Trinity Of God

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
No sources, seems they just make claims as they go, throw in a few out of context verses for good measure and occassionally quote early Church leaders - also out of context. Jack Chic has made a career out of it.
The Catholic Church keeps those records. They do not post it on the Internet. A few old history books have a little bit of info, but they are not online either.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
34,437
3,872
On the bus to Heaven
✟60,078.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Catholic Church keeps those records. They do not post it on the Internet. A few old history books have a little bit of info, but they are not online either.

CR, it would benefit you to do a research on the extant manuscripts, uncials, and miniscules available through several internet sources or in books. You seem to be basing your understanding on incorrect information.
 
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
CR, it would benefit you to do a research on the extant manuscripts, uncials, and miniscules available through several internet sources or in books. You seem to be basing your understanding on incorrect information.
It would be helpful if you offered proof of any error.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Hi Der, long time no type! Hows things??

Think we’ve been here before! This verse doesn’t have Jesus here “clearly” as the speaker as you assert. I think you’re aware that Revelation has a number of different speakers and its up to the reader to make up his mind using his intellectual honesty to decide who is the speaker at any one time.

Now in these verses it seems more likely that the speaker is the angel that John tries to worship a few verses earlier (verse 6), that’s why the writer identifies Jesus as a new speaker in verse 16. And BTW, No, the angel is not trying to claim to be the alpha and the omega either, he's just quoting from elsewhere in the scriptures that are referring to Jehovah.

Cyprian (A.D. 200-258) The Treatises Second Book-Testimonies 1.
Rev 22:13
-

Also in the Gospel according to John, the Lord says: “And this is life eternal, that they should know Thee, the only and true God, and Jesus Christ, whom Thou hast sent. I have glorified Thee on the earth: I have finished the work which Thou gavest me to do. And now, do Thou glorify me with Thyself, with the glory which I had with Thee before the world was made.” Also Paul to the Colossians: “Who is the image of the invisible God, and the first-born of every creature.” Also in the same place: “The first-born from the dead, that He might in all things become the holder of the pre-eminence.” In the Apocalypse too: “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto Him that is thirsting from the fountain of the water of life freely.”

22. Also in the Apocalypse: “And I saw a Lamb standing on Mount Sion, and with Him a hundred and forty-four thousand; and they had His name and the name of His Father written on their foreheads.” Also in the same place: “I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end. Blessed are they that do His commandments, that they may have power over the tree of life.”​
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The Catholic Church keeps those records. They do not post it on the Internet. A few old history books have a little bit of info, but they are not online either.
Funny, that is what Jack Chic claims too.
Am sure it helps sell tracts and it is titillating to spread such gossip. Apparently since there are plenty of historic books/records that are used to paint the Church in a negative light ( which we have in at least part because of the Church), am always amazed that folks need to imagine some conspiracy within the Church to bury whatever missing source that if they could only get there hands on it would prove whatever it is they want to claim.
That's alright it is not uncommon actually. Have met people that think our government did the 9-11 job and they could prove it if only they got their hands on some of those alledged missing documents the government keeps stored but offline.
 
Upvote 0
C

catholichomeschooler

Guest
I was going to use the ten commandments as an example, but I see that the Catholics have put it back in order from this one.


The Ten Commandments

Protestant: First

Catholic: Second

Hebrew: third


1Pr. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

1Ca. I am the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not have strange gods before me.

1He. I am the Lord thy God, who brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.

2Pr.Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and (keep my commandments).

2Ca.Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.

2He.Thou shalt have no other gods before Me. Thou shalt not make unto thee a graven image, nor any manner of likeness, of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; Thou shalt not bow down unto them, nor serve them; for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me; And showing mercy unto the thousandth generation of them that love Me and (keep My commandments).

3Pr.Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

3Ca.Remember thou keep the Sabbath Day.

3He.Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain.

4Pr. (Remember) the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

4Ca. Honor thy Father and thy Mother.

4He.(Remember)the sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work. But the seventh day is the sabbath in honor of the Lord thy God; on it thou shalt not do any work, neither thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.



This is completely irrelevant to your point.

I guess you can't defend your original statement.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
34,437
3,872
On the bus to Heaven
✟60,078.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Ratiocination

Senior Member
Apr 28, 2004
978
31
London
✟4,702.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
Marital Status
Private
Cyprian (A.D. 200-258) The Treatises Second Book-Testimonies 1.
Rev 22:13
-

Also in the Gospel according to John, the Lord says: “And this is life eternal, that they should know Thee, the only and true God, and Jesus Christ, whom Thou hast sent. I have glorified Thee on the earth: I have finished the work which Thou gavest me to do. And now, do Thou glorify me with Thyself, with the glory which I had with Thee before the world was made.” Also Paul to the Colossians: “Who is the image of the invisible God, and the first-born of every creature.” Also in the same place: “The first-born from the dead, that He might in all things become the holder of the pre-eminence.” In the Apocalypse too: “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto Him that is thirsting from the fountain of the water of life freely.”

22. Also in the Apocalypse: “And I saw a Lamb standing on Mount Sion, and with Him a hundred and forty-four thousand; and they had His name and the name of His Father written on their foreheads.” Also in the same place: “I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end. Blessed are they that do His commandments, that they may have power over the tree of life.”​
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Well hello to you to... i'm fine by the way... thanks for asking ;-)[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Cyprian's opinion on the matter is hardly of any worth, notwithstanding the fact that his conclusion of the issue doesn’t match yours, i.e. he doesn’t believe that the title of 'Alpha and Omega' makes Jesus the second person in a triune being, he's also just expressing his personal belief 150 or so years after the death of the last apostles. And that der is very dangerous indeed given the warnings in scripture (2Peter 2:1). You should stick to the inerrant word of God when making a defence of your claims otherwise you may end up just reprinting the same mistakes of the apostates that came before us...[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]With that said I thought you believed the bible to have no contradictions? If so you have just created one here with your theology! You see Christ is said to be brothers of those that conquer...[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Revelation 21:6 said:
And he said to me: “They have come to pass! I am the Al′pha and the O·me′ga, the beginning and the end. To anyone thirsting I will give from the fountain of the water of life free. 7 Anyone conquering will inherit these things, and I shall be his God and he will be my son.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]These verses indicate that Christians who are spiritual conquerors are NOT brothers of the one known as the Alpha and the Omega, but they will be his sons. However, the kind of relationship of spirit-anointed Christians to Jesus Christ was one of brotherhood.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Heb. 2:11 said:
For both the one who is sanctifying and those who are being sanctified all stem from one, and for this reason he is not ashamed to call them brothers,
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Matt. 25:40 said:
In reply the King will say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]And after his resurrection...[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Matt. 28:10 said:
Then Jesus said to them: “Have no fear! Go, report to my brothers, that they may go off into Gal′i·lee; and there they will see me.”
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
John 20:17 said:
Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me. For I have not yet ascended to the Father. But be on your way to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and YOUR Father and to my God and YOUR God.’”
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Revelation 12:10 said:
And I heard a loud voice in heaven say: “Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!
[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]But those ‘brothers’ of Jesus are referred to as “sons of God.” [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Gal. 3:26 said:
You are all, in fact, sons of God through your faith in Christ Jesus
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Gal. 4:6 said:
Now because you are sons, God has sent the spirit of his Son into our hearts, and it cries out: “Abba, Father!”
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]So 'Clearly' the Alpha and the Omega at Rev. 22:13 is referring to Jehovah himself because:[/FONT]

  1. [FONT=Arial, sans-serif]The Alpha and Omega at Revelation 21:6,7 is said to be the father of those conquering.[/FONT]
  2. [FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Jesus is said very clearly in scripture to be the brother of those Christians.[/FONT]
  3. [FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Brother and Son are not equivocal terms in any language to my knowledge.[/FONT]
  4. [FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Cyprian and other early church leaders are not authoritative according to those apostles who were directly commissioned by Jesus.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Just a small amount of scriptural study points to this conclusion. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]You see, you have to take your assertions right to their conclusion, and the conclusion here would be a contradiction of scripture. Unless of course you can somehow squeeze out a famous Trinitarian explanation to sort out this misunderstanding, but even that would have to be explained somewhere in scripture. So Jesus being given the title of Alpha and Omega is a big 'no no' in scripture.[/FONT]
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Well hello to you to... i'm fine by the way... thanks for asking ;-)

Cyprian's opinion on the matter is hardly of any worth, notwithstanding the fact that his conclusion of the issue doesn’t match yours, i.e. he doesn’t believe that the title of 'Alpha and Omega' makes Jesus the second person in a triune being, he's also just expressing his personal belief 150 or so years after the death of the last apostles. And that der is very dangerous indeed given the warnings in scripture (2Peter 2:1). You should stick to the inerrant word of God when making a defence of your claims otherwise you may end up just reprinting the same mistakes of the apostates that came before us...

We might say the same thing about your WBTS theology, that "opinion on the matter is hardly of any worth." You are expressing your personal belief 1860+ years after the death of the last apostles. Cyprian was a native Greek speaker and I consider his interpretaton of the scripture more accurate than the doctrinally biased "interpretations" of members of a 19th century erroneous religious group who are not native Greek speakers, and likely could not conjugate a Greek verb if their life depended on it.

With that said I thought you believed the bible to have no contradictions? If so you have just created one here with your theology! You see Christ is said to be brothers of those that conquer...

Originally Posted by Revelation 21:6, 7
And he said to me: “They have come to pass! I am the Al′pha and the O·me′ga, the beginning and the end. To anyone thirsting I will give from the fountain of the water of life free. 7 Anyone conquering will inherit these things, and I shall be his God and he will be my son.

These verses indicate that Christians who are spiritual conquerors are NOT brothers of the one known as the Alpha and the Omega, but they will be his sons. However, the kind of relationship of spirit-anointed Christians to Jesus Christ was one of brotherhood.

I fail to see a contradiction. God is ominpotent, He can do anything He wants, any time He wants, anywhere and in any way He wants.

Originally Posted by Heb. 2:11
For both the one who is sanctifying and those who are being sanctified all stem from one, and for this reason he is not ashamed to call them brothers,

Originally Posted by Matt. 25:40
In reply the King will say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’

And after his resurrection...

Originally Posted by Matt. 28:10
Then Jesus said to them: “Have no fear! Go, report to my brothers, that they may go off into Gal′i·lee; and there they will see me.”

Originally Posted by John 20:17
Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me. For I have not yet ascended to the Father. But be on your way to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and YOUR Father and to my God and YOUR God.’”

Originally Posted by Revelation 12:10
And I heard a loud voice in heaven say: “Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!

But those ‘brothers’ of Jesus are referred to as “sons of God.”

Originally Posted by Gal. 3:26
You are all, in fact, sons of God through your faith in Christ Jesus

Originally Posted by Gal. 4:6
Now because you are sons, God has sent the spirit of his Son into our hearts, and it cries out: “Abba, Father!”

So 'Clearly' the Alpha and the Omega at Rev. 22:13 is referring to Jehovah himself because:

The Alpha and Omega at Revelation 21:6,7 is said to be the father of those conquering.
Jesus is said very clearly in scripture to be the brother of those Christians.
Brother and Son are not equivocal terms in any language to my knowledge.
Cyprian and other early church leaders are not authoritative according to those apostles who were directly commissioned by Jesus.
Just a small amount of scriptural study points to this conclusion.

You see, you have to take your assertions right to their conclusion, and the conclusion here would be a contradiction of scripture. Unless of course you can somehow squeeze out a famous Trinitarian explanation to sort out this misunderstanding, but even that would have to be explained somewhere in scripture. So Jesus being given the title of Alpha and Omega is a big 'no no' in scripture.

In historical Biblical Theology Jesus is both God and man, as God Christians are His sons, while He was man Christians are His brothers. And in support of my assertion that Jesus is God I offer these scriptures.

There is one God! The Son is called/referred to as God, in scripture, but the Son is not the Father or the Spirit. Thirty six (36) scripture which address or refer to Jesus as God, Matt 1:23, Isa 9:6, Luke 7:16, John 1:1, 3, 4, 10, 14, 18, 10:33, 5:18,8: 58, 12;24, 14:9, 17:5, 10, 20:28, Act 20:28, Rom 9:5, 2 Cor 4:4, Col 1:14-16, 2:9, Eph 3:9, Heb 1:1:2-3, 8-12, 3:3, Phi 2:6, 1 Tim 1:1, 3:16, 6:15, Tit 2;13, 2 Pet 1:1, 1 John 5:20, Rev 17:14, 19;16, 22:12-13

[1] Mat 1:23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

[2] Isa 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

[3]Luk 7:16 And there came a fear on all: and they glorified God, saying, That a great prophet is risen up among us; and, That God hath visited his people.

[4] Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

[5] Joh 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

[6] Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him[God created the world, Gen 1:1][/color], and the world knew him not.

[7] Joh 1:14 And the Word [acting on Himself] became flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

[8] Joh 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten God, μονογενὴς θεὸς ] which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

[9] John 10:30 I and my Father are one.

[10] Joh 10:33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. [Jewish leaders speaking]

[11] Joh 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.[John speaking]

[12] Joh 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, before Abraham was, I am [אהיה/ehyeh, I am, Ex 3:14].

[13] John 12:41 These things said Esaias, when he saw his [Jesus, vs. 36] glory, and spake of him[יהוה/YHWH, Isa 6:1ff].

Isa 6:1 In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple​

[14] Joh 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?

[15] Joh 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was[Jesus was aware of His existence before the world was created.].

[16] Joh 17:10 And all mine are thine, and thine are mine[Everything that belongs to the Father belongs to Jesus]; and I am glorified in them.

[17] Joh 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, [Jesus] My Lord and my God. [Thomas addressed Jesus as God and Jesus praised him.]

[18] Act 20:28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

[19] Rom 9:5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever[Jesus called God]. Amen.

[20] 2 Cor 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

[21] Col 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:
15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
[22] Col 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

[23] Eph 3:9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:

[24] Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;
3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

[25] Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever[God calls the Son, God]: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.
10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;
12 And as a vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the same, and thy years shall not fail.

[26] Heb 3:3 For this man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honour than the house.
4 For every house is builded by some man; but he that built all things is God.

[27] Phi 2:6 Who, being [existing] in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

[28] 1 Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh[Jesus called God], is justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

[29] 1 Tim 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ[Jesus called God], which is our hope;

[30] 1 Tim 6:15 Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;[The lamb is king of kings, Rev 17:14, Jesus is king of kings, Rev 19:16, God is Lord of Lords Deu 10:17]

[31] Tit 2:13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ[Jesus called God];
14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.

[32] 2 Pet 1:1 Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ[Jesus called God]:

[33] 1 John 5:20 And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life[Jesus called God].

[34] Rev 17:14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings[יהוה/YHWH, Deu 10:17]: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

[35] Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS[יהוה/YHWH, Deu 10:17].

[36] Rev 22:12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be[יהוה/YHWH, Isa 40:10].
13 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.[יהוה/YHWH, Isa 44:6]
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
This is your error.



Start here.
Manuscripts - CSNTM
Publishing your finds is not permitted without their permission according to them. That makes them almost useless.
I would think that ancient bible text written for the public would not still come under copyright laws. How is it that the wealthy are able to keep ancient biblical text as their own property? How many thousands of years will this go on?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Publishing your finds is not permitted without their permission according to them. That makes them almost useless.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with the copyright laws. Hentenza did nothing wrong.

I would think that ancient bible text written for the public would not still come under copyright laws. How is it that the wealthy are able to keep ancient biblical text as their own property? How many thousands of years will this go on?

Historical artifacts, such as ancient scrolls Biblical or otherwise, found on public lands, unless the country where they are discovered claims them as state property, belong to whomever discovers them. No different than prospectors finding gold in Alaska.
 
Upvote 0

alex2165

Newbie
Jan 2, 2014
382
83
✟11,292.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I do not believe in the Da Vinci Code, to me it is complete nonsense.

I believe in the word of GOD only.

Above all, why would GOD coded something? What the purpose of it.

The only purpose of His Word is to educate us, to change us into better human beings, and invite us into His Heavenly Kingdom.

So why He would make it difficult for us?
 
Upvote 0

Ratiocination

Senior Member
Apr 28, 2004
978
31
London
✟4,702.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
Marital Status
Private
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Der said:
We might say the same thing about your WBTS theology, that "opinion on the matter is hardly of any worth." You are expressing your personal belief 1860+ years after the death of the last apostles. Cyprian was a native Greek speaker and I consider his interpretaton of the scripture more accurate than the doctrinally biased "interpretations" of members of a 19th century erroneous religious group who are not native Greek speakers, and likely could not conjugate a Greek verb if their life depended on it.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Not so sure Cyprian was native Greek, his writings were in Latin! If your argument rested on that, then it seems to have just sunk.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]And I'm not sure how you can get so quickly confused, were not debating the translation of Rev. 22:13 were discussing who the title was applied to! If you need clarification in future of something ive written then just ask, i'm happy to aid you in anyway I can ;-)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
der said:
I fail to see a contradiction. God is ominpotent, He can do anything He wants, any time He wants, anywhere and in any way He wants.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Indeed, so can he even confuse the terms of 'Son' and 'Brother' if he chooses? My God, the God of the bible would endeavour to be extremely consistent with his use of language to avoid confusion! Do you worship a God of confusion?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Der said:
In historical Biblical Theology Jesus is both God and man, as God Christians are His sons, while He was man Christians are His brothers. And in support of my assertion that Jesus is God I offer these scriptures.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]A very lazy and typical response der as usual, nothing changes lol! [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]In my previous post are verses where Jesus still calls the Christians brothers, even after his resurrection![/FONT] Would you like me to re-paste them for you???

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]I joined this conversation because you said “Jesus is clearly called 'Alpha and Omega'”, my contention was the word 'clearly', you seem to have moved away from this somewhat, do I take that as a retraction? [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]You see your theology clearly clouds your judgement of certain things written in scripture, you stop digging far too early, and once the premature conclusion has been decided upon, then all other things contrary to that conclusion must be explained in a rather obscure way.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]I asked for an explanation from scripture to your expected Trinitarian response. What I mean is, I don’t deny that the bible in places applies the title of Theos to Jesus, my contention is the then formulated doctrine of the trinity, with such an obscure and alien thinking would have required reams of pages to explain the relationship between The Almighty and the persons of the Almighty, it simply doesn’t make even a small attempt at this explanation, therefore the Trinity doctrine must be regarded with great suspicion![/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Der said:
There is one God! The Son is called/referred to as God, in scripture, but the Son is not the Father or the Spirit....
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Agreed![/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Thought i'd address the daisy chain of Trinitarian weaknesses one at a time, starting with this one as it was first in your list...[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Der said:
(1)Mat 1:23
Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. [/quote][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]This one is just kindergarten. To assume the meaning of a name says anything about the person is probably the weakest of the Trinitarian proof texts. For example elsewhere Eli′athah means “God Has Come”; Jehu means “Jehovah Is He”, so to be consistent, are you saying that these people are also God?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]The paralell account here:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Luke 1:32 said:
This one will be great and will be called Son of the Most High; and Jehovah God will give him the throne of David his father,
[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Says he will be great, not almighty, but great, son of the most high, not equal with, but the son, and given the throne of David. Why would almighty God need to be given a throne by anyone?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]I'm looking forward to going through the rest of the proof texts you’ve provided but don’t want to discourage others from jumping in by answering them all in one go...[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Cheers Der, I forgot how much fun this can be...[/FONT]
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Not so sure Cyprian was native Greek, his writings were in Latin! If your argument rested on that, then it seems to have just sunk.

Patellar reflex response. "I'm right and you're wrong! Am too! Nuh Huh!" Yes this is going to be fun

And I'm not sure how you can get so quickly confused, were not debating the translation of Rev. 22:13 were discussing who the title was applied to! If you need clarification in future of something ive written then just ask, i'm happy to aid you in anyway I can ;-)

And what exactly is it you think you "clarified" here?

Indeed, so can he even confuse the terms of 'Son' and 'Brother' if he chooses? My God, the God of the bible would endeavour to be extremely consistent with his use of language to avoid confusion! Do you worship a God of confusion?

I must have missed that memo where God designated you to speak for Him what He will or will not do.

A very lazy and typical response der as usual, nothing changes lol!

Typical lazy patellar reflex response!

In my previous post are verses where Jesus still calls the Christians brothers, even after his resurrection! Would you like me to re-paste them for you???

Was that when He returned as a flesh and bones man, not a spirit, or are you speaking about some other incident?

Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.​

I joined this conversation because you said “Jesus is clearly called 'Alpha and Omega'”, my contention was the word 'clearly', you seem to have moved away from this somewhat, do I take that as a retraction?

What a joke. I have not moved away from anything. The grammar of Rev 22:13 refers to the one speaking vs. 12, " And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be" and who identifies Himself as Jesus, vs. 16. Your theology demands that you slip in a couple of invisible changes of speaker.

You see your theology clearly clouds your judgement of certain things written in scripture, you stop digging far too early, and once the premature conclusion has been decided upon, then all other things contrary to that conclusion must be explained in a rather obscure way.

You will see as we continue that it is your WTBS theology which clouds judgement. I would say also "premature conclusions" but they aren't conclusions only copy/pastes from WTBS writings.

I asked for an explanation from scripture to your expected Trinitarian response. What I mean is, I don’t deny that the bible in places applies the title of Theos to Jesus, my contention is the then formulated doctrine of the trinity, with such an obscure and alien thinking would have required reams of pages to explain the relationship between The Almighty and the persons of the Almighty, it simply doesn’t make even a small attempt at this explanation, therefore the Trinity doctrine must be regarded with great suspicion!

What is the purpose of all of this irrelevant bloviation? Is this supposed to address anything I said?

Thought i'd address the daisy chain of Trinitarian weaknesses one at a time, starting with this one as it was first in your list...
Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
This one is just kindergarten. To assume the meaning of a name says anything about the person is probably the weakest of the Trinitarian proof texts. For example elsewhere Eli′athah means “God Has Come”; Jehu means “Jehovah Is He”, so to be consistent, are you saying that these people are also God?

And you think this is relevant how? That imperfect men name their children with theophoric names is irrelevant because they have no power to make their children be or become anything. But when God names someone He means what He says and says what He means. For example when God changed Abram's name, he became the progenitor of many nations as God said he would. Abraham means "father of a multitude."

The paralell account here:

Luke 1:32
This one will be great and will be called Son of the Most High; and Jehovah God will give him the throne of David his father,​

Says he will be great, not almighty, but great, son of the most high, not equal with, but the son, and given the throne of David. Why would almighty God need to be given a throne by anyone?
I'm looking forward to going through the rest of the proof texts you’ve provided but don’t want to discourage others from jumping in by answering them all in one go...
Cheers Der, I forgot how much fun this can be...

Why would Jesus have to be given a throne? Read Phip 2:6-11.

NIV Phi 2:6 Who, being in very nature[1] God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
Phi 2:7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature[2] of a servant, being made in human likeness.
Phi 2:8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death--even death on a cross!
Phi 2:9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
Phi 2:10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
Phi 2:11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.​

Jesus’ earthly ministry occurred between verses, 7 and 8. Where the one who was equal with God, vs. 6, the one who, acting upon himself, became flesh, cf. John 1:14, made himself of no reputation, vs. 7, cf. Heb 2:17, took upon himself the form of a servant, and was in the likeness of men, vs. 7. After which God, not merely exalted him, but “highly exalted” him, and glorified him with the same glory he had with the Father before the world existed (John 17:5)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I suggest you familiarize yourself with the copyright laws. Hentenza did nothing wrong.



Historical artifacts, such as ancient scrolls Biblical or otherwise, found on public lands, unless the country where they are discovered claims them as state property, belong to whomever discovers them. No different than prospectors finding gold in Alaska.

So if I find your pocket book full of money it is mine to keep? Scripture is given to humanity. So then, humanity forfeits their inheritance to the wealthy?
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
34,437
3,872
On the bus to Heaven
✟60,078.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Publishing your finds is not permitted without their permission according to them. That makes them almost useless.
I would think that ancient bible text written for the public would not still come under copyright laws. How is it that the wealthy are able to keep ancient biblical text as their own property? How many thousands of years will this go on?

The contents of the link are for you to study the variety of extant media available to you, not to publish your findings commercially. Studying the extant mss, uncials, and miniscules will give you the understanding of where they were found, what they say, and how they relate to the translations used in our bibles. The originals were not destroyed with the judiaziers but their location, if they are still extant, is not known. The copies come from a variety of countries and areas which makes it impossible for the CC to have altered them (although there is alterations in them but most probably come from margin notes making it into the text itself). You don't have to buy them but merely study them. This is just one site but there are many more. I assume that you know how to use a search engine to find others.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So if I find your pocket book full of money it is mine to keep? Scripture is given to humanity. So then, humanity forfeits their inheritance to the wealthy?

Wrong analogy. While the scriptures were in general for mankind, indvidual copies belonged to somebody. If the original owner is no longer living, and any living relatives cannot be identified, as is the case here, my first reply still stands. The scrolls are historical artifacts and become the property of whomever finds them. As I said before just like prospectors who find gold in Alaska.
 
Upvote 0

Ratiocination

Senior Member
Apr 28, 2004
978
31
London
✟4,702.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
Marital Status
Private
der said:
Rat said:
Not so sure Cyprian was native Greek, his writings were in Latin! If your argument rested on that, then it seems to have just sunk.
der said:
Patellar reflex response. "I'm right and you're wrong! Am too! Nuh Huh!" Yes this is going to be fun
This is the nature of debate! Did you foolishly make a false argument???
Der said:
Rat said:
And I'm not sure how you can get so quickly confused, were not debating the translation of Rev. 22:13 were discussing who the title was applied to! If you need clarification in future of something ive written then just ask, i'm happy to aid you in anyway I can ;-)
Der said:
And what exactly is it you think you "clarified" here?
If you can reread it carefully I was not claiming to clarify anything, just inviting you to ask me for clarification... Sooo....When did I dispute the translation of Rev. 22:13??? Or was you last post just the usual bluster?
Der said:
Rat said:
Indeed, so can he even confuse the terms of 'Son' and 'Brother' if he chooses? My God, the God of the bible would endeavour to be extremely consistent with his use of language to avoid confusion! Do you worship a God of confusion?
Der said:
I must have missed that memo where God designated you to speak for Him what He will or will not do.
So it's true! You do feel comfortable serving a God of confusion! Nice, not to hard to admit was it?
Der said:
Was that when He returned as a flesh and bones man, not a spirit, or are you speaking about some other incident?
Let's think about your argument here!
You say Jesus is called Alpha and Omega...
I point out this cant be true because the Alpha and the omega is said to have sons in Rev 21...
Jesus calls his Christian followers 'brothers'...
You say he can call them by either term depending on his current status, i.e. as God or man...
Now you seem to be adding another completely irrelevant topic to the discussion, i.e. his bodily resurrection...
Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
but either way you'd have to admit somewhere that Christ is no longer made of flesh, otherwise he cant call the Christians 'sons'!!!
Please follow along Der!
Der said:
Rat said:
I joined this conversation because you said “Jesus is clearly called 'Alpha and Omega'”, my contention was the word 'clearly', you seem to have moved away from this somewhat, do I take that as a retraction?
Der said:
What a joke. I have not moved away from anything. The grammar of Rev 22:13 refers to the one speaking vs. 12, " And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be" and who identifies Himself as Jesus, vs. 16. Your theology demands that you slip in a couple of invisible changes of speaker.
Brilliant! Probably your finest detraction from an argument to date. I hate to admit it but I think I admire you deep down, no where ever have I met someone as thick skinned as you.
As previously pointed out the literal speaker in Rev. 22: 12,13 could well have been the angel that John attempts to worship in verses 9 and 10, you didn’t answer this objection!
Der said:
Rat said:
I asked for an explanation from scripture to your expected Trinitarian response. What I mean is, I don’t deny that the bible in places applies the title of Theos to Jesus, my contention is the then formulated doctrine of the trinity, with such an obscure and alien thinking would have required reams of pages to explain the relationship between The Almighty and the persons of the Almighty, it simply doesn’t make even a small attempt at this explanation, therefore the Trinity doctrine must be regarded with great suspicion!
Der said:
What is the purpose of all of this irrelevant bloviation? Is this supposed to address anything I said?
Not directly, you know me by now Der, just laying the ground work for further discussion... All i'm asking is how did the Trinity doctrine sneak into the early Christian congregation (pre 100CE) undetected?
Der said:
Rat said:
Thought i'd address the daisy chain of Trinitarian weaknesses one at a time, starting with this one as it was first in your list...
Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
This one is just kindergarten. To assume the meaning of a name says anything about the person is probably the weakest of the Trinitarian proof texts. For example elsewhere Eli′athah means “God Has Come”; Jehu means “Jehovah Is He”, so to be consistent, are you saying that these people are also God?
Der said:
And you think this is relevant how? That imperfect men name their children with theophoric names is irrelevant because they have no power to make their children be or become anything. But when God names someone He means what He says and says what He means. For example when God changed Abram's name, he became the progenitor of many nations as God said he would. Abraham means "father of a multitude."
And certainly when God named Jesus Immanuel, God was indeed with us! Your point?
Der said:
Why would Jesus have to be given a throne? Read Phip 2:6-11.
Der said:
NIV Phi 2:6 Who, being in very nature[1] God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
Phi 2:7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature[2] of a servant, being made in human likeness.
Phi 2:8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death--even death on a cross!
Phi 2:9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
Phi 2:10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
Phi 2:11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Jesus’ earthly ministry occurred between verses, 7 and 8. Where the one who was equal with God, vs. 6, the one who, acting upon himself, became flesh, cf. John 1:14, made himself of no reputation, vs. 7, cf. Heb 2:17, took upon himself the form of a servant, and was in the likeness of men, vs. 7. After which God, not merely exalted him, but “highly exalted” him, and glorified him with the same glory he had with the Father before the world existed (John 17:5)
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Yep, all to the glory of God the father! But wait I didn’t ask why Jesus would be given anything, I asked why Almighty God would be given a throne, not Jesus![/FONT] Another of your famous detractions lolol

:)

 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Wrong analogy. While the scriptures were in general for mankind, indvidual copies belonged to somebody. If the original owner is no longer living, and any living relatives cannot be identified, as is the case here, my first reply still stands. The scrolls are historical artifacts and become the property of whomever finds them. As I said before just like prospectors who find gold in Alaska.

Mankind is still living. I have no problem with them holding on to them and making a prophet. My complaint is for fair use for the public.
 
Upvote 0