1: 1) KJV

This War in Heaven was a Future EVENT Post AD96 so where did your naughty spirit angels come from before Adam & Eve?
. shortly come to pass (Rev. 1: 1) KJV doesn't equate to already happened.
Also this prophecy of a ' War in Heaven ' was not to take place ' In God's Heavenly Domain ' being a book of signs and symbols (Rev. 1: 1 ' signified ') it is a reference to a Political War on earth in the Political Heavens in which the Jews believed.

HEAVEN. The Jews spoke of three heavens ; — (1.) The atmosphere, or lower region of the air, in which birds and vapors fly. Job xxxv. 11 ; Matt. xvi. 1. (2.) The expanse above, in which the stars are disposed, and which they seem to have thought was a solid concave. Matt. xxiv. 29. (3.) The habitation of God, where his power and glory are more immediately and fully manifested. Heaven is always the symbol of government ; the higher places in the political universe.

The "kingdom of heaven," is the same as the kingdom of God, Matt. x. 7 ; Luke ix. 2 ; and is Messiah's reign on earth. See Psa. lxxii (i.e. 72:) ; Dan. vii. 14, 27 ; Matt. xxv. 31 — 34. (EMPHATIC DIAGLOTT Alphabtical Appendix)

The Serpent Creature never deceived Adam and led him into darkness, Adam did that all by himself. (1 Tim. 2:14)


John Wesley once received a note which said, “The Lord has told me to tell you that He doesn’t need your book-learning, your Greek, and your Hebrew.”

Wesley answered “Thank you, sir. Your letter was superfluous, however, as I already knew the Lord has no need for my ‘book-learning,’ as you put it. However—although the Lord has not directed me to say so—on my own responsibility I would like to say to you that the Lord does not need your ignorance, either.”

Osborne & Woodward, ‘Handbook for Bible study’, pp. 13-14 (1979)
(All above quoted from a friend of mine)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ron4shua
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
he man,

it is MOST likely that Revelation, while the completion was for a 'time to come', also added past events in order to show RELEVANCE. But even if it DOESN'T, even if the battle in heaven is a FUTURE EVENT, it STILL SHOWS the Dragon, Satan, the Devil, that old serpent as being the opposing FORCE in that battle.

While you insist that he doesn't exist, even if what is offered in Revelation is a FUTURE event, it SPECIFICALLY mentions Satan, the Great Dragon, that 'old serpent'. So how do you account for THAT? Satan doesn't exist YET? Yet the Bible references Satan as the TEMPTER throughout the NT. the ENTIRE book of Job shows Satan as a LITERAL INDIVIDUAL adversary that was capable of MEETING with God in HEAVEN. Whether literal or figurative, it makes NO DIFFERENCE. The story is offered for OUR edification. The story STARTS with a dialog between God and SATAN.

And here is a pretty poignant point: If there is NO Satan, that would mean that there is NO opposing 'god' of this world. Why would God find it SO despicable for men to worship 'other gods' if there ARE NO 'other gods' in TRUTH? I mean really. For God to be SO adamantly opposed to men worshiping 'other gods', there must be SOME SUBSTANCE to such behavior or it wouldn't matter in the LEAST.

I propose that ALL 'other gods' are Satan in his many guises. Satan doesn't CARE what 'name' you place on him so long as you worship HIM as God. Heck, Satan would LOVE for you to call him God or Jesus more than any other names. But he is almost as pleased with Molech, Baal, Lucifer, Mammon, etc, etc, etc.................So long as men worship HIM as God, he doesn't really CARE what names they use.

And there is NO other indication in the Bible of ANY other gods of this world than the ONE that was cast down from heaven. While there are MANY different NAMES, there is NO actual indication that is ANY OTHER 'god of this world' other than Satan.

And it's OBVIOUS that for him, (Satan). to offer the kingdoms of this world to Christ as a temptation, he had to have the power to deliver or it wouldn't have been a TEMPTATION. For one cannot TEMPT someone in TRUTH without the ability to DELIVER the temptation.

You keep offering quotes from MEN. They have little bearing on MY understanding. For it is not the random or erroneous thoughts of MEN that direct my understanding, but the Word of God as offered in the Bible. Along with the Holy Spirit's guidance, it is God's Word that I seek, not that of men. You could find SOME man that would offer ANYTHING you desire to hear if you look hard enough. But that has NO bearing on the TRUTH unless you choose to be a follower of MEN instead of God through His Son.

So, even if what is offered in Revelation is a FUTURE event, (which I do NOT believe that it is. Not the part that is a REcap of events that happened before the 'creation' of MEN so far as the part that SPECIFICALLY STATES: that OLD DRAGON, indicative of something that has been around for AGES), how do you explain the use of the words pertaining to: The 'Great Dragon', that 'Old Serpent', THE DEVIL. You say he does not exist. Yet even if this reference is to a FUTURE event, the ENTITY is mentioned and NAMED that YOU say doesn't exist. Not only mentioned and Specifically NAMED, but also said to be the cause of a great battle in heaven. An entity that YOU propose, does not even exist. Past, present or future, it makes NO difference. If you say Satan does not exist, then you obviously ERR. But am curious: who do YOU say this FUTURE Great Dragon, Old Serpent, the Devil IS?

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Goodness! Allow me to be as clear as possible:

You and I appear to have been shaped by different theological camps/traditions, both of which probably take scripture very seriously, and both of which probably study scripture very carefully, but which come to different interpretive conclusions. That's all I was saying.

If you disagree with that, then we're even more different than I imagined. And that's okay, too.

You may believe that you're right and I'm wrong. I'm fine with that. I don't believe that I'm right and you're wrong - I believe that we probably both interpret in the ways we've been taught to interpret, and we make every effort to honor God in the ways we interpret. That's all we can do, and that's good enough for me. A bit of humility thrown in to say "I might be wrong" makes it even better.

When I said we could "move on," I was saying "we're not going to convince each other, bub." Frankly, when I encounter people with the approach you have taken in these posts, I generally pity them. You've jumped to all kinds of conclusions about me, you have made all kinds of incorrect assumptions about me, and you've been bordering on rude the entire time. But that's okay. This is an internet forum, that kind of mistake happens and I don't allow myself to become worked up over it.

We've communicated poorly, which is an indication that it might be best to stop communicating at all. If I knew you personally, I might be concerned that we are still at odds. Encountering you only online, all I can say is that I hope you don't find this too upsetting. I'm sure we'd find it easier to resolve this discussion offline.

If you feel like you need to respond, do so. I'll grant you the final response as I bow out.

I prepared a long and drawn out response but decided instead to simply offer these words: It would seem that you were more interested in letting me know how RUDE you consider me to be than offering anything of substance concerning the topic. And in that light, you and I DO agree on ONE thing: we DO adhere to two ENTIRELY different 'camps' so far as understanding is concerned.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Now, he man, SHOW me the 'others' that believe as you do. Show that ONE 'group' that has it ALL figured out. And within that 'group', show me JUST TWO who believe in the SAME THINGS concerning what we are offered in the Bible.

For that IS THE POINT of this thread. Not whether Satan exists or not. For you have I have been through MOST of this on numerous different occasions in the past. That certainly wasn't what I MEANT for this thread to BE.

Instead, it was meant to discuss the REASON that NO two people I have EVER MET have the SAME understanding. And if the REASON might very well be that we have ALL been duped into believing something different because of ALL THE THINGS we let into our heart that would LEAD us to false understanding. For I have witnessed MOST men being willing to suffer ANY consequence in order to obtain their 'hearts desire'. Willing to sacrifice any or EVERYTHING in order to obtain what they LOVE the most. I have simply failed to find anyone willing to DO anything BUT talk about that 'thing' being God and His Son. I hear a bunch of TALK, but I see those same people TALKING, seeking the things of this world MORE than God or His Son when it comes to their actual ACTIONS.

So, if those that are the CLOSEST to finding and following the truth are MISLED, what does that say about the REST OF US? For the Bible TELLS US that if God does NOT intervene, even His very ELECT would be led astray. And in the past, the history of the Bible, WHEN does God intervene when it comes to saving His ELECT? More than once we see that it is when there is ONLY ONE MAN LEFT. Noah, Lot, Moses, (although it was only a THREAT with Moses for Moses was able to somehow convince God NOT to destroy EVERYONE except Moses and start over). So the examples would indicate that it will be little different the NEXT time God decides to CLEANSE this planet. He is NOT going to destroy the RIGHTEOUS along with the EVIL. He will wait until it is clear that there may be only ONE or TWO righteous LEFT. That THIS may well BE the deciding factor of WHEN it's time for this Earth to suffer 'tribulation' like it's never SEEN before.

So, how CLOSE are we to there being ONLY one or TWO righteous followers LEFT? A year, ten, twenty, a hundred? Regardless of a literal answer, we are getting closer each and every day. And that would indicate that people are being led FURTHER and FURTHER away from the truth with every minute that passes.

I'll close with this:

2 Thessalonians 2





https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Thessalonians 1&version=KJV

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Thessalonians 2&version=KJV;NIV
(KJV)

2 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
13 But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:
14 Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
16 Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, which hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace,
17 Comfort your hearts, and stablish you in every good word and work.


Blessings,


MEC
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
he man, , even if the battle in heaven is a FUTURE EVENT, it STILL SHOWS the Dragon, Satan, the Devil, that old serpent as being the opposing FORCE in that battle. If you say Satan does not exist, then you obviously ERR. But am curious: who do YOU say this FUTURE Great Dragon, Old Serpent, the Devil IS? Blessings, MEC
Thank you for not addressing my Bible answers with Bible scripture. 1. I have shown the earthly battle in the dominion of earthly kingdoms is what that means by " the battle in heaven ".

I know you disagree and that's fine, you are entitled to your opinion. But your opinion happens to be against Scripture, and I prefer to stick with the facts.
I think you will find that the Satan is anything adversarial to God, but of course in Job he is not adversarial to God but to Job.

The term Satan usually denotes someone who is an adversary of someone else. E.g. Peter was an adversary to Christ in Matthew 16. It takes on a special meaning of sin manifest in individuals or groups in the Scriptures. E.g. in 1 Peter 5 it refers to the Roman Empire persecuting Christians.

In Job it refers to a nameless adversary. We don't know who that adversary is but he certainly does God's work in the end (Job 42:11). It is likely Job is a parable of a real man's plight.

E.g. Solomon's adversaries - the word used is Satan. It's not a proper noun. Could it be an angel of God?. We aren't told and it's not important; the story of Job does not hinge on us identifying the adversary.

In Chronicles as in the book of Job it is both God and the Angel/adversary who provoke David into a census and we see how this works in the book of Job, again the context is to test. In fact see here what the Jews believed: http://whatjewsbelieve.planation7.html

In the Bible there are also verses which show that it is God, the Creator and Ruler of the whole universe, who is responsible for both the Good and the Bad, and not a devil or god of the underworld:
I am the Eternal, and there is none else, there is no god beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the Eternal, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Eternal do all these things. [Isaiah 45:5-7]

And the Eternal said unto <the>adversary, Hast thou considered my servant Job ..In the above verses, The adversary must get permission from God to perform this "sting operation" on Job. The adversary has no power or authority of his own, like a District Attorney who must also obtain permission from The Judge for anything he does.

For God, the Bible, and for Judaism, to have an entity that competes with God, that has power and authority of his own in opposition to God, is to violate the basic idea of monotheism.

Christ was tested by an Angel of God because Only God and no one else had the ability/right to give Jesus the kingdoms of the world as described in Matthew 4: 8-9:
God had promised the kingdoms of the world to Jesus in Psalm 2:8 (A Friend)

Satan, in connection with other names, occurs in the Revelations three times. The first is in reference to battle fought in heaven - that is, in the mental and moral state of man, so that it may be determined whether lesh or pirit is to rule the individual. nd there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon and the dragon fought and his angels, and prevailed not: neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him, Rev. 12v 7-9.

Here Satan is described as a dragon; he is described as an old serpent, as the devil, so that there are three additional features under which Satan is presented. The same four-fold character or personification is presented in another passage in the same book, and I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil and Satan, and bound him a thousand years. And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should receive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season. Rev. 20v 1-3.

From these passages it is perfectly clear that Satan is not an individual being; because, how could he be a dragon, a serpent, a devil, and a satan? How could one distinct being be four distinct beings? It will not do to assert, as some dogmatically do, that he assumed, all these forms. This is merely begging the question. It cannot be literally that Satan can be a dragon and an old serpent too. He must he one or the other, not both. As he is said to be all, the meaning in which he is all must be sought. How Satan can be and is the devil has been already explained: Satan an adversary, manifests himself in that character as a false-accuser, diabolos. Satan, as an adversary, has his strength in the sensual part of a man nature, which he old serpent represents. he dragon too, is a wasteful, destroying agent, so is the sensual principle in man: hence the application of these terms to the selfish principle in man nature personified.

The great embodiment of truth, represented by Michael, and the messengers of truth represented by Michael messengers, fight with the sensual principle in man, and victory is at last obtained.

But in the third of these occurrences a striking and most interesting fact is brought into prominence, viz., that it is for a time only that Satan is imprisoned: and when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison; and shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle; the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved loved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them and the devil (diabolos), that deceived them, was cast in the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever, (Rev. 20v 7-10).

Thus it is revealed that the self-love of man will be brought under rule for a given time: diabolos, and satan will be imprisoned. Later, will the imprisoned gain his freedom: he will deceive the nations; and, at length, after the system of Self has been again tried and found wanting, Christ and his truth will triumph, and the adversary, the Diabolos, and his works be destroyed (Heb. 2v 14; 1 Jno. 3v 8; 1, Cor. 15v 54).

So, what Bible scriptures do you have that prove otherwise?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'll start with this: Satan is NOT described as BEING four DIFFERENT 'entities'. He is described using FOUR different descriptions.

Like saying, "you know Santa, that Jolly old man, that bearded wonder, Man from the North Pole, Bringer of toys for children, Husband of Mrs Clause, Rider of a sleigh pulled by eight reindeer, one of which has a shinny nose". ALL descriptions of ONE entity.

Just as is offered in Revelation. Great Dragon, Old Serpent, The Devil. All references to ONE entity playing numerous different parts or roles. Old Serpent referring to the event in the garden. Great Dragon referring to a war in heaven. And all of these being The Devil or Satan.

So he is not FOUR different 'beings'. ONE being with many different roles and existences.

I am a MAN, but I am also a father. a brother, a husband, a worker, a believer, an American, a Floridian, an old man, a young man, I am MANY different things according to the occasion. Just as Satan has many different roles and guises, I TOO have many different aspects to my life. And any one of them is just as accurate as the others. To older people I am a young man. To younger people I am an OLD man. But one could add about a hundred MORE aspects of WHO or WHAT i am and not be WRONG about a single one.

It is no different with Satan. He fills MANY DIFFERENT roles but he is still the SAME entity.

You keep trying to tell ME and others what the ancients Jews believed. First of all, I don't know that I agree with MOST of what you offer to start with. Second, it doesn't really matter anyway. If there were ONE group of people on this planet that I would refuse to listen to or follow, it would be the JEWS. Heck, he man, the Jews don't even believe in JESUS. So is it any surprise that they may not recognize Satan EITHER?

Yet I can assure you that you are WRONG in what you have offered concerning the Jews and they LACK of belief in 'any other gods'. For they had been enslaved by other nations OVER and OVER. And each of those nations worshiped DIFFERENT gods than their own. And having done the research over the years, the REASON that Moses made the statement that he would not suffer a witch to live among them was due to the FACT that there were many women that learned the black arts of those to whom they were enslaved and brought those teachings along with them when they were freed. And I can ASSURE YOU that they BELIEVED in the gods that granted the powers involved with witchcraft. MOSES believed in the POWER and that is why there were laws offered for the destruction of anyone caught practicing witchcraft.

So there HAD to be an understanding of a DIFFERENT power, one OPPOSED to God, that was capable of answering the prayers of those that worshiped them. Powers capable of producing EFFECTS brought about by those that worshiped them.

And it is mentioned MANY times in the OT where the people were sacrificing their children to Molech. Sending them 'through the fire'. So there is MORE proof that you are WRONG when you say that the Jews didn't have ANY knowledge of 'other gods'. They had PLENTY of knowledge.

Monotheism isn't about ONLY accepting ONE power. It is about accepting only one TRUE GOD as THE God. One can most certainly be monotheistic and recognize that there are opposing factors that exist other than the ONE true God. I am a monotheist. Yet I believe that Satan EXISTS and I also worship God's Son. It's not a matter of whether I am or whether I am not. For anyone that so chooses to label me a polytheist from their OWN perspective. Trinitarians do it ALL the time. INSISTING that an acceptance of Christ as God's Son and worshiping Him as such MAKES me a polytheist. Yet I can ASSURE YOU, I worship ONLY ONE GOD 'as God'. I worship the Son AS THE SON. And though I acknowledge the existence of Satan, I do NOT worship HIM at all. Not any more. At least I HOPE not. For you have already read the opening of this thread: what if we have ALL be 'duped'? I would add that the word "ALL" includes MYSELF.

I asked before if you were a Universal Reconcilliationalist. You said no. Exactly what IS the name of your 'religion'? For the ONLY persons I have ever encountered in the past that do not acknowledge the existence of Satan are Universal Reconcilliationists.

I would offer this from MY perspective: it would be IMPOSSIBLE to be a FOLLOWER from MY perspective without recognition of Satan as a 'fallen angel'. You can't believe in God or His Son WITHOUT believing in Satan as well. NOT from a Biblical perspective: THIS IS MY OPINION.

For the Bible says that even the DEMONS acknowledge that Christ is the Son of God and TREMBLE in His presence.

And when Christ states to Peter, "Satan get behind me." He is NOT speaking TO Peter, He is speaking to that which is possessing Peter and offering IT'S influence. Peter was NEVER 'the Satan' or 'adversary to Christ' YOU have indicated. For Christ STATED that, 'UPON this ROCK will I build my Church'. NO WAY that Christ would BUILD or ESTABLISH His Church upon one considered to be HIS ADVERSARY. Peter may have been WEAK in the flesh as MOST of us are, but he was CERTAINLY NOT an ADVERSARY of Christ.

It is AMAZING how MUCH of the Bible and the concepts that it offers one must ALTER in order to eliminate the existence of Satan as THE enemy of God, Christ and man. The FATHER of lies and the RULER of darkness. Heck, if I were to listen to YOU, I would NEED to read an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT Bible in order to find the TRUTH. So obviously you are teaching a DIFFERENT 'truth' than the one I have come to believe and place my faith in.

Blessings,

MEC

The entire OT is full of their MISTAKES and BLUNDERS and LACK OF UNDERSTANDING. So trying to prove a point by telling me what THEY believed is one the LAST ways you are going to convince me. The Jews were the ones that insisted up nailing Christ to the cross. Chose to release a thief and murderer in the place of Christ. So using what THEY believed or what THEY thought as EVIDENCE of anything other than how WRONG they were more often than RIGHT is an effort in futility as far as I am concerned.

and he man, MOST of the scripture you have offered I read in an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT manner. You have actually stated that YOU believe that Christ was CAST OUT of this Earth. That the CREATOR of this Earth could somehow be CAST OUT?????? That in an of itself is enough to show most just how far you will stretch to try and make what you WANT to believe fit scripture. But trust me, it DOESN'T fit in any way shape or form. Except in YOUR mind and heart.
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I have YET to find just TWO PEOPLE that are in agreement when it comes to what they BELIEVE according to the Bible.
For it would ONLY STAND TO REASON that there would certainly be at least TWO persons following the SAME understanding if the whole concept is based on a SINGLE God with a SINGLE purpose. If God is the same today as yesterday and tomorrow, HOW CAN there be SO MANY DIFFERENT understandings of this "ONE GOD"?Blessings, MEC
First of all, there is one basic requirement: 1 Corinthians 9:14 Even so the Lord has commanded that those who preach the gospel should live according to the gospel.

Secondly, in the days of Christ there were only about 50 or 60 people who actually followed what he taught.

Lastly, they do not LISTEN to what he teaches and are not willing to let him into their minds to allow him to speak for them through the parables of hidden glad tidings: Ex 4:12 Now go; I will help you speak and will teach you what to say.&#8221;

NOW, what does he teach?
Angels cannot fall, they are immortal and therefore never die.
Luke:20:34 So Jesus said to them, &#8220;The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 20:35 But those who are regarded as worthy to share in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. 20:36 In fact, they can no longer die, because they are equal to angels and are sons of God, since they are sons of the resurrection.

"Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same nature; that through death he might destroy him who has the power of death, that is, the devil . . ." (Hebrews 2:14)

In Hebrews 2:14 Jesus destroyed the devil. It starts with saying that he was a flesh and blood human and then it tells us that he also had our sinful nature. Through his death he destroyed the devil in his life and therefore has showed us how we are to do the same. Notice it says the devil has the power of death. According to Paul sin has the power of death. We can then see that these words are used synonymously.

The verse below would have been a good place for the Apostle to tell us the truth about the devil being a real fallen angel. We, all that have not been blinded, see the opposite.

Romans 6: 19 Put in human terms we are weak in our natural selves. Just as you used to offer the parts of your body in slavery to impurity and to ever-increasing wickedness, so now offer them in slavery to righteousness leading to holiness.
20 When you were slaves to sin, you were free from the control of righteousness.

21 What benefit did you reap at that time from the things you are now ashamed of? Those things result in death!

22 But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves to God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life.

23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Sin holds the power of death and this comes from within the person. Not some fallen angel.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I have a serious question he man. HOW MANY different 'gods' are there? Is it possible that you and I, when we discuss the Bible or our 'God', we are discussing MORE than 'one god'?

Example:

I find it hard to believe that those that were following Jim Jones or David Koresh were following the SAME God that I profess to follow. I find it IMPOSSIBLE to believe that they could have been LED by these men in the direction they were led IF a single one of their followers actually KNEW God.

So the indication is that they were somehow introduced to a DIFFERENT God through the SAME Bible that I read. I mean when a man can influence another man to drink poison in order to go BE with God, then they OBVIOUSLY believe in a DIFFERENT God than the God I believe in.

I question whether one can be forgiven for a sin such as suicide. I mean, how does one exhibit repentance or ASK for forgiveness for an act which ENDED their ability to DO EITHER? I mean seriously, WHY would God offer MORE life to someone that didn't value what they had already been given?

So, wouldn't those that were instructed to KILL THEMSELVES, if they were following the SAME God that I am, KNOW that it is quite likely IMPOSSIBLE to KILL ONESELF in order to get to God QUICKER?

2 Thessalonians 2:

2 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

These words STATE that there is coming a 'falling away FIRST', BEFORE Christ's return. And that at the moment BEFORE Christ's return, Satan will set himself up, HERE ON EARTH, in 'the temple', (whether merely in men's hearts or a physical temple I am not sure), and proclaim himself to BE GOD. He will be WORSHIPED AS God:

Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

And we are warned;

Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

Obviously an ENTITY that may be the Son of Satan or somehow SATAN himself in the flesh. But note: WITH ALL POWER AND SIGNS AND LYING WONDERS.

So all this in just ONE chapter, completely REFUTES what you offer so far as there being NO ENTITY called Satan. It explains in DETAIL the PLAN that Satan has envisioned since the 'beginning'. He rebelled in heaven by deciding that HE wanted to BE GOD.

Now he KNEW that it wasn't possible to OVERTHROW God Himself. But how he hoped to accomplish his goal, (being God), was by INFLUENCING MEN to worship HIM AS GOD. For that is really one of the only means that God can RECOGNIZE the MEANING behind BEING GOD: having men WORSHIP Him AS GOD.

So that is HOW Satan decided he would 'be God'. By influencing men to worship HIM AS GOD. That is ALL he wants. To destroy the 'creation' he wanted from the beginning. To turn the 'creation' into worshipers of HIM instead of God.

The words in this one chapter EXPLAIN it without dispute: Satan will one day in the near future, manifest himself in the FLESH. Some entity, whether HIS SON or someone that he is able to be a PART of, will set himself up on this Earth in something representing THE temple, and CLAIM to be God Himself. And he will have the POWER to produce MIRACLES and LYING wonders to convince men that HE IS INDEED: God Himself.

Now, WHY would ANYONE want to do the OPPOSITE of that which they have been instructed concerning these words???? Note the beginning of the INSTRUCTION:

we beseech you, brethren, (We BEG you, brethren):

3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition

Here we have Paul BEGGING those who he wrote this letter to, NOT to let ANY MAN deceive them by ANY MEANS.

Yet it would seem, he man, that YOU would attempt to deceive anyone willing to listen to you by offering that this 'man of sin', the son of perdition DOESN'T exist and therefore the words offered in this epistle are somehow UNTRUE. For you STATE that there is NO SUCH ENTITY as Satan. Yet these words tell us that Not only does Satan EXIST, but is going to manifest himself in the flesh and set himself up on this planet AS GOD.

So your continued offerings about what other MEN have stated that is CONTRARY to this message have absolutely NO VALID meaning. They are just WORDS. Obviously offered to do JUST we have been warned NOT to let them DO: lead us AWAY from the TRUTH.

LET NO MAN DECEIVE you!!!!! Do I trust PAUL and what he had to offer? Or do I trust YOU in who Paul offered dire warning AGAINST? Obviously, if I had ONLY ever read the Bible and you came along with what you offer, the answer is that it is CLEAR that it is YOU that Paul is offering warning AGAINST: LET NO MAN...................

I must learn GREEK in order to re TRANSLATE God's Word in order to find the TRUTH? You've GOT to be KIDDING. Like God is incapable of revealing Himself in any other language than GREEK???? That is no different than trying to tell me that 'creation' took place in three literal DAYS as if God is confined in time by the rotation period of a planet HE CREATED. A day to God can be as 10000 years, or 10000 years as a DAY. Get it?

And then, once learning Greek, I need to go back and re translate EVERY mention of Satan and turn the ENTITY that is revealed in the Bible in ENGLISH into merely an adversary in Greek????? Can't you SEE just how ridiculous this sounds to everyone but YOURSELF?

The topic of this thread was, "What if we have ALL been duped?" With that in mind, I have offered THIS over and over again: "If you DO NOT RECOGNIZE an ENEMY, you have NO WAY to defend yourself FROM that enemy".

So I would offer that ANY and EVERYONE that refuses to accept what is offered in the Bible concerning Satan, they are WIDE OPEN to be influenced BY Satan to believe that HE IS GOD. And the scripture that I have quoted above STATES this very thing: there will come a 'falling away FIRST'. That doesn't mean that there will be a lessening of RELIGION. Just that the RELIGIONS will be teaching a FALSE God. A 'falling away' from the TRUTH. For Satan WILL BE WORSHIPED when he manifests himself in the FLESH. He WILL be worshiped AS GOD. He will produce miracles and LYING WONDERS that will convince the majority of the populace to BELIEVE that HE IS GOD. He will bring three and a half years of PEACE between the Jews and the Arabs and will cease hunger around the world. And by doing just these TWO THINGS he will be able to convince the MAJORITY of the WORLD that HE IS GOD. And he will end up winning WARS before this peace. Wars that no one would believe ONE individual capable of. He is GOING TO BE: God on EARTH. The problem is, he is going to be a FALSE God on Earth.

So from my perspective he man, you have CERTAINLY been DUPED. No question about it to ME from MY perspective. And that perspective simply being God's Word. You would have us ALTER it to suit YOUR belief that there IS NO Satan. And I would offer that this is one of his most profound TOOLS: influencing men to believe that HE DOES NOT EXIST. I have made this statement THOUSANDS of times over the past twenty years or so. There is a reason that BILLIONS of readers and some followers of God through His Word have BELIEVED that the Devil EXISTS. And it is NOT by mistake. God offered us plenty of information IN HIS WORD so that we could KNOW of and be ABLE to defend ourselves against the ENEMY: Satan and his demons.

But if you deny this, in essence, you have absolutely NO DEFENSE whatsoever. Satan has already WON the battle with YOU and and anyone else that refuses to acknowledge his existence. For you CANNOT defend yourself against an UNKNOWN or UNRECOGNIZED enemy. As soon as the attack begins, you have already LOST the battle and lost the war for being UNABLE to recognize the ENEMY.

And I do NOT offer these words as a personal attack. I am simply responding to what YOU have offered in words. Your words are CONTRARY to the TRUTH we have been offered in God's Word. You openly ADMIT it by saying that the Bible NEEDS to be re translated by going back and learning GREEK. You are SAYING that the Bible is NOT accurate and therefore your beliefs are CONTRARY to the Bible AS OFFERED. You have veered from the PROPER path on to one of your OWN design the MOMENT you first decided to rebel AGAINST God's Word. The moment you FIRST decided that the Bible is in error and YOU can determine what it was MEANT to reveal ON YOUR OWN TERMS.

Nothing PERSONAL. Just observation of the words you have offered now over and over.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I have a serious question he man. HOW MANY different 'gods' are there? Originally Posted by Imagican View Post

I have YET to find just TWO PEOPLE that are in agreement when it comes to what they BELIEVE according to the Bible.
For it would ONLY STAND TO REASON that there would certainly be at least TWO persons following the SAME understanding if the whole concept is based on a SINGLE God with a SINGLE purpose. If God is the same today as yesterday and tomorrow, HOW CAN there be SO MANY DIFFERENT understandings of this "ONE GOD"?Blessings, MEC
First of all, there is one basic requirement: 1 Corinthians 9:14 Even so the Lord has commanded that those who preach the gospel should live according to the gospel.

Secondly, in the days of Christ there were only about 50 or 60 people who actually followed what he taught.

Lastly, they do not LISTEN to what he teaches and are not willing to let him into their minds to allow him to speak for them through the parables of hidden glad tidings: Ex 4:12 Now go; I will help you speak and will teach you what to say.”

NOW, what does he teach?
Angels cannot fall, they are immortal and therefore never die.
Luke:20:34 So Jesus said to them, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 20:35 But those who are regarded as worthy to share in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. 20:36 In fact, they can no longer die, because they are equal to angels and are sons of God, since they are sons of the resurrection.

"Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same nature; that through death he might destroy him who has the power of death, that is, the devil . . ." (Hebrews 2:14)

In Hebrews 2:14 Jesus destroyed the devil. It starts with saying that he was a flesh and blood human and then it tells us that he also had our sinful nature. Through his death he destroyed the devil in his life and therefore has showed us how we are to do the same. Notice it says the devil has the power of death. According to Paul sin has the power of death. We can then see that these words are used synonymously.

The verse below would have been a good place for the Apostle to tell us the truth about the devil being a real fallen angel. We, all that have not been blinded, see the opposite.

Romans 6: 19 Put in human terms we are weak in our natural selves. Just as you used to offer the parts of your body in slavery to impurity and to ever-increasing wickedness, so now offer them in slavery to righteousness leading to holiness.
20 When you were slaves to sin, you were free from the control of righteousness.

21 What benefit did you reap at that time from the things you are now ashamed of? Those things result in death!

22 But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves to God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life.

23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Sin holds the power of death and this comes from within the person. Not some fallen angel.
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And here's the DEAL folks.

Satan is willing and capable of offering us whatever PLEASES our flesh in order to turn us AWAY from the TRUTH.

And the Bible TELLS us that there WILL come a 'falling away FIRST'. Before Christ returns to this Earth to separate Satan from mankind, there will come a 'falling away from the TRUTH'. And the indication from the history of the Bible is that God has NEVER destroyed the RIGHTEOUS along with the WICKED so that means that there will be NO righteous LEFT when it comes time for this Earth to be destroyed. No DISCERNIBLE 'righteous'. The ENTIRE EARTH, (other than maybe ONE or TWO individuals), will have been DUPED into a FALSE sense of TRUTH. The WHOLE Earth will be DEVOTED to Satan instead of God.

That is WHY no one KNOWS the 'time'. For God Himself may well have NOT SET a 'time' but the EVENT. WHEN there are ONLY one or TWO of His elect LEFT, that is WHEN. Not a specific DATE or TIME so far as HOURS or MINUTES are concerned. But AN EVENT: WHEN there are only one or TWO of His elect LEFT, in order to SAVE that one or those TWO, THEN will it be TIME to 'cut the days short' in order to SAVE His very ELECT. That means, so far as a DAY, an HOUR, a MINUTE, and a SECOND, God Himself has YET to determine that 'TIME' so NO ONE KNOWS it EXCEPT by God KNOWING WHEN. Not by a TIME, but by a sequence of EVENTS. When the events are manifest it will THEN be 'the time'.

If what I propose is truth, WHICH among us has NOT been DUPED into a false sense of belief in the TRUTH?

I look around and see ALL men in LOVE with this 'world' and what it has to offer. I see ALL men loving THINGS and EACH OTHER 'more' than God or His Son. And I see their LOVE of the THINGS and PEOPLE turning THEIR truth into whatever they MAKE IT instead of merely FOLLOWING as we have been DIRECTED: IN Christ's FOOTSTEPS. I see NO ONE 'overcoming' this world but ALL embracing it as if IT is their God. I see ALL loving their THINGS more than their neighbors. Loving THEMSELVES more than ANYTHING else. Seeking their OWN pleasure above ANYTHING that brings HONOR to God.

If I am wrong, so be it. That will be MY judgement. But I feel like the prophets of the Hebrews/Jews. Like, "Am I the ONLY ONE that actually SEES what's going on AROUND ME?"

Over and over and over again, God sent messengers to WARN those that He loved. TURN BACK. Stop following the WRONG direction. LET GO of the influence of this world and simply accept what is offered through the Holy Spirit.

Yet we have twisted this idea so much that it isn't even fathomable to most any longer. They can't even SEE the errors of their ways because they have ENDEARED themselves to this world to the point that IT determines their FAITH and WORSHIP.

And isn't this basically what the Bible WARNS us is to come? That in the end, if God does not 'cut the days short', even His VERY ELECT would be 'led astray'?

I FIRMLY believe that my message has a touch of divinity involved. I don't BELIEVE that I could SEE what I SEE without it being REVEALED. For it would seem that MOST have been LULLED into a false sense of security concerning their Salvation. A belief that ALL they NEED to DO is SAY they are believers in order to be FORGIVEN.

But the Bible offers a DIFFERENT 'story'. It STATES that one must FIRST be repentant, then 'born again' IN SPIRIT, and THEN be FOLLOWERS of the TRUTH in Spirit. No 'other method' is offered in the Bible for FORGIVENESS.

I've been told over and over by many that they perceive me to be RUDE in my delivery. I don't BELIEVE it. I THINK that this is merely a matter of REBELLING against the TRUTH that makes me RUDE to those that would RATHER believe something CONTRARY: the spirit of THIS WORLD that runs through their hearts that makes them SEE what I offer as RUDE. When in reality, it is merely the TRUTH that few are willing to even CONTEMPLATE. And for some, it causes outright REBELLION against my words.

And folks, they are REALLY NOT MY WORDS. They are words delivered straight out of the Bible. But the Bible as a WHOLE. Not just the parts that I LIKE, but ALL OF IT. Heck, my FLESH 'likes' NONE OF IT. If I allowed it, my FLESH TOO would rebel against just about every word that I offer. At one time, my flesh DID rebel against every principle that I have offered concerning God and His Word. For there was a time when His Word was utterly FOOLISHNESS to me. Contrary to EVERYTHING my flesh found PLEASING.

But I am forced to wonder........................"Am I the ONLY ONE that actually SEES what I SEE?" And what if I TOO have been DUPED into a false sense of TRUTH by that which is pleasing to my flesh? What if I TOO have been duped by being influenced to love this world and the things IN IT more than God or His Son? I believe the answer lies in this:

WHO is willing to GIVE UP all that they OWN and FOLLOW in the footsteps of Christ. I don't BELIEVE I am willing. ARE YOU? Willing to give a stranger you coat or your watch or ring? Willing to sacrifice YOUR OWN PLEASURE for the sake of someone else's well being? Willing to teach your children the TRUTH instead of teaching them to be SUCCESSFUL 'in this world'?

So, have we ALL been DUPED? Has 'the world' won the race in each and everyone of our lives? Has each of us, from the time we were born, been DUPED into a FALSE understanding of the TRUTH as offered through the Holy Spirit? Duped to the point that we can't even SEE the TRUTH any longer? As I asked, 'which among us is willing to GIVE UP the 'things of this world that we hold so dear' in order to FOLLOW in TRUTH and SPIRIT? I wonder..............................................? Is my HONESTY offensive to ANY?

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I JUST OFFERED YOU THE 2nd epistle written to the Thessalonians. IN IT, Paul explains the Devil in DETAIL. He explains Satan's very PURPOSE. And he also explains that we are not to let ANY man deceive us in ANY manner that these words are the TRUTH. He also states that he TAUGHT these things when he was AMONG the Thessalonians. He admonishes them to REMEMBER that he already TOLD them these things previously.

You didn't even TRY to answer my question. You state that angels are eternal and cannot fall or die.

Yet the Bible tells us that SOME of us will end up JUDGING angels. Of what consequence could judgment hold if not to determine RIGHTEOUS from UNRIGHTEOUS?

1 Corinthians 6 (KJV)

6 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?
4 If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.
5 I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren?


While this doesn't offer an exact nature of our 'judging angels', it certainly STATES that some of us WILL.


And what is the PURPOSE of ANY true judgement? RIGHTEOUSNESS. We are to judge ALL according to RIGHTEOUSNESS.


So, those that are determined to judge angels will certainly NOT be judging RIGHTEOUS angels according to RIGHTEOUSNESS? That would be INANE. So WHAT angels are going to be judged UNRIGHTEOUS according to RIGHTEOUSNESS?



Those that fell with Satan ARE THE angels that will be judged. You don't JUDGE righteousness according to righteousness. One judges UNRIGHTEOUSNESS according to RIGHTEOUSNESS.


So, while ALL angels may have been created with the POTENTIAL for eternity, the indication from the BIBLE is that NOT ALL will fulfill their potential. Those that chose to rebel with Satan will be SEPARATED along WITH Satan when the time comes. And they will be DESTROYED along with Satan when THAT time comes as well.


Revelation 12:


9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.


he man, the words are PRETTY PLAIN and SIMPLE. Unless, of course, you don't LIKE them and would instead choose to turn them into something MORE pleasing.


AND HIS ANGELS WERE CAST OUT WITH HIM. With WHO? the Great Dragon, that old serpent, CALLED THE DEVIL. HE and the angels that FOLLOWED HIM. "They" were 'cast out' WITH him and will one day be JUDGED by 'some of us'.


At least that is what we are offered IN the Bible as IT is offered. Without trying to CHANGE the words to create some OTHER 'understanding'.


You see, I STARTED reading the Bible about thirty five years ago. And started studying it about 18 years ago. Not ONE line at a time. But PRINCIPLES and TRUTH as is offered within it's pages. I did NOT 'start' with the premiss that it's WRONG and needs to be RE-TRANSLATED. I stared with the KNOWLEDGE that the Bible is God's Word in TRUTH. And can ONLY be revealed through the Holy Spirit.


We are to SERVE in TRUTH and SPIRIT. The Bible IS that very TRUTH and is revealed AS TRUTH through the HOLY SPIRIT. Not by MEN insisting that we RE translate it. But by FAITH in the TRUTH revealed THROUGH the Holy Spirit.


What I have offered I have offered STRAIGHT out of the Bible. What you continue to offer is that the Bible is NOT the TRUTH.


So really and truthfully, your position is MOOT. It really has NO validity in meaning OR truth. You propose we learn the TRUTH through a DIFFERENT Bible. I propose that the Bible published in 1611 IS the TRUTH.


So were are not arguing on the same terms. You are choosing to disregard what the Bible offers and create a DIFFERENT Bible of YOUR OWN.


he man, I see NO FAITH in such an approach to God's Word. I see an utter LACK of faith in God for one that insists that God has been unable to PRESERVE His Word. You are saying that men have MORE power than God. That YOU can take a work ALREADY completed and RECREATE it to find a DIFFERENT truth. And I say, 'you are correct'. The problem lies in it BEING a 'different truth'. One NOT revealed through the Bible as offered. But a truth YOU believe you can create on YOUR OWN simply by RE TRANSLATING what ALREADY exists.


The Bible is CLEAR on the existence of Satan as a FALLEN angel. And it is also clear that there were many OTHER angels that rebelled along with Satan. So clear, in fact, that the Bible informs us that SOME OF US will one day, 'judge those angels'. MAYBE even Satan himself.


The Bible clearly exhibits Satan as the ONE that introduced DEATH into the lives of men. And that Christ DEFEATED Satan by DEFEATING death upon the cross.



But the Bible also offers that God will LET what is NOW until it is TIME to separate Satan from mankind. For a TIME. And then he will be loosed again in order to WEED out the unworthy.


Why YOU have determined to seek some OTHER understanding is the question? WHY would you insist upon DENIAL of what is offered in the Bible and insist that there is an ALTERNATE truth if one is able to RE TRANSLATE the Bible according to a DIFFERENT language?


From what YOU have offered, all those unwilling or unable to learn GREEK are unable to come to the truth in the Bible offered in ANY other language. And to me, that is a ridiculous concept. It completely ignores that it's NOT 'the language' that matters, but a matter of the Holy Spirit revealing the TRUTH regardless of 'language'.


It would seem that, not ONLY the world finds the Bible as offered 'foolishness', but YOU TOO. Insisting that one MUST go back and re translate the original Greek into English. Like the 47 scholars that previous spent SEVEN YEARS DOING this very thing were less capable or competent than either YOU or I would be. And these scholars being COMPLETELY FLUENT in the GREEK you would insist one MUST learn in order to FIND the TRUTH.


You have indicated that YOU are more competent than ALL those that have ALREADY DONE what YOU propose: Scholars that ALREADY went BACK to the original languages and TRANSLATED the Bible as closely as possible into ENGLISH.


And he man, where is THE Bible that YOU propose that exists when the original GREEK is used? What is the NAME of YOUR Bible? What BIBLE exists ONCE the re translation has 'taken place'?


For you SAY that you READ the King James Version. But what is THE version once the King James Version has been RE TRANSLATED?


Blessings,


MEC
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
You didn't even TRY to answer my question. You state that angels are eternal and cannot fall or die.
1 Corinthians 6 (KJV) 3 Know ye not that we shall call in question pastors? how much more things relating to the present existence?
&#959;&#965;&#954; &#959;&#953;&#948;&#945;&#964;&#949; &#959;&#964;&#953; &#945;&#947;&#947;&#949;&#955;&#959;&#965;&#962; &#954;&#961;&#953;&#957;&#959;&#965;&#956;&#949;&#957; &#956;&#951;&#964;&#953; &#947;&#949; &#946;&#953;&#969;&#964;&#953;&#954;&#945; [GNT-V]
&#959;&#965;&#954; &#959;&#953;&#948;&#945;&#964;&#949; &#959;&#964;&#953; &#945;&#947;&#947;&#949;&#955;&#959;&#965;&#1010; &#954;&#961;&#953;&#957;&#959;&#965;&#956;&#949;&#957; &#956;&#951;&#964;&#953; &#947;&#949; &#946;&#953;&#969;&#964;&#953;&#954;&#945;
Codex Sinaiticus - See The Manuscript | Genesis |

Meaning the false ministers of the Gospel, and pastors of churches, called "angels" , whose doctrines are examined, tried, and judged by the saints, according to the word of God contradicted, condemned, and accursed by him and the judgment of them, and of their ejection out of the Gentile world, out of their oracles, idols, and idol temples.
Jer 10:21 For the pastors are become brutish, and have not sought the LORD: therefore they shall not prosper, and all their flocks shall be scattered.

What part of NO don't you understand? Angels cannot fall, they are immortal and therefore never die. If we are to be made immortal and are equal to the Angels, then ANGELS cannot die if they are immortal. Luke 20:36 In fact, they can no longer die, because they are equal to angels and are sons of God, since they are sons of the resurrection
Revelation 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. The Bible is CLEAR on the existence of Satan as a FALLEN angel. And that Christ DEFEATED Satan by DEFEATING death upon the cross.
People who try to use Is 12:14 as an excuse for a fall of satan also quote Rev 12:9, not realizing THAT JOHN clearly STATES THAT ALL THINGS IN REVELATIONS, ARE THINGS WHICH HAVE NOT YET HAPPENED AND ARE future tense.

Rev 4:1 After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter.

If your satan was defeated by the death of Christ, then how is it able to be running around loose and allowed to be alive? I heard that the soul that sins dies and is not immortal. That seems like a very weak way to kill the most powerful superman thing in the universe.
From what YOU have offered, all those unwilling or unable to learn GREEK are unable to come to the truth in the Bible offered in ANY other language. And to me, that is a ridiculous concept. It completely ignores that it's NOT 'the language' that matters, but a matter of the Holy Spirit revealing the TRUTH regardless of 'language'. And he man, where is THE Bible that YOU propose that exists when the original GREEK is used? What is the NAME of YOUR Bible? Blessings, MEC
see here> Codex Sinaiticus - See The Manuscript | Genesis |
 
Upvote 0