EO & evolution

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,143
39
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟64,422.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
What I want to know is why God didn't just hand Moses a manual inscribed with F = ma, Ke = 1/2mv^2, v^2/2 + gz + p/r = constant, etc.

caaaaaaaause that has nothing to do with salvation ... ?
 
Upvote 0

Dorothea

One of God's handmaidens
Jul 10, 2007
21,553
3,534
Colorado Springs, Colorado
✟240,029.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I do think we need to shift to finding a consensus here on Church authority, and if we can't obtain that, this is all a waste of time.

But just to you I'll say I think they find mutations and effects of disease and disorders, I think they find incomplete evidence (skeletons and so on) which they fill in with projections, I think that everything now taken as gospel truth about "Lucy", "Cro-Magnon Man", etc, will be shown to be wild misunderstanding based on very reasonable - but wrong - assumptions.
Oh, Ok. Imo, that's good to know.
 
Upvote 0

Dorothea

One of God's handmaidens
Jul 10, 2007
21,553
3,534
Colorado Springs, Colorado
✟240,029.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
and Matt is correct - the Fathers see various layers to the "coats of skin" - of course they were literally clothed in coats of animal skin, but it also means that man took on heavier, denser flesh - our bodies changed. now we are susceptible to sickness and pain, we are subject to the elements, we need food to live, we void waste, etc -- none of these things were true before the Fall.
Ok, this is to add to this and in response to Matt's response to me on the clothing in the Garden that I said I saw something on in the book Animals and Man. Here's what I read:

God gave Adam and Eve everything inside and outside Paradise through grace, requiring nothing in return either for His creation of them or for the glory in which He clothed them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gxg (G²)
Upvote 0

Dorothea

One of God's handmaidens
Jul 10, 2007
21,553
3,534
Colorado Springs, Colorado
✟240,029.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Originally Posted by jckstraw72
we are not talking about science. we are talking about theology. classic evolutionist misunderstanding.

And there in is the problem, half of you are talking science and the other half are talking theology, and some of you don't get theology while others of you don't get science, and none of you are talking to the the each other, so all of you are chasing your tail! Fascinating a conversation where one side isn't really talking to the other but only themselves lasted this long.

As you were.
I'm certainly no expert on either side. In fact, I practically know nothing on the science side, other than the basic info through what I learned ages ago in school and some more current things through homeschooling my sons. My feelings and thoughts are simply how I see things. It is usual for me to tend to agree with what the CF's have said and unanimously agreed upon, even if it's not in the form of an EC and isn't dogma, over other people's opinions, so I can understand and see those speaking on the theology side. Doesn't mean I'm right. It's just what I think and believe.
 
Upvote 0

Dorothea

One of God's handmaidens
Jul 10, 2007
21,553
3,534
Colorado Springs, Colorado
✟240,029.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
and again, the creation of the world is one of the spiritual visions that Saints receive, as Sts. Isaac the Syrian and Gregory of Sinai, among others, have taught.
I agree, and it says in the Scriptures that spiritual wisdom is much more superior than earthly wisdom.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 15, 2008
19,375
7,272
Central California
✟274,069.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Well, while this is humorous, you do know what I mean. Like Matt and Jesse were talking about, God could've easily given the story of evolution in simple terms to Moses and the ancients. No extensive formulas needed. ;)

What I want to know is why God didn't just hand Moses a manual inscribed with F = ma, Ke = 1/2mv^2, v^2/2 + gz + p/r = constant, etc.
 
Upvote 0

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,143
39
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟64,422.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
Neither does whether one believes in evolutionary or cosmological theories or not. So why are we discussing all this?

this is precisely what i said a page or two ago - evolutionists confuse the issue. this is about theology/salvation, not science.
 
Upvote 0

Dorothea

One of God's handmaidens
Jul 10, 2007
21,553
3,534
Colorado Springs, Colorado
✟240,029.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Dot sweetie, you have not actually tried to teach theology or science in any of your posts, so you'd hardly be the one I'm referring to. You have only asked questions and shared things you've read, some thoughts/ ideas that your son has come up with that made you think. Which btw, I love the fact your son is thinking deeply about these things and trying to figure them out.

Thank you! That's so kind of you to say. :)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Protoevangel

Smash the Patriarchy!
Feb 6, 2004
11,662
1,248
Eugene, OR
✟33,297.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
In Relationship
Another question has popped into my mind. Are there other Saints who have spoken on the literal 24-hour day, or just St. Basil?
St. Ambrose, St. Bede, St. Ephriam are a few that I can think of just off the top of my head.
 
Upvote 0

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,143
39
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟64,422.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
plenty of others have as well
St. Ambrose of Milan, Hexameron 1:37
In notable fashion has Scripture spoken of a “day,” not the “first day.” Because a second, then a third, day, and finally the remaining days were to follow, a “first day” could have been mentioned, following in this way the natural order. But Scripture established a law that twenty-four hours, including both day and night, should be given the name of day only, as if one were to say the length of one day is twenty-four hours in extent.
St. Athanasius, Against the Arians 2.19
And all the visible creation was made in six days:—in the first, the light which He called day; in the second the firmament; in the third, gathering together the waters, He bared the dry land, and brought out the various fruits that are in it; and in the fourth, He made the sun and the moon and all the host of the stars; and on the fifth, He created the race of living things in the sea, and of birds in the air; and on the sixth, He made the quadrupeds on the earth, and at length man. And ‘the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made; and neither the light is as the night, nor the sun as the moon; nor the irrational as rational man; nor the Angels as the Thrones, nor the Thrones as the Authorities, yet they are all creatures, but each of the things made according to its kind exists and remains in its own essence, as it was made.
notice also that the bolded part is completely incompatible with evolution

Venerable Bede, On Genesis (Translated Texts for Historians vol. 48, trans. By Calvin B. Kendall, Liverpool University Press, 2008), p. 75
And there was evening, with the light gradually setting after the completed period of the length of the day and passing beneath the lower parts of the world, which now regularly happens at night with the familiar circuit of the sun. And there was morning, with the same light gradually returning above the earth and beginning another day. At this point one day was completed – without doubt a day of twenty-four hours.
Clement of Alexadria, The Stromata 4.25 Whence He commands them not to touch dead bodies, or approach the dead; not that the body was polluted, but that sin and disobedience were incarnate, and embodied, and dead, and therefore abominable. It was only, then, when a father and mother, a son and daughter died, that the priest was allowed to enter, because these were related only by flesh and seed, to whom the priest was indebted for the immediate cause of his entrance into life. And they purify themselves seven days, the period in which Creation was consummated. For on the seventh day the rest is celebrated; and on the eighth he brings a propitiation, as is written in Ezekiel, according to which propitiation the promise is to be received.
St. Dimitri of Rostov, Rostvsky Demetrius, St.. Chronicle. Moscow, 1998, pp. 11-12, in “On the Question of Evolutionism,” by Fr. Constantine Bufeyev, at К вопросу о «православном эволюционизме»
When seeing the light in the darkness bezdennoy, God divided the light and the darkness and called the light Day, and the darkness - at night, and it was the first day that we call the week (Sunday), and the first month, subsequently named Martha, and the first of this month ... On the second day, we call today Monday, made ​​the all-powerful His word the heavens from the waters of the abyss ... On the third day, we call Tuesday, collecting water in a single place, he hath both land and named it the land, and built it capable to grow the seeds and every plant and grow trees. On the fourth day, which we call the environment created in the sky two great lights - the sun and the moon and the stars. On the fifth day, called us Thursday and made ​​fish and aquatic reptile and produced in birds. sixth corresponding to our Friday, He created animals, cattle, and creeping thing of the earth after his kind: and after all the creatures created Adam and Eve, and brought them into paradise. On the seventh day God rested from all his work, and was named the day this Saturday, it is quiet, because he rested in the day Creator of all his work and made ​​it holy, as is written in the book of Genesis in Chapter II.
St. Ephraim of Syria, Commentary on Genesis 1, pg. 282
No one should think that the Creation of Six Days is an allegory; it is likewise impermissible to say that what seems, according to the account, to have been created in six days, was created in a single instant, and likewise that certain names presented in this account either signify nothing, or signify something else. On the contrary, we must know that just as the heaven and the earth which were created in the beginning are actually the heaven and the earth and not something else understood under the names of heaven and earth, so also everything else that is spoken of as being created and brought into order after the creation of heaven and earth is not empty names, but the very essence of the created natures corresponds to the force of these names.
Pg. 287
Although both the light and the clouds were created in the twinkling of an eye, still both the day and the night of the First Day continued for twelve hours each.
St. Gregory the Theologian, Homily 44, “On the New Week, Spring, and the Commemoration of the Martyr Mamas,”5
Just as the creation begins with Sunday (and this is evident from the fact that the seventh day after it is Saturday, because it is the day of repose from works) so also the second creation begins again with the same day [i.e. the day of Resurrection].
St. Hippolytus of Rome, On Genesis
Gen. I. 5. And it was evening, and it was morning, one day.
Hippolytus. He did not say "night and day," but "one day," with reference to the name of the light. He did not say the "first day; "for if he had said the "first" day, he would also have had to say that the "second" day was made. But it was right to speak not of the "first day," but of "one day," in order that by saying "one," he might show that it returns on its orbit and, while it remains one, makes up the week.
St. Isidore of Seville, Chronicon, 1st Age of the World
1. God created everything in six days. On the first day he fashioned light; on the second, the firmament of heaven; on the third, the land and the sea; on the fourth, the stars; on the fifth, the fish and the birds; on the sixth, the animals and the beasts of burden and finally the first man, Adam, in his image.
6th Age of the World
121. 5,814 years have passed from the beginning of the world to the present era 654 [616 AD], that is, to the fifth year of the imperium of Heraclius and the fourth of the most glorious prince Sisebut.
Schema-Abbot John (Alekseyev), Elder of Valaam, Letters of the Valaam Elder Schema-Abbot John, 1996, pp. 86-87
An academy student and missionary said to me that by God’s creation in days one must understand millions of years. You poor missionary – you represent the omnipotent Creator as being very weak and attribute millions of years to Him. That’s how your reason speaks, but I believe that, as the Lord said, “And the evening and the morning were the first day,” one must understand days and not millions of years. For the Lord said, “And it was so.” With a word He divided the water from the land, and the water, with a noise, stood in its indicated places: there were seas, the rivers and streams began to flow, and across the whole earth there were warm waters and cold springs. The Lord said, “Let there be forests,” and there were forests across the whole earth in perfect form – one kind in the north, and another kind in the south – and then they began to gradually grow. So also the birds were created by God’s word: they immediately flew across the whole earth and were of various kinds; and all the rest of creation, as it is said in the Bible. The more I consider nature, the more I am amazed and come to know the omnipotence of the Creator.
St. John Chrysostom, Homily 3.10, as qtd. in The Christianity Reader, ed. Mary Gerhart and Fabian E. Udho, University of Chicago Press (2007), p. 34. so Sacred Scripture speaks in that way, showing considerateness for the limitations of our hearing when it said,” God saw that the light was good,” and added, “God separated light from darkness; he called the light day and he called the darkness night,” allotting to each its own particular area and establishing limits for each right from the beginning so that they could keep to them permanently without interference. Everyone in his right mind can understand this, how from that time till this the light has not surpassed its limits, nor has darkness exceeded its due order, resulting in confusion and disruption. Really, this fact alone should suffice to oblige people obdurate in their lack of response to come to faith and obedience to the words of Sacred Scripture so as to imitate the order in the elements, respecting as they do their course uninterruptedly, and not overstep their own limitations but rather recognize the extent of their own nature. 11. Then, when he had assigned to each its own name, he linked the two together in the words, “Evening came, and morning came: one day.” He made a point of speaking of the end of the day and the end of the night as one, so as to grasp a certain order and sequence in visible things and avoid any impression of confusion.
St. John of Damascus, Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith 2.7
In the beginning, then, that is to say on the first day, God created light, the ornament and glory of the whole visible creation. For take away light and all things remain in undistinguishable darkness, incapable of displaying their native beauty. And God called the light day, but the darkness He called night. Further, darkness is not any essence, but an accident: for it is simply absence of light. The air, indeed, has not light in its essence. It was, then, this very absence of light from the air that God called darkness: and it is not the essence of air that is darkness, but the absence of light which clearly is rather an accident than an essence. And, indeed, it was not night, but day, that was first named, so that day is first and after that comes night. Night, therefore, follows day. And from the beginning of day till the next day is one complete period of day and night. For the Scripture says, And the evening and the morning were one day
St. John of Kronstadt, My Life in Christ (1971), Pg. 290-291
Why did not the Almighty create the world at once, but in six days? In order to teach man by deeds to perform his work gradually, not hurriedly, but with consideration. If you pray, pray without hurrying; if you read the Gospel, or, in general, any religious or worldly books, do not read them hurriedly, but read with consideration and with a true view of the material. If you are learning a lesson, do not hurry to finish it quickly, but penetrate into the subject deeply and consider it well. If you are doing work, do it without hurrying, with consideration quietly. Even the world was not created instantaneously but in six days. The Lord shows us an example in everything; let us follow His steps
St. Justin Martyr, 1st Apology, chapter 67
But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead.
St. Theophilus of Antioch, To Autolycus 3.18 And from the foundation of the world the whole time is thus traced, so far as its main epochs are concerned. From the creation of the world to the deluge were 2242 years. And from the deluge to the time when Abraham our forefather begat a son, 1036 years. And from Isaac, Abraham's son, to the time when the people dwelt with Moses in the desert, 660 years. And from the death of Moses and the rule of Joshua the son of Nun, to the death of the patriarch David, 498 years. And from the death of David and the reign of Solomon to the sojourning of the people in the land of Babylon, 518 years 6 months 10 days. And from the government of Cyrus to the death of the Emperor Aurelius Verus, 744 years. All the years from the creation of the world amount to a total of 5698 years, and the odd months and days.
 
Upvote 0

rusmeister

A Russified American Orthodox Chestertonian
Dec 9, 2005
10,394
5,011
Eastern Europe
Visit site
✟432,491.00
Country
Montenegro
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Oh I beg to differ some of you on theology side have shown you do not understand science, just as some on the science side have shown they do not understand theology. I've read the thread and quite frankly some you of on both sides are way over your head when you try to venture into the other area. On the bright side all of that some in both camps think they understand and are experts in both areas.

I haven't seen any indication that anyone on here "doesn't get science"??

I agree.
GL, what do you mean by "get science"? It seems to me you mean "agree with modern science". But is it actually impossible to understand a view and also disagree with it?

Further, that would mean that "get theology" similarly means "agree with the Orthodox consensus of theology", something no Orthodox Christian may disagree with. Sure, if there is a real lack of consensus you can disagree, but where there is not, you can't. But TF really does, and so his view is decidedly un-Orthodox. The others try to balance, hold both understandings in equal respect, at the cost of ignoring the real theological implications, whereas Gurney, Jack, Matt and I DON'T ignore the scientific implications at all, but deny them openly where there is mutual incompatibility.
 
Upvote 0

rusmeister

A Russified American Orthodox Chestertonian
Dec 9, 2005
10,394
5,011
Eastern Europe
Visit site
✟432,491.00
Country
Montenegro
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
it's not that we on the theology side don't get the science - it's that we really do see the implications of forcing the science onto our Scriptures. it seems to me that most on the science side are not willing to look into this. truefiction realizes the problem and simply sides with the science. most of the others don't recognize the problem.

That's why TF's position can't be Orthodox, 3-bar cross or no. Everyone else can be honestly mistaken. All of us, standing in Liturgy, have goofy messed-up things in our heads. But we all have to confess that we believe in the one holy catholic apostolic Orthodox Church, even if the modern popular theories of science contradict it. And the one thing we may not do is treat our own individual voice as equal to the Church. I can only even begin to do so by accepting what the Church teaches. Only then may I speak with confidence and boldness. Confidence and boldness in contradicting the Church is foolishness, not wisdom.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Philothei

Love never fails
Nov 4, 2006
44,872
3,217
Northeast, USA
✟68,179.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
As far as I am concerned there is no theological "dogma" as to where evolution stands in EO. Yes there is a tendency to literal interpretation if we look at consensus but we have no idea what the consensus would be if the above mentioned fathers lived in our times. Not all EOs are evolutionists or vise versa since we have Christians that do believe in evolution....or they would not be able to be both scientists and EO Christians... For most ( I would dare to say almost all) of doctors or researchers would have to "believe" in evolution to finish their studies at least. The simple truth is that even if they doubt evolution at least for practical reasons they would have to at least agree to it! Biology of what I understand from my daughter has changed the last couple of years and it is taught differently....because it seems that science is soooo progressing and new findings come to disaprove what was throught to be a standard.
I do not know science and will not claim I do but what I know is that with the new findings one is for sure that the relationship with theology changes too. NOT our dogma and our belief in Him; only how we relate science to Him. I do not think being an evolutionist would make one also an unbeliever. Still the link is missing as to how life came about and how man came about from the primate.... Still too many questions we cannot figure out... And that is where God comes in; man will never be able to find out what God only knows and can do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gzt
Upvote 0
Oct 15, 2008
19,375
7,272
Central California
✟274,069.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
We have to also bear in mind the effect of evolutionary theories on our society at large. Has evolution been a positive or negative for the Christian faith? I think back to when I was first watching "Planet of the Apes" as a kid. Well, what was the general portrayal of religious folks in that film vs. the enlightened evolution fan? We see the apes arrogantly covering up the TRUTH of evolution that they evolved from humans and concocting a fake religion with a "Law-Giver" who seems to be a composite of Jesus and Moses in one, and they scoff at anyone who believes in science at all. The religious powers that be scrutinize science with raised eyebrow hating it. They won't let the science-minded chimpanzees go into the "Forbidden Zone" for fear of finding the truth! They have the "ape was made in the image of the Law-Giver" homage to the 'backwardness' of the Judeo-Christian view, and the whole movie kind of lampoons anyone who is of faith and not wholly given to evolution. It is a cautionary tale of a film for those who haven't 'progressed' into the new modern worldview....

And as I read online comments from people day in, day out, I keep reading the pessimism and anti-religious comments of people when they reference evolution. Evolution has been a battle cry of affirmation that religion is bogus primitive shamanism. Evolution is the 'proof' that we've been mind-controlled by priests and bishops, popes, ministers, and other charlatans for long enough! That is really the tone of evolution in our society. It is a theory that people run to when they want to doubt faith and the supernatural, the spiritual and the godly.

There really are two visions of the ascent of man:

a) The Creation: God made man in His image, breathing the divine spark into simple Earth and bringing forth His creation to live and grow into theosis. But this Man and his Companion, Woman, fell. They created death and darkness. But in His love for Man, God didn't give up on His crowning achievement. He made His Only Son Incarnate to come and trample the death they had created. Our sins are a result of the Fall. We must struggle with them and grow, fight and grapple, claw our way through life grasping God's grace to our hearts to make it through the marathon. No excuses for our sins, just constant repentance and prayer, sacraments, and love.

b) Man is happenstance. He ascended from the oceans as a simple organism. He developed through a long, drawn-out, primitive process. He became a series of hominids that finally killed one another off. Humanity COULD'VE been Neanderthal, but the homo sapiens killed them off and eventually took control of the Earth. Man is a series of mutations and adaptations, an organism that continually changes to survive. He is an extension of nature, not a crowning achievement of a Great and Loving God. He is a steady adaptation and does what it takes to live. He is nothing but a more sophisticated animal. Sometimes he is born and cannot help thinking he is a woman, or that she is a man. Sometimes he is attracted to the same sex by his very nature and cannot change that, so we embrace it. Abortion happens in nature, so we embrace it. Homosexuality happens in nature, so why can it not be so with us? Animals are not monogamous, so why must we all be (polyamory, the latest craze!). Animals kill. So can we.

If you look at the two worldviews, one is very animalistic, pessimistic, bizarre, and cynical. The other is hopeful and faithful, difficult, and contrary to the fallen nature.

I just don't understand why folks in the pro-evolution or agnostic evolution corner don't see the myriad ways that evolution negatively impacts society. It has far-reaching effects that are mostly pretty darn lousy!

If I were convinced evolution were true, then I promise you I WOULD be pro-gay, pro-eugenics, pro-abortion, and probably practice all these evils. They are very natural when you have the evolutionary mindset. Thanks be to God for the Orthodox faith is all I can say. I just wish folks would approach this topic with less zeal to back up the scientific community and more skepticism and theological meditation on the subject...

That's why TF's position can't be Orthodox, 3-bar cross or no. Everyone else can be honestly mistaken. All of us, standing in Liturgy, have goofy messed-up things in our heads. But we all have to confess that we believe in the one holy catholic apostolic Orthodox Church, even if the modern popular theories of science contradict it. And the one thing we may not do is treat our own individual voice as equal to the Church. I can only even begin to do so by accepting what the Church teaches. Only then may I speak with confidence and boldness. Confidence and boldness in contradicting the Church is foolishness, not wisdom.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
As far as I am concerned there is no theological "dogma" as to where evolution stands in EO. Yes there is a tendency to literal interpretation if we look at consensus but we have no idea what the consensus would be if the above mentioned fathers lived in our times. Not all EOs are evolutionists or vise versa since we have Christians that do believe in evolution....or they would not be able to be both scientists and EO Christians... For most ( I would dare to say almost all) of doctors or researchers would have to "believe" in evolution to finish their studies at least. The simple truth is that even if they doubt evolution at least for practical reasons they would have to at least agree to it! Biology of what I understand from my daughter has changed the last couple of years and it is taught differently....because it seems that science is soooo progressing and new findings come to disaprove what was throught to be a standard.
I do not know science and will not claim I do but what I know is that with the new findings one is for sure that the relationship with theology changes too. NOT our dogma and our belief in Him; only how we relate science to Him. I do not think being an evolutionist would make one also an unbeliever. Still the link is missing as to how life came about and how man came about from the primate.... Still too many questions we cannot figure out... And that is where God comes in; man will never be able to find out what God only knows and can do.
:clap:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

rusmeister

A Russified American Orthodox Chestertonian
Dec 9, 2005
10,394
5,011
Eastern Europe
Visit site
✟432,491.00
Country
Montenegro
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
As far as I am concerned there is no theological "dogma" as to where evolution stands in EO. Yes there is a tendency to literal interpretation if we look at consensus but we have no idea what the consensus would be if the above mentioned fathers lived in our times. Not all EOs are evolutionists or vise versa since we have Christians that do believe in evolution....or they would not be able to be both scientists and EO Christians... For most ( I would dare to say almost all) of doctors or researchers would have to "believe" in evolution to finish their studies at least. The simple truth is that even if they doubt evolution at least for practical reasons they would have to at least agree to it! Biology of what I understand from my daughter has changed the last couple of years and it is taught differently....because it seems that science is soooo progressing and new findings come to disaprove what was throught to be a standard.
I do not know science and will not claim I do but what I know is that with the new findings one is for sure that the relationship with theology changes too. NOT our dogma and our belief in Him; only how we relate science to Him. I do not think being an evolutionist would make one also an unbeliever. Still the link is missing as to how life came about and how man came about from the primate.... Still too many questions we cannot figure out... And that is where God comes in; man will never be able to find out what God only knows and can do.

It's nice to have opinions if you don't try to understand what the people you are disagreeing with are saying.

I am much more OK with disagreement that DOES make that effort; as far as I can tell only TF has truly managed it. I think pro-evolutionists ARE sincere and are rational in wanting to square and synthesize all forms of what they see to be knowledge. Having held those views myself, I think I really understand them.

I just wish the understanding was two-way. Disagreement would be much clearer.
 
Upvote 0